SMU_Sox said:That's USDA Certified Organic cat shit, asshole.
We've had this debate. Organic, certified, alphabet-soup acronyms can't hide that it's cat shit.
Otherwise known as a McFitzbertson.
SMU_Sox said:That's USDA Certified Organic cat shit, asshole.
SMU_Sox said:Well right... but I did say cat shit which implies I'm not trying to deny or hide what it is. In all seriousness we drafted for floor. I thinkWilsonGabbertFitzpatrickMcCown has a high floor as a game manager move the sticks don't turn it over run on sentence I'm too tired for grammar insert cliche here.
Nice pick. He was on my short list for round 2 options. He needs to get stronger, but he can stick in any just about any WR's back pocket and should be able to at least start in the slot. If he was bigger, he would be my #1 CB in the draft. His tape impressed the hell out of me. And, obviously, you can never have too many good DBs in today's game.bsj said:My secondary clearly needs a bit of help....losing two corners in the steal rounds has taken my secondary from solid if not spectacular to very clearly hole ridden...
I spent a long time debating between 3 players with this pick....2 are obvious, 1 maybe not...but at the end of the day I went with my first instinct
Jason Verrett, CB, San Diego
Verrett is undersized. But he is quick and plays with a chip on his shoulder.
PM sent to Turrable
Kenny F'ing Powers said:Where's all the shit talking about my pick?
soxfan121 said:Yeah, he was very high on my list - that's an excellent pick SSF.
soxfan121 said:Yeah, he was very high on my list - that's an excellent pick SSF.
bsj said:Can someone who has doc edit access slide waddle into my empty guard position? Thx.
SeoulSoxFan said:
Hey thanks SF121 -- he stands out and phragle would have snapped him up as an NT if I had not, as he posted above.
I got nervous when Eck (I think) posted about when the non-rookie F.A.s would go and thinking that'd make GMs look & get Daniels before the end of the 1st.
I keep thinking about protecting Fleener when I should have kept Kenny Stills though -- but too late.
phragle said:
I think it was a good pick, but what he does throwing to Evans, Jackson, and Martin doesn't have anything to do with how he does throwing to whomever you have.
He's so good I was considering taking him and trying to sell him as a NT, ESC style
phragle said:
I think it was a good pick, but what he does throwing to Evans, Jackson, and Martin doesn't have anything to do with how he does throwing to whomever you have.
phragle said:Austin Sefarian-Jenkins
I’d bet on him as an NFL general manager, but keep my
expectations to that of a run blocker and short-range
receiver. If he blossoms into an intermediate perimeter
threat, it’s a bonus.
Granted, the quarterback opts for the standing variety as opposed to the full-blown, “put-my-thumb-in-my-mouth-and-read-me-a-bedtime-story,” fetal position. But even when Garoppolo realizes that he’s a beat away from a turf-nap and spins to his right, the initial frozen reaction affords the edge rush to reach the quarterback for the sack.
This isn't an isolated play. These are three plays from the same quarter. I wish I could tell you this was a bad day from Garoppolo, but these are consistent tendencies in other games.
Luckily for Red October and the Patriots Waldman's track record on QBs is pretty awful.SMU_Sox said:
sleepyjose03 said:Player B is the Vikings newest member, DL Malik Jackson in 2013 - his second season in the league.
RedOctober3829 said:I need a QB and I think I've found my franchise guy after flaming out with Geno Smith. The Jets have selected QB Jimmy Garoppolo.
soxfan121 said:
So...how's this gonna work? I mean, assuming that phragle is correct and that Tom Brady is impervious to age and injury, this guy is never gonna see the field other than in preseason.
Take a wild ass guess? Take the 0.0 and try to argue that if he played he'd be "like X"?
We had this issue with Myt1's team last year; his QBs were Ryan Nassib, Mark Sanchez, and Landry Jones, none of whom played a snap.soxfan121 said:
So...how's this gonna work? I mean, assuming that phragle is correct and that Tom Brady is impervious to age and injury, this guy is never gonna see the field other than in preseason.
Take a wild ass guess? Take the 0.0 and try to argue that if he played he'd be "like X"?
Super Nomario said:We had this issue with Myt1's team last year; his QBs were Ryan Nassib, Mark Sanchez, and Landry Jones, none of whom played a snap.
Sanchez was on IR so his quality was a moot point.SMU_Sox said:With Sanchez we can guess his thoroughly below average production. That's going to apply to Geno too.
Nassib was third string behind Curtis Painter and the Giants went out and signed Josh Freeman this offseason, so it would be pretty tough to argue he's the man.soxfan121 said:
And that team got more last place votes than any team to not actually finish last. Plus, buttfumble.
If anyone can craft a convincing argument about how JG succeeds with his team, it's RedOctober. I look forward to reading, now or after the season, how he is going to assess JG. And since we will all get to see JG play in the preseason, RO's arguments will be backed by some knowledge.
I didn't see Ryan Nassib or Landry Jones during last preseason, so Myt1 missed an opportunity to craft an extensive, wordy, TL;DR argument about how Nassib was actually THE MAN. I guess we can use long form fan fiction and Preseason Game Balls to evaluate players instead of PFF scores.
If one's fantasy of football includes Curtis Painter, it's a pretty shitty fantasy.Super Nomario said:Sanchez was on IR so his quality was a moot point.
Nassib was third string behind Curtis Painter and the Giants went out and signed Josh Freeman this offseason, so it would be pretty tough to argue he's the man.
Similarly, if Garoppolo's third string and inactive behind Mallett all year, we can safely assume he's not ready for prime time. If he can seize the backup job earlier than expected, it's a more interesting argument.
Baka's got like an hour left, right?
EDIT: No one's going to get pissed at me for mentioning Jones, Freeman, Painter, and Sanchez, are they? Technically they are in this draft.
So am I. If someone's on IR, they have no contribution. What did Travis Kelce contribute to the Browns last year? If they're on IR in real life, I think we have to assume they're on IR in RFP.SMU_Sox said:Well he was on IR, sure, but I think my statement still holds true - we're discussing methodology.
Are you just laying the groundwork for how you're going to argue up McCown's performance next season if Glennon wins the starting job? Are you going to use his career record or his great 5-game stretch from last year?SMU_Sox said:... I'm not disagreeing with you. My point is we have a frame of reference for Sanchez. IR or no IR it doesn't matter. If he is on the IR obviously we know how to evaluate that. If he is not on the IR we have his past seasons to try to guess at his performance. In other words we can assume production from him and other veterans based on their past results, and other relevant factors like age, injury, etc. The question was how to evaluate QBs who didn't play or don't start. Sanchez was mentioned. I answered how to guess at his production - but Sanchez is just one of many veteran QBs who didn't play last year. My answer to Sanchez is not just applicable to him. The real life IR applies to us. No arguments. I think I didn't make my point clearly.