Week 8 Game Thread

Brand Name

make hers mark
Moderator
SoSH Member
Oct 6, 2010
4,423
Moving the Line
Dolphins this season will be only the third team in NFL history to have a greater than .500 record since 1920 after team's 1st 7 games, despite being shutout in the 1st half of 3+ of those 7. The others are the 1968 Broncos (5-9 finish) and the 1989 Eagles (11-5, playoffs, lost in WC, 8th in Total DVOA).
 

rymflaherty

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2010
3,420
Norfolk
I swear the Dolphins have been outscored about 150- 10 on National TV over the last few years...or at least that’s what it seems like.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Suh is the worst, surprised some team hasn’t gotten fed up and just chopped him and taken the 15 yards.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,820
There's a lot I don't know about football - like why the Ravens didn't do exactly the same thing against CHI. There must be some schematic reason that is beyond me. I don't know how people bet the NFL.

edit: MIA over their last 17 games are 13-2 against the rest of the NFL and 0-2 against BAL being outscored 76-6. What a crazy league!
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,169
Westwood MA
Another barn burner of a game, what a product the NFL displays week to week.

During this current Patriots 17 year run, Miami has been to the playoffs a whopping three times, going 0-3 and being outscored 66-24.

The only threat they pose is to themselves.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,590
Hingham, MA
The more I watch the play, the more I think that both Flacco and Alonso were at fault. That slide was late, and Alonso was already committed to stopping Flacco. But at the same time, IMO Alonso definitely could have lessened up on the hit. Contact was probably unavoidable, but it didn't have to be that forceful.

Also, the Dolphins and Matt Moore are who we thought they were.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,432
Southwestern CT
The more I watch the play, the more I think that both Flacco and Alonso were at fault. That slide was late, and Alonso was already committed to stopping Flacco. But at the same time, IMO Alonso definitely could have lessened up on the hit. Contact was probably unavoidable, but it didn't have to be that forceful.

Also, the Dolphins and Matt Moore are who we thought they were.
I get that Alonso was already committed. But we ask players not to follow through on such hits all of the time. (The NFL rule covering QBs is more than 30 years old.) By and large, NFL defenders have been trained to adjust when they see a QB starting a slide, which is the moment when the rule kicks in.

Here's a picture of the moment when Flacco began his slide.


Alonso is 4+ yards away. Importantly, Alonso is running normally with a low center of gravity, but he has not yet changed his body position for the hit.

Immediately after this picture and in response to Flacco giving himself up, Alonso made the decision to lower his shoulder and launch himself at Flacco. I get that it may have been instinct, but it's an incredibly dangerous, dirty play.

Edit: To insert image. Also, I feel dirty for defending Joe Flacco.
 
Last edited:

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Lost in this is Suh, who got two personal fouls and grabbed Mallett by the throat, well after the game was decided (as if that should matter). He is more deserving of a suspension than Alonso.

Some things don't change. Suh is one. Ravens as a bad matchup for Miami another.
 

rymflaherty

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2010
3,420
Norfolk
Using stills as proof of anything within that play is ridiculous.
A linebacker sprinting is covering 4 yards in about half a second.
I don’t even think he took more than a step in that time frame before completly selling out and launching his body to protect the first down line.

I realize that play may still constitute a penalty regardless of those circumstances and intent...but watching it, I still think it as much (if not more) representative of a Defensive player hyper-aware of down and distance, doing his job, and a QB doing the opposite of what you’d expect, than it being intentionally dirty.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
"When a guy slides, the target is very small. I just think it [Flacco's slide] was a second late, which is why I hit him, to be honest with you, "the linebacker explained, via ESPN.com's Jamison Hensley. "At first I was anticipating I thought he was going to slide. And then it got to a point where I was like, 'I got to him,' because he slid too late."

That reads to me like "I thought he was late sliding so I tried to get a good shot in" which lines up with what I see in the video, Alonso making no attempt to avoid Flacco and, if anything, trying to give him a forearm shot. Maybe it wasnt intentionally dirty in that Alonso wasnt thinking he was going to headshot Flacco, but it was pretty reckless and what player safety rules are trying to deter. Alonso should sit at least a week.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,820
"When a guy slides, the target is very small. I just think it [Flacco's slide] was a second late, which is why I hit him, to be honest with you, "the linebacker explained, via ESPN.com's Jamison Hensley. "At first I was anticipating I thought he was going to slide. And then it got to a point where I was like, 'I got to him,' because he slid too late."

That reads to me like "I thought he was late sliding so I tried to get a good shot in" which lines up with what I see in the video, Alonso making no attempt to avoid Flacco and, if anything, trying to give him a forearm shot. Maybe it wasnt intentionally dirty in that Alonso wasnt thinking he was going to headshot Flacco, but it was pretty reckless and what player safety rules are trying to deter. Alonso should sit at least a week.
It also shows a complete misunderstanding of the rules. When a QB slides, the target isn't small - it's non-existent. If he thinks the QB is going to slide, he should be pulling up, not figuring out how to hit a small target.

Also, none of this explains why Alonso lead with his shoulder and his forearm to Flacco's head.

We've all seen people jump over sliding QBs. Alonso didn't even try to hold up.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,590
Hingham, MA
"When a guy slides, the target is very small. I just think it [Flacco's slide] was a second late, which is why I hit him, to be honest with you, "the linebacker explained, via ESPN.com's Jamison Hensley. "At first I was anticipating I thought he was going to slide. And then it got to a point where I was like, 'I got to him,' because he slid too late."

That reads to me like "I thought he was late sliding so I tried to get a good shot in" which lines up with what I see in the video, Alonso making no attempt to avoid Flacco and, if anything, trying to give him a forearm shot. Maybe it wasnt intentionally dirty in that Alonso wasnt thinking he was going to headshot Flacco, but it was pretty reckless and what player safety rules are trying to deter. Alonso should sit at least a week.
Yeah I agree with this. Contrast it to the Matt Ryan scramble in the 4th quarter against the Pats. Ryan never ended up even sliding, but McCourty just tackled him as opposed to trying to hurt him.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,505
Alonso is the reason I stopped rooting for the Ducks. That said, Burfict and Suh are way worse.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,638
02130
As is often the case, if the league was serious about protecting players, they would re-write the rule so that the intent wouldn't matter. All of this discussion would then be moot.

If Alonso has put himself into a position where he can't avoid making brutal contact with Flacco's head (I disagree, but whatever), he is at fault for being reckless. If that means some running QBs can scramble better because defenses are a little more wary about tackling them, who cares?

Even if the league doesn't give a shit about player safety in general they should protect the QBs (even the non-elite ones) because there aren't that many that can play at an average level and the sport becomes borderline unwatchable with someone like Mallett or Moore playing.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Or one could argue that if the League were really serious about protecting QBs, it would mandate that they cannot run beyond the line of scrimmage. Illegal forward run.

And if that means legsy QBs are factored out of the game, who cares?
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
Halfway through the second quarter, 6-3 Cleveland over Minnesota. No posts on SoSH, but at least it's not 28 to 0, like all the other London games.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
4th and 4 on the 39 of Cleveland. Minnesota punts. Man, I hate NFL coaches, that is just so weak. They gained a total of 27 yards of field position with that move.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,900
If Jets go up 14-0 it will be 3 weeks in a row where they blow a 14 point lead.