Week 1 vs. Eagles--Pre Game Discussion and News

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,557
around the way
I tend to like the Pats defense early in the season. It's simple, and with the shortened preseason, I feel like it comes together a lot faster than an NFL offense. The Eagles are rolling back a lot of the same players, so it may not matter, but I could see the Pats holding them into the mid 20's and having a 1 possession game on our hand in the 4th quarter.
I can see the Pats holding them to mid 20s absolutely.

Problem is that with this OL, the Pats offense is good for 13 IMO. If nobody wins the turnover battle decisively, it's really a two possession game. And frankly with the Pats OL right now, we shouldn't be banking on winning the turnover game either.

I figure two TOs for each side, 26-10 bad guys.
 

Time to Mo Vaughn

RIP Dernell
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
7,275
I can see the Pats holding them to mid 20s absolutely.

Problem is that with this OL, the Pats offense is good for 13 IMO. If nobody wins the turnover battle decisively, it's really a two possession game. And frankly with the Pats OL right now, we shouldn't be banking on winning the turnover game either.

I figure two TOs for each side, 26-10 bad guys.
I think the biggest issue with Mac and the receiving corp isn't necessarily inability to pick up yards and go down the fields, but I have zero confidence in them in the red zone. Maybe Elliot will provide a huge boost there, but in a two possession game my gut would tell me the Patriots pick up two field goals.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I think the biggest issue with Mac and the receiving corp isn't necessarily inability to pick up yards and go down the fields, but I have zero confidence in them in the red zone. Maybe Elliot will provide a huge boost there, but in a two possession game my gut would tell me the Patriots pick up two field goals.
I think they have a couple things going for them in the red zone compared to last year:
  • Gesicki. On his own, a very good RZ target, but in a set with Henry at the other TE, there should be mismatches here for one or the other.
  • Parker. Another year in the system and comfort with Jones should help him use his contested catch ability well in the close quarters of the RZ.
  • Pop Douglas. His exceptional short-space quickness should be useful down there, in the same way that Edelman was a great RZ target.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,557
around the way
None of that matters if the OL is a screen door on a submarine. Long routes off the table, and Philly loads up the box to take away the runs, slants, basically everything short of like 8 yards. I'd be surprised if that Pats sustain many drives in which they methodically get 50+ yards of field position and have a hard time imagining how they complete a pass way downfield. It's going to be a jailbreak.

We will score and might put together a couple of decent enough drives.

I'd love if TtMV is correct and that we just have a finishing problem and can actually move the ball between the 20s. Red zone is something that coaching can fix somewhat. Just have zero faith in the OL right now, and going against a very good front seems hopeless.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,518
They have to establish the run and get the ball out fast. That's supposed to be Mac's strength. He's going to take some lumps though.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,379
It's the new NFL where week 1 is almost an extension of the preseason so anything can happen.

NEP special teams for the win!
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,298
from the wilds of western ma
I think the Pats will play a very competitive game Sunday. I’m more bullish on the offense than some, if only because it is now competently and professionally coached. And the tight ends will cause match up problems for a lot teams, particularly in the red zone. I also think the defense has the potential to develop into an elite unit, with a great combination of pass rush and secondary play. But, to beat a team as loaded as Philly in todays NFL, I think you have to out score them. Not sure the Pats are equipped to do that, at least this early in the season. Iggles 27. Pats 21. But a solid effort, and nothing to panic over.
 

dirtynine

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 17, 2002
8,435
Philly
There’s basically zero tape on this updated version of the Pats approach (BOB+current personnel). Maybe they can spring a few things that catch the Eagles off guard.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,163
"The halcyon days of the Sanchize."*

* Not the most common sentence in English...
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
There’s basically zero tape on this updated version of the Pats approach (BOB+current personnel). Maybe they can spring a few things that catch the Eagles off guard.
For three of the four coordinators, this is their first game in the role, I think there is going to be a multitude of weirdness.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,050
Hartford, CT
For three of the four coordinators, this is their first game in the role, I think there is going to be a multitude of weirdness.
As best anyone can tell from the outside, how do the Eagles feel about the new coordinators?

I’m not entirely sure Jonathan Gannon was a huge loss, in particular. What was he really adding aside from having the benefit of a monster DL? This may be very uncharitable on my part, I grant, and it’s not like I closely analyzed the Eagles D over the course of last season.
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I think the Pats will play a very competitive game Sunday. I’m more bullish on the offense than some, if only because it is now competently and professionally coached. And the tight ends will cause match up problems for a lot teams, particularly in the red zone. I also think the defense has the potential to develop into an elite unit, with a great combination of pass rush and secondary play. But, to beat a team as loaded as Philly in todays NFL, I think you have to out score them. Not sure the Pats are equipped to do that, at least this early in the season. Iggles 27. Pats 21. But a solid effort, and nothing to panic over.
Advantages for the Patriots Offense:
- Many rookies or year 2 guys who didn't play much starting for the Eagles on Defense.
- First time coordinator playing his first game on the road for the Eagles D
- Most of the main guys have played together for 2-3 seasons
- Playing at home in week 1 with Tom Brady in the house.

Disadvantages for the Patriots Offense:
- The Eagles have 4 key players who are long in the tooth on D (Cox, Graham, Slay, Bradberry). You would rather play those guys in week 8 than in week 1.
- The OL is poop.
- The WR corps is uneven, possibly poop.
- The QB is uneven, probably poop.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,509
deep inside Guido territory
When healthy, I honestly don’t think the Pats O line is beyond terrible. With Strange and Onwenu back, I think they’re average to above average at 4 of the 5 spots from L to R. Now, it may not look like it Week 1 given the injury circumstances of training camp and the opponent but I believe that the line will be serviceable enough to get the job done.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,589
Hingham, MA

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
As best anyone can tell from the outside, how do the Eagles feel about the new coordinators?

I’m not entirely sure Jonathan Gannon was a huge loss, in particular. What was he really adding aside from having the benefit of a monster DL? This may be very uncharitable on my part, I grant, and it’s not like I closely analyzed the Eagles D over the course of last season.
So I would say that - much like seating at a SoSH bash - it is a pretty fluid situation.

People love Brian Johnson. He has been a guy that folks have been rumbling about for a while. Now, if I am Deuce Staley I am incensed, but it is what it is. He has so much talent and experience underneath him that it is going to be hard for him to fail, but O-coordinator is a tough job. We will see.

Sean Desai is a total unknown, and people want him to succeed because they hate Jonathan Gannon so much. Imagine Parcells playing his little SB game with the Jets, but as a coordinator, and then multiply the loathing by 1,000 as the Eagles lost the SB, and then lost the ability to hire Vic Fangio (who EVERYONE wanted) because of Gannon. But people also view this defense - which has some holes - as being an absolute battleship and any time they get 25+ points scored against the D people are going to bitch. He is moving into a tough spot.

Personally, Gannon can be summarized very simply: Excellent coordinator against mediocre QBs, horrible coordinator against top tier QBs. Last season the guys who tore up the Eagles were Goff (week 1), Rodgers, Prescott, Heinicke (abberation) and Mahomes. You get the big bucks for game plans that beat those guys, IMO.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,509
deep inside Guido territory
Not healthy.

Also, I'd love to know who is above average even if they were healthy. I mean, above the middle of the bell curve. I'd be pretty fucking stoked if this line is average by week 5. It sure as shit isn't close to that for week 1.
Above average when healthy? Trent Brown and Mike Onwenu. Andrews is an average center at this point. Cole Strange is a 1st round pick who got better as the year went on last year so you should have a basic expectation that he'll improve on last year.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Talent obviously helps on the oline but five guys playing together really well can be a great offensive line even if you don’t have many super talented individuals.

Big if with a new OL coach, injuries,some scheme changes over the past few years etc
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,596
Talent obviously helps on the oline but five guys playing together really well can be a great offensive line even if you don’t have many super talented individuals.

Big if with a new OL coach, injuries,some scheme changes over the past few years etc
Is Scar gonna write a book? Like, does even he know why he was so good at making O-lines be good? Or is it just Dark Magic?
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Is Scar gonna write a book? Like, does even he know why he was so good at making O-lines be good? Or is it just Dark Magic?
You know a lot of the “best” offensive line coaches -Sandusky for the dolphins for years, Miss, Scar-all had great QBs. I think having the great QB who gets rid of the ball fast makes the offensive line look good but also let’s the OL coach have more time to develop the OL because you’re not constantly ditching pieces.

Its probably obsolete but I’m still a subscriber to the Bill Walsh concept that you need continuity on offense and physical talent in defense. Having a Brady around let’s you build that conduits moreeasily
 

Oil Can Dan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2003
8,052
0-3 to 4-3
So I would say that - much like seating at a SoSH bash - it is a pretty fluid situation.

People love Brian Johnson. He has been a guy that folks have been rumbling about for a while. Now, if I am Deuce Staley I am incensed, but it is what it is. He has so much talent and experience underneath him that it is going to be hard for him to fail, but O-coordinator is a tough job. We will see.

Sean Desai is a total unknown, and people want him to succeed because they hate Jonathan Gannon so much. Imagine Parcells playing his little SB game with the Jets, but as a coordinator, and then multiply the loathing by 1,000 as the Eagles lost the SB, and then lost the ability to hire Vic Fangio (who EVERYONE wanted) because of Gannon. But people also view this defense - which has some holes - as being an absolute battleship and any time they get 25+ points scored against the D people are going to bitch. He is moving into a tough spot.

Personally, Gannon can be summarized very simply: Excellent coordinator against mediocre QBs, horrible coordinator against top tier QBs. Last season the guys who tore up the Eagles were Goff (week 1), Rodgers, Prescott, Heinicke (abberation) and Mahomes. You get the big bucks for game plans that beat those guys, IMO.
As you say, this guy gets it. Except you gotta spell Duce Staley correctly or else turn in your card.

One other note on OC Brian Johnson - he was coached by Jalen Hurt's father in high school and has been tight with Jalen for like 20 years.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
Usual caveat that "limited" can mean almost anything. The player may have been limited to the stretching drills during the portion of the practice open to the media. Or the player participated in all but the last 15 minutes of practice. Or anything in between. Both Onwenu and Strange were present at practice all last week, and today was the first practice in which the team had to file a report.

Obviously, Brown's addition due to illness is new. We'll learn "more" when the injury report comes out on Friday.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,459
Overland Park, KS
In the two Mac Jones seasons, the Pats have started 1-3 in their first 4 games. Interestingly, they have been 1-3 in their last 4 games in each season. If Mac could play only between Oct and Nov he might be something.

We keep hearing about play-action and RPOs in the BOB offense. Hopefully, the Pats can jump on this Philly back seven.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,589
Hingham, MA
You know a lot of the “best” offensive line coaches -Sandusky for the dolphins for years, Miss, Scar-all had great QBs. I think having the great QB who gets rid of the ball fast makes the offensive line look good but also let’s the OL coach have more time to develop the OL because you’re not constantly ditching pieces.

Its probably obsolete but I’m still a subscriber to the Bill Walsh concept that you need continuity on offense and physical talent in defense. Having a Brady around let’s you build that conduits moreeasily
2014-2015 under Gug kind of disproved this for me.

Edit: of course, on the flip side, Scar's lines couldn't block the Giants in either 2007 or 2011. So.
Usual caveat that "limited" can mean almost anything. The player may have been limited to the stretching drills during the portion of the practice open to the media. Or the player participated in all but the last 15 minutes of practice. Or anything in between. Both Onwenu and Strange were present at practice all last week, and today was the first practice in which the team had to file a report.

Obviously, Brown's addition due to illness is new. We'll learn "more" when the injury report comes out on Friday.
Sounds like it may have been heat related

View: https://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/1699540855340634611
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,817
Melrose, MA
I think the biggest issue with Mac and the receiving corp isn't necessarily inability to pick up yards and go down the fields, but I have zero confidence in them in the red zone. Maybe Elliot will provide a huge boost there, but in a two possession game my gut would tell me the Patriots pick up two field goals.
I actually think there is reasonable grounds for optimism on the red zone front.

They weren't a bad red zone team in 2021. Some of that was probably Damien Harris, who I thought was a better goal line runner than Stevenson when healthy. But they also had Henry and some semblance of a goal line offense.

Last year they were terrible but I can see the coaching mess as being partly to blame. Mac this year will have better tools and better coaching.

If there is one thing that worries me about Mac it is the lack of late game heroics. According to pro-football reference, Jones has one game winning drive in 31 starts. It's not a fair standard, but Brady had 6 in his first 30 starts. Matt Cassel had 2 in his 15 starts as a Pat. Cam Newton had 3 in 15 starts and he was washed up. In his 2 starts as a Patriot, Jimmy Garoppolo had one.
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
If there is one thing that worries me about Mac it is the lack of late game heroics. According to pro-football reference, Jones has one game winning drive in 31 starts. It's not a fair standard, but Brady had 6 in his first 30 starts. Matt Cassel had 2 in his 15 starts as a Pat. Cam Newton had 3 in 15 starts and he was washed up. In his 2 starts as a Patriot, Jimmy Garoppolo had one.
I don't think that Mac Jones is a good QB, but this is not fair to Mac. Tom Brady and Matt Cassel were playing in an AFC East that had 3 other tomato cans, so they had a ton of close games to take the lead in the 3rd and 4th quarter. Right now the Patriots have to play an elite Bills team, a very good Miami team, and the Jets (who should be good this season, but you get my drift). The poor guy played in a playoff game where the other team literally didn't punt. I mean.......there's a little bit of blaming the starting pitcher because he didn't get the win when his team only scored two runs going on here.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I actually think there is reasonable grounds for optimism on the red zone front.

They weren't a bad red zone team in 2021. Some of that was probably Damien Harris, who I thought was a better goal line runner than Stevenson when healthy. But they also had Henry and some semblance of a goal line offense.

Last year they were terrible but I can see the coaching mess as being partly to blame. Mac this year will have better tools and better coaching.

If there is one thing that worries me about Mac it is the lack of late game heroics. According to pro-football reference, Jones has one game winning drive in 31 starts. It's not a fair standard, but Brady had 6 in his first 30 starts. Matt Cassel had 2 in his 15 starts as a Pat. Cam Newton had 3 in 15 starts and he was washed up. In his 2 starts as a Patriot, Jimmy Garoppolo had one.
I feel like practically every game last year there was one trip inside the 5-yard line that would get pushed back due to a DOG or false start penalty. I don't know where to find the numbers, but I bet the probablblity of turning a RZ trip into a TD is MUCH higher on 1st and goal from inside the 5, than from the 5-10.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,817
Melrose, MA
I don't think that Mac Jones is a good QB, but this is not fair to Mac. Tom Brady and Matt Cassel were playing in an AFC East that had 3 other tomato cans, so they had a ton of close games to take the lead in the 3rd and 4th quarter. Right now the Patriots have to play an elite Bills team, a very good Miami team, and the Jets (who should be good this season, but you get my drift). The poor guy played in a playoff game where the other team literally didn't punt. I mean.......there's a little bit of blaming the starting pitcher because he didn't get the win when his team only scored two runs going on here.
That's true, to a point. But...

Last year 39 NFL QBs managed at least one game winning drive. Mac had zero. In the previous season, 33 QBs had at least one GWD, but Mac was one of 14 QBs who had only one. Mac was 16-15 in his 31 starts in that span, the Pats as a team were 18-16. It probably is true that the Pats these past 2 years did not have a lot of opportunities, but they had more than one opportunity.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,589
Hingham, MA
That's true, to a point. But...

Last year 39 NFL QBs managed at least one game winning drive. Mac had zero. In the previous season, 33 QBs had at least one GWD, but Mac was one of 14 QBs who had only one. Mac was 16-15 in his 31 starts in that span, the Pats as a team were 18-16. It probably is true that the Pats these past 2 years did not have a lot of opportunities, but they had more than one opportunity.
He’s also been unlucky, e.g., the fumble in the opener against Miami in 2021.
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
And beat the shit out of the NFC Champs, who came thisclose to winning it all.

Edit: it was 38-0 19 seconds into the 2nd half!!
That Cardinals team had no business making the Super Bowl when you look at the regular season. I think the Eagles beat them by 20+, the Patriots by 30+, and I think they had two other losses by the same amount. Their playoff run was banana pants.
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
That's true, to a point. But...

Last year 39 NFL QBs managed at least one game winning drive. Mac had zero. In the previous season, 33 QBs had at least one GWD, but Mac was one of 14 QBs who had only one. Mac was 16-15 in his 31 starts in that span, the Pats as a team were 18-16. It probably is true that the Pats these past 2 years did not have a lot of opportunities, but they had more than one opportunity.
I think his ceiling is no higher than the low end of the second quartile/high end of the 3rd quartile. But Mac Jones was not a gaping wound on an otherwise virile Patriots team in either season, IMO. There were a lot of guys who were paid to play shitty football by sadly-sober-Bob-Kraft.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,589
Hingham, MA
That Cardinals team had no business making the Super Bowl when you look at the regular season. I think the Eagles beat them by 20+, the Patriots by 30+, and I think they had two other losses by the same amount. Their playoff run was banana pants.
This is true.

And then they really should have won the Super Bowl. If it wasn’t for the James Harrison play, who knows.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,817
Melrose, MA
I think his ceiling is no higher than the low end of the second quartile/high end of the 3rd quartile. But Mac Jones was not a gaping wound on an otherwise virile Patriots team in either season, IMO. There were a lot of guys who were paid to play shitty football by sadly-sober-Bob-Kraft.
I can't argue with that. I hold out hope that Mac will develop and be better than that, but I think the odds are very much against it. He's OK but that may be it.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,124
That's true, to a point. But...

Last year 39 NFL QBs managed at least one game winning drive. Mac had zero. In the previous season, 33 QBs had at least one GWD, but Mac was one of 14 QBs who had only one. Mac was 16-15 in his 31 starts in that span, the Pats as a team were 18-16. It probably is true that the Pats these past 2 years did not have a lot of opportunities, but they had more than one opportunity.
He might have had one vs. LAS or CIN but Rham gave those both away with a significant assist to Jakobi vs. LAS. What might be more telling is that on both of those drives the majority of the production came via Rham runs, then again given who was calling plays at the time it might mean nothing at all.
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,512
Worcester
One thing that we have seen from Mac in preseason that we hadn’t seen before is him throwing the ball before the receiver comes out of his break. Someone (I think Howe) brought this up a.few weeks ago during the GB joint practices. Bourne was throwing a head fake right and Jones already has released the ball to the left, hitting 84 right in the numbers as he turned. Last year there were cases of Mac waiting until the receiver made his break before throwing, leading to smaller windows.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,254
306, row 14
That's true, to a point. But...

Last year 39 NFL QBs managed at least one game winning drive. Mac had zero. In the previous season, 33 QBs had at least one GWD, but Mac was one of 14 QBs who had only one. Mac was 16-15 in his 31 starts in that span, the Pats as a team were 18-16. It probably is true that the Pats these past 2 years did not have a lot of opportunities, but they had more than one opportunity.
Depends on how you want to define game winning drives. They had opportunites and they typically go belly up.

2021 Week 1 vs. Miami: Down 17-16, the Pats take over at midfield after a Tua INT with 8:07 left and drive to the Miami 9 when Harris fumbles.
2021 Week 4 vs Tampa Bay: Down 19-17, Pats get the ball at their own 25 with 1:52 left. Drive to the Tampa 37, Folk misses a 54-yarder in the rain. Big play on the drive was a DPI on Tampa for 20 yards.
2021 Week 5 vs. Houston: Tied 22-22, Pats get the ball with 7:17 left at their own 13. They drive to the Houston 3 and kick the game winning field goal with 11 seconds left. Big plays were a 24 yard completion to Meyers, a Bolden 25 yard run and an RTP penalty on a 3rd and 18. Once they got into field goal range they ran to kill the clock.
2021 Week 6 vs Dallas: Down 26-21 with 2:20 left, one big play to Bourne for the TD. Also converts the 2 pointer.
2021 Week 6 vs Dallas: Tied 29-29 in OT, Pats get the ball first and drive 21 yards before punting on 4th and 3 from their own 46.

2022 Week 3 vs. Baltimore: Down 31-26, Pats take over with 12:00 left after a Ravens fumble, Mac throws pick in the end zone. Gets a 2nd chance with 6:30 left and hit a big play to Agholor who fumbles.
2022 Week 12 vs NY Jets: Tied 3-3, Pats took over with 3:00 left and punted after 1 first down.
2022 Week 13 vs Minnesota: Not a game winning situation but were down 33-26 with 4:12 left. Moved it from the NE 13 to MN 30 before a sack put them in a 4th and 16 and turnover on downs.
2022 Week 14 vs. Las Vegas: Down 17-16 with 5:10 left they score in 3 plays (short run, 39 yard pass to Meyers, 34 yard TD run by Stevenson). Convert the 2 pointer.
2022 Week 15 vs. Cincy: Down 22-18 take over on the Cincy 43 following a fumble and go 7 plays (5 runs) down to the 8, Stevenson fumble.

Main takeaway from looking at it is that they have a hard time sustaining drives and have had 3 of them end on fumbles in situations where they may have won otherwise. It's also been pretty boom or bust, they either hit a big play or fizzle out. In some of these situations it's hard to tell if they don't trust Mac or if they're too hell bent on burning as much clock as possible. The Miami one in his debut is understandable. The Cincy one last year they were just keeping the ball on the ground.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,557
around the way
One thing that we have seen from Mac in preseason that we hadn’t seen before is him throwing the ball before the receiver comes out of his break. Someone (I think Howe) brought this up a.few weeks ago during the GB joint practices. Bourne was throwing a head fake right and Jones already has released the ball to the left, hitting 84 right in the numbers as he turned. Last year there were cases of Mac waiting until the receiver made his break before throwing, leading to smaller windows.
Mac did that in plenty of the college game film that I saw pre-draft. Honestly it was the only encouraging thing on the film. The lack of mobility and high-end arm talent was obvious, but it seemed that he had touch and anticipation. We haven't seen a ton of that to date in the NFL, but it's possible that he still has that. And if he has it, hopefully he can do it in about 2.2 seconds.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,589
Hingham, MA
Depends on how you want to define game winning drives. They had opportunites and they typically go belly up.

2021 Week 1 vs. Miami: Down 17-16, the Pats take over at midfield after a Tua INT with 8:07 left and drive to the Miami 9 when Harris fumbles.
2021 Week 4 vs Tampa Bay: Down 19-17, Pats get the ball at their own 25 with 1:52 left. Drive to the Tampa 37, Folk misses a 54-yarder in the rain. Big play on the drive was a DPI on Tampa for 20 yards.
2021 Week 5 vs. Houston: Tied 22-22, Pats get the ball with 7:17 left at their own 13. They drive to the Houston 3 and kick the game winning field goal with 11 seconds left. Big plays were a 24 yard completion to Meyers, a Bolden 25 yard run and an RTP penalty on a 3rd and 18. Once they got into field goal range they ran to kill the clock.
2021 Week 6 vs Dallas: Down 26-21 with 2:20 left, one big play to Bourne for the TD. Also converts the 2 pointer.
2021 Week 6 vs Dallas: Tied 29-29 in OT, Pats get the ball first and drive 21 yards before punting on 4th and 3 from their own 46.

2022 Week 3 vs. Baltimore: Down 31-26, Pats take over with 12:00 left after a Ravens fumble, Mac throws pick in the end zone. Gets a 2nd chance with 6:30 left and hit a big play to Agholor who fumbles.
2022 Week 12 vs NY Jets: Tied 3-3, Pats took over with 3:00 left and punted after 1 first down.
2022 Week 13 vs Minnesota: Not a game winning situation but were down 33-26 with 4:12 left. Moved it from the NE 13 to MN 30 before a sack put them in a 4th and 16 and turnover on downs.
2022 Week 14 vs. Las Vegas: Down 17-16 with 5:10 left they score in 3 plays (short run, 39 yard pass to Meyers, 34 yard TD run by Stevenson). Convert the 2 pointer.
2022 Week 15 vs. Cincy: Down 22-18 take over on the Cincy 43 following a fumble and go 7 plays (5 runs) down to the 8, Stevenson fumble.

Main takeaway from looking at it is that they have a hard time sustaining drives and have had 3 of them end on fumbles in situations where they may have won otherwise. It's also been pretty boom or bust, they either hit a big play or fizzle out. In some of these situations it's hard to tell if they don't trust Mac or if they're too hell bent on burning as much clock as possible. The Miami one in his debut is understandable. The Cincy one last year they were just keeping the ball on the ground.
Thank you for putting this together, great research. Overall the team has just had a lot of problems with little mistakes over the last couple years. Very un-BB-like, historically. They need to clean it up this year or they're looking at another mediocre season, complete with several excruciating losses that prevent them from making the playoffs.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,272
Thank you for putting this together, great research. Overall the team has just had a lot of problems with little mistakes over the last couple years. Very un-BB-like, historically. They need to clean it up this year or they're looking at another mediocre season, complete with several excruciating losses that prevent them from making the playoffs.
And it wasn't just Mac. Remember the 2020 season when Cam got to the 1 yard line against Seattle but got stuffed? Against Denver a few weeks later, they had the ball at our 28 with 3 mins to go and stalled right outside the Broncos red zone. Then, you had the infamous Cam fumble in the Bills' red zone a few weeks after that. And after THAT, they had the ball down 7 against Houston and stalled outside of the red zone.

For whatever reason, this team has sucked pretty hard in "close and late" situations since TB12 left. I know we were spoiled but I generally have zero confidence in this team when the game is close and late. Thankfully, Marcus Jones helped us last year against the Jets with the PR TD.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,589
Hingham, MA
And it wasn't just Mac. Remember the 2020 season when Cam got to the 1 yard line against Seattle but got stuffed? Against Denver a few weeks later, they had the ball at our 28 with 3 mins to go and stalled right outside the Broncos red zone. Then, you had the infamous Cam fumble in the Bills' red zone a few weeks after that. And after THAT, they had the ball down 7 against Houston and stalled outside of the red zone.

For whatever reason, this team has sucked pretty hard in "close and late" situations since TB12 left. I know we were spoiled but I generally have zero confidence in this team when the game is close and late. Thankfully, Marcus Jones helped us last year against the Jets with the PR TD.
Yes yes and more yes.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,326
2018: 12th
2019: 26th
2020: 24th
2021: 7th
2022: 32nd

RZ Scoring Attempts by Game

2018: 6th
2019: 4th
2020: 25th
2021: 10th
2022: 28th

So, a big drop in RZ scoring attempts from post Brady. Much worse in converting in the final Brady year, post Gronk. Pretty solid in 2021 on both; awful last year at getting in the RZ and even worse at converting.

Definitely better at both stats in 2021 than I would have guessed, which is comforting. Granted, they really seemed to beat up on some terrible teams that year (which isn’t a bad thing).
 
Last edited: