The in-house options are Reyes, Refsnyder, and Dalbec. Two of them are locks for the 26-man right now. Considering Casas should be a 150+ game guy at this point, a dedicated back-up 1B probably doesn't need to be a priority. Upgrading the in-case-of-injury fill-in from Dalbec would certainly be welcome but I suspect being able to stash that guy in Worcester has its advantages.Any word recently on who's going to be backup 1B? (Please not Dalbec)
It’s DalbecAny word recently on who's going to be backup 1B? (Please not Dalbec)
34% K rate in AAA is why not.It’s Dalbec
why not him? He’s experienced, is just as good defensively as Casas and had 2 great at bats yesterday and a season in the minor leagues last year and also brings some speed for the position and doesn’t cost much and can also back up 3B and maybe even be an emegency COF and MIF
Better then 34% GIDP rate34% K rate in AAA is why not.
"Just as good defensively as Casas" is really funny though, well done.
I'd prefer we replaced him but I'd honestly be happy with him getting in there against LHP. He'll crush those guys, he's cheap, and he'll do just fine as a pinch hitter for our glut of lefthanders. Still possible something changes but if not, it isnt the end of the world.34% K rate in AAA is why not.
"Just as good defensively as Casas" is really funny though, well done.
You give Casas a day off against lefties (.215) against whom Dalbec rakesNeither Casas nor Devers need a platoon, so backing them up with someone who can't hit RHP just serves to reduce your flexibility on when you give them a day off.
He needs a day off against someone. He can't play every day. May as well give him a day off against lefties when they can put in a RH bat that crushes them.Casas just had a 121 WRC+ vs LHP, he doesn't need a day off against them.
If Dalbec is the answer, that’s an incredibly fucking low bar to clear. Even for “cheap”I'd prefer we replaced him but I'd honestly be happy with him getting in there against LHP. He'll crush those guys, he's cheap, and he'll do just fine as a pinch hitter for our glut of lefthanders. Still possible something changes but if not, it isnt the end of the world.
Again, I don't disagree! But the reality is that Solano et al are good enough hitters to probably find a full-time job somewhere and are trying to get that. They don't want to sit on the bench 75% of the time and spell Devers and Casas once a week or only step-in when someone is injured.Only 20% of the starters in the rest of the division are LHP. Our 1B backup is going to see RHP sometimes and I'd prefer we got someone that has demonstrated an ability to do that at some point in the last 3 years instead of getting progressively worse.
Well, that's fine, but we don't need to waste a roster spot on a guy whose only role is to fill in for those 10-20 games. Better to have someone already on the roster handle it.He needs a day off against someone. He can't play every day. May as well give him a day off against lefties when they can put in a RH bat that crushes them.
What was Dalbec’s WRC+ vs LHP?Casas just had a 121 WRC+ vs LHP, he doesn't need a day off against them.
So significantly better than Casas, huh.136 on a .778 BABIP.
Are you just ignoring the unsustainable BABIP?So significantly better than Casas, huh.
……yeah, no. Look at the BABIP bubbaSo significantly better than Casas, huh.
Hey man, if you can't project a full season WRC+ off of 22 plate appearances with a BABIP almost 3x higher than what one could normally expect, then I don't even know what we are here for.Are you just ignoring the unsustainable BABIP?
The Cubs don't have a 1B. Garrett Cooper is an at-best marginal fielding 1B, who hits poorly overall. His skill is a platoon bat v. LHP. Which isn't always consistent year to year. He's like Mini-Rob-Refsnyder-on-the-verge-of-becoming-a-DH.My favorite Bobby Dalbec stat. He struck out in 52.8% of his plate appearances last year (small sample size yada yada yada). You have to go back 140 years to find another position player who struck out as frequently (min: 50 PA).
It’s unbelievable that a team with playoff aspirations would roster Bobby Dalbec, even in a limited role. Garrett Cooper just got a NRI with the Cubs.
All that BABIP shows me is that Dalbec crushed the ball v LHP.……yeah, no. Look at the BABIP bubba
Saw that a bit earlier. I think Cora likes the idea of getting both O'Neill and Rafaela in there for a more L/R balance in the lineup.Rafaela starting at 2B today
View: https://twitter.com/IanMBrowne/status/1770851225296097364
Grissom is a RHH, Valdez is a LHH. So this is really about replacing Valdez with a RHH, and assumes (probably correctly) that Rafaela will outhit Reyes v. LHP, and the other two OF (Yoshida/Duran) will as well.Saw that a bit earlier. I think Cora likes the idea of getting both O'Neill and Rafaela in there for a more L/R balance in the lineup.
That's exciting. Anyone who doesn't think this team is fun really needs to watch C-Note play.
I'd rather wait until May 15 or so and get the extra year of control. But good for him, he's earned it. Looking forward to watching him.That's exciting. Anyone who doesn't think this team is fun really needs to watch C-Note play.
Yeah, I actually agree. Those are the rules, so they really should use them for the extra year.I'd rather wait until May 15 or so and get the extra year of control. But good for him, he's earned it. Looking forward to watching him.
in order from most to fewest, imo:Who sees the fewest PA between Rafaella/Duran/O'Neill/Yoshida/Abreu? The most?
C-Note looks like the kind of player who's going to be very good while young, but as his athleticism slips he'll decline more quickly. If he's fixed his chasing problems at the plate, then it makes sense to improve the team now as this squad will need all the help it can get. If he develops beyond what they expect they can extend him, or trade him to make room for one of the other OF prospects coming up. If he hasn't fixed his pitch recognition and his offense craters they can always send him back down and re-establish the extra year...Yeah, I actually agree. Those are the rules, so they really should use them for the extra year.
Yup, and if he’s good enough that we care about that additional year, we should be aiming for an extension.C-Note looks like the kind of player who's going to be very good while young, but as his athleticism slips he'll decline more quickly. If he's fixed his chasing problems at the plate, then it makes sense to improve the team now as this squad will need all the help it can get. If he develops beyond what they expect they can extend him, or trade him to make room for one of the other OF prospects coming up. If he hasn't fixed his pitch recognition and his offense craters they can always send him back down and re-establish the extra year...
Yeah and when he's ready we can add Grissom: 23 to the listRafaela: 23
Duran: 27
O'Neill: 28
Abreu: 24
Casas: 24
Devers: 27
Wong: 27
Bello: 24
At least I like the look of that.
Is a full year of control really nickel and diming?Yup, and if he’s good enough that we care about that additional year, we should be aiming for an extension.
I love this.
I think it’s a good vibes thing in the organization, too. Let’s set the expectations with the young core we’re hoping to promote over the next two years that the team isn’t going to nickel and dime them on service time.
Yeah I think it's more serious theft than that (except it's legal of course).Is a full year of control really nickel and diming?
Yes, IMO. Maybe that’s not the right idiom, but the message it sends to the players on the farm is awful: we are an organization that cares about excellence and integrity and competing for championships and we want to build a group of people who care about each other and those common goals — unless we get a chance to suppress your career earnings somewhat by not putting the best team we can on the field for six weeks. Then all that goes out the window.Is a full year of control really nickel and diming?
I mean, that's the Collective Bargaining Agreement and this happens all the time. I guess I'm just not one who believes that every time management acts in accordance with the Agreement and makes a smart business decision they are acting in bad faith.Yes, IMO. Maybe that’s not the right idiom, but the message it sends to the players on the farm is awful: we are an organization that cares about excellence and integrity and competing for championships and we want to build a group of people who care about each other and those common goals — unless we get a chance to suppress your career earnings somewhat by not putting the best team we can on the field for six weeks. Then all that goes out the window.