The Story remains the same? The progress back from injury

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
The trends against RHP are alarming. He has major problems with breaking stuff away and that’s how he’s being pitched. Needs to adjust.
He also spent extra time in the minors on rehab in order to work on stuff like this. And yet he's struggling.

He'll have the next few weeks to see if he can figure things out. This offseason will be a big one. If there is any hint that he can't regain his timing and hitting eye, and the Sox don't get an insurance policy at short, 2024 is going to be a mess.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,320
That's still pretty small. Through 96 PA on May first Casas was batting .128.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,823
Alamogordo
He also didn't spend "extra" time in the minors on rehab. he came back to the MLB club two days before his rehab time expired.

He struggling, and it is hard and frustrating to watch. I hope he has a fully healthy offseason and can prepare well for next year. I still think he is a net positive because his defense is so good, but the low and away breaking stuff from RHP's is just killing him.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
He also didn't spend "extra" time in the minors on rehab. he came back to the MLB club two days before his rehab time expired.

He struggling, and it is hard and frustrating to watch. I hope he has a fully healthy offseason and can prepare well for next year. I still think he is a net positive because his defense is so good, but the low and away breaking stuff from RHP's is just killing him.
Wasn't there chatter that he took an extra week after he was physically ready to stay down there to work on stuff? Primarily his throwing but everything in general.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,161
That's still pretty small. Through 96 PA on May first Casas was batting .128.
He's been bad, no doubt about it, but the peripherals arent all bad. K rate is through the roof, BB % is way down, and that largely appears to be an issue with him being unable to lay off soft stuff off the plate. He needs to make an adjustment there.

On the other hand, anyone who's been actually keeping up with the games knows a lot of line drives have gone for outs. His hard hit % is 47 - which is very good, exactly the same as Casas, fwiw - and his BABIP is only .278 despite at least two balls that should have been outs falling in (that I remember).

So he appears due for some correction just based on luck.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,128
Newton
I can’t get worked up about Story. He was hurt all year, came back a little early because the team needed him, has played stellar defense and has had moments where he looks great at the dish. The rest feels like handwringing to me.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,679
It’s frustrating and the chase rate vs. RHP is a trouble spot but I think he’ll be fine. I’ll be officially concerned if he looks the same on May 15, 2024.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,823
Alamogordo
Thanks. No he didn't. 20 days max for position players and 30 days max for pitchers.
Right, as far as I can tell he only spent 16 days of his rehab assignment (first day was July 21st, last was August 6th, could be 18 if you count his last as his MLB debut day, which was the 8th of August). I apologize if I am being confusing, I honestly can't tell if you are agreeing with me or not, LOL.

(It's entirely possible that I am out of my mind, as well, and if I am just tell me so).
 

absintheofmalaise

too many flowers
Dope
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2005
23,835
The gran facenda
Right, as far as I can tell he only spent 16 days of his rehab assignment (first day was July 21st, last was August 6th, could be 18 if you count his last as his MLB debut day, which was the 8th of August). I apologize if I am being confusing, I honestly can't tell if you are agreeing with me or not, LOL.

(It's entirely possible that I am out of my mind, as well, and if I am just tell me so).
I'm agreeing with you!
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,280
If Story can get his OPS+ close to league average, I’ll take his elite defense at shortstop in 2024.
With great D at SS, he can be further from league average than one might think. Anthony Volpe has an OPS+ of 91 and bWAR of 3.6.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,725
I can’t get worked up about Story. He was hurt all year, came back a little early because the team needed him, has played stellar defense and has had moments where he looks great at the dish. The rest feels like handwringing to me.
This sums up my thoughts on the matter perfectly.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,161
With great D at SS, he can be further from league average than one might think. Anthony Volpe has an OPS+ of 91 and bWAR of 3.6.
There's plenty of reason to think he can be league average or better, too. A career wrc+ of 108, and several seasons north of 115. If he can just cut down on the freaking strikeouts, he'll be golden. Back in Colorado, he was regularly around 25%, and now he's suddenly a guy who's striking out 35% of the time?

Now, I was interested... is the narrative we've been telling ourselves -- that he's not laying off stuff out of the zone -- true?

70384

Looks like in the last 3 years his O-Swing% has climbed from a low of 30% all the way to 37% last year and 36% this year. Making thins worse is the O-Contact% is way down.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,823
Alamogordo
There's plenty of reason to think he can be league average or better, too. A career wrc+ of 108, and several seasons north of 115. If he can just cut down on the freaking strikeouts, he'll be golden. Back in Colorado, he was regularly around 25%, and now he's suddenly a guy who's striking out 35% of the time?

Now, I was interested... is the narrative we've been telling ourselves -- that he's not laying off stuff out of the zone -- true?

View attachment 70384

Looks like in the last 3 years his O-Swing% has climbed from a low of 30% all the way to 37% last year and 36% this year. Making thins worse is the O-Contact% is way down.
This is what makes me think it is a timing issue more than anything else.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,161
This is what makes me think it is a timing issue more than anything else.
That's some of it - I see him swinging through fastballs in the zone sometimes - but I think it's more likely a selectiveness or a pitch ID issue. His swinging strike percentage is up, but he's making just as much contact on stuff in the zone.

I think he's been swinging at a lot of non-competitive pitches, specifically sliders and curveballs in the dirt or even in the other batter's box. He has no chance of making contact on those, no matter how good his timing is. I just took a look through his at-bats on game day. There's some strikes out looking and some on balls in the zone but a lot of his recent strikeouts look like this:

70385

Or like this:

70386

One way of thinking about this: if it was just timing wouldn't his Z-Contact %'s be down?
 

geoflin

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2004
712
Melrose MA
I think it's more likely a selectiveness or a pitch ID issue.
I agree with this, I think it's a pitch ID issue. Just from what I've seen he's not recognizing pitches soon enough and committing too early to swinging at sliders or curves that end up low and away.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,272
I think we need a “When is it ok to worry about Trevor Story” thread. He is completely lost up there.
 

mauidano

Mai Tais for everyone!
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2006
36,039
Maui
C’mon now. We are not winning the World Series this year. Let him have as many AB’s as he wants. Defense is fantastic. He’s an exceptional hitter. Let him finish with some high quality AB’s.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,212
C’mon now. We are not winning the World Series this year. Let him have as many AB’s as he wants. Defense is fantastic. He’s an exceptional hitter. Let him finish with some high quality AB’s.
I opt for living with the strikeouts, there's plenty of folks Cora can put at the other 3 infield positions to make errors.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,493
C’mon now. We are not winning the World Series this year. Let him have as many AB’s as he wants. Defense is fantastic. He’s an exceptional hitter. Let him finish with some high quality AB’s.
As unlikely as the Sox are to get into the playoffs.... I actually think they're built to be a playoff type of team. Annoyingly they probably won't get the chance to show that.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,050
St. Louis, MO
As unlikely as the Sox are to get into the playoffs.... I actually think they're built to be a playoff type of team. Annoyingly they probably won't get the chance to show that.
Yep, they are a sprinter as opposed to a marathoner. 162 games exposes them; they would be a tough playoff out. But the 162 was too much.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
614
New York, USA
Isn't it pretty to think so?
Just look at how they play against good teams. The problem this year is the went in to funks against the Royals, Cards and Pirates. Decent lineup that can get hot and a really good bullpen can’t put you on 6-8 game run.

But they are inconsistent… like a teams that teases and just misses.
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,604
Just look at how they play against good teams. The problem this year is the went in to funks against the Royals, Cards and Pirates. Decent lineup that can get hot and a really good bullpen can’t put you on 6-8 game run.

But they are inconsistent… like a teams that teases and just misses.
Are there teams that end up within a few games of .500 that are incredibly consistent? You can probably say that about every team around them in the standings.
 

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
5,361
Just look at how they play against good teams.
5-14 against the Ms, Jays, Astros, Dodgers and Rays in the last ~ month when it mattered. I'm a congenital optimist and was reeled in too, but they are what their record says they are.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,030
Boston, MA
Are there teams that end up within a few games of .500 that are incredibly consistent? You can probably say that about every team around them in the standings.
Almost every team is streaky, no matter where they are in the standings. We had just this discussion when it comes to the unexpected number of lopsided playoff series. Playoff teams should always be fairly evenly matched, but there are a whole lot more 3-0, 4-0, and 4-1 series than straight math would say there should be.
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,604
Almost every team is streaky, no matter where they are in the standings. We had just this discussion when it comes to the unexpected number of lopsided playoff series. Playoff teams should always be fairly evenly matched, but there are a whole lot more 3-0, 4-0, and 4-1 series than straight math would say there should be.
I agree. But when you are .500 (or close to it) there are more losses and less wins to distribute over the year, so you'll probably notice more clustering. Good or bad teams are going to have more of one or the other, so the clustering is most likely going to go down. Now, it would be fun to look at distribution to see what teams were the most consistent or inconsistent, and how that played out across the standings, but that would take actual work and I find it easier to just generalize and talk out of my ass.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
The Sox are exactly at their pythag of 72-68.

36-33 at home, 36-35 on the road.

17-19 in 1 run games, 4-5 in extras.

Look at their monthly splits:

0-1
15-13
13-13
13-15
15-8
13-15
3-3

There's zero indication that the Sox are either better or worse than their record indicates. They are in every possible way just around a .500 team.
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,604
The Sox are exactly at their pythag of 72-68.

36-33 at home, 36-35 on the road.

17-19 in 1 run games, 4-5 in extras.

Look at their monthly splits:

0-1
15-13
13-13
13-15
15-8
13-15
3-3

There's zero indication that the Sox are either better or worse than their record indicates. They are in every possible way just around a .500 team.
They also score the 8th most runs and give up the 10th most. It's pretty obvious how they got to be a .500 team.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,655
If you read Eno Sarris' piece about the Sox in today's Athletic, specifically their defense, it's not pretty:

By some of the older-school metrics like Ultimate Zone Rating, these Red Sox aren’t one of the top 50 worst defensive teams since 2000. But Outs Above Average, which hasn’t been around as long, has them as the third-worst since 2015, behind only the 2022 Nationals and the 2017 Mets, so there is a case that this is one of the worst defensive teams of recent times.
And the defense isn't the reason why the Sox pitching isn't great:

Maybe it’s surprising, then, to see that the Sox have only the 10th-biggest gap between their ERA and their Fielding Independent Pitching numbers, or that there are three worse teams at allowing balls in play to become hits. Maybe there’s something to the fact that some of the younger arms have struggled — thinking of Nick Pivetta, Cutter Crawford and Tanner Houck, they’ve all been good at times but also have had issues. Still, Brayan Bello has been better than his strikeout numbers suggest he should be, so it’s not quite pervasive, and just sticking an opener in front of Pivetta seemed to do a lot of good (that doesn’t obviously have a relationship to defense), so I’m not sure Boston has broken any models with this approach yet.
The Sox would get waxed in a playoff series.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,655
Probably. But as @Max Power noted, weird things happen in short series. 3, 5 or even 7 games isn't a lot of samples.
I won't ever argue against "sometimes things happen in sports" because that thinking resulted in the one of the best Red Sox results in forever, but if we're going by the numbers; I don't think it looks good.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,670
Hingham, MA
As frustrated as I am with this season, I have to disagree JMOH. I think this team would advance in the playoffs.

But there is no chance this team makes the playoffs. Literally zero. I don't want to hear this "go 17-7" talk. It's. Not. Happening.

Therein lies the rub.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,627
Miami (oh, Miami!)
There's zero indication that the Sox are either better or worse than their record indicates. They are in every possible way just around a .500 team.
I think you'd expect a "true" .500 team to win fewer games against elite opponents, and more games against the worst teams in the league.

A more even spread (winning against good teams and losing against bad teams) tends to (IMO) indicate untapped potential or the like.

And I think that corresponds to the subjective impression of the season. They'll go on offensive tears and slumps. The pitching will vary from everyone firing on all cylinders (mostly) to spectacular implosions.

So if they got into the post season, they may not go deep. . .but it would be an enjoyable roll of the dice.
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,604
As frustrated as I am with this season, I have to disagree JMOH. I think this team would advance in the playoffs.

But there is no chance this team makes the playoffs. Literally zero. I don't want to hear this "go 17-7" talk. It's. Not. Happening.

Therein lies the rub.
Fangraphs has them at ~4% chance of making the playoffs. So not literally zero, but so low it's not really worth thinking about. That feels about right.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,161
For what it's worth, Hard Hit% is in line with career norms at 42%. That's a pretty good clip. BABIP is at .266. He seems, anecdotally, to have had a lot of hard hit balls go for outs the last week or so.

I think he's pretty close to getting his timing back. Wouldn't be surprised to see a little bit of a tear here at the end of the season.
71113

For reference, Casas is at 46% HH%, Devers is at 54%, Duran was at 45% this season. Mookie Betts, for his career, is at 42%. So Story is hitting the ball hard plenty.
71116

The most concerning thing, to me, is the spike in strikeouts and the drop in BB%. The could be he's pressing at the plate, it could be a pitch ID Issue. But it's a Dalbecian, Duvallish K rate.

71115

I would love to have the Trevor Story who strikes out 25% of the time back.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,161
We never had that guy. File under: Hitting Coaches, Boston.
The first sentence is certainly true. I'm completely agnostic about the second half of your assertion. I would be stunned if Story wasn't aware that he's swinging at too much garbage, watching film, looking at pitch charts - but it's also not outside the realm of possibilities.