mpx42 said:I hope nobody is actually surprised.
Shelterdog said:
I'm a little disappointed--I think the parties have enough information that if he is going to re-sign he would do it before, and not after, 4 pm tomorrow.
jsinger121 said:This sucks
Ed Hillel said:So he's a free agent right now, isn't he? Schefter just reported it has been declined.
Shelterdog said:
I'm a little disappointed--I think the parties have enough information that if he is going to re-sign he would do it before, and not after, 4 pm tomorrow.
And it matters only if you believe the fiction that offers have not been made this weekend, as Eric Wilbur evidently does.mpx42 said:I hope nobody is actually surprised.
Shelterdog said:
I'm a little disappointed--I think the parties have enough information that if he is going to re-sign he would do it before, and not after, 4 pm tomorrow.
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 6s6 seconds ago
Darrelle Revis was informed he will not have his $20M option picked up, but two sides will continue to try to negotiate a deal, source said
amfox1 said:
Kimberley A. Martin @KMart_LI 16m16 minutes ago
Revis hasn't hit free agency, but if he does, I heard he's seeking something in the ballpark of 3yrs, $48M with $40M gtd. We'll see.
Edit: Martin is Newsday's Jet beat writer.
so, that would be a max cap hit this year of somewhere aorund 18 million, right? (13 + 5 carryover)amfox1 said:
Kimberley A. Martin @KMart_LI 16m16 minutes ago
Revis hasn't hit free agency, but if he does, I heard he's seeking something in the ballpark of 3yrs, $48M with $40M gtd. We'll see.
Edit: Martin is Newsday's Jet beat writer.
theapportioner said:Anyone else surprised that no other teams are apparently in the mix, besides the Pats and the Jets?
loshjott said:
Why does Schefter's tweet change this equation?
Ed Hillel said:Assuming the Marting tweet is right, there's no great way to structure 3/48/40 without essentially making it all guaranteed. Still, I'm not sure why the Pats wouldn't throw out something like 5 years, 21 million bonus, with base salaries of 8, 9, and 10 over the first three years and a massive roster bonus due at the beginning of the fourth. Cap hits of 17.2, 13.2, 14.2, 4.2, 4.2. Revis also gets to test free agency again in 3 years.
Ed Hillel said:
I don't get it, why isn't this done?
Ok, so apparently they've informed him they won't, they haven't formally declined.
Papelbon's Poutine said:It would cost them an extra $722K according to Miguel.
Does one "formally decline" an option like this?
Ed Hillel said:
The issue is with his injury. If he was healthy, they could designate him post June 1 and save over 6 million immediately. One thing to consider here is that Mayo might be willing to waive that and accept a release now if he thinks his market will be better now with more money available.
I believe so, yes. If the Patriots don't send in the paperwork by 4PM tomorrow, the option is picked up automatically, as I understand. The Patriots have to act first.
Officially with $10 million in cap space after Revis option decline and $6 million cap hit to DMC.DennyDoyle'sBoil said:So, looks as though the Patriots are now about $16 million under the cap, minus however much McCourty is going to cost against the cap in 2015. So, they probably have about $10 million to play with now without any other moves, and upwards of $15 million if they can get Solder and Amendola deals re-worked.
Yes. Declining the option brings clarity and closure. Any team that might have been lying in the weeds now has to step up. And if Revis isn't decisive, he could lose leverage. He cannot count on the Pats remaining in the mix after 4:00 tomorrow.TheoShmeo said:Like others, I see this as a positive.
I mean yeah, on the one hand, I would like to see them already done or the option exercised to keep him off the market.
But (1) it's well known that deals often do not get done until the parties are pressed up against a deadline, (2) I would not like the Pats to pay any player that much for one season given the cap ramifications and (3) it's possible that Revis would be extremely butthurt if the Pats exercised the option given that there may have been an understanding from the beginning that they would not do that, and I would not like to see them do anything that would sour the player's relationship with team and would much prefer a multi year deal that works for both sides.
Get it done, Bill/Bob/Darrelle.
Help me understand this. Haven't the Pats had an "exclusive negotiating window" all along, and it will continue until tomorrow when free agency begins? In that case, declining the option has absolutely nothing to do with creating a window.soxhop411 said:@AlbertBreer: And catching up, Patriots declining the option on Darrelle Revis essentially created a 24-hour exclusive negotiating window for the team.
Were other teams allowed to talk to Revis for the past few days?? He wasn't a free agent so I would think not. Wouldn't declining the option do the opposite: enable the rest of the NFL to speak with him?djbayko said:Help me understand this. Haven't the Pats had an "exclusive negotiating window" all along, and it will continue until tomorrow when free agency begins? In that case, declining the option has absolutely nothing to do with creating a window.