On it's face, not so good I'm sure. The best players tend to be 4 year seniors for one thing. The best players also tend to be the best shooters, which translates quite poorly to the NBA. There are other problems too - it's not trying to project NBA performance, it's just trying to measure NCAA performance (which are very different things).luckiestman said:how well does that college VORP predict NBA performance?
There are metrics which are calibrated specifically to predict NBA performance, focusing more on things that do translate well, like steals, blocks, and assists. Pelton's WARP projections are like that, ranking Wiggins 19th among prospects who declared for the draft. That's hardly definitive either, given WARP doesn't know Wiggins is a super athlete (but does know his age). I think everyone would agree Wiggins was better than the 19th best draft prospect (I ranked him 3rd, behind Embiid and Exum). I was just giving VORP/ASPM for the idea that was only okay in college. Much of his draft status is because of projection about the future, rather than his NBA readiness now.