The Bills will take DT Jay Bromley. Nice depth with Raji's inconsistencies and McDonald getting long in the tooth.
PM on the way to Dougie.
PM on the way to Dougie.
DaughtersofDougMirabelli said:With 2 rounds in the books, I'm interested in what people think of rookies vs veterans.
SMU_Sox said:For teams that are close to the cusp making sure you don't have any huge holes and plugging them in with medium floor guys isn't a bad idea.
I had Brock as the best available veteran CB, but probably wouldn't have looked at him until round 3. Given Eli's age I think it was a reasonable pick.DaughtersofDougMirabelli said:Question for RFP since there isn't a ton of talk in here anyway.
After a ton of deliberating I took Brock in the first round. Was anyone else looking at him? Think he would have made it to me here? I probably would have gone with best available but I had two positions of need going into this draft and wanted to make sure I hit on both. CB and C. Didn't see a good CB falling here (I guess I was half right but maybe Brock would have been available), and that would have also pushed me out of the top Cs available.
With 2 rounds in the books, I'm interested in what people think of rookies vs veterans.
I don't see a lot of "productive, entrenched veterans," to be honest. This draft is full of players who either we didn't think good enough to draft in 33 rounds last year, or drafted but then dropped. The veterans drafted - Clark, McCown, Brock, Daniels, Jackson, Collins - are all guys who had pretty unimpressive track records coming into last year. That doesn't make them bad picks, but there's a degree of risk not dissimilar from that of a high draft pick.soxfan121 said:
I'm shocked that all the productive, entrenched veterans weren't snapped up by now. Lots of rookies sound good but every year a bunch of them turn out to not be good. Taking the veterans was always my particular strategy but I am surprised at how few have been taken and how many raw, questionable rookies have gone instead.
DaughtersofDougMirabelli said:Question for RFP since there isn't a ton of talk in here anyway.
After a ton of deliberating I took Brock in the first round. Was anyone else looking at him? Think he would have made it to me here? I probably would have gone with best available but I had two positions of need going into this draft and wanted to make sure I hit on both. CB and C. Didn't see a good CB falling here (I guess I was half right but maybe Brock would have been available), and that would have also pushed me out of the top Cs available.
With 2 rounds in the books, I'm interested in what people think of rookies vs veterans.
Super Nomario said:I don't see a lot of "productive, entrenched veterans," to be honest. This draft is full of players who either we didn't think good enough to draft in 33 rounds last year, or drafted but then dropped. The veterans drafted - Clark, McCown, Brock, Daniels, Jackson, Collins - are all guys who had pretty unimpressive track records coming into last year. That doesn't make them bad picks, but there's a degree of risk not dissimilar from that of a high draft pick.
phragle said:The Necks will take Malcolm Smith
I'll finish the write up in a bit.
sleepyjose03 said:Edit: Damn, was really hoping he'd stay under the radar... I like the pick
sleepyjose03 said:Edit: Damn, was really hoping he'd stay under the radar... I like the pick
Thanks guys.SMU_Sox said:You and me both Sleepy. Once again, nice pick gentlemen. You mothers are so not picking in the top ten next year .
PM sent.wibi said:Posting mobile
I'll take Tom Savage, QB from Pitt
Can someone PM the next and I'll writeup tonight
sleepyjose03 said:Write-up coming later: Vikes select CJ Fiedorowicz, TE
SeoulSoxFan said:
OH COME THE FUCK ON
SeoulSoxFan said:
OH COME THE F*CK ON
...I wish he had fallen to like round 4 or something...
Super Nomario said:OFT's clock is up at 11:30 Eastern, right?