Game 2 Mia, goats

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
yeah, but also an issue is that they complete an absurdly low percentage of their downfield passes. The huge gap in Intended air yards to completed air yards is very worrying.
I agree, I just think YAC is also an issue on top of it. I think people's general perception of this offense to start the year (not talking SoSH specifically, just what I'm reading from fans and media) is a little divorced from the reality that they're averaging a full yard per play and a full yard per drop back less than they did in 2022. Before I'm yelled at, not saying anything about Mac Jones here, or blaming the Quarterback. To me it falls mostly on the OL, but it's been bad.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,544
Hingham, MA
I agree, I just think YAC is also an issue on top of it. I think people's perception of this offense is a little divorced from the reality that they're averaging a full yard per play and a full yard per drop back less than they did in 2022.
Right, overall Mac has been decent so far - B ish range grade? But his YPA has gone from 7.3 in 2021 to 6.8 last year to 5.7 so far this year.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
So, I'm curious what people think about all of these tackle for loss plays and screens that have zero chance. It feels like very often Mac is throwing the ball to a guy that has a defender already two steps away lining the receiver or back up in the backfield.

What happens to other teams on these plays? Are these quick, zero option plays that are do or die and the QB has to throw the ball and hope? Or are these situations that Mac should be diagnosing at the line, and again after the snap, and looking for something else?

I guess what I'm getting at is wondering about Mac's diagnosis skills. It was a little hard watching Tua get to the line with 20 seconds on the clock and pretty routinely finding an optimal match up -- even when they didn't convert it felt like he was doing a pretty good job of understanding what was about to transpire. I don't often get that vibe from Mac, but that could just be that it always looks like that when the O-line stinks.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
So, I'm curious what people think about all of these tackle for loss plays and screens that have zero chance. It feels like very often Mac is throwing the ball to a guy that has a defender already two steps away lining the receiver or back up in the backfield.

What happens to other teams on these plays? Are these quick, zero option plays that are do or die and the QB has to throw the ball and hope? Or are these situations that Mac should be diagnosing at the line, and again after the snap, and looking for something else?

I guess what I'm getting at is wondering about Mac's diagnosis skills. It was a little hard watching Tua get to the line with 20 seconds on the clock and pretty routinely finding an optimal match up -- even when they didn't convert it felt like he was doing a pretty good job of understanding what was about to transpire. I don't often get that vibe from Mac, but that could just be that it always looks like that when the O-line stinks.
I think it's a lot of things....
1. Our guys don't make the first guy miss basically ever, and that's what those plays ask for.
2. Mac doesn't get the ball there quick enough, you're asking a guy to win in 2 steps on a quick release fastball, anything less and it's 1 or 0 steps.
3. Much like the INT downfield last night.... I think Mac is not doing a great job pre-snap or post-snap at being ready to go away from the 1st option on the play.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
This is Miami's #2 receiver:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnfPqaZVJTQ



When Mac gets a pocket that clean, a receiver with that separation and misses the throw regularly, I'll definitely get more concerned.

Of course, if Mac makes that same throw, there is a 10% chance one of our receivers comes down with it, and everyone would blame Mac for slightly underthrowing it, just as Tua did.

This is the kind of separation Mac's receivers get:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBhNG_Yqb6I
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,272
So, I'm curious what people think about all of these tackle for loss plays and screens that have zero chance. It feels like very often Mac is throwing the ball to a guy that has a defender already two steps away lining the receiver or back up in the backfield.

What happens to other teams on these plays? Are these quick, zero option plays that are do or die and the QB has to throw the ball and hope? Or are these situations that Mac should be diagnosing at the line, and again after the snap, and looking for something else?

I guess what I'm getting at is wondering about Mac's diagnosis skills. It was a little hard watching Tua get to the line with 20 seconds on the clock and pretty routinely finding an optimal match up -- even when they didn't convert it felt like he was doing a pretty good job of understanding what was about to transpire. I don't often get that vibe from Mac, but that could just be that it always looks like that when the O-line stinks.
I honestly hate these plays, even hated them when we had the GOAT and great YAC guys like Brown, Edelman, Welker, etc. They can work but there are so many perils and the risk of penalty of a hold is so real, even if you are able to complete the initial pass.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
So, I'm curious what people think about all of these tackle for loss plays and screens that have zero chance. It feels like very often Mac is throwing the ball to a guy that has a defender already two steps away lining the receiver or back up in the backfield.

What happens to other teams on these plays? Are these quick, zero option plays that are do or die and the QB has to throw the ball and hope? Or are these situations that Mac should be diagnosing at the line, and again after the snap, and looking for something else?

I guess what I'm getting at is wondering about Mac's diagnosis skills. It was a little hard watching Tua get to the line with 20 seconds on the clock and pretty routinely finding an optimal match up -- even when they didn't convert it felt like he was doing a pretty good job of understanding what was about to transpire. I don't often get that vibe from Mac, but that could just be that it always looks like that when the O-line stinks.
Those routes/screens are designed to get the ball out quickly against a pass rush, to a guy in space who can then make something happen with the ball in their hands.

The problem is those plays work great against a 5-6 man rush, a blitz, etc.

The Pats offensive line is giving up blitz like rushes against 3-4 man fronts, so Mac has to get it out quickly, but there's an extra 2 defenders out there in the secondary/linebacker positions, we don't have receivers that make people miss, so they go nowhere.

But ultimately, you can't fix that without fixing the line.
 

Bowser

New Member
Sep 27, 2019
431
What are the consequences of that hypothesis?
I'm trying to come up with a way out of the Mac sucks/does not suck binary. I mean, I don't think parsing every play in order to pin the blame on Mac, the WR, OL, BoB's play design or Belichick's roster construction is an edifying strategy.

Why repeatedly run up the gut on 2nd and 1? Why not take a shot? Why all the passes behind the line of scrimmage? Why the endless screens and the lack of play action (which is criminal)? Why is it that Mac can have some success each week, make a bunch of good throws, a handful of great plays, put up decent numbers, and yet our offense is still largely ineffective?

Maybe it is the OL. They're terrible. And the WRs/TEs are below average. Mac is far from the only problem we have, but he's limited, and when the guy who handles the ball on every play isn't elusive in the pocket, can't threaten the defense with his feet, can't zip the ball unless the pocket is clean, isn't disciplined enough to set his feet consistently even when he has the opportunity to do so, regularly fails to spot open receivers, doesn't have the arm talent to attack all areas of the field, and makes the occasional bafflingly dumb throw ... your offense will be relatively easy to defend. And that's our offense. Teams are stacking the box, giving us all the easy shit underneath, and making us drive the field because they know we can't do it without shooting ourselves in the foot.

Note that most of the criticisms cited above have nothing to do with Mac's supporting cast.

(But maybe this is just a thinly veiled way of saying Mac sucks, which I think he mostly does. So I'll own that.)
 

Pesky Pole

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
2,521
Phoenixville, PA
Maybe we need an In Season Pats thread but lacking that, I'll put this here. Don't we have to try to bring La'el Collins onboard? At this point, I'm just not sure what downside there is from the guys being trotted out there on the OL. His grades dropped off dramatically last year and he was always a better run blocker than pass blocker. All that said, he's a starting tackle on the street after week 2 and he's apparently best friends with our backup running back.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
Mac can't get the ball out any slower because he doesn't have time to wait, and he can't put more zip on his passes because he can't step into the throw.

The final play last night is a perfect example of it. Pause this video just as Mac releases the ball. He's got 2 receivers that haven't even turned around yet, and he's got Gesicki just short of the sticks. If he's able to step into this throw, it's probably a first down. But he can't step into it, because our 5 man offensive line can't stop a 4 man pass rush for 1.5 seconds and a guy comes right up the gut into Mac's face. This isn't an arm strength issue, it's a no time, no room to step into the throw issue that results in these passes not gaining the yardage they should:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r07wecJU4Q
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
You’re right, he’s beyond question. My bad
BB obviously isn't above criticism but there is something a little hypocritical about what some are doing saying "BB he just runs a sloppy ship and needs to be tougher" and then saying "how dare he staple someone to the bench for fumbling."
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494
Mac can't get the ball out any slower because he doesn't have time to wait, and he can't put more zip on his passes because he can't step into the throw.

The final play last night is a perfect example of it. Pause this video just as Mac releases the ball. He's got 2 receivers that haven't even turned around yet, and he's got Gesicki just short of the sticks. If he's able to step into this throw, it's probably a first down. But he can't step into it, because our 5 man offensive line can't stop a 4 man pass rush for 1.5 seconds and a guy comes right up the gut into Mac's face. This isn't an arm strength issue, it's a no time, no room to step into the throw issue that results in these passes not gaining the yardage they should:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r07wecJU4Q
They were technically blocking 6 on 4 on that play as Stevenson chipped Van Winkel before heading out on his route and Chubb sliced right through the middle like no one was there.

They've never been able to consistently replace Scarnecchia's ability to coach up even the most patch work offensive lines.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
I thought BB did a great job last night. He had a special teams play that I'm sure he would have loved to keep in the bag all year, and he pulled it out at exactly the right time. They had to get a turnover right then. A kick makes it a three-score game, and effectively ends the game. It was disappointing they couldn't pay off the turnover with an immediate TD, but they kind of got field position and eventually scored. It's not just the play itself, but the timing of when to try it, and it was awesome. It was the silver lining on that game.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,457
Mac doesn't have much time on the last play but he could have, and arguably should have, thrown that ball a half second earlier. He's at the top of his drop when Gesicki is starting his break. Jones should have been loaded with back foot set and rifle it in then. That's a first down.
Instead Mac takes another half second, turns parallel to the line and can't get much on the throw. Tough play and the line deserves the blame but Mac isn't completely without fault.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,867
Watch that play again and slow it down. Mac needed to deliver that ball when Gesicki was into his break. The rush shouldn't have mattered on this play.
I've watched that play and slowed it down about 30 times trying to figure out what is happening on the offensive line...and if you watch that play and think that Mac is the problem then I don't know what else to say at this point other than you simply want a Lamar Jackson type of QB. Gesicki runs a 3 yard out and is short of the sticks.

The play/routes are simply not designed for immediate pressure up the middle - the receivers are barely off the line before Mac has to decide where to throw. The only receiver with his head turned after Mac has already thrown the ball is Gesicki.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
BB obviously isn't above criticism but there is something a little hypocritical about what some are doing saying "BB he just runs a sloppy ship and needs to be tougher" and then saying "how dare he staple someone to the bench for fumbling."
That's true.

FWIW, it's hardly that Bill is beyond question. Folks sometimes wonder it part of the game has passed Bill by, and those questions are fair. "Do we need to spend real money on special teams specialists like gunners and long-snappers?" or "Fullbacks in this day and age, WTAF?" are fair questions. Not sure how accountability for your mistakes is anachronistic. "That jackass, holding people accountable and believing in ball security" is a really weird take, but perhaps not if you're someone who has had a thing for Belichick since day one.
 

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,930
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
I've watched that play and slowed it down about 30 times trying to figure out what is happening on the offensive line...and if you watch that play and think that Mac is the problem then I don't know what else to say at this point other than you simply want a Lamar Jackson type of QB. Gesicki runs a 3 yard out and is short of the sticks.

The play/routes are simply not designed for immediate pressure up the middle - the receivers are barely off the line before Mac has to decide where to throw. The only receiver with his head turned after Mac has already thrown the ball is Gesicki.
Shouldn't Mac already have an idea of where to throw before the snap?
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
Mac doesn't have much time on the last play but he could have, and arguably should have, thrown that ball a half second earlier. He's at the top of his drop when Gesicki is starting his break. Jones should have been loaded with back foot set and rifle it in then. That's a first down.
Instead Mac takes another half second, turns parallel to the line and can't get much on the throw. Tough play and the line deserves the blame but Mac isn't completely without fault.
I disagree. I think his first read on that play is Henry and he has to come off Henry who hasn't even considered looking back for the ball yet when the pressure gets there.

There is no way his first read on a 4th down play should ever be a guy running a route short of the sticks, and Gesicki went into his break a full 2 yards before the sticks.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
That's true.

FWIW, it's hardly that Bill is beyond question. Folks sometimes wonder it part of the game has passed Bill by, and those questions are fair. "Do we need to spend real money on special teams specialists like gunners and long-snappers?" or "Fullbacks in this day and age, WTAF?" are fair questions. Not sure how accountability for your mistakes is anachronistic. "That jackass, holding people accountable and believing in ball security" is a really weird take, but perhaps not if you're someone who has had a thing for Belichick since day one.
I guess the difference in perspective comes from the disagreement on whether or not to permanently bench a player is the only way to hold him properly accountable.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I disagree. I think his first read on that play is Henry and he has to come off Henry who hasn't even considered looking back for the ball yet when the pressure gets there.

There is no way his first read on a 4th down play should ever be a guy running a route short of the sticks, and Gesicki went into his break a full 2 yards before the sticks.
I also don't think there's any way that play is designed for Gesicki to go into his break short of the sticks. If it is, they have much bigger problems than his inability to gain an extra yard after the catch or Mac's timing or whatever.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
Shouldn't Mac already have an idea of where to throw before the snap?
If that were true, we wouldn't have things like reads and progressions.

I think it's clear Mac's first read is meant to be Henry, that's where he's looking, but he doesn't have time to stick with it and let it develop (it may have opened up too), so he has to take the throw to Gesicki off his back foot with a guy in his face.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,552
around the way
I guess the difference in perspective comes from the disagreement on whether or not to permanently bench a player is the only way to hold him properly accountable.
Agreed, and it's fair to differ in that assessment as well. But what Bill did seems consistent with the way that Belichick has done things like forever, which won him six rings (as HC), which was my point. It's not like his last ring was 15 years ago.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,867
Shouldn't Mac already have an idea of where to throw before the snap?
I think he has progressions ... and frankly he threw to the right receiver as far as I can tell under the circumstances. This is literally 1 second into the play 71050
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Agreed, and it's fair to differ in that assessment as well. But what Bill did seems consistent with the way that Belichick has done things like forever, which won him six rings (as HC), which was my point. It's not like his last ring was 15 years ago.
I guess I don't think stuff like that is what won him 6 rings, though you can argue it cost them one against the Eagles.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
Agreed, and it's fair to differ in that assessment as well. But what Bill did seems consistent with the way that Belichick has done things like forever, which won him six rings (as HC), which was my point. It's not like his last ring was 15 years ago.
Except when it came to Cyrus Jones.
 

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,930
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
If that were true, we wouldn't have things like reads and progressions.

I think it's clear Mac's first read is meant to be Henry, that's where he's looking, but he doesn't have time to stick with it and let it develop (it may have opened up too), so he has to take the throw to Gesicki off his back foot with a guy in his face.
I said an idea. If he's going through reads after the snap, it's too late. We're not seeing many audibles at the line and he's struggling with post snap progressions.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
Maybe we need an In Season Pats thread but lacking that, I'll put this here. Don't we have to try to bring La'el Collins onboard? At this point, I'm just not sure what downside there is from the guys being trotted out there on the OL. His grades dropped off dramatically last year and he was always a better run blocker than pass blocker. All that said, he's a starting tackle on the street after week 2 and he's apparently best friends with our backup running back.
I'm sure they'll take a look, but he's coming off an ACL, hasn't been practicing and word out of Cinci is he's 4-6 weeks away from playing in an NFL game, maybe more.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
I said an idea. If he's going through reads after the snap, it's too late. We're not seeing many audibles at the line and he's struggling with post snap progressions.
He's completing 69% of his passes while having pressure on 1/3rd of his drop backs through 2 games. I don't see the evidence he's struggling with post snap progressions. Nobody is open, so he has to take what's there and I think he's doing that pretty well.
A guy like Tua doesn't even really have to go through progressions. He hits his drop and bang, he's got multiple guys open, for very easy throws, and very little pressure to face. Speed and the ability to get separation off the line is sorely missing on this Pats team, and its exacerbated by the fact we can't block anyone.
 

FL4WL3SS

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
14,930
Andy Brickley's potty mouth
He's completing 69% of his passes while having pressure on 1/3rd of his drop backs through 2 games. I don't see the evidence he's struggling with post snap progressions. Nobody is open, so he has to take what's there and I think he's doing that pretty well.
A guy like Tua doesn't even really have to go through progressions. He hits his drop and bang, he's got multiple guys open, for very easy throws, and very little pressure to face. Speed and the ability to get separation off the line is sorely missing on this Pats team, and its exacerbated by the fact we can't block anyone.
69% of passes that go 5.7y downfield. Hasn't this been the story with him for 3 years? He completes a lot of kind of meaningless passes? I'd prefer 55% of passes where he's pushing the play downfield more.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,092
69% of passes that go 5.7y downfield. Hasn't this been the story with him for 3 years? He completes a lot of kind of meaningless passes? I'd prefer 55% of passes where he's pushing the play downfield more.
Downfield to who exactly?

And how, when he has less than 2.5 seconds to throw?

You just said you want him to get the ball out to Gesicki short of the sticks on fourth down quicker, but you also want him to wait and potentially get sacked so he can push it downfield to receivers that aren't open anyway?

I think it might help people remember what he can do when he has some time and open guys to throw to. Looking at only his bad plays (or more often than not, bad results that weren't necessarily bad plays by him) doesn't paint a full picture.

Mac absolutely has the ability to go downfield, I mean, this was his rookie year:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-eWssO7Sco


Here is against Philly last week:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTyCQ3KyRPQ
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,357
Manchester, N.H.
I'm finding it too hard to get upset at the QB or gameplan when the OL is playing like this. It feels pretty obvious that is the root cause here and a lot of these pointless screens, run designs, odd routes, and short timed throws can be traced back to not trusting the offensive line to fend off the pass rushes they're facing. That's an indictment on a bunch of folks and I am sure a lot of other flaws would be apparent if and when that got fixed, but that's a big issue now. Even Brady wasn't good with up the middle pressure.

This isn't to say Mac isn't flawed (he is) or the skill guys aren't flawed (they are) or any of this other stuff - this also isn't to say they can win - but until the O-Line starts to perform like the offensive lines of the 2000s and 2010s we're probably not seeing sustained success. If the Pats move on from Mac next year, I get it, but I don't know if many pocket passing QBs would be dramatically better with this line - even the good ones.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,457
I disagree. I think his first read on that play is Henry and he has to come off Henry who hasn't even considered looking back for the ball yet when the pressure gets there.

There is no way his first read on a 4th down play should ever be a guy running a route short of the sticks, and Gesicki went into his break a full 2 yards before the sticks.
I agree Henry probably is his first read but Mac knows the pressure is coming and seems to already be looking to Gesicki as he finishes his drop. Think he had the opportunity to let it rip. It is a tough play though and I might be nitpicking on Jones a little here. As I said, the line is mainly to blame.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
I'm sure they'll take a look, but he's coming off an ACL, hasn't been practicing and word out of Cinci is he's 4-6 weeks away from playing in an NFL game, maybe more.
One of the things I find challenging about being a football fan is that it's just so hard to do the work to have an informed opinion. I think we're all ok at evaluating the Pats--a lot of us watched most every snap all season and we have a good basis for saying our RTs sucked. (Although even there we can have differernces of opinion--I thought the oline played a lot better at the end of the season and mcgovern was a not horrendous fill in at RT, other think he should be launched into the sun.) But when it comes to evaluating, i don't know, RTs, very very few of us have watched enough tape to have anything like an idea. And players decline fast sometimes. But can la'el collins still play? could he play last year? If he can still play why did Cincy cut him? Is Jawaan Taylor good? Is Mike McGlinchey? Caleb McGarry? Right now where does Collins stand compared to Wheatley?
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,969
Dallas
In theory when Mac's back foot hits he needs to release it. That is a timing and anticipation pass. He was late on the one to Boutte that ended the game too.
 

LaszloKovacks

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 21, 2006
2,135
Los Angeles via Providence
Here's what I don't understand...

BB has a long standing defensive strategy where he'll willingly give yards -- sometimes lots of yards -- in order to prevent big plays, and have the D stiffen in the red zone. So we have a bunch of games where it seems like the D is getting gashed, but then we look up and they've only given up 17 points in 3 quarters. BB knows that it is exceedingly difficult for an offense to consistently string together 10, 12, 14 play drives for TDs. Things break down, penalties occur, turnovers happen.

And yet... this is precisely what we're trying to do on offense! No explosive weapons, no big plays. Just grind it out runs and short passes. Trying to move the ball 75 yards in 12 plays. And we can successfully do that a couple times a game, at best, don't score enough, and lose.

I'm utterly baffled at why the approach we know works preventing TDs on D is the one we're trying to employ on offense.
It's because his entire strategy hinges on having a coaching advantage. For a variety of reasons, he is less able to do so these days than he did throughout the 2000s and 2010s. He's fond of saying "it's a players game," but I've always thought he thinks the complete opposite. Following this team for the past 20+ years, imo nearly all of his decision making points to him valuing coaching/coachability over talent. He thinks his offense should be able to string together these drives where his opponent's fall apart because they've prepped them specifically to do so and have enough flexibility to go against any style (on both sides of the ball). That worked with a completely mind-melded Brady, but we're really seeing the cracks in the armor the past few seasons with the restrictions on practice time and the brain drain on the coaching staff.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,771
69% of passes that go 5.7y downfield. Hasn't this been the story with him for 3 years? He completes a lot of kind of meaningless passes? I'd prefer 55% of passes where he's pushing the play downfield more.
In Mac's second seasons they tried a lot more pushing the ball down the field (if I recall correctly) and it led to a lot of bad plays/turnovers. We had quite an extensive discussion about it here.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Tom E Curran:

Patriots are 2-7 in their last 9. Common feature? Deep holes repeatedly dug by self-inflicted errors.

End-of-game comebacks fall short giving the impression they're close IF they clean up the sloppiness.

But the sloppiness is starting to feel like a feature, not a bug.
Man. When put that way, it really does look like the wheels have come off the entire operation.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,550
In theory when Mac's back foot hits he needs to release it. That is a timing and anticipation pass. He was late on the one to Boutte that ended the game too.
Exactly. He's a count late on that throw. If he leads Gesicki out of the break, he just falls forward for the first down.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,771
Football is the ultimate team sport. When they win, it's because a lot of people are doing their jobs well. And when they lose, it's because a lot of people are making mistakes. Mac made some bad decisions and had the horrible pick. Strange was a turnstile. There were dropped passes. Douglas fumbled. Gonzalez - who otherwise played well - took a terrible angle on the last Mostert TD. They had penalties that hurt. The DL and LB couldn't stop the run much of the game. Receivers ran bad routes (Parker down the sideline, even Gesicki's last play was short of the sticks when the game was on the line...you just cannot do that). Coaches made bad decisions. If they had somehow pulled this game out, we would all be focusing on the wonderful plays that happened. But they lost so we're rightly focusing on the bad stuff. And there was plenty of it to go around.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Exactly. He's a count late on that throw. If he leads Gesicki out of the break, he just falls forward for the first down.
But that's their issue, right? They've built an offense with such a small margin for error, you could argue the QB double clutching it for 0.3 seconds cost them two games because it was just enough to demand that guys make a play for him they weren't capable of making. You can't live like that in this league. You can't expect Mac to have to put together 6-10 perfect consecutive plays to score points. You need to have some room to operate.

I think so much of the frustration with this team is due to the fact that they are exactly who we thought they'd be on offense, to a tee, based on the roster construction. This is the team they wanted to put together. Nothing has gone wrong that wasn't entirely predictable. And yet.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,969
Dallas
But that's their issue, right? They've built an offense with such a small margin for error, you could argue the QB double clutching it for 0.3 seconds cost them two games because it was just enough to demand that guys make a play for him they weren't capable of making. You can't live like that in this league. You can't expect Mac to have to put together 6-10 perfect consecutive plays to score points. You need to have some room to operate.

I think so much of the frustration with this team is due to the fact that they are exactly who we thought they'd be on offense, to a tee, based on the roster construction. This is the team they wanted to put together. Nothing has gone wrong that wasn't entirely predictable. And yet.
I had them starting 0-4 and going 9-8 and I could see them even going 10-7 or 11-6 given that I had them going 0-2 against the Jets but the problem here is that even if they make the playoffs they won't be competitive because the games there will require more offense than they can consistently generate. Parker, Bourne, and Juju are not good enough to win in the big games. They can still probably beat a lot of bad to mid-level teams but we are who they thought they were as you state. You can’t live in the world of needing everything to be perfect on drives to score.

Honestly even though I think they could turn this around mentally I’m already starting to think more about next year and what they need to do to go from being competitive with teams to actually winning. It’s pretty simple but figuring it out will be hard: offensive tackles and a premiere pass catcher. If they don’t do that they will continue to fail.

I might seriously give some thought to hiring someone to help evaluate professional and college pass catchers too if that’s a thing.

edit: I also had them splitting with the Fins and Bills but maybe that was optimistic.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
I had them starting 0-4 and going 9-8 and I could see them even going 10-7 or 11-6 given that I had them going 0-2 against the Jets but the problem here is that even if they make the playoffs they won't be competitive because the games there will require more offense than they can consistently generate. Parker, Bourne, and Juju are not good enough to win in the big games. They can still probably beat a lot of bad to mid-level teams but we are who they thought they were as you state. You can’t live in the world of needing everything to be perfect on drives to score.

Honestly even though I think they could turn this around mentally I’m already starting to think more about next year and what they need to do to go from being competitive with teams to actually winning. It’s pretty simple but figuring it out will be hard: offensive tackles and a premiere pass catcher. If they don’t do that they will continue to fail.

I might seriously give some thought to hiring someone to help evaluate professional and college pass catchers too if that’s a thing.
Honestly I think whether it's Mac's fault or not they need a new QB. The roster you have to build around a Mac Jones talent at QB is too expensive to also pay Mac Jones non-rookie money, so you basically have a year left.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,924
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I had them starting 0-4 and going 9-8 and I could see them even going 10-7 or 11-6 given that I had them going 0-2 against the Jets but the problem here is that even if they make the playoffs they won't be competitive because the games there will require more offense than they can consistently generate. Parker, Bourne, and Juju are not good enough to win in the big games. They can still probably beat a lot of bad to mid-level teams but we are who they thought they were as you state. You can’t live in the world of needing everything to be perfect on drives to score.

Honestly even though I think they could turn this around mentally I’m already starting to think more about next year and what they need to do to go from being competitive with teams to actually winning. It’s pretty simple but figuring it out will be hard: offensive tackles and a premiere pass catcher. If they don’t do that they will continue to fail.

I might seriously give some thought to hiring someone to help evaluate professional and college pass catchers too if that’s a thing.
I have no doubt they'll be competitive and win at the very least about 7 or 8 games, it's just that to be quite honest in year 4 post Brady they've had the exact same plan they've had since arguably 2018 when they shipped out Cooks, let Amendola go and tried to trade Gronk in the offseason following Brady's MVP campaign in which they had the best offense in football. What's the evolution here? Because I already know the high floor the coaching and the defense set for this team. What's the plan offensively to take the next step? I guess I was holding out hope it might just be having a good professional OC, now I'm skeptical.