Is there some sort of tightly orchestrated entertainment planned for the void we must now endure?
Yes, that's very weird.taking the ball? Feel like optimal strategy is going second so you know what you need, and can go for 2 and the win.
I think the D is too tired honestly. Gives them rest.Why take the ball????? I hate that
Yeah, with the new rules, wouldn’t you want to know how much you need to score to match (or if you even need to score)?Receiving first is a mistake.
It ranks right up there with FBS figuring out that they could make even more money with a larger playoff as quirks.Everyone gets the ball is a fun new quirk.
Maybe it’s better to rest your D more.Under these rules, doesn't it make more sense to kick?
i thought they just said each team gets a possessionIf they score a TD they win, I don’t hate it
I think you want it second now.Is it clear you want ball first given each team gets a possession!
new rules, you don't, so you open it up for the other team to score a TD and 2pt and win.If they score a TD they win, I don’t hate it
I want the ball first because if the score is tied after each team possesses, you get first crack at the win.taking the ball? Feel like optimal strategy is going second so you know what you need, and can go for 2 and the win.
It is not, only because the 2nd team to have the ball knows if they need to go for it on 4th down. They get the luxury of the extra down.Is it clear you want ball first given each team gets a possession!
Whoa… I’m Tony Romo…?Maybe it’s better to rest your D more.
Thanksnew rules, you don't, so you open it up for the other team to score a TD and 2pt and win.
Only case for it is maybe your D is tired?
shitty drive, punt, KC walk off FG sounds about rightSo KC pick 6 or shitty drive, punt, KC TD?
I’d kick if I had the choice. You get the ball either way, and would know what you need.
If you go second you can win on the first possession... TD if they get a FG, 2pt if they kick it, kicking it if they go for 2 and missI want the ball first because if the score is tied after each team possesses, you get first crack at the win.
As is tradition.Thanks
Pats win so they change rules typical
After KC/BuffaloWait did they change the rules after the Pats Falcons SB?
Any way you can. Run. Screen, Slant. Whatever.Give the f'ing ball to CMC.
Or a FGSo if Niners kick then Chiefs can win with TD?
No, FG and you loseUnder these rules, isn't the best strategy to try an onside kick? If you get it, the other team had their opportunity to possess the ball, and otherwise you have to defend a short field but still get a chance to respond on the second possession.
If onside kicks weren't nearly impossible now due to other rules changes, sure. As is, nah.Under these rules, isn't the best strategy to try an onside kick? If you get it, the other team had their opportunity to possess the ball, and otherwise you have to defend a short field but still get a chance to respond on the second possession.