Revis: Reportedly Signs with the Jets

Re-Boot Question One: Who gets Revis?

  • Pats

    Votes: 113 48.1%
  • Jets

    Votes: 35 14.9%
  • KC

    Votes: 40 17.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 47 20.0%

  • Total voters
    235
Status
Not open for further replies.

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,615
@CharlesRobinson: #Patriots will continue to negotiate with Darrelle Revis despite not picking up option. They are NOT done talking. They're still working it.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,943
Here
So he's a free agent right now, isn't he? Schefter just reported it has been declined.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
mpx42 said:
I hope nobody is actually surprised.
 
I'm a little disappointed--I think the parties have enough information that if he is going to re-sign he would do it before, and not after, 4 pm tomorrow.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Doubt picking up the option was ever a realistic option.
 
Pats will put their best offer on the table Tuesday and we'll know shortly.  Could be he's already heard a number from the Jets the Pats cant compete with, but if he wants every last dollar he was never coming back.
 
Hope he ends up here, but Im definitely not in the Revis or bust camp as far as fielding a repeat champion next year.
 
Not picking up the option now actually lets the Jets talk with Revis since we are in the legal tampering period, right?
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
15,026
Silver Spring, MD
Shelterdog said:
 
I'm a little disappointed--I think the parties have enough information that if he is going to re-sign he would do it before, and not after, 4 pm tomorrow.
 
Why does Schefter's tweet change this equation?
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,973
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Shelterdog said:
 
I'm a little disappointed--I think the parties have enough information that if he is going to re-sign he would do it before, and not after, 4 pm tomorrow.
 
So? What indicates that the Patriots won't re-sign Revis before 4pm tomorrow? What has changed? This is exactly what everyone thought would happen.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,615
@jeffphowe: Checked in on @AdamSchefter's Revis report and it sounds like a Patriots negotiating ploy. Both sides can continue negotiating til tomorrow.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
mpx42 said:
I hope nobody is actually surprised.
And it matters only if you believe the fiction that offers have not been made this weekend, as Eric Wilbur evidently does.

Any team interested would have made its interest known and communicated the parameters of a deal. There is no point in holding back. Even if a team were to swoop in at the last minute, Revis would shop that offer with the Jets and Pats unless it were an offer with strings attached that blew everyone else's out of the water.

This will be over soon. Still think he'll push the Pats as far as he can, then re-sign here.
 

mpx42

New Member
Apr 23, 2010
2,684
Seattle, WA
Shelterdog said:
 
I'm a little disappointed--I think the parties have enough information that if he is going to re-sign he would do it before, and not after, 4 pm tomorrow.
 
It's in his best financial interest to hit the market, and see how high he can drive New England's price up. But they were never gonna pick up his option - just don't have the cap space.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,615
@RapSheet: Darrelle Revis was informed he will not have his $20M option picked up, but two sides will continue to try to negotiate a deal, source said
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
This strikes me as good news.  Why leak this a day early if they hadn't made progress on an actual deal?
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,943
Here
Assuming the Marting tweet is right, there's no great way to structure 3/48/40 without essentially making it all guaranteed. Still, I'm not sure why the Pats wouldn't throw out something like 5 years, 21 million bonus, with base salaries of 8, 9, and 10 over the first three years and a massive roster bonus due at the beginning of the fourth.  Cap hits of 17.2, 13.2, 14.2, 4.2, 4.2. Revis also gets to test free agency again in 3 years.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,293
CA
This is not suprising. Wouldn't they have to cut Amendola/Mayo/Browner et al in order to even fit the $25million cap hit that the option would have resulted in?
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
loshjott said:
 
Why does Schefter's tweet change this equation?
 
It's one more move--albeit a marginal one--in the march towards free agency, and I think he's gone if he hits free agency because the opportunity cost of keeping cap space available for a potential Revis deal is too high. 
 
It's also not a great sign that they're beginning to negotiate a bit through the press. The quote that Revis is looking for 3/48 with 40 guaranteed suggests strongly to me the Pats offer (and whatever the Jets have put forward) is under 3/48, 40g and team Revis is fishing for another offer.
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
I'm guessing this is a move by the Pats as more of a notice thing to the agents so they are all discussing apples/apples. I'm assuming there are some advantages to discussing the contract from a standpoint of a new one versus a restructured one, and by notifying them they aren't picking up the option, they are now having discussions of offers of the same "type".  I could be wrong.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
On the cap for $10.3, $10.5MM left in guaranteed money until he passes a physical.  They could still, I believe, defer some of that cap hit to next year by designating him a post June 1st cut (after the league year turns to 2015 I think), but as of right now it would cost more cap space to cut Mayo than keep him.
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,840
The back of your computer
Ed Hillel said:
Assuming the Marting tweet is right, there's no great way to structure 3/48/40 without essentially making it all guaranteed. Still, I'm not sure why the Pats wouldn't throw out something like 5 years, 21 million bonus, with base salaries of 8, 9, and 10 over the first three years and a massive roster bonus due at the beginning of the fourth.  Cap hits of 17.2, 13.2, 14.2, 4.2, 4.2. Revis also gets to test free agency again in 3 years.
 
You are correct.  There are certainly ways to structure a deal to give Revis the $40mm guaranteed and not kill the Patriot's cap.  Here's one within the Martin parameters:
 
2015 - $2.66mm salary, $13.33mm bonus
2016 - $2.66mm salary, $13.33mm bonus
2017 - $2.66mm salary, $13.33mm bonus
2018 - $16mm salary, no bonus
2019 - $16mm salary, no bonus
 
Cap hits - $10.66mm, $10.66mm, $10.66mm, $8mm (assuming cut before 2018 season), $8mm (assuming cut before 2018 season)
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,615
@AlbertBreer: And catching up, Patriots declining the option on Darrelle Revis essentially created a 24-hour exclusive negotiating window for the team.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,533
AZ
Ed Hillel said:
 
I don't get it, why isn't this done?
 
Ok, so apparently they've informed him they won't, they haven't formally declined.
 
Does one "formally decline" an option like this?  Maybe this is all semantics, but I think option typically implies a right to exercise, after which the option expires if it is not exercised.  It sounds to me from the terminology people are using -- have informed him they will not be picking up the option -- that basically the option simply will expire at the end of the 2014 league year tomorrow at which point he will be a free agent.  It's different than being cut, for example -- it sounds to me as though what happens is that the Patriots must take an affirmative step in order to trigger the second year on the contract and if they do not, it will simply lapse, as will their $20 million obligation.  
 
They were never going to pick up the option.  Even if they wanted to a day or so ago, signing McCourty made it all but impossible.  I think that this announcement is targeted as much at other players than it is at Revis.  Once Breer reported this morning that picking up the option was a possibility, the Patriots may well have had a shit storm hit them from agents of the players who would interpret that as saying they were at risk of being significantly impacted if the Patriots put $20 million on the books -- guys like Mayo, Browner, Amendola, Dennard, and Solder.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,943
Here
Papelbon's Poutine said:
It would cost them an extra $722K according to Miguel. 
 
The issue is with his injury. If he was healthy, they could designate him post June 1 and save over 6 million immediately. One thing to consider here is that Mayo might be willing to waive that and accept a release now if he expects to pass his physical down the line (which he should), and believes his market will be better now than later.
 
Does one "formally decline" an option like this?
 
I believe so, yes. If the Patriots don't send in the paperwork by 4PM tomorrow, the option is picked up automatically, as I understand. The Patriots have to act first.
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,720
Ed Hillel said:
 
The issue is with his injury. If he was healthy, they could designate him post June 1 and save over 6 million immediately. One thing to consider here is that Mayo might be willing to waive that and accept a release now if he thinks his market will be better now with more money available.
 
 
I believe so, yes. If the Patriots don't send in the paperwork by 4PM tomorrow, the option is picked up automatically, as I understand. The Patriots have to act first.
 
Or he possibly plays ball with the Pats and takes a pay cut for practically missing the majority of the last 2 seasons.
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Like others, I see this as a positive.
 
I mean yeah, on the one hand, I would like to see them already done or the option exercised to keep him off the market.
 
But (1) it's well known that deals often do not get done until the parties are pressed up against a deadline, (2) I would not like the Pats to pay any player that much for one season given the cap ramifications and (3) it's possible that Revis would be extremely butthurt if the Pats exercised the option given that there may have been an understanding from the beginning that they would not do that, and I would not like to see them do anything that would sour the player's relationship with team and would much prefer a multi year deal that works for both sides.
 
Get it done, Bill/Bob/Darrelle.    
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,293
CA
From Barnwell's Grantland article posted this morning:

"Ideally for the Patriots, Belichick and Revis would come to terms on a contract extension before the 2014 league year ends Tuesday afternoon. That would lower Revis’s cap hit without forcing the Patriots to make moves first. The Patriots can’t actually pick up Revis’s option at the moment because that would put them more than $4 million over the 2015 cap. They would need to cut Amendola and likely Mayo to pick up the option, even if it was just to give them more time to negotiate after the league year began."
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,615
@NEPD_Loyko: McCourty - "Revis wants to be back, I hope they work out a way"
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,615
@NEPD_Loyko: McCourty - "there's not way I'm saying Revis is going anywhere, I really think he'll be back in NE"
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,615
@NEPD_Loyko: McCourty said he talked with Revis last night after his deal came out.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,533
AZ
So, looks as though the Patriots are now about $16 million under the cap, minus however much McCourty is going to cost against the cap in 2015.  So, they probably have about $10 million to play with now without any other moves, and upwards of $15 million if they can get Solder and Amendola deals re-worked.
 
Edit:  And it looks like McCourty is indeed $6 million against the cap for 2015.
 
@mikereiss Patriots Devin McCourty's new deal includes a signing bonus of $15M.  His 2015 cap hit is $6m.  So, that puts the Patriots at $10 million
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,687
deep inside Guido territory
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:
So, looks as though the Patriots are now about $16 million under the cap, minus however much McCourty is going to cost against the cap in 2015.  So, they probably have about $10 million to play with now without any other moves, and upwards of $15 million if they can get Solder and Amendola deals re-worked.
Officially with $10 million in cap space after Revis option decline and $6 million cap hit to DMC.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
TheoShmeo said:
Like others, I see this as a positive.
 
I mean yeah, on the one hand, I would like to see them already done or the option exercised to keep him off the market.
 
But (1) it's well known that deals often do not get done until the parties are pressed up against a deadline, (2) I would not like the Pats to pay any player that much for one season given the cap ramifications and (3) it's possible that Revis would be extremely butthurt if the Pats exercised the option given that there may have been an understanding from the beginning that they would not do that, and I would not like to see them do anything that would sour the player's relationship with team and would much prefer a multi year deal that works for both sides.
 
Get it done, Bill/Bob/Darrelle.    
Yes. Declining the option brings clarity and closure. Any team that might have been lying in the weeds now has to step up. And if Revis isn't decisive, he could lose leverage. He cannot count on the Pats remaining in the mix after 4:00 tomorrow.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
26,134
Los Angeles, CA
soxhop411 said:
@AlbertBreer: And catching up, Patriots declining the option on Darrelle Revis essentially created a 24-hour exclusive negotiating window for the team.
Help me understand this. Haven't the Pats had an "exclusive negotiating window" all along, and it will continue until tomorrow when free agency begins? In that case, declining the option has absolutely nothing to do with creating a window.
 

BrunanskysSlide

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 29, 2003
1,137
If Revis ends up signing with the Jets does it make it more likely that the tampering charge will stick and we get something out of the punishment? 
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,739
"Hey Devin, it's Bill again. Glad we got you locked up. Hey do me a favor.......STFU!! See you at OTA's."
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
djbayko said:
Help me understand this. Haven't the Pats had an "exclusive negotiating window" all along, and it will continue until tomorrow when free agency begins? In that case, declining the option has absolutely nothing to do with creating a window.
Were other teams allowed to talk to Revis for the past few days?? He wasn't a free agent so I would think not. Wouldn't declining the option do the opposite: enable the rest of the NFL to speak with him?

I must be missing something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.