jon abbey said:
Does Syracuse play their starters that much all the time? They averaged almost 42 minutes apiece tonight, that is crazy.
They have an 8-man rotation, but two of them are injured (Coleman, a 6'9" center, is out for the year, and Keita, a 6'10" center, is out for a little while). They only have one real big man on the roster that can play right now in Christmas. They have always only had just one backup backcourt player (Gbinije), so they're fortunate to not have had any injuries in the backcourt.
Roberson occasionally plays, but right now they're looking at a 6-man team. And that's one of the biggest reasons why SU plays at such a slow pace. They just don't have enough people to run all game long.
The Keita loss is huge for them right now. They've struggled without him, as it's really killed their depth down low. Now anyone gets in foul trouble or anything and they just don't have enough people. It's not shocking they lost during this stretch, though I never thought it would be to Boston freaking College at home.
You know, it's interesting. SU played shorthanded in two recent games: at Pitt, a ranked team, and home vs. BC (they played a pretty decent NC State team in-between, but let's just focus on Pitt and BC). The win at Pitt was a great win. Winning there is always tough, and winning on the road vs. a ranked team is always very difficult to do. But losing at home to an utterly crap team is just awful. So how much credit does SU get for winning at Pitt and how much credit gets taken away by losing at home vs BC?
Now imagine those games were reversed. Say SU lost at Pitt and won at home vs BC. How much credit do they get for a close loss at Pitt, and how much credit do they get for a close win at home vs BC? Would it have been better for SU to win at Pitt and lose vs BC, or to lose at Pitt and win vs BC?
How do you think pollsters think about those things? How do the computers reflect those things?