Liverpool 23-24: The Long Klopp Goodbye

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,730
I would have to think the price tag for him is going to minimum 60 million, and should be more. Which isn't a bad flip for Palace since they bought him for 28, and added Jefferson Lerma on a free.
There's are two very specific numbers floating around on Twitter. 58M and 70M. Scuttlebutt is that he may have a release clause around 60M which Liverpool would trigger.

My guess is that its a minimum of 70M...and honestly, Liverpool should bite the bullet and offer that much quickly.

They would still have around 30M for a defender
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
Trent limped off with an iced ankle at the end of the match. Bears watching since the back up is?

 

SocrManiac

Tommy Seebach’s mustache
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2006
8,694
Somers, CT
Maybe if they assign the three match ban to the referee and VAR that had their call overturned we’d see the system work correctly.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,466
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Lots of noise today about Al Ittihad wanting Salah THIS window and want to make him the highest paid player in the world.

Given they have a week to source a replacement I don’t think that’s happening regardless of how much a stink Salah makes.

But next summer for sure - and then only if they get a suitable offer . Supposedly earlier in the window they valued him at £60m - which is a joke given the transfer fee inflation hugely instigated by themselves.

Part 2 of the plot is the Reds playing another Saudi team on Sunday. Nothing like unsettling your opponents most important player.
 

SocrManiac

Tommy Seebach’s mustache
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2006
8,694
Somers, CT
Time for the big clubs to start feeling like the minnows when it comes to teams throwing money at their big players. For teams like Dortmund or Southampton, it’s part of their economic model. Clubs like Liverpool don’t have plans in place for shit like this. Yet.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
There is no replacing Salah and all the things he does for this team on the pitch, in the clubhouse, and in terms of revenue stream.

The attack is the drapery group in the squad, but only if a true 6 comes along so that Gakpo can move back to the 9. And even then, you’re replacing Mo with a combo of players With different styles and strengths. And none of them have Salah’s incredible ability to stay healthy.

Ahhh. Losing Mo now means a year of constant shuffling and covering for injuries in all areas of the pitch.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
And Jarrod Bowen is the mooted replacement. Have to think that with every passing day, the late-window-premium keeps climbing for Liverpool.
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,134
Duval
Buzz today that Al- Ittihad will make a ~£130m bid for Salah. I don’t think that gets LFC to the table - but up that north of £150m and I think they’d have to listen.
I’d do that in a heartbeat. I love me some Mo. his is the only LFC shirt I’ve owned. But he’s on the wrong side of 30 now. £150m for that? Done.

But man, would that hurt/be sad.
 

pedro1918

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
5,165
Map Ref. 41°N 93°W
Liverpool’s Virgil van Dijk charged by FA over reaction to red card at Newcastle

Virgil van Dijk has been charged with acting in an improper manner in the aftermath of being shown a red card at Newcastle on Sunday.
The Liverpool captain was dismissed for a foul on Alexander Isak in the first half of his side’s 2-1 victory at St James’ Park but the centre-back initially refused to leave the pitch and then remonstrated with the referee, John Brooks.

The red card earned him an automatic one-match ban against Aston Villa this Sunday but the suspension could be increased, which could force him to sit out the trip to Wolves the following weekend.
I have an issue with the DOGSO rule (If Isak was so free to run on goal, how did he get fouled in the first place?) but I'm fine with the red card. It is the rule. I think an additional match ban would be kind of ridiculous. But then again, I have no idea what VVD actually said or did. We will see.
 
Last edited:

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,466
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Liverpool’s Virgil van Dijk charged by FA over reaction to red card at Newcastle



I have an issue with the DOGSO rule (If Isak was so free to run on goal, how did he get fouled in the first place?) but I'm fine with the red card. It is the rule. I think an additional match ban would be kind of ridiculous. But then again, I have no idea what VVD actually said or did. We will see.
I think it may stem from his initial reluctance to leave the pitch. On the other hand he’s the captain and he could argue he had the right to continue disputing the red card.
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,076
The Granite State
Liverpool’s Virgil van Dijk charged by FA over reaction to red card at Newcastle

I have an issue with the DOGSO rule (If Isak was so free to run on goal, how did he get fouled in the first place?) but I'm fine with the red card. It is the rule. I think an additional match ban would be kind of ridiculous. But then again, I have no idea what VVD actually said or did. We will see.
If my amateur lip-reading skills are any good, he pointed his finger at the ref’s face a couple of times and said, “You’re a fucking joke.”
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
For so long Bayern were great at snapping up young talent and developing them into fantastic players. But now they’re bailing on young’uns and collecting high priced vets.

Their loss, Liverpool’s gain? Gravenbach is not a 6, but he’s young and has a huge, athletic frame (6’3”). He could be molded into a combative DM with fantastic technical skill. I think that’s the bet with Gravenbach.

But I think the fee is going to be more than Liverpool will pay. Bayern got a steal at £18m a year ago with Gravenbach’s contract running down, and now they’re going to want a price reflecting young talent with 4 years left on his deal.
 
Last edited:

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,466
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
For so long Bayern were great at snapping up young talent and developing them into fantastic players. But now they’re bailing on young’uns and collecting high priced vets.

Their loss, Liverpool’s gain? Gravenbach is not a 6, but he’s young and has a huge, athletic frame (6’3”). He could be molded into a combative DM with fantastic technical skill. I think that’s the bet with Gravenbach.

But I think the fee is going to be more than Liverpool will pay. Bayern got a steal at £18m a year ago with Gravenbach’s contract running down, and now they’re going to want a price reflecting young talent with 4 years left on his deal.
Well - two things - one he’s been in their mid shortlist all summer so they clearly are interested. And, if they’re negotiating then one assumes it’s just haggling over the price. Supposedly LFC’s initial evaluation was £30m

If Bayern had set a fee north of £60m I’m pretty sure they’d have walked away. On the other hand the Lavia bungle might indicate they’ll nickel and dime this and won’t get it over the line.

For the life of me I don’t understand why they haven’t signed a CB. The guy from Bayern Leverkusen - Piero Hincapie sounds perfect but they want £60 or £70m - which I don’t think they’ll pay.
 

swiftaw

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2009
3,443
Gravenberch is one of my FM favorites and I've been wanting Liverpool to sign him since his Ajax days. I read a report that says Bayern wants 30 million. At that price you snatch their hand off.
 

swiftaw

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2009
3,443
Okay, so it seems that Fulham are close to signing Iwobi from Everton, which will then allow Palhinha to join Bayern, which should allow us to sign Gravenberch.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
Nat Phillips loaned to Celtic. With Konate’ late injury, I thought Nat was going to get stuck here again as cover. Hope he bosses it up there, deserves a chance to shine.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
Lot of reports that the Saudis offered £100m+ for Mo last night, was rejected out of hand.

Have to think the Saudis aren’t serious about landing Mo bow if they waited until the last hours of the window to make this bid. In July among the first wave of big money moves…maybe. Liverpool would have time to recruit a replacement. But now? That’s asking to get turned down.
 

Royal Reader

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2005
2,299
UK
Lot of reports that the Saudis offered £100m+ for Mo last night, was rejected out of hand.

Have to think the Saudis aren’t serious about landing Mo bow if they waited until the last hours of the window to make this bid. In July among the first wave of big money moves…maybe. Liverpool would have time to recruit a replacement. But now? That’s asking to get turned down.
Yeah, it feels like a co-ordinated thing to get the player to agitate for the move, and LFC to compromise by agreeing to sell him in January/next summer if he's a good soldier to that point.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,466
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
The Saudi window is open for another couple of weeks so I’m guessing more offers will be forthcoming

From LFC’s perspective there’s really no difference between now and , let’s say the end of the Saudi window - they weren’t replacing him with a day to go.

I suspect if something like £170m arrives they’ll let him go.
 
Last edited:

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,506
Gravenberch official per LFC instagram. Exciting but not exactly what we needed. Hoping Endo can hold up or Bajcetic can get and stay healthy and continue to grow
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
James Pearce breaks down the Mo saga - about a month ago, Saudi representatives reached out to Salah’s agent to sound out a deal. At that time, the offer wasn’t enough to turn Mo’s head, hence the public declarations of staying put.

But the Saudis persisted, kept upping the ante to somewhere about £1.5m/week. That has Mo’s attention and his agent is now engaged in active talks, but Salah’s position is still that it’s up to LFC to decide. So…not enough money for Mo to get his hands dirty.

Pearce says KSA will go up to £200m, so it only makes sense for LFC to hold out for now. But Al Ittihad are playing at home in the Club World Club in January, want to put on a show there. So the price they’re willing to pay may drop at that point - they want Mo so there’s a chance to win major silverware.
 
Last edited:

SocrManiac

Tommy Seebach’s mustache
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2006
8,694
Somers, CT
At what ridiculous amount of money do you let a 31 year old winger go?

The flip side of that coin is that an enormous fee doesn’t help your negotiating position when you start shopping.
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,134
Duval
At what ridiculous amount of money do you let a 31 year old winger go?

The flip side of that coin is that an enormous fee doesn’t help your negotiating position when you start shopping.
At the next bid, even if it’s short of £200m

If he were 27-28, I can see giving a flat “no.” 31? Muddle through and just get to January then find your replacement if there’s nobody in the hopper presently, which I doubt based upon how this summer has gone already.
 

pedro1918

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
5,165
Map Ref. 41°N 93°W
Trent Alexander-Arnold and Jack Grealish withdraw from England squad due to injury

Liverpool defender Trent Alexander-Arnold and Manchester City midfielder Jack Grealish have withdrawn from England’s squad for their September matches against Ukraine and Scotland due to injury.
Alexander-Arnold underwent a scan on Monday and is set to be sidelined for two weeks after suffering a minor hamstring strain in Sunday’s 3-0 victory over Aston Villa.

The 24-year-old was replaced in the 71st minute and after receiving treatment on the field, he walked straight down the tunnel.

The injury leaves him a doubt for Liverpool’s Premier League clash with Wolverhampton Wanderers on September 16 but his availability for the fixture will depend on how he responds to treatment. He is expected to miss no more than one Premier League game.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,466
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Supposedly Al- Ettihad officials are in London and are prepping a £215m offer for Salah.

There seems to be some confusion over how much of that is Add-Ons

Regardless - do LFC hold the line or sell him now?

Should LFC hold the line or sell him now?

That’s a lot of money - they could even countenance a Mbappe bid - or simply reinvest in the defence?

One would think the same offer isn’t arriving next summer - maybe £150?

So , is a year of Salah worth ~£50m ? - of course that assumes he doesn’t get hurt (very likely ) or doesn’t fall off a cliff (likely)

I think they WILL hold - I think they SHOULD sell
 

DontTauntOrtizMe

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,297
Supposedly Al- Ettihad officials are in London and are prepping a £215m offer for Salah.

There seems to be some confusion over how much of that is Add-Ons

Regardless - do LFC hold the line or sell him now?

Should LFC hold the line or sell him now?

That’s a lot of money - they could even countenance a Mbappe bid - or simply reinvest in the defence?

One would think the same offer isn’t arriving next summer - maybe £150?

So , is a year of Salah worth ~£50m ? - of course that assumes he doesn’t get hurt (very likely ) or doesn’t fall off a cliff (likely)

I think they WILL hold - I think they SHOULD sell
I think if you can turn Mo Salah into Mbappe, you do that in a cocaine heartbeat. But I would want to be sure I was getting Mbappe given how disappointing last season was for Liverpool.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
8,860
At £215m you have to sell. That’s insane money. Of course, let’s see how much of that is base fee - the last offer was reportedly £100m base and £50m in add ons.

Al Ittihad are paying a premium to get Mo in time for the Club World Cup in KSA this winter. They want to show out and maybe…just maybe…lift that cup. That would be a stunning accomplishment after like 7 months of investing and be a huge win for the country’s ruling class.

For LFC, it’s a massive gamble on next year’s UCL qualification. How many points are they risking before they can line up a replacement? Does that even matter if you’re playing makeshift back lines anyway?

Mbappe is not happening. The wages, the agent fees, the commercial rights, the jobs for Mbappe’s family & entourage…that’s all stuff Madrid is practiced in. They price it in to their transfer business. FSG won’t pay all that.

Kvaradona would be the dream, but look at how Napoli ran the Osimhen “negotiations.” With 4 years left on his deal, Napoli will be asking for all the Mo money.

Other names that have been tossed around the interwebs by at least somewhat thoughtful commenters - Chiesa, Malen, Moussa Diaby, Adeyemi, Leroy Sane.

Too bad Pulisic just moved, though Gio…

Joking! One of Mo’s greatest abilities is staying healthy. Going from 50+ matches a year of Mo to 25 matches of Gio would be a fucking disaster. But the thought of the Reynas trying to blackmail Klopp into more playing time is pretty funny.
 
Last edited:

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,134
Duval
Supposedly Al- Ettihad officials are in London and are prepping a £215m offer for Salah.

There seems to be some confusion over how much of that is Add-Ons

Regardless - do LFC hold the line or sell him now?

Should LFC hold the line or sell him now?

That’s a lot of money - they could even countenance a Mbappe bid - or simply reinvest in the defence?

One would think the same offer isn’t arriving next summer - maybe £150?

So , is a year of Salah worth ~£50m ? - of course that assumes he doesn’t get hurt (very likely ) or doesn’t fall off a cliff (likely)

I think they WILL hold - I think they SHOULD sell
Was this radio or local chatter?
Jeez that’s a lot of money.