Bell is amazing, every run looks like a 1 yard gain and it always ends up 4-15 yards. He's so cool.
That was the joke. Some goof on ESPN is going to say something like "Let me tell you, the Pittsburgh Steelers are a real contender" like it is a real bold statement.PIT isn't a sleeper; if anything, they're overrated.
PIT-KC should be a good game. The winner will get their puncher's chance at NE in Foxborough. The Chiefs are the tougher matchup of the two, imo.
I disagree. These guys are a serviceable QB away from being a very good team.Yep, I really enjoy the Miami thread on this forum and the good fans there, but that team got flat out lucky on it's so-called "run." As misleading an improvement under Gase as the Jets last year under Bowles.
Really?I disagree. These guys are a serviceable QB away from being a very good team.
If I'm their GM, I'm working the phones starting tomorrow. The Pats won't trade JG within the division, but McCarron is probably better than Tannehill or Moore, and is likely available.
Yeah, about that whole "serviceable" QB. There's like 13 of them in the league. Tannehill isn't the answer. Moore is worse, obviously.I disagree. These guys are a serviceable QB away from being a very good team.
If I'm their GM, I'm working the phones starting tomorrow. The Pats won't trade JG within the division, but McCarron is probably better than Tannehill or Moore, and is likely available.
Because it was cruel to toy with Miami's D like that.Why?
Tomlin wants to get Bell's carries in now, so he can sit out the second halfThat's like some Madden-level sadistic dominance there. See if you can complete a whole drive using one player.
I feel like QB is low on their list of problems.I disagree. These guys are a serviceable QB away from being a very good team.
If I'm their GM, I'm working the phones starting tomorrow. The Pats won't trade JG within the division, but McCarron is probably better than Tannehill or Moore, and is likely available.
Lost a bit of yardage on 1st down, FWIW.This is an utterly meaningless review. It's either a TD now or a TD in four seconds.
I think there's more like 20. Andy Dalton or Alex Smith would be a big upgrade for Miami.Yeah, about that whole "serviceable" QB. There's like 13 of them in the league. Tannehill isn't the answer. Moore is worse, obviously.
It's what happens when you're playing backups and guys you signed mid-season off the street.I don't get the Miami safety's approach to Bell there. He angled to keep Bell away from the middle of the field (where the bulk of the defensive help was), but Bell wasn't close enough to the sideline to be pinched along it.
I disagree. These guys are a serviceable QB away from being a very good team.
If I'm their GM, I'm working the phones starting tomorrow. The Pats won't trade JG within the division, but McCarron is probably better than Tannehill or Moore, and is likely available.
um...Really???Really?
Neither would she man. That's foreplay.In by 2.5 inches, but I wouldn't call it conclusive.
No one should ever feel comfortable in an AFCCG.Granted this is MIA looking like dogshit today, but I'm not sure why anyone would feel comfortable facing PIT.
If that's not conclusive, I'm not sure what is. It's close, and I don't blame the refs for missing it on the field, but he's clearly on his feet with at least a portion of the ball across the plane.In by 2.5 inches, but I wouldn't call it conclusive.
We have a 16 player roster and everyone plays. So, you usually have someone or at least a defense.Yeah, me too. I went all in on Pats, Sea, Pitt, and Atl, with one entry with NYG players and another with GB players. But I didn't take a Hou, Miami, Oak, Det, or KC player.
The camera is not quite right along the line, though.If that's not conclusive, I'm not sure what is. It's close, and I don't blame the refs for missing it on the field, but he's clearly on his feet with at least a portion of the ball across the plane.
Yes, but the game thread will be worseI am really bored. Will the late game be better? I hope
Lol. No. The issues isn't Tannehill, who is a middle of the pack a QB. Without pouncey the online is starting third string center. They average over 160 yards a game rushing last two years when pouncey and two tackles start and are 10-1. The rest of the O is fine. Can upgrade TE after they lost Cameron for year. He sucked anyways.I disagree. These guys are a serviceable QB away from being a very good team.
If I'm their GM, I'm working the phones starting tomorrow. The Pats won't trade JG within the division, but McCarron is probably better than Tannehill or Moore, and is likely available.