It is the wrong thread but I have to say Nick Wright was really on point when he was pointing why he was wrong as well as really defined what the next steps for the Celtics look like. Basically something along the lines of no dynasty is believed in the beginning but this season can be elevated by winning next season.I don't want to sully the Celtics media thread, but man, NBA media/punditry really did a bad job this season. I'm not even talking about the clowns like SAS or Nick Wright, but these other "experts" are supposed to be there to elevate basketball talk and inform the public on what they might see in a game or what they did see, and they seemed pathologically incapable of doing it.
I know this isn't just an NBA media issue, but man, they were so bad.
Lot of money for Monty to sit at home....
His star has fallen pretty far. I don't know that he'll be able to get a gig right away; might have to rehab in another role first.Monty go to the Lakers?
Monty was also really, really awful as a Pistons coach. I mean, I don’t think you could find anyone who was even somewhat positive on the job he did.That Detroit job is really rough. That has to be one if the least-talented rosters in recent memory, with very little help on the horizon given how bad the draft is. On the plus side, I guess the expectations will be low for a few years.
I'm a little surprised they didn't keep Monty for at least one more year given that they need to tank again, but I guess this will be a "culture-shift" year.
I really hope he stays for some continuity, but I would be worried he gets picked up. I'm sure they are prepared for this eventuality. On the plus side, quite a few former HCs (Vogel, Williams, Bickerstaff) are out there for potential assistant roles. No idea whether CJM or Brad have good connections with any of these guys.Wonder if that means Cassell could be gone.
Or Warriors? They could use a coaching staff shakeup, Atkinson may be moving on, and IIRC Kerr and Monty are close…Monty go to the Lakers?
I'm coming around to thinking that JJ will be fine, but he also won't be much of a positive difference maker for a team that's just not going anywhere. I get you take the job that's offered and, as the media will tell you, the Lakers are a marquis franchise, but if he wants to coach, I think he's better suited for a team on the rise, like Orlando, where he can grow with the players (and hire some vet assistants). On the Lakers he's just kind of along for the ride.
I think Reddick will be fine with JVG as his lead assistant.
But like you, I think the talent deficit will play a bigger role in their performance than coaching.
From the other side, seems like a tough situation for Reddick. Given his pod with LBJ seemed like an extended coaching interview session, I wonder if he's going to have any issues in the locker room. He'd better get out to a fast start or he will be under fire quickly IMO.
Except jvg is going to the clippers and Tyrone Lue
+1 for the indigestion you just gave every Lakers fan by confusing them with the ClippersI think Reddick will be fine with JVG as his lead assistant.
But like you, I think the talent deficit will play a bigger role in their performance than coaching.
From the other side, seems like a tough situation for Reddick. Given his pod with LBJ seemed like an extended coaching interview session, I wonder if he's going to have any issues in the locker room. He'd better get out to a fast start or he will be under fire quickly IMO.
edit: oops; senior moment.
Yeah, it's an insult to the Clippers to compare them to a non-contender like that.+1 for the indigestion you just gave every Lakers fan by confusing them with the Clippers
To be fair, it was probably worth that much to the Pistons to not have them continue to be coached by Monty.So the Lakers only offered Dan Hurley $60 million to be their coach, while the Pistons were willing to pay $65 million to Monty Williams to not coach them?
It's crazy that the Celtics won more games in the postseason than the Pistons won all year.That Detroit job is really rough. That has to be one if the least-talented rosters in recent memory, with very little help on the horizon given how bad the draft is. On the plus side, I guess the expectations will be low for a few years.
I'm a little surprised they didn't keep Monty for at least one more year given that they need to tank again, but I guess this will be a "culture-shift" year.
Yeah, I like each player’s new team fit better. OKC is going to be a handful. Still think they need more shooting but the defensive potential of that team will be immense.Very interesting trade. Immediate reaction is I really like it for both teams
Agree. It also makes sense for Chicago to bet on Giddey's youth and upside.Yeah, I like each player’s new team fit better. OKC is going to be a handful. Still think they need more shooting but the defensive potential of that team will be immense.
Did OKC make this trade unmolested?
I don't know, but it's not a minor transaction by any means.Did OKC make this trade unmolested?
Seems like a decent win-win trade for both sides, favoring OKC a bit more. (I don't value Giddey that high, since his defense is almost Luka level bad. But his upside is definitely there)Very interesting trade. Immediate reaction is I really like it for both teams
I'm still waiting for that shoe to drop. Seems like a bad move for the Bulls unless they got a pick or two.Can’t believe Chicago couldn’t get one of OKC’s 48 draft picks. Steal for the Thunder.
Not sure if it was a factor or not but I believe Harden didn’t exactly have good things to say about dealing with Morey.
I read that as "PG's agent told us he has zero interest"
LaVine's got 3/$134 left on his deal. I don't think it's a guarantee they can get much for him or Vucevic.CHI can get something back for ZL but can they get anything for Vucevic? I think tearing everything there down to the studs is the right thing to do, but man is it going to be ugly.
I would usually scoff at the idea that they're not writing their own tweets, but those Woj tweets are...woof.Do you think Shams and Woj write the tweets or do the teams/agents write them for them?
This isn't a rhetorical question. I'm genuinely wondering how it works.