The sixers and building a winner

Status
Not open for further replies.

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
So they just go best player available and worry later.
Given Noel's defensive ability he and oak could be a nice combo let embiid heal and if all three are healthy and balling you have some serious trade chip?

Kind of hard to criticize the pick with Russell gone. I am really surprised the Lakers took a guard over a center.

In an Era of ever smaller ball the Sixers keep getting bigger .
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
I'd also say that Noel if not hurt was probably the number 1 pick, Embiid pre the foot was consensus number 1 and just look at the thread title for who people were thinking was the consensus stud earlier this season. And he won the title while playing great and dropped to three.
 
For a team to keep missing the top lottery picks despite being awful and keep getting really good players doesn't seem a disaster. Sure it's unlikely if all three pan out you can play them all, but that's a good problem you'd think.
 
Yes the league is going more to outside shooting and small ball, but Hinkie has been part of that revolution anyway, the sixers have been clearly moving towards at the basket and 3 point scoring and not the jumper or long 2. You still need rim protection, and a post threat isn't useless. Noel and Oak seem like a potentially interesting front court while Embiid recovers (and if he doesn't it's now slightly less disastrous than before).
 
I liked Russell a lot, but he will likely need some time to adjust, and there is a seeming surplus of point guards right now. Would I rather have a surplus of big men with huge talent or point guards? Big men. Still. The area where there seems to be a shortage of players and a rising need to really good wings, which makes Justice slipping to the Heat all the more annoying.
 
Bottom line next year the Sixers have their own (likely high ish lottery) Lakers (lottery for me still most likely) Heat and OKC picks (not likely to be great) plus lots of second round picks plus Saric and Embiid potentially coming. 
I don't know how this all plays out, and if Saric can't play the 3 in a big lineup that isn't ideal as well.but there is a lot of talent and trading chips.
 
Would i rather Embiid hadn't had some potentially bad injury news and Russell had been there at 3? Yeah sure. But given the injury concern and the fact Russell wasn't there. Hard to argue.
 

Apisith

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2007
3,218
Bangkok
LondonSox said:
So they just go best player available and worry later.
Given Noel's defensive ability he and oak could be a nice combo let embiid heal and if all three are healthy and balling you have some serious trade chip?

Kind of hard to criticize the pick with Russell gone. I am really surprised the Lakers took a guard over a center.

In an Era of ever smaller ball the Sixers keep getting bigger .
96 minutes at the 4 and 5 combined surely is enough for those 3, if they're all healthy. There's really no need to trade them, and I don't see why they can't live like this in the long run. Players don't really play 40 minutes anymore. Even guys like LeBron play barely more than 35 minutes a game.
 

Apisith

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2007
3,218
Bangkok
I'm not surprised the Lakers took a guard over a center. Funnily enough Scott Sumner at moneyillusion had a small post on this. In a world where teams are getting smaller than ever, the Lakers did the right thing.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
Apisith said:
96 minutes at the 4 and 5 combined surely is enough for those 3, if they're all healthy. There's really no need to trade them, and I don't see why they can't live like this in the long run. Players don't really play 40 minutes anymore. Even guys like LeBron play barely more than 35 minutes a game.
Short term of course, but you would struggle to justify paying all three the max and having a balanced team.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,397
Apisith said:
96 minutes at the 4 and 5 combined surely is enough for those 3, if they're all healthy. There's really no need to trade them, and I don't see why they can't live like this in the long run. Players don't really play 40 minutes anymore. Even guys like LeBron play barely more than 35 minutes a game.
The only one of the three who can remotely defend the perimeter is Noel and that is usually on switches. You're going to have 48 minutes of a mismatch asking two of these guys to defend the 4 and the three-point line. It's not even remotely feasible. This is simply asset accumulation until future moves are made.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,229
Yeah, the experts on NBA-TV last night all didn't think that even two of those three could be on the floor together for very long. 

Also, do they have any shooting to take pressure off Okafor? As it is, I'd think he just gets swarmed every time he touches the ball near the hoop. 
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
jon abbey said:
Yeah, the experts on NBA-TV last night all didn't think that even two of those three could be on the floor together for very long. 

Also, do they have any shooting to take pressure off Okafor? As it is, I'd think he just gets swarmed every time he touches the ball near the hoop. 
 
Well I'd disagree with that. The Sixers have a clear plan to be able to play Embiid and Noel together (which was one reason they moved him to the 4 off the 5 later in the year. I think Noel is althetic enough to play a four, and be able to defend the smaller fours and the bigger. I think he can be great defensively there, and Embiid has a pretty broad game he's not a pure low post guy.
Noel I think with Oak can work too, he can help cover some defensive failing and be the help. Clearly Oak is going to be on the post which means Noel needs to do something else offensively. He was improving but did his best work on pick and roll offence after MCW was traded. 
 
In short I think Noel can play the 4 next to the other two. I don't know how Embiid and Oak can play together. Maybe Embiid can play away from the basket more, but I have no idea.
 
As for shooters, well the sixers have been rotating in potential shooting fits, and a couple have stuck. Covington was something of a revelation, and Gratn was a major surprise with his vastly improved shooting. It's far far far from a finished article, but then they have a LOT of cap space and a LOT of picks to find a couple of shooters in the coming years. The plan is clearly that. Constant pressure inside and if teams overcommit kick and shoot the three.
 
The sixers are going to be a team shooting a vast percentage of their shots right at the basket or from three. They have the talent for the inside, health and development depending of course, they don't have the wings or guards yet. Which is why half of Philly is in mourning about missing Russell, and any of the other top guards. 
 
They must like him though, because you have to think orlando or the knicks would have liked to move up if they could have. 
 
I really don't know if they were caught out though, I doubt it. But I really thought the Lakers couldn't pass a franchise center to take a guard who needs the ball when they have kobe. But I don't believe Hinkie is a guy who isn't prepared for the likely possibilities.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
The Sixers weren't going to be any better if they had gotten Russell than they will be with Okafor next year.  I can't in any way process this other than as a coup for the Sixers.   
 
It would have been great if they could have gotten a guard somewhere in the draft, but it’s crazy that they got the guy who was the consensus best player in this draft for the past year AND WHO ACTUALLY LED HIS TEAM TO A TITLE and people are complaining about them not getting a kid that came up out of nowhere the past year and was nowhere to be found in the tournament.  NOWHERE. Arizona threw athletes at Russell and he crumbled.  What is he going to find waiting for him in the NBA? 
 
The Sixers have cap space, and now at least they have one player who should develop into the type of star that could make it possible for them to attract some others to come play with him.  They're still a couple of years away from contending for a playoff spot, but at least they have some idea who'll be leading them there when that day comes.  
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
https://twitter.com/DerekBodnerNBA/status/614473924764676096
 
those seconds in 2020 and 2021 GOLDMINE!
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Honestly, I would have rather they had taken a chance on one of the guards that went in the run in the second round like Thornton or Connaugton, than draft a guy just to swap him for two second round picks next decade, but TRUST THE PROCESS.  
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
Yeah that's weird. I mean sure those picks will probably be good because  the knicks, but eh kinda lame.
 
Remagellan said:
 
The Sixers weren't going to be any better if they had gotten Russell than they will be with Okafor next year.  I can't in any way process this other than as a coup for the Sixers.   
 
It would have been great if they could have gotten a guard somewhere in the draft, but it’s crazy that they got the guy who was the consensus best player in this draft for the past year AND WHO ACTUALLY LED HIS TEAM TO A TITLE and people are complaining about them not getting a kid that came up out of nowhere the past year and was nowhere to be found in the tournament.  NOWHERE. Arizona threw athletes at Russell and he crumbled.  What is he going to find waiting for him in the NBA? 
 
The Sixers have cap space, and now at least they have one player who should develop into the type of star that could make it possible for them to attract some others to come play with him.  They're still a couple of years away from contending for a playoff spot, but at least they have some idea who'll be leading them there when that day comes.  
 
 
This yeah. ESP as Embiid is still a question mark. 
I like Russell a lot, but I think assuming anything about him is wish casting. The big concerns about him were his play when the competition went up, and his lack of athleticism and defence. 
I have no idea in the long run but I bet next season there are plenty of regrets about that pick, as they watch Okafor be a weapon on the low post. ESP as Russell wants the ball and the limelight and KOBE
 

wutang112878

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2007
6,066
I wonder what it might take to get Embiid from them.  Granted he is a huge injury risk but thats why I think they might be willing to part with him.  And if he can stay healthy I still think he could be a real impact player.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
If healthy he's a potential top 10 player.
What does hinkie value him at? I think any deal he'd take smart fans of the other side would feel sick about and then you'd wonder if he knows something you don't and feel worse.

Hinkie wants a stud to build around. That's it. Now if okafor is a stud and embiid is a question mark then a trade is possible but until he has his star he's not given away a potential one for anything less than a better odds
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,229
"The 76ers are close to making a decision that will dictate center Joel Embiid's immediate and long-term future, general manager Sam Hinkie said in a news conference Friday.
 
Hinkie said that another surgery has not been ruled out, and that he can't see Embiid playing for either of the Sixers' two summer league teams.
 
Hinkie said that he had a meeting about Embiid on Friday and that the next step is to consult surgeon Robert Anderson in Charlotte, N.C. Hinkie said a decision on Embiid's treatment will include input from Embiid's representatives, the team's performance staff, and medical experts."
 
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/sixers/20150627_Embiid_s_last_CT_scan_raised_red_flag__Hinkie_says.html
 

ElcaballitoMVP

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 19, 2008
3,955
If Hinkie calls about Embiid, I hope Danny hangs up. That guy is shady as hell, like when he traded Jrue Holliday to the Pelicans without fully disclosing his injury history. The 76ers didn't lose any draft picks and only had to pay NO $3M for a deal that eventually landed them, amongst other assets, Nerlens Noel, Dario Saric and a likely '17 1st. No thanks, Philly. You can keep your broken players. 
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
If you read the story, the curious thing is that Embiid is experiencing no pain, no symptoms, no indication at all that his foot is not healing properly.  I'm sure his agent is going to ask for the opinions of at least a couple more doctors before they would agree to have him undergo another surgery, if that really is what the Sixers deem is necessary.
 
Maybe I'm just hoping it's so, but I suspect this is Hinkie continuing the smokescreen he whipped up before the draft to explain them drafting Okafor.   
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
The stories about the foot go back to the regular season when there was no guarantee that they would have any shot at drafting either Towns or Okafor. The reality may be that Embiid's foot might be in the same shape as Oden's knee.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,229
Devizier said:
 
The unforseen consequence of relentless tanking.
 
I'd say it's more the current personnel, if Noel and Embiid and Saric were all healthy perimeter players actually on the roster, I'm pretty sure Okafor would be a lot happier to be part of the team. 
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
jon abbey said:
I'd say it's more the current personnel, if Noel and Embiid and Saric were all healthy perimeter players actually on the roster, I'm pretty sure Okafor would be a lot happier to be part of the team. 
These are kind one and the same. Taking a series of high upside players who won't play for your is part of tanking
 

moly99

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2007
939
Seattle
Remagellan said:
If you read the story, the curious thing is that Embiid is experiencing no pain, no symptoms, no indication at all that his foot is not healing properly.  I'm sure his agent is going to ask for the opinions of at least a couple more doctors before they would agree to have him undergo another surgery, if that really is what the Sixers deem is necessary.
 
Maybe I'm just hoping it's so, but I suspect this is Hinkie continuing the smokescreen he whipped up before the draft to explain them drafting Okafor.   
 
This makes no sense. Why would any GM intentionally tank the value of one of his prime assets? If Embiid is really healthy then Philly has no reason to invent an injury.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
moly99 said:
 
This makes no sense. Why would any GM intentionally tank the value of one of his prime assets? If Embiid is really healthy then Philly has no reason to invent an injury.
 
 
Unless you had no intention of trading Embiid and wanted to convince people who were stating that the Sixers would never take Okafor because the three of them can't play together that you will certainly take Okafor if he falls to you.   The hope is that would have prompted the Knicks to give the Sixers something to move from 3 to 4, and then the Sixers would have taken either Porzingas or more likely, Mudiay.  
 
The story about Embiid's setback broke on June 14*.  That is not back in the regular season.  Back then the reports were that everything was progressing normally.  But it is around the time that people started flipping Okafor and Russell in their mock drafts. 
 
Whatever, I guess time will tell.  
 
*From today's Philly.com:
 
It was the second shot to the face this offseason. The first one came a couple of weeks ago when one of the periodic machinery evaluations of Joel Embiid's right foot showed something was not healing quite right. Now, according to Hinkie, the 76ers are spanning the globe searching for medical opinions and solutions to a foot problem that isn't causing Embiid any pain, but is inflicting an inordinate amount of heartache on a tortured fan base.
 
Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/sixers/20150629_For_Sixers__still_a_lot_of_losing_in_immediate_future.html#oRQDSTF3slKgJcTY.99
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,468
bowiac said:
These are kind one and the same. Taking a series of high upside players who won't play for your is part of tanking
 
 
Agreed.  Whether the approach is right or wrong depends to some degree whether they can turn around the negativity; as much as I don't love the Celtics second half success last year, it just is true that teams playing hard and trying to win is better than the Sixers situation in terms of morale.   Now, if they sign a big FA to go with all that young talent and get a significant coach to sign up, this problem will go away immediately---but it is one of the risks of tanking.
 

moly99

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2007
939
Seattle
Remagellan said:
Unless you had no intention of trading Embiid and wanted to convince people who were stating that the Sixers would never take Okafor because the three of them can't play together that you will certainly take Okafor if he falls to you.   The hope is that would have prompted the Knicks to give the Sixers something to move from 3 to 4, and then the Sixers would have taken either Porzingas or more likely, Mudiay.  
 
But why would they take Okafor at all unless they either believed in him or were worried about Embiid? If they preferred Porzingas or Modiay why didn't they draft one of them when the Knicks didn't trade up? The only way it makes sense to draft Okafor when they really wanted to drop one spot is if Hinkie only values adding future assets and doesn't care about the talent of the players in the current draft. That's possible, I suppose, but then he would essentially be locked into tanking for a decade.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
PedroKsBambino said:
 
 
Agreed.  Whether the approach is right or wrong depends to some degree whether they can turn around the negativity; as much as I don't love the Celtics second half success last year, it just is true that teams playing hard and trying to win is better than the Sixers situation in terms of morale.   Now, if they sign a big FA to go with all that young talent and get a significant coach to sign up, this problem will go away immediately---but it is one of the risks of tanking.
 
Except of course there is every bit of evidence that the team was close and happy and played hard. There are constantly young guys trying to prove themselves on the team and everything coming out of the team seems positive. Players who were pissed to be traded there etc rapidly changed their tune and have been happy.
 
I suspect he's more upset about all the centers, and because he thought he was going to the Lakers to be the next Lakers big man superstar. He really needs to shut up though because this is perfect for him, he'll be offensive weapon 1 and will be fed and given an opportunity to show he's a star. Embiid clearly isn't an issue on playing time near term and he and Noel are potentially a decent match at 4/5 (noel defensively helping him).
 
You slipped because people think the league is changing and they worry about your D and FT so show them. 
 
You are right though this is the risk of tanking people don't want to come. But hey if Embiid is healthy you're getting traded or someone else is and the team is going to get a lot better from that. Next year Saric another wave of draft picks etc are coming the team has mad cap space. They will absolutely build around him if he shows he's worth it. 
 
I don't worry too much, because this isn't the first time yet everyone seems to turn around quickly. I suspect all the efforts to find edge are impressive, and everyone seems to like Brett Brown. The team is young and full of fun guys and seems like everyone enjoys hanging out etc. This is an interesting test though. If he sulks through a year it could make the whole thing worse / confirm the theory about losing culture all that.
 
edit: re the coach you're way off here. Brown is great. 
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Forget it, London, it's Cs-town.  They look at three seconds of a clip of a kid at a press event and start counting the days until they can poach him off the Sixers for a couple of second round picks or one of their own players that they overrate.  
 
(Marcus Smart, 16 and 28 for Noel and the number 3?   As Ryan Rusellio and Chad Ford agreed, "I wouldn't trade Noel for Smart straight up, so why would I give you number 3 for 16 and 28?")
 
What was Okafor supposed to do with the jersey after the event, fold it like a flag after a funeral?  It's not his jersey, unless you think all three draft picks are wearing number 76 next season. 
 
I think Stevens is an excellent coach, perhaps the next best coach in the league when Pop retires, but Brown's shown himself to be a pretty good one himself when you consider that for two straight seasons he's coached a team that everyone believed to be the worst in the league, one potentially historically terrible, with a scandalously unworthy of this level collection of talent assembled specifically to lose the most games, and yet they've never done that under Brown.      
 
I'm not suggesting that Brown deserves to be considered in the upper ranks because of that, but people who follow the Sixers believe whatever problems this team may have, the head coach is not one of them.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,607
Somewhere
Dude, did you watch the clip? It's not like this was ballghazi-style navel gazing here. This clip was plastered all over the place. Like it or not, people - not just Celtics fans - are rooting for Hinkie to fail.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
I agree re stevens, excellent. 
 
Brown hasn't had great results, but not like he's had the talent, but more impressive than outperforming his team's talent is the buy in reported just about everywhere. The big improvements in young players (eg Noel and especially his completely re tooled FT shot- all worked with by Brown).
Even more while dealing with very young very inexperienced and not top players he's managed to get his plan across. Defensively they were solid, to very good and offensively he's clearly been able to cut out the not very efficient mid range jumper. The players just aren't good enough to hit the shots he's creating. ESP from 3.
 
The Spurs love Brown and he and Pop talk a lot, which also works for me. 
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
Embiid has to be a major concern for Philly, right?  If so, and given who the Celtics just drafted (Rozier, a smaller version of Smart), would a Smart-for-Embiid deal make any sense for both teams?  The Sixers get the point guard of the future, to pair with Noel and Okafor (need big-time wing scoring though).  The Celtics unload from a position of excess, and take a risk that at some point Embiid will be healthy and a dominant rim protector.  The salaries line up pretty well also.  
 

jscola85

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
1,305
I would not touch Embiid with a 10' pole at this point.  He looks like he may wind up in the Greg Oden / Ralph Sampson / Yao Ming graveyard of big men whose career was destroyed by leg injuries.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,397
Noel has worked with a private coaching service, as many other players do, since 2013 on his shooting and offensive game not Brown. Rarely if ever do head coaches deal in one-on-one player development anymore as this is primarily done by the assistants.....in Noel and others cases it isn't even from the organization.

The rumor for #3 never made sense but I can envision a Smart for Noel swap with picks going to Philly but Smart isn't going to be anyone's PG of the future. He should be a solid 3 and D combo/2-guard for this league though. His inability to get to his spot with the ball to initiate the offense and/or poor first step with the dribble prevents him from playing the 1 full time offensively while he defends 2's much better than the quicker 1's he has trouble with.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
HomeRunBaker said:
Noel has worked with a private coaching service, as many other players do, since 2013 on his shooting and offensive game not Brown. Rarely if ever do head coaches deal in one-on-one player development anymore as this is primarily done by the assistants.....in Noel and others cases it isn't even from the organization.
 
Well, they have a one on one workout together as part of every pre game warmup, and reportedly practice too. 
 
After doing his pregame ritual of shooting drills with Brett Brown followed by a game of one-handed horse, Nerlens Noel headed back to the Sixers' locker room at the Pepsi Center.
 
http://www.csnphilly.com/basketball-philadelphia-sixers/brown-happy-progress-nerlens-noels-shot
 
Smart isn't a terrible fit for Philly but he's not what they want for a PG and not sure he's really their plan for a 2. I certainly don't think they'll be giving up on a potential super star for him, and if they did you'd probably assume the worst about Embiid.
 
It's hard to think that Embiid is worth more to anyone that he is to the Sixers. Because they aren't trying to win now, so can give him time, and are desperate for a star. Not good players, a star. Embiid flaming out due to injuries would suck for the sixers and basketball generally, but who can afford to give him the same treatment and pay for the right to do so?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,397
LondonSox said:
 
Well, they have a one on one workout together as part of every pre game warmup, and reportedly practice too. 
 
http://www.csnphilly.com/basketball-philadelphia-sixers/brown-happy-progress-nerlens-noels-shot
 
Smart isn't a terrible fit for Philly but he's not what they want for a PG and not sure he's really their plan for a 2. I certainly don't think they'll be giving up on a potential super star for him, and if they did you'd probably assume the worst about Embiid.
 
It's hard to think that Embiid is worth more to anyone that he is to the Sixers. Because they aren't trying to win now, so can give him time, and are desperate for a star. Not good players, a star. Embiid flaming out due to injuries would suck for the sixers and basketball generally, but who can afford to give him the same treatment and pay for the right to do so?
Yes however that Pre-game work is simply drills ran by the assistant coaches. I wouldn't give much credit to any head coach for player development based on this work. The credit deserves to go to Noel for caring enough about his career and being a professional to work at his craft. As we know there are many bigs who simply cash the check and/or get by on their natural gifts.

Still I see a Okafor/Noel tandem as one that doesn't complement each other well since they both primarily operate in the paint. The spacing would be awful together and that is without even factoring in Embiid. Who knows what Hinkie's future plans are though so rolling with this for now is certainly possible. I don't view Noel as a star it franchise player but a very very good role player with an upside of a fringe All-Star....I don't see where he fits with Okafor on his low block.

Yeah, Smart's problem is that he isn't what anyone is looking for in a 1 and role playing 2's are a dime (ok maybe a quarter) a dozen. They are always available like Afflalo is this summer.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
Remagellan said:
The story about Embiid's setback broke on June 14*.  That is not back in the regular season.  Back then the reports were that everything was progressing normally.  But it is around the time that people started flipping Okafor and Russell in their mock drafts.
You obviously weren't paying a lot of attention to them last year (no fears, not even their fans did). From January we have a story about Odbiid ballooning to 300 pounds and the Sixers fears that his weight and cavalier attitude towards conditioning would aggravate the foot injury. In March they admitted that he'd had a setback in the recovery from the stress fracture.
 
People really need to get over the idiotic "smoke screen" meme, because 99.9% of the time it's just wishcasting. The Sixers weren't throwing up any smokescreens, LA had elected to pick Russell #2 and Okafor was the best player left when Philly picked. Even if Odbiid were 100% healthy Philly would likely have made the exact same pick as Okafor was the third leg of this draft's big three and when you suck you draft the best possible player and worry about the fit later.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
Yeah, Philadelphia did not announce the Embiid news as a smokescreen. It got leaked and they made a statement because ti was better than having rumors that his career might be over. Hinkie is all about maximizing assets, why even if he wasn't planning to trade Embiid would he damage the value of one of his players for some draft nonsense.
 

zenter

indian sweet
SoSH Member
Oct 11, 2005
5,641
Astoria, NY
ivanvamp said:
Embiid has to be a major concern for Philly, right?  If so, and given who the Celtics just drafted (Rozier, a smaller version of Smart), would a Smart-for-Embiid deal make any sense for both teams?  The Sixers get the point guard of the future, to pair with Noel and Okafor (need big-time wing scoring though).  The Celtics unload from a position of excess, and take a risk that at some point Embiid will be healthy and a dominant rim protector.  The salaries line up pretty well also.  
 
Why would the C's give up at the very least a solid contributor on any NBA team for a possible nothing? Smart has more on-court and likely upside than Embiid. Embiid has a higher ceiling, but seems to be crashing through the floor as we speak.
 
If the C's grab him, it should be for a couple 2nd rounders and/or nonguaranteeds.
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oh no, I've been following them so I was aware of all that.  But this is not supposedly the same thing.  Back then, it was that Embiid tweaked something.  Now Embiid is claiming he's fine but it is the Sixers who are claiming that there is something wrong.
 
And I already admitted that I was "wishcasting" when it comes to this injury, because I am eager to see Embiid on the court as soon as possible. 
 
FYI, the Sixers have a shooting coach:
 
From a September 2014 article:
 
While saying "shooting most definitely is going to be a problem" with this team, Brown said the team had hired Philadelphia native Eugene Burroughs as shooting coach.
 
When Brown came over from the Spurs he tried to bring the Spurs shooting coach Chip Engelland with him, but Engelland didn't want to leave San Antonio.  
 
I totally agree that regardless of Embiid's health situation, the Sixers would have taken Okafor.  They are about as far from being in the situation where they could ignore the best player available to fill a team need as a team could be, so they had to take him. 
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
What they identified was an MRI that showed that the foot wasn't healing as quickly as it should, which they've been admitting since last winter. No doubt as part of a master plan to demolish his trade value in hopes that they would end up in a position to pick another big man.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,397
Remagellan said:
FYI, the Sixers have a shooting coach:
 
From a September 2014 article:
 
While saying "shooting most definitely is going to be a problem" with this team, Brown said the team had hired Philadelphia native Eugene Burroughs as shooting coach.
 
When Brown came over from the Spurs he tried to bring the Spurs shooting coach Chip Engelland with him, but Engelland didn't want to leave San Antonio.  
  
I assumed Noel was using the same private organization as when he was when he left Kentucky as many players do.

Edit: After some digging I saw several pieces with Brown working with Noel his rookie season when he was injured so that is good Brown is a hands-on coach with this group.......however that apparently has been scraped as Noel credits his improvement to work not only with the same private company but with the founder of CoachUp rather than anyone from the Sixers organization. I'd guess this doesn't please Philly and maybe it's why his name has been mentioned in trades.

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/pattisonave/Nerlens-Noel-credits-private-coaching-for-increased-confidence.html

In one word, I would describe private coaching as crucial, Noel explained. Early on I was gifted athletically, but to really bring your skill set along, you need someone there working with you.
Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the Sixers staff.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,229
Back to the Okafor thing for a second, this was just an aside but I haven't seen this written anywhere else and thought it was interesting. In a short piece in the NY Post this weekend about Hernangomez (the big guy who PHI took 35th and traded to NY for two future seconds). The second half of this sentence was what I thought was interesting, since if this happened, it presumably happened before they picked Okafor and when they just had Noel/Embiid as centers:

"According to a source, the Sixers already had a deal in place with the Knicks at No. 35 when they picked the Spaniard, who had already informed the Sixers he wasn’t interested in playing there."
 
http://nypost.com/2015/06/27/porzingis-will-have-a-buddy-on-the-knicks-just-not-next-season/

 
 

BoSoxFink

Stripes
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
7,662
South Park
After the trade yesterday, I friggin love what the Sixers are doing. This is the absolute best way to build a winner in the NBA and in a couple more years this team is going to be very good. I wish the Celts went this route.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
BoSoxFink said:
After the trade yesterday, I friggin love what the Sixers are doing. This is the absolute best way to build a winner in the NBA and in a couple more years this team is going to be very good. I wish the Celts went this route.
I think the 76ers are in good shape, but lets wait for actual signs of life from them before saying this is "absolute best way to build a winner." Embiid is a huge question mark at this point. Noel looks even more offensively limited than expected. Okafor might end up being a one-way player, and its unclear how he fits on the court with Noel (and you can't always get equal value if you want to rearrange your team "fit"). Plus Okafor seems less than thrilled to be on the team.
 
This could still go a number of ways. Right now, it's hard to be sure that they've got more title equity than Miami or Houston for instance, who built/rebuilt on the "fly."
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,948
bowiac said:
I think the 76ers are in good shape, but lets wait for actual signs of life from them before saying this is "absolute best way to build a winner." Embiid is a huge question mark at this point. Noel looks even more offensively limited than expected. Okafor might end up being a one-way player, and its unclear how he fits on the court with Noel (and you can't always get equal value if you want to rearrange your team "fit"). Plus Okafor seems less than thrilled to be on the team.
 
This could still go a number of ways. Right now, it's hard to be sure that they've got more title equity than Miami or Houston for instance, who built/rebuilt on the "fly."
It's definitely not the absolute best way to build a winner. If they succeed it is A way to build a winner, and maybe the best for a city that can't get FA.
No other team has built this way to this extent (except maybe the old Clippers, but that failed miserably), so I'd wait for them to be real title contenders before declaring it the best way to build. Also it is going to depend on time frame. One concern is that Noel has 2 years until he gets paid, Embiid 3, and Saric really looks like he wants to wait the required 3 years and get a much bigger than draft pick max deal. They not only need 3 of their picks to turn into stars, they need to re-sign them AND convince good role players to sign (likely cheaply) to play with them in Philly. They  have a lot of potential, but on the whole they still need a LOT of things to go right for them to be a contender, and there is a real risk the window will be pretty short even if they make it.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
If nothing else this shows the benefits of not spending your cap space for the sake of it.
This deal (and the one where they took McGee for a 1st) and others to come are all becuase they won't waste money on players. They'll pick up guys with skill and try them and then move on if they don't hit and keep them if they do.
 
Hinkie is a beast here.
This trade makes me silly happy.
 
Right now if the Sixers do better than expected, let's say do a celtics and push for a late playoff space, they can swap their pick with a bad team in a bad situation in the west. Or if they tank, they probably get the extra lottery balls - ie if the Kings get lucky the Sixers benefit.
 
If the lottery is changed, to more of a all the bad teams have a better chance, they get twice the chance if the kings are one of those teams. 
 
Then they get a straight up 1st round top 10 protected as well as the most talented player in the deal who is in his 2nd year. Oh and is a perfect fit for a shooter for the big men to pass out of any double teams.
 
I mean next year, it's theoretically possible for the Sixers to make the playoffs - get the number 1 overall pick from the kings on swap, the lakers pick at 4, the heat pick at 11 and the thunder pick at wherever. I know these aren't likely (though some are possible). 
Oh and on top of that they probably get to add Saric too for 2016, on top of all that. 
 
I mean holy shit
 

Remagellan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Teams full of young players don't gel into title contenders overnight, but this is another great development for those of us who trust the process.   
 
They are going to have cap space, and Philly is a lovely area to live and work in.  But obviously the key to their ability to be able to attract any free agents in the next few years will be whether Okafor or Embiid develop into real NBA stars (I think Noel can be a premium defender, but he'll always be limited offensively), and the team can get to the point at which it seems to be only a player or two away from legitimate title contention.  
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,607
Somewhere
Cellar-Door said:
It's definitely not the absolute best way to build a winner. If they succeed it is A way to build a winner, and maybe the best for a city that can't get FA.
No other team has built this way to this extent (except maybe the old Clippers, but that failed miserably), so I'd wait for them to be real title contenders before declaring it the best way to build. Also it is going to depend on time frame. One concern is that Noel has 2 years until he gets paid, Embiid 3, and Saric really looks like he wants to wait the required 3 years and get a much bigger than draft pick max deal. They not only need 3 of their picks to turn into stars, they need to re-sign them AND convince good role players to sign (likely cheaply) to play with them in Philly. They  have a lot of potential, but on the whole they still need a LOT of things to go right for them to be a contender, and there is a real risk the window will be pretty short even if they make it.
 
A good example of the Sixers' approach backfiring is what the Bulls attempted in the early 00's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.