Also agrees to a new contract...This is bad news for the AFC West/AFC. Unload before he becomes a liability.
Also agrees to a new contract...This is bad news for the AFC West/AFC. Unload before he becomes a liability.
Good for the AFC East, I think. Giving away that much draft capital for a WR seems ludicrous.Also agrees to a new contract...This is bad news for the AFC West/AFC. Unload before he becomes a liability.
Why is it bad news for the AFC West? Isn't it good that Hill is no longer on the Chiefs?Also agrees to a new contract...This is bad news for the AFC West/AFC. Unload before he becomes a liability.
I think he will not age well and is a "fall-off-a-cliff" candidate. I was hoping the Chiefs would be burdened with a bunch of horrible contracts and waste PM for the next 4 years.Why is it bad news for the AFC West? Isn't it good that Hill is no longer on the Chiefs?
This does seem like bad news for the AFC East because Hill is a problem when he's on the field.
Gotcha. I was looking at this solely through the lens of next year, when Hill will presumably still be a real problem on the field.I think he will not age well and is a "fall-off-a-cliff" candidate. I was hoping the Chiefs would be burdened with a bunch of horrible contracts and waste PM for the next 4 years.
Miami poised to make some noise this year. And this should make Tua’s first reads even easier. Pats lack of DBs or quick LBs becoming…more concerning.Initial thoughts are Hill and Waddle on the field at the same time is absolutely insane. Gesicki can play the Kelce role of eating in the soft coverage underneath.
I mentioned this in the Miami thread, but Miami pulled this off and kept their two firsts next year. This is Tua’s final stand. If he doesn’t get it done, those two picks are earmarked for another QB next year.
Yeah, that was my initial reaction. 1/3 of a billion for Hill and Watson this week.Man Watson and Hill cashing in at the same time makes me want to puke. This league sucks.
That seems pretty bad, though, especially given the draft capital? This is a go for it now move with a bottom 10 QB.That is not that bad. My guess is it's a two year contract at 30m each.
Heck, it's conceivable they could have wound up on the same teamYeah, that was my initial reaction. 1/3 of a billion for Hill and Watson this week.
That's my take, honestly. But after years of enduring local adoration for Roethlisberger, I've become desensitized.Man Watson and Hill cashing in at the same time makes me want to puke. This league sucks.
I suppose....Heck, it's conceivable they could have wound up on the same team
This is where I am at - its a huge draft and financial commitment to Hill that I don't see moving the needle with Tua - plus McDanials is a rookie head coach.Honestly, I can see both teams regretting this.
That's an awful trade for Miami. They will regret it immediately.While this is obviously not good for the Pats, so the schadenfreude is with hesitance, that's a shitty trade for Miami. That is an ENORMOUS amount to give up for the right to give out that deal and that's before you factor in that Tua's ceiling is probably not top 3rd of the QBs league at any given time.
As an NFL fan, I'm excited to be able to watch Mahomes do magic shit and not have to hear announcers fawn over an abuser when he does it.
Again, Miami pulled this trade off without giving away two firsts next year. This is putting all your eggs in the Tua basket for a single season.I am fascinated by this new discounting of draft pick value. It feels like the Rams won a SB by trading away a huge number of picks and now teams are falling all over themselves to give away their picks. Seems like a bad idea.
As already observed above, this feels like putting a lot of eggs in the Tua basket.
The problem with the NFL being so follow-the-trend is that you never know when a team that has success with a certain formula is an outlier. The Rams just had a perfect storm of circumstances fall in line for them -- SF winning two crazy games, the Bucs stupid blitz call -- even after going for broke.I am fascinated by this new discounting of draft pick value. It feels like the Rams won a SB by trading away a huge number of picks and now teams are falling all over themselves to give away their picks. Seems like a bad idea.
That's accurate. it's the absolute right move at the absolute right time to sustain KC's excellence. I hate this trade so much.That's a really good trade for KC. Get rid of a big contract, and pick up extra picks in a good WR draft. The anti-Rams approach. If they get lucky and find a Deebo or Chris Godwin (meaning a productive guy with a later pick) they'll be in better shape than if they had kept Hill.
Edit-to be clear, they are not going to replace Hill's explosiveness and production. But 80%, at a fraction of the cost-that's a BB type move.
I think you are overestimating how easy it will be to move up to a top 3ish pick to get one of the top QBs. Even if Tua is bad, I don't expect the Dolphins to be much worse than .500 (unless their team has more than just a Tua problem) & the 49ers pick should also be 2nd half of the first round.Again, Miami pulled this trade off without giving away two firsts next year. This is putting all your eggs in the Tua basket for a single season.
He plays well or he doesn’t. If he doesn’t, the draft class in 2023 is a loaded QB class and Miami will have the requisite capital to move on from Tua.
If he plays well, they have two firsts to utilize on the rest of the roster.
Spending that much money and draft capital with the 2023 plan being "I hope Tua doesn't continue to play the way he has throughout his career this year" and the 2024 plan being "Let's hope the QB we draft has a nearly-unprecedented ability to be effective in his first year in the NFL" seems unwise to me. I guess we'll see.Again, Miami pulled this trade off without giving away two firsts next year. This is putting all your eggs in the Tua basket for a single season.
He plays well or he doesn’t. If he doesn’t, the draft class in 2023 is a loaded QB class and Miami will have the requisite capital to move on from Tua.
If he plays well, they have two firsts to utilize on the rest of the roster.
I think the 2022 plan is actually let’s give Tua two completely uncoverable receivers, a franchise LT, actual RB talent, and an innovative head coach and proper scheme to see if he can capture his Alabama form.Spending that much money and draft capital with the 2023 plan being "I hope Tua doesn't continue to play the way he has throughout his career this year" and the 2024 plan being "Let's hope the QB we draft has a nearly-unprecedented ability to be effective in his first year in the NFL" seems unwise to me. I guess we'll see.
Edit: I will note that the Pats tried that 2024 plan last season and it was not a resounding success.
I agree with this. Who is looking really bad for next year? Texans, Falcons, JESTS, Lions, Giants, Jax, Seahawks, Washington? A couple of those are bound to take a QB this year and shit can change in a hurry, but there will be more than a few teams in the bottom 8 (or so) looking for a QB in the next draft.I think you are overestimating how easy it will be to move up to a top 3ish pick to get one of the top QBs. Even if Tua is bad, I don't expect the Dolphins to be much worse than .500 (unless their team has more than just a Tua problem) & the 49ers pick should also be 2nd half of the first round.
These teams probably project to be worse than the Dolphins this year even if Tua is not so good & would also be likely looking for a QB: Texans/Giants/Falcons/Seahawks/Panthers. The Seahawks & Texans also have 2 1st round picks next year.
He's a free agent.ho knows what's up with Josh Gordon but he's pretty cooked too.
Yeah, I also don't expect any of the guys from this draft to be anyone's long-term solution with the exception of potentially Malik Willis.I agree with this. Who is looking really bad for next year? Texans, Falcons, JESTS, Lions, Giants, Jax, Seahawks, Washington? A couple of those are bound to take a QB this year and shit can change in a hurry, but there will be more than a few teams in the bottom 8 (or so) looking for a QB in the next draft.
In addition to the teams you listed:I agree with this. Who is looking really bad for next year? Texans, Falcons, JESTS, Lions, Giants, Jax, Seahawks, Washington? A couple of those are bound to take a QB this year and shit can change in a hurry, but there will be more than a few teams in the bottom 8 (or so) looking for a QB in the next draft.
While WR talent is becoming more replaceable and bountiful by the year, Hill has ability that few humans on earth have.FWIW, as a Dolphins fan, playing around with mocks…most every time, I wound up with a WR that fell at 29 and Kenneth Walker at 50. So while those two would certainly be cheaper…In terms of draft capitol, to me, it kind of feels like Hill and Mostert/Edmunds, instead of two rookies.
Beyond that, there’s a lot to process. To say I was caught off guard when I saw the notification is an understatement. First reaction probably skews a bit negative, as Hill obviously has baggage and I have a working hypothesis that WR will begin to be viewed like RB’s in terms of value (especially second contracts) in the near future…but yeah, a lot to process.