Yes.So basically the consensus seems to be that since Brady was treated unfairly by ESPN then Peyton should be treated unfairly by ESPN. And if ESPN doesn't unfairly shit on Peyton then they suck for not being assholes.
Do I have that right?
Not just ESPN. They're #2 in the pecking line here.So basically the consensus seems to be that since Brady was treated unfairly by ESPN then Peyton should be treated unfairly by ESPN. And if ESPN doesn't unfairly shit on Peyton then they suck for not being assholes.
Do I have that right?
Why do they have to do something about this? Why can't they just essentially ignore it?Not just ESPN. They're #2 in the pecking line here.
NFL. The motherfucking NFL has to do something about this and it's the most beautiful thing that's happened all season.
Deflategate went from late night tweet to leading the national news within 36 hours. There was practically no evidence of anything occurring, other than Mort's infamous 11 of 12 report.So basically the consensus seems to be that since Brady was treated unfairly by ESPN then Peyton should be treated unfairly by ESPN. And if ESPN doesn't unfairly shit on Peyton then they suck for not being assholes.
Do I have that right?
That's not really a shocking revelation, ghoff. Peyton should be innocent until proven guilty, sure. And if we were going to be big about this we'd all be saying it. But it's just sports and what we say doesn't really matter, so people are mad.So basically the consensus seems to be that since Brady was treated unfairly by ESPN then Peyton should be treated unfairly by ESPN. And if ESPN doesn't unfairly shit on Peyton then they suck for not being assholes.
Do I have that right?
I think you're right. Both this story and the deflategate allegations draw attention to the NFL's stupidity, but the difference is that the NFL can't claim ignorance about PED use as easily as they can about possible ball tampering.ESPN and the NFL will ignore this not just because it's Peyton but because nobody wants to inspire digging into PED use in the league.
Frankly, I think the ESPNFL would try to kill this story if it involved Brady too.
Moat career playoff flops*Most career touchdown passes*
Most career passing yards*
For my part, I don't see it that way. I see it as loving the fact that they are in (what I/we assume to be) an uncomfortable place, in that they probably don't want to treat Peyton unfairly but when they don't it'll magnify the horrible way they handled the Brady affair.So basically the consensus seems to be that since Brady was treated unfairly by ESPN then Peyton should be treated unfairly by ESPN. And if ESPN doesn't unfairly shit on Peyton then they suck for not being assholes.
Do I have that right?
If we put aside the persecution complexes for a moment and assume that none of the conspiracy theories were true, what might be the main distinguishing factor between the two teams that could cause some people in the media to jump on the Pats' story faster?Deflategate went from late night tweet to leading the national news within 36 hours. There was practically no evidence of anything occurring, other than Mort's infamous 11 of 12 report.
It'll be very interesting how this story develops.
Most people outside of the NE fan base don't really think Brady was treated unfairly. I wouldn't expect that angle to resonate.For my part, I don't see it that way. I see it as loving the fact that they are in (what I/we assume to be) an uncomfortable place, in that they probably don't want to treat Peyton unfairly but when they don't it'll magnify the horrible way they handled the Brady affair.
It was officially "banned" in 2011, but wasn't tested for until 2014. I assume many players have and continue to use, and for good reasonTrue. Although it was in the 2011 CBA and Harrison got a suspension for admitting HGH usage back in 2007.
Even if many seem to agree it makes sense for players to use it considering the sparse testing and the exceptional likelihood a lot of players would do it, it does carry a suspension by default if proven. If they can prove this report, with the massive reaction in the Saints bounty investigation and the Pats' deflation investigation, it seems like it'd be pure hypocrisy if they don't go hard on this too.
Bill Polian will head the task force.Why do they have to do something about this? Why can't they just essentially ignore it?
Bill Polian will head the task force.Why do they have to do something about this? Why can't they just essentially ignore it?
I honestly don't really care, but you do know that both the Colts and Broncos have organizational histories of "cheating", right?If we put aside the persecution complexes for a moment and assume that none of the conspiracy theories were true, what might be the main distinguishing factor between the two teams that could cause some people in the media to jump on the Pats' story faster?
As I've said before, I'm a non-Pats fan who thought Brady got screwed. But as soon as I saw this thread title I knew what half of the posts would sound like.
How could you possibly blame anyone? This fanbase has had truckloads of shit dumped on them since September 2007, when anyone with an honest bone in their body knows BB is the best coach in football (and has been for years) and Tom Brady is one of the best quarterbacks of all time. Yet, despite those facts, fans from other teams, the NFL, and ESPN have done everything they can to diminish the value of what the Patriots have accomplished the last 15 years.If we put aside the persecution complexes for a moment and assume that none of the conspiracy theories were true, what might be the main distinguishing factor between the two teams that could cause some people in the media to jump on the Pats' story faster?
As I've said before, I'm a non-Pats fan who thought Brady got screwed. But as soon as I saw this thread title I knew what half of the posts would sound like.
Makes sense. Redskins win NFC East is more unlikely than Manning with HGH.It's up on ESPN now. Though the Redskins winning the East is the headline.
Just read the comments on the ESPN story on it, half are "oh sure I get all my sports info from ISIS news".A wonderful subtext to all of this is Al Jazeera breaking a story potentially crushing the hero of the south/Middle America. You know there will be conspiracy theories about this and I look forward to reading them.
That would be hard for him to do, since he served a 4 game suspension for HGH in 2007.If this comes up on SNF and Rodney Harrison says something along the lines of, "I now have to question the legitimacy of Manning's comeback in the 2007 AFCCG", I will be his butler for life.
I don't think you can place much into this guy 'recanting' what he said to Collins in secretly recorded conversations. It's not like he can claim he was pressured or coerced into lying here. He could claim he lied in an attempt to brag to Collins. But if he didn't supply athletes with PEDs for illicit purposes, why would he?manning categorically denies the allegations and the source of the article has recanted? If so, what's the story here? The NFL is a bunch of fucking hypocrites, but that doesn't mean they should shit their pants again looking to smear manning, does it?
Why? When he's being recorded without his knowledge, he could just be bullshitting to sound more big time than he is. His later statements could easily be trying to undo the lie.Yes, precisely. I would put more stock in the unwitting statements of a guy being recorded without his knowledge than his subsequent statements when he knew his audience, especially given the magnitude of this information becoming public.
His agent isn't denying that drugs were sent to his wife. So you must believe that she had a legitimate use, and this doctor happens to be bullshittig. I guess you could also believe that she didn't receive any PEDs, but they chose not to deny it and hid behind her privacy for some reason, but that move doesn't make much sense to me.I tend to believe it's a crock.
Not that I believe Manning (or any pro athlete) has been perfect during their careers, but because it just seems as though someone as prepared, calculating and detail-oriented in his on-field performance would go for the "send it to me under my wife's name" gambit. Manning would have a far more intricate way of concealing any misdeed.
We haven't had a good congressional hearing in a while. With elections coming, it's a good time for some old fashioned grandstanding.Is there enough here for a probe into the Guyer Institute by the FBI? I'd love for Goodell and the league to try and sweep this under the rug while the Feds step in and say, "Not so fast, Roger".
That would be hard for him to do, since he served a 4 game suspension for HGH in 2007.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2999994
So not only does Manning ride off into the sunset as a garbage QB, he also goes out with the stank of PEDs on him. That's karma Kramer.Edit: plus if any of them are still out there, it provides a nice end to the debate of who is GoAT.