Mullen looks fine to me at this point, but it's probably too late for him. Brian at MGoBlog promised a coaching candidate post if they lost today, so yay?
Dgilpin said:
DukeSox said:Holy shit can this guy hoke get sent to jail for that?
sachmoney said:I don't like Hoke anymore either. I didn't watch the game. I heard about what happened. I'm ashamed and embarrassed. We're not even talking about the result of the game here. We're talking about the well being of a student athlete. How can you trust thing guy as a parent of a recruit?
My tank is extremely low.
riboflav said:What Hoke did should be criminal. What an embarrassment for a once-proud program. For shame, Michigan. For shame on you.
Dick Pole Upside said:RapSheet reporting this morning that his "sources" are indicating that Michigan prefers John over Jim. Sleaze vs. hyperintensity... pick your poison, Michigan.
How is John the "sleaze?" It wasn't his decision to keep Ray Rice on his team.Dick Pole Upside said:RapSheet reporting this morning that his "sources" are indicating that Michigan prefers John over Jim. Sleaze vs. hyperintensity... pick your poison, Michigan.
Dick Pole Upside said:
Do you know why Morris went back in the game?
Because Russell fucking Bellomy, the third-string QB, wasn't paying attention and coudn't find his helmut. And rather than calling a timeout, Hoke, who wasn't paying attention either, let an injured player go back in the game.
The TV cameras were paying attention enough to a) diagnose that Morris was injured, b) conclude that he shouldn't be going back in the game, c) identify that an alternative QB needed to enter because of Gardner's helmut coming off, d) locate Bellomy on the sidelines within seconds, and then e) keep the camera on Bellomy as he tried on not one, not two, but three different helmuts before finding his own... after Morris entered the game.
Russell fucking Bellomy.
Brady fucking Hoke.
Neither of whom was paying attention to the on-field play.
Unacceptable on so many levels.
RapSheet reporting this morning that his "sources" are indicating that Michigan prefers John over Jim. Sleaze vs. hyperintensity... pick your poison, Michigan.
Helmet. With an e.Dick Pole Upside said:Do you know why Morris went back in the game?
Because Russell fucking Bellomy, the third-string QB, wasn't paying attention and coudn't find his helmut. And rather than calling a timeout, Hoke, who wasn't paying attention either, let an injured player go back in the game.
The TV cameras were paying attention enough to a) diagnose that Morris was injured, b) conclude that he shouldn't be going back in the game, c) identify that an alternative QB needed to enter because of Gardner's helmut coming off, d) locate Bellomy on the sidelines within seconds, and then e) keep the camera on Bellomy as he tried on not one, not two, but three different helmuts before finding his own... after Morris entered the game.
I don't see why either Harbaugh would come to be honest. John is a well respected NFL coach, with a Super Bowl ring, and a team/fanbase that seems to like him. Jim's a lunatic, but he's made it pretty clear he likes the NFL, even if he doesn't get along with 49ers ownership. Crazy or not, he'll be offered a few jobs this offseason if he wants to leave.sachmoney said:How is John the "sleaze?" It wasn't his decision to keep Ray Rice on his team.
Michigan will have to stump up a lot of cash for the new coach, especially if it's a Harbaugh. Are you guys comfortable with that?
Hoke has sadly been exactly what he looked like to me when hired. A mediocre coach in over his head. But I'm curious why we think the next coach will have some material to work with? Doesn't it seem likely we're going to have a pretty big exodus of talent when Hoke is fired?Chemistry Schmemistry said:I liked the Hoke choice as much as I hated the RichRod choice. But it seems both choices were bad ones. At least the next coach has some material to work with, but apparently nothing at quarterback.
I don't think either is likely either.bowiac said:I don't see why either Harbaugh would come to be honest. John is a well respected NFL coach, with a Super Bowl ring, and a team/fanbase that seems to like him. Jim's a lunatic, but he's made it pretty clear he likes the NFL, even if he doesn't get along with 49ers ownership. Crazy or not, he'll be offered a few jobs this offseason if he wants to leave.
Eh, possibly, but if we do get a big name, than may be players will be excited/reinvigorated? May be? I don't know.bowiac said:Hoke has sadly been exactly what he looked like to me when hired. A mediocre coach in over his head. But I'm curious why we think the next coach will have some material to work with? Doesn't it seem likely we're going to have a pretty big exodus of talent when Hoke is fired?
bowiac said:Hoke has sadly been exactly what he looked like to me when hired. A mediocre coach in over his head. But I'm curious why we think the next coach will have some material to work with? Doesn't it seem likely we're going to have a pretty big exodus of talent when Hoke is fired?
As WayBackVasquez loves to point out, I've only been a fan for a bit (~2008), so Schembechler is mostly just an idea for me. And while I did happen to get Hoke right (#422), I'm pretty sure I'd also have loved the RichRod hire.Chemistry Schmemistry said:Well, you saw what I didn't. Perhaps I was looking too hard for someone who walked the Schembechler walk and talked the Schembechler talk. Hoke welcomed Denard Robinson and worked pretty well with him. RichRod ran Mallett off the reservation without as much as "hello". I thought there were significant differences.
I don't think Hoke will trash the team on the way out, but moreso than usual it seems, the current players are here because they and their parents liked Hoke personally. That makes me think there's going to be a lot of turnover, as the personal connection is gone, and they're not offering a good product on the field either.Chemistry Schmemistry said:A good coach can win with different players. A good Hoke replacement will talk to Jabrill Peppers, who is a huge Hoke fan, and make him a huge new coach fan. I do think Hoke is a good guy. He won't trash the team on the way out. He understands. He has seven games to magically create a team that can beat Ohio State and look convincing doing it.
Please expand on this, preferably with citation to some kind of authority. In particular, explain whether "usual" refers to all colleges of Michigan specifically. That is, did Hoke attract his recruits with his raw animal magnetism, while his predecessors mostly wooed kids with the weather and Zingerman's? Or is Hoke's singular charisma responsible for bringing recruits to godforsaken Michigan while most coaches at other schools get to rely on tradition, history, academic excellence, etc.? Thanks in advance.bowiac said:I don't think Hoke will trash the team on the way out, but moreso than usual it seems, the current players are here because they and their parents liked Hoke personally. That makes me think there's going to be a lot of turnover, as the personal connection is gone, and they're not offering a good product on the field either.
Dick Pole Upside said:Thought this was a pretty interesting article from Dan Wetzel:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/where-does-michigan-go-from-here-034153283-ncaaf.html
My disdain for John stems from the fact that I don't buy the revised story of him wanting to cut Rice. I just don't. From the exaltation of Lewis, to the cover-up on Rice, to the 5 players arrested in the office season with little to no discipline, to the whole attitude of the Ravens inner circle knowing better than the "haters", he's the Head Coach who projects a win-at-any-expense profile. I'm not in any way suggesting that a lot of coaches aren't also this way, but I question whether this would best suit Michigan at this point in time.
I got bad news for you. When I said "it seems", I meant I was relying on my sense, rather than any citable authority. It comes from following recruiting with some closeness for a few years, and speaking with other Michigan fans who have been following for longer. I don't think my sense is all that unusual, but I could be wrong. If you disagree, that's fine.WayBackVazquez said:Please expand on this, preferably with citation to some kind of authority. In particular, explain whether "usual" refers to all colleges of Michigan specifically. That is, did Hoke attract his recruits with his raw animal magnetism, while his predecessors mostly wooed kids with the weather and Zingerman's? Or is Hoke's singular charisma responsible for bringing recruits to godforsaken Michigan while most coaches at other schools get to rely on tradition, history, academic excellence, etc.? Thanks in advance.
Well, he was a consensus three star at a position where recruiting stars have the most predictive impact. That's not a great sign.twibnotes said:If Morris doesn't develop well, how likely is Speight to be the guy? Is there any word from AA on his development?
Espn liked him more, and he did miss a lot of time with an injury. Hopefully he's better than his perceived value (ie, the opposite of what Morris may be).bowiac said:Well, he was a consensus three star at a position where recruiting stars have the most predictive impact. That's not a great sign.
I'm not sure a good talent development elsewhere and good coaching couldn't "manufacture" a QB. QB is the most important position, but if the rest of the talent is there, is getting Morris up to "game manager" levels so crazy?
Best part of the press conference today was a reporter asking if Hoke would consider wearing a headset in the future, so he could be better apprised of injury situations.Old Fart Tree said:I feel bad for UM fans. It's one thing to put a crap product on the field, quite another to have your coach make indefensible decisions. It sucks when the institutions you root for let you down, basically.
You need look no further than Bill O'Brien and Matt McGloin to agree with this.twibnotes said:Espn liked him more, and he did miss a lot of time with an injury. Hopefully he's better than his perceived value (ie, the opposite of what Morris may be).
In the end, I'm a big believer that in college coaching is a massive factor in qb play. Put the kid in a position to excel with his particular skill set.
Excellent example. I also recall Bill Walsh indicating that he could win with different QBs (as read in "The Blind Side"), and the evidence there seems to indicate that he was right.SoxJox said:You need look no further than Bill O'Brien and Matt McGloin to agree with this.
This feels a bit different. McGloin is in the NFL today, getting snaps in actual games for the Raiders. It looks like less of a "put a kid in a position to succeed", and more of a "identify talent when you see it" thing with him.SoxJox said:You need look no further than Bill O'Brien and Matt McGloin to agree with this.
canderson said:If Hoke goes, it's probably Les Miles time right?
maufman said:
Why would Miles take the Michigan job? I have to imagine LSU will find a way to match the dollars.
Ah, I didn't realize Miles was an alum.WayBackVazquez said:
Because believe it or not, there are some people who would prefer to coach at Michigan than LSU. Especially when they are alumni.
It's both. I'm married to a penn stater and have seen mcgloin play a fair amount. He's not a guy with any outstanding skills, but Obrien taught him to make good decisions and enabled him to make throws he was comfortable making. Most importantly, mcgloin improved significantly. Hoke's qbs get worse.bowiac said:This feels a bit different. McGloin is in the NFL today, getting snaps in actual games for the Raiders. It looks like less of a "put a kid in a position to succeed", and more of a "identify talent when you see it" thing with him.
McGloin was a walk on with zero offers. I don't know if this helps Bowiac's argument as far BoB finding talent where no one else saw it versus his stars being predictive for success argument.twibnotes said:It's both. I'm married to a penn stater and have seen mcgloin play a fair amount. He's not a guy with any outstanding skills, but Obrien taught him to make good decisions and enabled him to make throws he was comfortable making. Most importantly, mcgloin improved significantly. Hoke's qbs get worse.
Manuel looks like Borges. Bates looks like Mike Leach. I'll take Bates.bowiac said:Well, now that "a source" says the AD hunt is on, anyone want to weigh in which AD candidate is preferable? I don't know anything about either of them, but UConn seems to have been better run than BC lately...?
Edit - or not.
Anything else would be better.Chemistry Schmemistry said:Could the topic title be changed to - "2014 Michigan Football: 109,901 angry fans in need of a quarterback and a new head coach"? Or just something that doesn't claim we've solved our offensive woes.
Hey Gene DiFlippo is available aka 'Coach Flip'bowiac said:Well, now that "a source" says the AD hunt is on, anyone want to weigh in which AD candidate is preferable? I don't know anything about either of them, but UConn seems to have been better run than BC lately...?
Edit - or not.