Lee Jenkins: LeBron James is returning to Cleveland

Swedgin

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2013
702
moly99 said:
 
I'm not sure what you mean by the former statement. By positioning himself to grab rebounds rather than position himself between penetrating players and the hoop, Kevin Love pads his rebounding numbers at the expense of his team. If he stops doing that and tries to play defense, then his rebounding numbers will drop.
 
If you mean you believe he does offer solid help defense . . . His disinterest in defense is the reason his coaches didn't want to give him many minutes early in his career and tried to use playing time a carrot for making an effort on defense. You don't have to believe me, but surely Coach K and Kurt Rambis know what their players are/were doing.
I don't think of any of us should give much credence to what Kurt Rambis does as a coach.
 

moly99

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2007
939
Seattle
LeoCarrillo said:
Pretty interesting thought on Love, that he pads rebound stats with shitty help D.
 
Gotta say that his boards-and-blocks stats seem to support the theory.
 
Last year he was third in the NBA at 12.5 per game in rebounds but was 101st in blocks at a meager 0.45 per game. A 6-foot-10 guy who's a couple names after John Wall on the list plus swats fewer balls than dozens of guards overall. Pretty suspect.
 
The one big counterpoint to my argument is that he has done well in drawing charges. Unfortunately there aren't many sites that track this, and offensive fouls drawn are low incident events. But he has done a pretty decent job of picking up fouls. One explanation is that he might be drawing a lot of fouls from his own man. (He is a satisfactory on-ball defender.) Alternatively he might simply be getting superstar treatment from the refs.
 
But there's no getting around the fact that he lets opponents shoot 57.4 percent at the rim against him last year despite being a solid space eater.
 
And for the record, I don't have a problem with Love. Put him on the right team next to someone like Larry Sanders or Nerlens Noel and his lack of rim protection wouldn't be a major issue. But the Cavs don't have anyone like that. The closest is Varejao, and he is always injured and more of a solid overall defender than pure shot blocker.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,160
moly99 said:
 
I'm not sure what you mean by the former statement. By positioning himself to grab rebounds rather than position himself between penetrating players and the hoop, Kevin Love pads his rebounding numbers at the expense of his team. If he stops doing that and tries to play defense, then his rebounding numbers will drop.
 
 
I think the point was that in your first post you said he'd let them have "free layups". NBA players generally won't miss "free layups" so there won't be more rebounds.
 

moly99

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2007
939
Seattle
DrewDawg said:
 
I think the point was that in your first post you said he'd let them have "free layups". NBA players generally won't miss "free layups" so there won't be more rebounds.
 
I don't know how many times I have to repeat this. He lets penetrating players drive to the hoop, which frequently turns an 8 foot shot into a layup.
 

zenter

indian sweet
SoSH Member
Oct 11, 2005
5,641
Astoria, NY
moly99 said:
I don't know how many times I have to repeat this. He lets penetrating players drive to the hoop, which frequently turns an 8 foot shot into a layup.
 
You have to repeat it zero times. It has certainly been said here and elsewhere that he avoids challenging players driving to the hoop in order to avoid fouls. I don't know if it's true, but it makes intuitive sense in a context where he's basically carrying the team.
 
If you have content, videographic evidence, or SportVU data, etc, that enhances your several related claims about Love and positioning, it would be swell. Can't say if you're wrong or right on something as hard to determine (from standard stats) as positioning and contesting.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,212
This is huge for them IMO:

https://twitter.com/SpearsNBAYahoo/status/501021726311190528
 

Blacken

Robespierre in a Cape
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2007
12,152
I love that signing. They can put out a stopper lineup that will hurt you with this roster. Even at his age, Marion can contain almost anybody at the three not named LeBron (convenient), Durant, or Paul George (also convenient) and might give LeBron some time on the floor where he doesn't have to guard the best wing.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,621
The team is basically all in place now with the exception of a rim protector. Unfortunately for the Cavs there aren't many of those available. There's also the question of what the Cavs actually have to offer. A lot depends on what pick(s) they have to give up in the Love trade (the rumor is that it is the MIA pick). If that is the case the best they have to offer is roster filler, the Brendan Haywood contract (which basketball writers a lot smarter than me seem to think is pretty valuable), Waiters, and the Grizz 1st round pick they own.
I wonder if that would be enough to get Larry Sanders? Another interesting possibility would be Roy Hibbert, but I don't know if Indy wants to blow up that core or give the Cavs the final piece to their championship puzzle. Will be interesting to see how David Griffin handles the issue
 

Yore

New Member
Aug 26, 2006
64
East Boston
tbb345 said:
The team is basically all in place now with the exception of a rim protector. Unfortunately for the Cavs there aren't many of those available. There's also the question of what the Cavs actually have to offer. A lot depends on what pick(s) they have to give up in the Love trade (the rumor is that it is the MIA pick). If that is the case the best they have to offer is roster filler, the Brendan Haywood contract (which basketball writers a lot smarter than me seem to think is pretty valuable), Waiters, and the Grizz 1st round pick they own.
I wonder if that would be enough to get Larry Sanders? Another interesting possibility would be Roy Hibbert, but I don't know if Indy wants to blow up that core or give the Cavs the final piece to their championship puzzle. Will be interesting to see how David Griffin handles the issue
 

Maybe they could offer Tristan Thompson in a deal for Sanders? I imagine he won't get many minutes behind Love (especially with Lebron getting minutes there in small lineups).
 
SF: James
PF: Love
C: Sanders
SG: Waiters
PG: Irving
 
Bench: Miller, Marion, Varejao, Allen?, Dellavedova
 

moly99

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2007
939
Seattle
I'm not sure why Milwaukee would want Thompson given the fact that their best lineup will probably be going small with Jabari Parker playing power forward.
 
Thompson might be better bang for buck going forward than Sanders. But Sanders plays a more valuable role than Thompson, they don't really need a player like Thompson and Thompson doesn't have the star potential to make such a gamble worth it.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,593
Somewhere
If the Cavaliers are looking for shot blockers at a depleted trade value, Javale McGee is probably a better look. He's also better than Sanders, albeit with a lower ceiling.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,212
Not for LeBron it wouldn't, Varejao is his boy and pretty much untouchable. 
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
Devizier said:
If the Cavaliers are looking for shot blockers at a depleted trade value, Javale McGee is probably a better look. He's also better than Sanders, albeit with a lower ceiling.
?!?!