The Michael McCorkle "Mac" Jones Thread

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,237
Imaginationland
I swear I'm watching a different game than some folks some nights. Did people not see, I don't know, the first 5+ years of Tom Brady's career where it was dink/dunk/game manage to victory? Mac ain't Tom, but Jesus, outside of 2007, this type of game is what we saw almost week in and week out for a long, long time.
From 2001-2006, Brady was 12th, 19th, 9th, 8th, 5th and 10th in adjusted net yards per attempt (average of 10.5). Mac was 17th last year and 24th this year. Even if the actual numbers are similar (Mac is at 5.93 for his career, vs Brady who was 6.29 from 2001-2006), the league is different now. Someone putting up passing numbers in 2022 that were, on average, 10th or 11th best in the early to mid 2000s shouldn't have much job security today.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,647
Oregon
It always confuses me that we can't point out definitively what we know about Mac based on this season, as though what he did last season ... with an actual OC and a better O-Line somehow showed us nothing.
I mean, I think Mac would top out as an above-average game manager ... which, with the right cast around him, would be a plus.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
It always confuses me that we can't point out definitively what we know about Mac based on this season, as though what he did last season ... with an actual OC and a better O-Line somehow showed us nothing.
I mean, I think Mac would top out as an above-average game manager ... which, with the right cast around him, would be a plus.
His ceiling has always been described as Chad Pennington, which would be pretty good. But so far he hasn't reached that height, and Pennington's peak transported to today's game would likely be average at best. The game has changed.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,647
Oregon
His ceiling has always been described as Chad Pennington, which would be pretty good. But so far he hasn't reached that height, and Pennington's peak transported to today's game would likely be average at best. The game has changed.
Right, but a Pennington/Jones type with competency on the O-Line and a professional OC would look better than what we're seeing at the moment
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
I mean I thought he was definitely better, but if we want to make comparisons... uh which defense is better? My point was more that you were laying things out as positively as possible for McCoy and as negatively as possible for Mac as a way to try and burnish the argument.

The whole point though should be... if we're comparing Mac to Colt McCoy, we're in trouble.

Mac was competent last night, that's all we asked for and that's what we got. Tells us nothing really of any value long-term. Got a win, might sneak into the WC. Probably won't learn much about Mac rest of the way unless the O-line gets healthy/on-track much faster than I expect it to.
I think the comparisons to Colt McCoy exist today because they just played each other last night.

When the Pats played the Bills, we were comparing Mac to Josh Allen. Obviously that comparison didn't go well for Mac, but hey, isn't it great that we're at least comparing Mac to Allen??
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,088
From 2001-2006, Brady was 12th, 19th, 9th, 8th, 5th and 10th in adjusted net yards per attempt (average of 10.5). Mac was 17th last year and 24th this year. Even if the actual numbers are similar (Mac is at 5.93 for his career, vs Brady who was 6.29 from 2001-2006), the league is different now. Someone putting up passing numbers in 2022 that were, on average, 10th or 11th best in the early to mid 2000s shouldn't have much job security today.
So I guess Kyler Murray, Justin Fields and Matthew Stafford should retire then, as they all have worse AN/YPA than Mac does this season. Sitting right above Mac are Russell Wilson and Daniel Jones.

Funny, other than Murray (but he had Hopkins out for most of the season), what do most of those guys all have in common.?

Shit ass receiving corps.

Last year, Mac was better than Murray, Lawrence, Tannehill, Goff, Hurts, Wilson, Lamar, Tua and Daniel Jones.

Moral of the story, single stats in football fucking suck.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
I only half agree. I think we HAVE learned a lot about Mac this year in terms of what he can't do. We can feel pretty comfortable in saying he's not a guy who can elevate a bad line, and that he isn't a guy who creates with his legs, and he isn't a guy who is going to be shifty in the pocket, and that he's not great a identifying/feeling pressure. Now maybe he can develop the last two, but we did learn some things, we just aren't at the point where we're likely to learn more.
"He can't elevate a bad line" is probably right.

But despite all the injuries and the horrific OL play and atrocious offensive coaching situation, Mac and the Patriots are 7-6 and in the last spot for the playoffs. Maybe most NFL QBs would do better with this team than him. But maybe most....wouldn't. We don't know. What we do know is that Mac is the starting quarterback, the defense has been really good for the most part, but a ton has not been good, and yet the Pats are 7-6. Where would this team be with an "average" NFL starting QB? 7-6 still? 8-5? Do we really know?
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,963
Dallas
I think he had a good game because of the calls not despite them, same as the Jets. They gave him lots of easy short completions, removed as many chances for him to make the mistakes he did early in the year as they could. They have him on training wheels, and given the line... it makes sense to do that. He doesn't handle real pressure well, so outside the occasional team that can't create pressure (MIN) they're trying to give him easy quick passes.
Don't you want him to execute the plays as called? Most great QBs win from structure and good play design. Him looking off the safety before hitting Hunter Henry in the seam was fantastic. That he is starting to win more consistently in structure when he has protection is a good thing. They didn't just give him easy short completions because he's Mac they did that because the OL is garbage right now and the Cardinals blitz a ton. He almost doubled his high for screens last night. As I mentioned earlier the Eagles ran more screens than Mac did vs this defense. They bring 5 or more at the highest percent in the NFL.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,849
Don't you want him to execute the plays as called? Most great QBs win from structure and good play design. Him looking off the safety before hitting Hunter Henry in the seam was fantastic. That he is starting to win more consistently in structure when he has protection is a good thing. They didn't just give him easy short completions because he's Mac they did that because the OL is garbage right now and the Cardinals blitz a ton. He almost doubled his high for screens last night. As I mentioned earlier the Eagles ran more screens than Mac did vs this defense. They bring 5 or more at the highest percent in the NFL.
I didn't mean it as a negative, I meant it as a positive. The coaching staff is calling what they can, and Mac is playing better because of it.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
Where Mac currently ranks among QBs with 8 or more starts:

Comp%: #3 (68.2%)
Y/A: #14 (7.2)
Yds/G: #21 (219.8)
Passer rating: #23 (85.7)
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,849
"He can't elevate a bad line" is probably right.

But despite all the injuries and the horrific OL play and atrocious offensive coaching situation, Mac and the Patriots are 7-6 and in the last spot for the playoffs. Maybe most NFL QBs would do better with this team than him. But maybe most....wouldn't. We don't know. What we do know is that Mac is the starting quarterback, the defense has been really good for the most part, but a ton has not been good, and yet the Pats are 7-6. Where would this team be with an "average" NFL starting QB? 7-6 still? 8-5? Do we really know?
No clue, but part of why the Patriots are 7-6 is that Bailey Zappe won 2 of those 7 (yes likely the 2 easiest on paper), and our defense is top 5 in the league. I think it's fair to say we won zero of our 7 wins because of stellar QB play, so it's hard to say how many games a better QB wins, but it's also hard to say how bad a QB would have to be to have won fewer. I mean we had people legit wondering if Bailey Zappe was good (because hope springs eternal) rather than wondering if we just had been getting really bad QB play such that a backup wasn't much worse.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,548
So I guess Kyler Murray, Justin Fields and Matthew Stafford should retire then, as they all have worse AN/YPA than Mac does this season. Sitting right above Mac are Russell Wilson and Daniel Jones.

Funny, other than Murray (but he had Hopkins out for most of the season), what do most of those guys all have in common.?

Shit ass receiving corps.

Last year, Mac was better than Murray, Lawrence, Tannehill, Goff, Hurts, Wilson, Lamar, Tua and Daniel Jones.

Moral of the story, single stats in football fucking suck.
Stafford should retire. Russ is cooked and thank the lord we aren't stuck with that albatross contract. Fields, Murray and Jones have a running capability that Mac simply will never have that can mitigate a lesser AN/YPA. Mac doesn't have that luxury.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,237
Imaginationland
So I guess Kyler Murray, Justin Fields and Matthew Stafford should retire then, as they all have worse AN/YPA than Mac does this season. Sitting right above Mac are Russell Wilson and Daniel Jones.

Funny, other than Murray (but he had Hopkins out for most of the season), what do most of those guys all have in common.?

Shit ass receiving corps.

Last year, Mac was better than Murray, Lawrence, Tannehill, Goff, Hurts, Wilson, Lamar, Tua and Daniel Jones.

Moral of the story, single stats in football fucking suck.
I'm not sure what the point here is - Murray, Stafford and Wilson are all generally agreed to be having terrible seasons, but they've got decent track records of being better than this. Fields has been brutal passing the ball, but has been incredible running the ball and his age and ceiling (a few miles above Mac) get him some more slack (plus everything around him is worse than for Mac). Daniel Jones is also a threat with his legs, and he still likely loses his job going into next year.

You're comparing Mac to guys who are all either having terrible seasons or can make plays with their legs in ways that Mac can't dream about. How is this a good thing?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,849
Where Mac currently ranks among QBs with 8 or more starts:

Comp%: #3 (68.2%)
Y/A: #14 (7.2)
Yds/G: #21 (219.8)
Passer rating: #23 (85.7)
Out of 29 if anyone else was curious.

Since I looked it up to see how many QBs it was, I'll add some other stats:
TD%- 28th
INT%- 22nd
ANY/A- 23rd
QBR- 28th
Bad throw %- 29th (this is very good BTW)

So overall, about what you'd expect, cutting back the offense has greatly reduced mistakes, but production is still near the bottom of the league as the INT is creeping up, but with no real TDs and ADOT declining meaning that even with more completions the ANY/A isn't moving much.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
Mac's yards per game factors in the game where he was hurt early on against Chicago. So take that out and he's averaging 241.7 yards passing per game. That number would bump his ranking in that category up to #14 instead of #21.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,088
I'm not sure what the point here is - Murray, Stafford and Wilson are all generally agreed to be having terrible seasons, but they've got decent track records of being better than this. Fields has been brutal passing the ball, but has been incredible running the ball and his age and ceiling (a few miles above Mac) get him some more slack (plus everything around him is worse than for Mac). Daniel Jones is also a threat with his legs, and he still likely loses his job going into next year.

You're comparing Mac to guys who are all either having terrible seasons or can make plays with their legs in ways that Mac can't dream about. How is this a good thing?

Did you guys both miss the 2nd part of the post or just choose to ignore it?


Last season, Mac was 17th (his rookie year). Stafford was #3, Tua (2nd year) was 19th, Hurts (2nd year) was 14th, Goff was 21st, Lawrence was 28th.

This year, Tua is #1, Hurts is #3, Goff is #5, Geno is #6, Burrow is #7, Allen is #8, and Lawrence is #10.

What do you think changed over the offseason that allowed Tua and Hurts to climb up that board like that? What do you think changed in New England that caused Mac to fall from 17th to 24th?

What I'm saying is that it's a stupid fucking stat that changes in crazy ways from year to year, and the common denominator is usually who a quarterback has around them in a given season. I guess maybe if Mac was #3 this year like Stafford was last year, you guys would say Mac is washed too. Or maybe it has something to do with Stafford being injured, their running game being a mess, Kupp getting hurt, Robert Woods getting shipped out of town....

Any stat that rates Geno Smith as the #6 QB in the NFL, ahead of Burrow and Allen, should be taken behind the barn and shot if it's going to be used in a single statistic context.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,963
Dallas
I don't want to be the Mac defender because to be honest I just don't like him. He's mid. Maybe he can be like Tua if you gave him weapons and a line and a good OC and play-caller. I don't know. But I know that he can't be a guy who thrives out of structure as well as in like a Mahomes or a Herbert. I love dual-threat QBs or at the least really good scramblers who are mobile but not quite dual-threats. I was a Fields guy. Mac actually had some nice moments as a scrambler last night. Mac is more mobile than we give him credit for. The sideline throw to Bourne on the scramble was very nice. Usually his sacks come against guys who have a clean path to him and who beat the OL quickly and decisively.

As for his throws on the move, what I want them to do is coach him and the receiver to work together on mobile throws - for the receiver (RB TE WR) to work back to Mac and for Mac to throw it low and as if the receiver was going to come back to him. That way there are no more defenders cutting it off and intercepting it. You could see it looked like he did that on the Bourne throw. He's never going to be a guy who can hit the throws like Herbert and Mahomes can so they have to work within his arm limitations.

Maybe they should look at Anthony Richardson this year in the draft. I don't know because on the one hand they just drafted Zappe but on the other hand they could use a guy with better physical traits to develop. Should they carry 3 QBs though and 2 of them being a 2nd year guy and a rookie next year?

Unless they give Mac some special weapons and an A+ line he's not going to thrive (which is true for most QBs). So hopefully they get a better OC, they get a better line, they get better weapons and see what Mac can do in year 3.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,849
I don't want to be the Mac defender because to be honest I just don't like him. He's mid. Maybe he can be like Tua if you gave him weapons and a line and a good OC and play-caller. I don't know. But I know that he can't be a guy who thrives out of structure as well as in like a Mahomes or a Herbert. I love dual-threat QBs or at the least really good scramblers who are mobile but not quite dual-threats. I was a Fields guy. Mac actually had some nice moments as a scrambler last night. Mac is more mobile than we give him credit for. The sideline throw to Bourne on the scramble was very nice. Usually his sacks come against guys who have a clean path to him and who beat the OL quickly and decisively.

As for his throws on the move, what I want them to do is coach him and the receiver to work together on mobile throws - for the receiver (RB TE WR) to work back to Mac and for Mac to throw it low and as if the receiver was going to come back to him. That way there are no more defenders cutting it off and intercepting it. You could see it looked like he did that on the Bourne throw. He's never going to be a guy who can hit the throws like Herbert and Mahomes can so they have to work within his arm limitations.

Maybe they should look at Anthony Richardson this year in the draft. I don't know because on the one hand they just drafted Zappe but on the other hand they could use a guy with better physical traits to develop. Should they carry 3 QBs though and 2 of them being a 2nd year guy and a rookie next year?

Unless they give Mac some special weapons and an A+ line he's not going to thrive (which is true for most QBs). So hopefully they get a better OC, they get a better line, they get better weapons and see what Mac can do in year 3.
I think Mac is more mobile than he gets credit for, but I think one thing he lacks is awareness and pre-snap identification.
He too often doesn't see pressure he should, and he almost never seems to know where the pressure is if he can't see it in front of him.
Really good scramblers are usually good at seeing/feeling pressure, and guys who are sneaky mobile, or immobile but pocket shifty, work on knowing pre-snap where pressure is most likely to be and shading it.
I think of last night, the scramble to Bourne, he SAW the pressure nice and early got on the move, made a good throw. The pick... he should KNOW that he has little time and where the pressure will be. He knows the play, he knows it's a blitz, and he SHOULD know that means even if it's picked up it left Henry on an island, and that means 3 seconds or less, and step up. he didn't, he got hit a 3.4 despite the cross being open before that.
The pre-snap stuff I think can be fixed, not sure if the instinct type stuff can.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,963
Dallas
Here are two articles that talk about how traditional pocket passers like Mac might not be high floor guys and how mobile/dual-threat QBs are the actual high-floor guys and not boom/bust like we've been thinking about.

The Definition of "High Floor Quarterback" Needs to Change - Zach Hicks SI

The Simple Math Behind the Colts’ Decision to Turn to Sam Ehlinger - Ben Solak The Ringer

Let’s start with an understanding of what raw data tells us about scrambles. Across all quarterbacks this season, scrambles are producing .508 EPA per play, which is the second-highest mark in any season since 2000. In comparison: The EPA per play of a league-average pass attempt (no spikes, no throwaways) is .212.

By expected points, scrambles are more than twice as valuable as pass attempts.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,237
Imaginationland
Did you guys both miss the 2nd part of the post or just choose to ignore it?


Last season, Mac was 17th (his rookie year). Stafford was #3, Tua (2nd year) was 19th, Hurts (2nd year) was 14th, Goff was 21st, Lawrence was 28th.

This year, Tua is #1, Hurts is #3, Goff is #5, Geno is #6, Burrow is #7, Allen is #8, and Lawrence is #10.

What do you think changed over the offseason that allowed Tua and Hurts to climb up that board like that? What do you think changed in New England that caused Mac to fall from 17th to 24th?

What I'm saying is that it's a stupid fucking stat that changes in crazy ways from year to year, and the common denominator is usually who a quarterback has around them in a given season. I guess maybe if Mac was #3 this year like Stafford was last year, you guys would say Mac is washed too. Or maybe it has something to do with Stafford being injured, their running game being a mess, Kupp getting hurt, Robert Woods getting shipped out of town....

Any stat that rates Geno Smith as the #6 QB in the NFL, ahead of Burrow and Allen, should be taken behind the barn and shot if it's going to be used in a single statistic context.
I'll agree with the bolded generally, but I didn't intend it to be a simple "is this guy good or not" barometer. I was using to differentiate between Brady's dink and dunk offense early in his career vs. Mac now. Brady's dink and dunk game still lead to a lot of yards relative to his era. Mac's has not.

I was really high on Mac after his rookie year, hoping that that would be his floor which left some good room to grow. It clearly wasn't.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,963
Dallas
I think Mac is more mobile than he gets credit for, but I think one thing he lacks is awareness and pre-snap identification.
He too often doesn't see pressure he should, and he almost never seems to know where the pressure is if he can't see it in front of him.
Really good scramblers are usually good at seeing/feeling pressure, and guys who are sneaky mobile, or immobile but pocket shifty, work on knowing pre-snap where pressure is most likely to be and shading it.
I think of last night, the scramble to Bourne, he SAW the pressure nice and early got on the move, made a good throw. The pick... he should KNOW that he has little time and where the pressure will be. He knows the play, he knows it's a blitz, and he SHOULD know that means even if it's picked up it left Henry on an island, and that means 3 seconds or less, and step up. he didn't, he got hit a 3.4 despite the cross being open before that.
The pre-snap stuff I think can be fixed, not sure if the instinct type stuff can.
I had hoped Mac would have climbed the pocket more in that one. He was better at feeling pressure at Alabama. He had good pocket presence there. He would slide around well. This year he doesn't have that. I wonder if he isn't stepping up in the pocket more because he doesn't trust the IOL.

As for the pick I would put maybe 10-15% of it on him. Cam Thomas got to him very quickly. FWIW PFF and the films guys I study are putting less than half of that on Mac. It's one of those - is it his fault? No. Would a better QB have had a better result there? Probably, yes. So I think we agree with each other on it.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,963
Dallas
One other quote from the article and one that should help explain why the Pats are struggling on offense. Negative plays like sacks are drive killers:

58839
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Two mac observations

1) A lot of the sacks where he doesn't sense pressure are on plays where the tackles are getting beaten very very quickly. (Last night's sack comes to mind).

2.) I'm surprised that anyone could watch last night's game and question his arm strength based on that game. I absolutely agree that he's no Jeff George but at least yesterday (and frankly much of this season) they aren't even putting him in positions where he could really demonstrate arm strength or the lack therefore; they're not asking him to make deep outs or what not.
 

Strike4

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,911
Portland, Maine
I'm not the biggest Mac fan but I just have no idea how anybody can make categorical judgments about him with all the horrific things going on with the offense. I only saw the middle part of the game but the fact that during that span Mac had to tell other players where to stand, or tell them they should be in motion, and there's the time getting the plays in, and drops and miscom fumbles...

I can't remember ever seeing an NFL team make so many obvious mistakes. Yes, I've seen worse single mistakes that might cost a game but not this continual flow of them. And I would be frustrated if I was Mac - he's trying to do his job and he has to correct others. Not only does that distract him from his job, it's demoralizing. And for everybody who says Mac sucks because he should be "elevating" the guys around him...think of how Brady would react to ONE of these mistakes.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,088
Here are two articles that talk about how traditional pocket passers like Mac might not be high floor guys and how mobile/dual-threat QBs are the actual high-floor guys and not boom/bust like we've been thinking about.

The Definition of "High Floor Quarterback" Needs to Change - Zach Hicks SI

The Simple Math Behind the Colts’ Decision to Turn to Sam Ehlinger - Ben Solak The Ringer
I was a Fields guy myself, but other than an argument for Mahomes and Russell Wilson, mobile quarterbacks haven't won Super Bowls. But I would argue those guys are pocket passers that also can run, as opposed to mobile quarterbacks that are good at throwing. I would put Josh Allen in that category as well.

I would argue pocket mobility like Rodgers, Wilson, Brady have is the most important trait when it comes to winning in the playoffs. Other than those guys, and the great season Cam Newton had, you really don't even see mobile QB's even winning conference championships. Yet.

A big part of that has to do with durability. Just this year, you have Kyler going down, Lamar is down, Fields got hurt, Trey Lance, etc. Maybe this is the year Jalen Hurts, a true running QB IMO, breaks the ceiling, but to date, I don't know if one can argue that running QB's have higher floors than pocket QB's (and pocket QB's that can move around), at least come playoff time. I mean, in fantasy football, they certainly do, but when it comes to wins and losses, not so sure at this point. The 8 division leaders right now include 5 pocket guys, and then Allen and Mahomes (who I believe are a hybrid pocket passer/runner), Hurts (running QB). Then you have Brady, Burrow, Jimmy G. Cousins and Tannehill.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,849
One other quote from the article and one that should help explain why the Pats are struggling on offense. Negative plays like sacks are drive killers:

View attachment 58839
Doesn't this logic not really pan out in most cases though? Mobile quarterbacks and QBs that can run are typically the most sacked QBs in the NFL, often because they either scramble around too long trying to make a play instead of throwing the ball away, or they flee clean pockets and run into trouble.

The most sacked QB's this season in order are:

Russell Wilson
Daniel Jones
Justin Fields
Joe Burrow
Matt Ryan
Jalen Hurts
Geno Smith
Kirk Cousins
Justin Herbert
Matthew Stafford
Ryan Tannehill

Only Ryan, Cousins and Stafford are who I would classify as non-mobile QBs. QBs who are Pat Mahomes, who have the skill to buy time but are disciplined enough to make smart decisions constantly, is the dream but also not attainable.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,963
Dallas
Allen is a dual-threat. Hurts is a dual-threat. He is a good pocket passer too.

Burrow is like Mahomes in that he can scramble and is a + athlete. I'd put both of them in the pocket QB's who can move around.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,765
Brady v. Mac this year...

Completion %
Brady: 65.8% (#14)
Mac: 68.2% (#2)

Yds/Att
Brady: 6.2 (#26)
Mac: 7.2 (#13)

Rating
Brady: 88.9 (#18)
Mac: 85.7 (#23)

Team scoring
Tampa Bay (6-7, 1st in NFCS): 17.2 p/g (#28)
New England (7-6, 3rd in AFCE): 21.2 p/g (#18)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,527
Hingham, MA
One other quote from the article and one that should help explain why the Pats are struggling on offense. Negative plays like sacks are drive killers:

View attachment 58839
I'm on record as being fairly neutral on Mac. He has his flaws, the line has its flaws, the coaching has its flaws. But what strikes me about this offense and the comparisons to the early Brady years is just the sheer volume of mistakes / negative plays / penalties. This offense is not good enough to bounce back from 1st and 15 or 20. And yet, it seems like every other drive there is this type of drive-ruining mistake. And again, I think it is a combination of Mac, the line, and the coaching. But the amount of mistakes this team makes compared to the Brady years is mind-boggling.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,006
AZ
Here are two articles that talk about how traditional pocket passers like Mac might not be high floor guys and how mobile/dual-threat QBs are the actual high-floor guys and not boom/bust like we've been thinking about.

The Definition of "High Floor Quarterback" Needs to Change - Zach Hicks SI

The Simple Math Behind the Colts’ Decision to Turn to Sam Ehlinger - Ben Solak The Ringer
Even the eye test confirms this. So many of the huge plays in the big games between good teams this year have been decided by scrambles. Not necessarily scrambles that score. But that series where you need points and you take a pre-snap penalty and so need 15 yards, I can think of so many big fourth quarter plays where Allen or Mahomes has converted a third and eight. It feels like a team with a scrambling QB has three options on every play where a team that has a pocket guy only has 2.

Offensive line play is so spotty right now. Everyone is scrambling all the time in the NFL right now.

I don't know -- Stafford just won the Super Bowl. Brady has won two in the last five years, so maybe it's not really a thing. But it really has seemed to be a difference maker so far this year.
 

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,219
Here are two articles that talk about how traditional pocket passers like Mac might not be high floor guys and how mobile/dual-threat QBs are the actual high-floor guys and not boom/bust like we've been thinking about.

The Definition of "High Floor Quarterback" Needs to Change - Zach Hicks SI

The Simple Math Behind the Colts’ Decision to Turn to Sam Ehlinger - Ben Solak The Ringer
I'm still a pocket passer fan. Quarterbacks who run take too much punishment. For the long term I'd rather trade a little better passing for worse running, though obviously that's not the world works.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,429
Philadelphia
I'm on record as being fairly neutral on Mac. He has his flaws, the line has its flaws, the coaching has its flaws. But what strikes me about this offense and the comparisons to the early Brady years is just the sheer volume of mistakes / negative plays / penalties. This offense is not good enough to bounce back from 1st and 15 or 20. And yet, it seems like every other drive there is this type of drive-ruining mistake. And again, I think it is a combination of Mac, the line, and the coaching. But the amount of mistakes this team makes compared to the Brady years is mind-boggling.
It is ridiculous. I just went back to look and last night on 6 of their first 10 drives (ie, while the game was still in doubt) they ended up in a longer than 10 yards to go situation at some point. You can't live like that.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,454
Negative plays like sacks are drive killers
I posted somewhere that Mac's raw stats this year were very similar to last season with the exception of TDs. But I also left out sacks. 26 in 10 games this year, 28 in 17 games last season.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,379
Comparing a sack on 3rd to a sack on 1st or 2nd probably is a bad idea. Yeah you give up 10 yards of field position versus an incompletion / scramble for less than a first down but it doesn't have remotely close to the impact of the latter.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,379
As I mentioned in the game thread, I'm really confused about the system of offensive lineman warning the QB when beat. It seems like other QBs are able to "see" pressure from the back of their head which is obviously verbal communication from the OL. But with Mac / our OL I don't see this happen as much as it should. Some refer to it part of pocket presence I guess but I think something is broken
 

macal

New Member
Jul 31, 2005
74
Even the eye test confirms this. So many of the huge plays in the big games between good teams this year have been decided by scrambles. Not necessarily scrambles that score. But that series where you need points and you take a pre-snap penalty and so need 15 yards, I can think of so many big fourth quarter plays where Allen or Mahomes has converted a third and eight. It feels like a team with a scrambling QB has three options on every play where a team that has a pocket guy only has 2.

Offensive line play is so spotty right now. Everyone is scrambling all the time in the NFL right now.

I don't know -- Stafford just won the Super Bowl. Brady has won two in the last five years, so maybe it's not really a thing. But it really has seemed to be a difference maker so far this year.
I'd go as far to say that a good running QB like Allen gives you a 4th option of the designed QB run. Also, it's not just getting a 1st down from say 3rd and 8, but also getting good positive yards on 1st and/or 2nd down, that then results in a 3rd and short and a better chance to keep moving the chains. I've been a pocket passer fan for as long as I can remember, due to less injury risk, longevity etc. However, I think that a good pocket passer with a decent amount of mobility is becoming a must have as it seems that defenses are getting more athletic and faster and the OL's have a hard time containing them for long stretches in a game.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,312
All of Mac’s sacks seem to be like huge losses, like 8+ yards every time, as opposed to a guy who can scramble a bit maybe only being taken down for a loss of a couple yards. Maybe this isn’t true but it sure feels like it.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,088
Comparing a sack on 3rd to a sack on 1st or 2nd probably is a bad idea. Yeah you give up 10 yards of field position versus an incompletion / scramble for less than a first down but it doesn't have remotely close to the impact of the latter.
All of Mac's sacks this year by down and distance, in order:

1st and 10
2nd and 10
3rd and 8
3rd and 7
2nd and 10
3rd and 11
1st and 10
1st and 8
3rd and 4
2nd and 5
2nd and 10
3rd and 10
2nd and 9
3rd and 3
3rd and 5
1st and 10
2nd and 8
3rd and 12
1st and 10
3rd and 10
1st and 10
1st and 10
3rd and 7
1st and 10
2nd and 8
3rd and 11
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,638
02130
Mac has one interception in his last 167 pass attempts. It was a play where his arm was hit and you blame Mac for it. Zappe had 3 interceptions in 92 pass attempts across the 4 games he played in. I imagine you have some reason to absolve him of blame for a couple of those, too, right?
Mac has two more near INTs that were extremely close in that time. One was called back for a roughing the passer in the first Jets game and the other was a terrible decision and throw that the defender cut off and couldn't stay inbounds on.

Probably a "fair" number of INTs in that time is 1-2 so he's about right. I don't really like Zappe either but he is a rookie.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,849
I had hoped Mac would have climbed the pocket more in that one. He was better at feeling pressure at Alabama. He had good pocket presence there. He would slide around well. This year he doesn't have that. I wonder if he isn't stepping up in the pocket more because he doesn't trust the IOL.

As for the pick I would put maybe 10-15% of it on him. Cam Thomas got to him very quickly. FWIW PFF and the films guys I study are putting less than half of that on Mac. It's one of those - is it his fault? No. Would a better QB have had a better result there? Probably, yes. So I think we agree with each other on it.
Yeah that's how I feel too, a better QB doesn't get hit there, but also, that pick is mostly a bit of back luck, a bit of bad blocking, a bit of holding too long, etc. Like that isn't a pick I think WOW what a screwup by anybody, just a bunch of little things and a lot of bad luck.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,088
All of Mac’s sacks seem to be like huge losses, like 8+ yards every time, as opposed to a guy who can scramble a bit maybe only being taken down for a loss of a couple yards. Maybe this isn’t true but it sure feels like it.
Mac's average loss per sack is 6.73 yards

Wilson is 6.48
D. Jones is 5.56
Fields is 5.95
Burrow is 6.40
Geno is 7.62
Hurts is 5.97
Cousins is 7.52
Herbert is 5.23
Tannehill is 7.24
Stafford is 7.24
Allen is 4.89
Lamar is 4.38
Kyler is 7.68
Rodgers is 7.79
Lawrence is 6.47
Mahomes is 6.67
Tua is 7.64
Brady is 7.28

Other than a couple outliers, Mac seems to be right in the middle or so.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,237
Imaginationland
All of Mac’s sacks seem to be like huge losses, like 8+ yards every time, as opposed to a guy who can scramble a bit maybe only being taken down for a loss of a couple yards. Maybe this isn’t true but it sure feels like it.
This seems to be one of the few (only?) areas of improvement from last year. In 2021, Mac's average yards loss per sack was 8.6 yards, 2nd worst in the league among the 31 QBs who were sacked 20+ times (only Murray was worse). So far in 2022, his average yards loss per sack is 6.7 yards, 14th worst among the 31 QBs with the most sacks. He's still completely unable to scramble and turn those 7 yard sacks into 2 yard sacks, but at least he's not running backwards which occasionally happened last year.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,312
This seems to be one of the few (only?) areas of improvement from last year. In 2021, Mac's average yards loss per sack was 8.6 yards, 2nd worst in the league among the 31 QBs who were sacked 20+ times (only Murray was worse). So far in 2022, his average yards loss per sack is 6.7 yards, 14th worst among the 31 QBs with the most sacks. He's still completely unable to scramble and turn those 7 yard sacks into 2 yard sacks, but at least he's not running backwards which occasionally happened last year.
Thanks for that - guess it’s not bad as I had thought. Although I guess the increase in sacks makes up for each sack not being for as big a loss.
 

Bowser

New Member
Sep 27, 2019
425
For me, Mac's biggest problem is that he can't finish drives in the endzone. To compare the start of his career to Tom Brady's is absurd. 20 years ago, the Pats were winning because of Brady. When the Pats win this season, it's almost never because of Mac, and often despite him.

Excuses can be made. It's hard to evaluate him because of Matty P, the OL, and our skill players. Sure, he'll zip a pass to Henry on occasion. His completion percentage is generally high. But backup QBs have skills, too. McCoy made plays on occasion. Minshew did during his run. So did Heinicke. I'm not blaming Mac for every failed drive, not at all. And part of me holds out hope that he's still the top 12-15 QB we saw last year. But increasingly he's looking like a backup talent playing with additional backup talent around him.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,006
AZ
One thing that seems very rare for this team is defensive penalties. I just don't remember the last time we drew a big one. I'm sensitive to the fact that there's confirmation bias in things like this and so I was hoping to find stats, but I don't see anything that breaks things down in terms of types of penalties. But defensive holding, pass interference, illegal contact. We get none of that.

Let's say I'm right and we're below average. What does that mean? Is that about Mac? About the offense in general? About the pass catchers? Or is that just another proxy for "yeah, the offense is not that dynamic."
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,865
One thing that seems very rare for this team is defensive penalties. I just don't remember the last time we drew a big one. I'm sensitive to the fact that there's confirmation bias in things like this and so I was hoping to find stats, but I don't see anything that breaks things down in terms of types of penalties. But defensive holding, pass interference, illegal contact. We get none of that.

Let's say I'm right and we're below average. What does that mean? Is that about Mac? About the offense in general? About the pass catchers? Or is that just another proxy for "yeah, the offense is not that dynamic."

They had some in the Vikings game that were uncharacteristic
 

Strike4

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,911
Portland, Maine
He was correcting where players had to stand because they were on RB3 and RB4 at that point. Their lack of experience with the offense was the reason.
He had to do it multiple times with Henry.

But the point remains...shouldn't even a RB3 know this? And if the RB3 doesn't, shouldn't it fall to somebody else besides Mac to coach the RBs?
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
1,809
Melbourne, Australia
One thing that seems very rare for this team is defensive penalties. I just don't remember the last time we drew a big one. I'm sensitive to the fact that there's confirmation bias in things like this and so I was hoping to find stats, but I don't see anything that breaks things down in terms of types of penalties. But defensive holding, pass interference, illegal contact. We get none of that.

Let's say I'm right and we're below average. What does that mean? Is that about Mac? About the offense in general? About the pass catchers? Or is that just another proxy for "yeah, the offense is not that dynamic."
They had a 39 yard defensive PI yesterday on Jonathan Jones against Hollywood Brown in the 2nd quarter. Flipped the field ARZ 34 to NE 27. But other than that, agree. Not many facemasks or defensive holding or even PI. Playing pretty clean.