I had not thought about Grand ma ma in years until I read your postEvery kid had a Hornets Starter jacket in the 90's.
View: https://youtu.be/V2Z-UexN24c
I had not thought about Grand ma ma in years until I read your postEvery kid had a Hornets Starter jacket in the 90's.
And those things were gross.Every kid had a Hornets Starter jacket in the 90's.
Sure, but he was the fourth wheel here, and he was clearly tired of it.Hardly----Celtics surely were good for $15-20 mil a year too
Get used to it, that's who he is.0-5 from field and 4 turnovers with 10 rebounds in 16 min and those slick passes. Weird line for him.
I'm not sure I would call that ridiulous court vision. The guy is running on the wing in front of him with a wide open lane. It's the behind the back pass that is making everyone go ga ga.Melo with a few spectacular passes tonight as well.
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1337935930343092224
We're talking about a guy whose career prospects are likely somewhere between Liangelo Ball and Lonzo Ball. People invested in seeing him succeed will take what they can get.I'm not sure I would call that ridiulous court vision. The guy is running on the wing in front of him with a wide open lane. It's the behind the back pass that is making everyone go ga ga.
In fairness it's a behind-the-back no-look pass that leads the guy in front of him perfectly. Not a lot of guys can do that. Those passes tend to result in turnovers.I'm not sure I would call that ridiulous court vision. The guy is running on the wing in front of him with a wide open lane. It's the behind the back pass that is making everyone go ga ga.
The pass was pretty. I questioned it being evidence that his court vision was "ridiculous".In fairness it's a behind-the-back no-look pass that leads the guy in front of him perfectly. Not a lot of guys can do that. Those passes tend to result in turnovers.
His prospects are far higher than thatWe're talking about a guy whose career prospects are likely somewhere between Liangelo Ball and Lonzo Ball. People invested in seeing him succeed will take what they can get.
Yeah, I’m not a LaMelo fan, but his ceiling is a whole lot higher than Lonzo’s.His prospects are far higher than that
It's fair to say his ceiling is a lot higher than Lonzo's current talent level (which is "intriguing but deeply flawed rotation player on a sub-.500 team"), but better than Lonzo's ceiling? Maybe now, but certainly not when Lonzo was drafted. The Ringer has Ball's top comparables as "Jason Williams, Lonzo Ball and Shaun Livingston." Back in 2017, they listed Lonzo's best case scenarios (yes, very different meaning) as "Penny Hardaway, Jason Kidd and Shaun Livingston with a jump shot." I'm higher on Lonzo than most (I think), but I'd be astonished if LaMelo did much better.Yeah, I’m not a LaMelo fan, but his ceiling is a whole lot higher than Lonzo’s.
I just don’t think those Lonzo comps were ever legit. He has zero Pennny to him; the Kidd comp is closer in style and skills but if you take away Kidds best passing and defense traits you have Lonzo....and that’s much more Ricky Rubio than anyone else.It's fair to say his ceiling is a lot higher than Lonzo's current talent level (which is "intriguing but deeply flawed rotation player on a sub-.500 team"), but better than Lonzo's ceiling? Maybe now, but certainly not when Lonzo was drafted. The Ringer has Ball's top comparables as "Jason Williams, Lonzo Ball and Shaun Livingston." Back in 2017, they listed Lonzo's best case scenarios (yes, very different meaning) as "Penny Hardaway, Jason Kidd and Shaun Livingston with a jump shot." I'm higher on Lonzo than most (I think), but I'd be astonished if LaMelo did much better.
Maybe we have a different definition of "court vision". To me, you're still describing the execution of the pass itself here.I mean it sort of is, that particular pass requires a lot of on the fly calculations that almost everyone flubs. I'm pretty much the opposite of a LaMelo fan, but props where they're due, he's a much better passer than I thought he'd be.
His court vision is his biggest strength and the reason he was drafted so high. If this was his only example of making a slick behind the back pass to a guy running on a fast break, then yes, it wouldn't really tell us anything about his vision. But there is plenty of tape and plenty of words written about how good his vision isMaybe we have a different definition of "court vision". To me, you're still describing the execution of the pass itself here.
Yeah, I’m not sure what definition you’re using, mine is “he can get passes to teammates in position to score”. On that play he did that with a really high degree of difficulty. You seriously need to be seeing things on the periphery that most guys can’t see when they’re looking straight at a play to make a pass like that.Maybe we have a different definition of "court vision". To me, you're still describing the execution of the pass itself here.
I've always considered court vision to be the ability to see plays developing and knowing where players are / going to be on the court - the act of getting the ball there not being part of said "vision". So that does explain why we have a different viewpoint on that statement. Seeing his player out ahead of him drive the open lane on the wing isn't too spectacular in and of itself. We've now spent way too much time on a dumb tweetYeah, I’m not sure what definition you’re using, mine is “he can get passes to teammates in position to score”. On that play he did that with a really high degree of difficulty. You seriously need to be seeing things on the periphery that most guys can’t see when they’re looking straight at a play to make a pass like that.
No surgery needed but I don’t miss this experience.He can’t even stay healthy through the shortest preseason ever. View: https://twitter.com/shamscharania/status/1339310741543763968?s=21
What an unexpected surprise.He can’t even stay healthy through the shortest preseason ever. View: https://twitter.com/shamscharania/status/1339310741543763968?s=21
How does Hayward feel about taking a back seat to Rozier?
Time to sign with the Knicks!How does Hayward feel about taking a back seat to Rozier?
To me, going to a losing organization because you want more touches on the ball is the epitome of stupidity. But, if all he wants in life is to enjoy money and individual success - that's his choice, I guess.Can't totally blame him for taking more money and a bigger role, even if his chances of winning went down significantly.
Meh, the RINGZZZZ narrative is massively overplayed in the NBA. Plenty of guys chase rings their whole career and never get one.To me, going to a losing organization because you want more touches on the ball is the epitome of stupidity. But, if all he wants in life is to enjoy money and individual success - that's his choice, I guess.
Agreed. He was looking at being a 3rd or 4th banana for the rest of his prime. I'll never blame an athlete for wanting to prove to others that they can be more than that.Meh, the RINGZZZZ narrative is massively overplayed in the NBA. Plenty of guys chase rings their whole career and never get one.
Hayward is a top tier player still in his prime, and the Celtics even with him aren't a sure bet to be a title team. There is something to be said for not wasting your talents in a role on a top 4 seed when you could use those talents to make a team a 7 seed with room to grow.
I think it depends on the situation honestly. Sometimes I agree with you, though I have sympathy in Hayward's case. In the 3 years since signing he had a career threatening injury and the Celtics developed 2 All-Star (or better) much younger wings making him into a 3rd option, at best.To me, going to a losing organization because you want more touches on the ball is the epitome of stupidity. But, if all he wants in life is to enjoy money and individual success - that's his choice, I guess.
Couple things......To me, going to a losing organization because you want more touches on the ball is the epitome of stupidity. But, if all he wants in life is to enjoy money and individual success - that's his choice, I guess.
Celtics offered him 100m if reports are to be believed, there was no practical difference in how his family and his future family could live. He chose to be the guy for a team no one cares about over being a smaller piece of a team playing relevant basketball every night.Basketball is a business, and while Hayward would have made life-changing money either way, you simply don't turn down the chance to make $100 million+, especially with his injury history and knowing you only have a few years left to make that kind of money. Hayward might not have a ring, but he'll go to bed every night that his kids, grandkids, great-grandkids, etc. will live the rest of their lives comfortably.
We ain't playing much at all right now!Celtics offered him 100m if reports are to be believed, there was no practical difference in how his family and his future family could live. He chose to be the guy for a team no one cares about over being a smaller piece of a team playing relevant basketball every night.
There is some incredible Boston arrogance in this post. Well done.Celtics offered him 100m if reports are to be believed, there was no practical difference in how his family and his future family could live. He chose to be the guy for a team no one cares about over being a smaller piece of a team playing relevant basketball every night.