Sox send Miley to Seattle for Smith (RP) and Elias (SP)

Mike F

Mayor of Fort Myers
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,068
Not that I am unhappy with the return on the Miley/Aro trade but I was looking forward to having a Johnson/
Furbush combo in the BP.
 

johnnywayback

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2004
1,422
Tazawa available as early as the 6th, with Smith/Uehara/Kimbrel lined up for the 7th-8th-9th, with Layne ready in case there's a tough lefty in the mix, with Wright playing the role of Frank Castillo, and one spot left for either Elias or Ross or Kelly (if Owens or Elias has a great ST) --> this bullpen is going to be every bit as much fun as the Royals' pen has been the last couple of years.

Or, if that's too optimistic, I'm now a lot less worried about burning Tazawa's arm out.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
Presumably Willis has a little familiarity with Elias too -at least from spring training.
I'm happy with the trade even he doesn't contribute much more than replacement level, assuming Smith does his thing.
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
I really like this trade, as I was concerned that Taz's best days were behind him.

The way that DDski has succession-planned for after his and Koji's last year is really well-done IMO. And it's not hard to imagine a scenario where one of Elias/Owens/Johnson is a key piece at the deadline to bring back a legit #2 starter.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,687
Rogers Park
Elias had two implosion starts against Houston and KC (good teams) last June, with 7ER in 3.1 and 3.2 innings respectively.

Outside of those, he was pretty sharp. I know this is cherry picking, and in between the two he had an excellent 10 K start, pitching into the 8th.

He allowed fewer than four runs 15 times out of 20 starts.
 

jtn46

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 10, 2004
9,775
Norwalk, CT
Does this slot Kelly into the rotation? I can't watch that guy pitch. I also hated watching our pen pitch. I guess I generally hated watching our pitchers do most anything.
I think Kelly's bounceback after his Pawtucket stint earned him a crack at this rotation, and it would have been hasty to give up on him as a starter. He was absolutely frustrating to watch pitch at times last season, but there's reason for optimism with him and there wasn't much to go on as to how Kelly would perform as a reliever, it could have been a disaster.

The benefit of having a lot of OK starters is that we're swapping in an OK Joe Kelly for an OK Miley, there's a shot that there is no dropoff there if what we saw from Kelly late last season was real. Miley was the guy in the rotation with value on the market and Dombrowski did a fantastic job leveraging that value to help the MLB team. I can't see any huge holes in this team now with the middle relief sewn up. Ramirez is a concern, but otherwise I'm thrilled with this offseason.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,507
Not here
I'd still like a better lefty than Ross, but other than that, I'm pretty much good with the offseason. We got another good bullpen arm without really sacrificing starting pitching depth.
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,448
Boston, MA
I don't understand what the Mariners are thinking here at all. 5 years of team control of Carson Smith is worth what? More than four years of Darren O'Day, I would think, and people think he's going to get 4/$36 to pitch until he turns 36. And you're giving him up for what. 3 years of Wade Miley being more average? Who of course you do have to pay for and is only somewhat below market, so you're adding payroll in the deal.

If you're a team with the resources of the Mariners you have to bet on your ability to get to average with low-cost guys like Elias. If you have to go out and spend important assets to get average, you're screwed.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,368
This deal makes so much sense on multiple levels and I don't believe DD is nearly done.

1. Miley's value is greatly tied to being a quality "Innings Eater" who saves our bullpen which isn't as valuable to us as it was pre-David Price. Still valuable.....but not nearly as much.
2. We have multiple backend starters available to provide similar production as Miley during regular season....some even come with a higher upside.
3. Miley's post-season role could be minimal or none at all while Smith's has the potential to be crucial.
4. We invested $30m in Price.....knocking around $7m off the payroll each of the next two seasons "isn't nothing" when constructing a roster with a somewhat reasonable budget. Having replacements available in house allow this to occur.
5. It allows us to even move Uehara if we need to reduce payroll further or as a part of the Hanley elimination.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,687
Rogers Park
The benefit of having a lot of OK starters is that we're swapping in an OK Joe Kelly for an OK Miley, there's a shot that there is no dropoff there if what we saw from Kelly late last season was real.
If Kelly's late season revival was for real, he's Matsuzaka circa 2008. He walked a *lot* of dudes and stranded them on base. I like his chances to be better than the 6 ERA guy he was in the first half, but it's a high-wire act.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
I'd still like a better lefty than Ross, but other than that, I'm pretty much good with the offseason. We got another good bullpen arm without really sacrificing starting pitching depth.
Are you forgetting about Layne? He's death to LHH.

I'm legit excited to watch this bullpen.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I don't understand what the Mariners are thinking here at all. 5 years of team control of Carson Smith is worth what? More than four years of Darren O'Day, I would think, and people think he's going to get 4/$36 to pitch until he turns 36. And you're giving him up for what. 3 years of Wade Miley being more average? Who of course you do have to pay for and is only somewhat below market, so you're adding payroll in the deal.

If you're a team with the resources of the Mariners you have to bet on your ability to get to average with low-cost guys like Elias. If you have to go out and spend important assets to get average, you're screwed.
Yeah I don't know why they couldn't have landed Miley for just Smith. And even that is robbing Peter to pay Paul, considering how bad their bullpen was last year.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Tim Britton@TimBritton 11m11 minutes ago
If you're wondering why M's would move Smith, velo was down later in the season, and you might worry about production if it doesn't return.

Just to be a buzzkill...
Hm, OK then. But he went from 48 to 70 appearances, so there are plenty of reasons why he might have fallen off late. Might need to be managed better, but the Sox shouldn't need to lean on him so heavily.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,911
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Tim Britton@TimBritton 11m11 minutes ago
If you're wondering why M's would move Smith, velo was down later in the season, and you might worry about production if it doesn't return.

Just to be a buzzkill...
He didn't give up a run in 12 September appearances, totaling 12 2/3 innings. He had a rough July, and his ERA in Aug. was 3.86, but I don't see a trend where he struggled late due to loss of velocity.
 

The Celtbot

New Member
Sep 15, 2011
246
Tim Britton@TimBritton 11m11 minutes ago
If you're wondering why M's would move Smith, velo was down later in the season, and you might worry about production if it doesn't return.

Just to be a buzzkill...
Carson Smith got four outs for his 22nd hold before Tom Wilhelmsen blew a save Saturday against the A's.
The main reason Smith hasn't spent the last month closing is because the Mariners don't want to have to pay him big bucks in arbitration a couple of years down the line. He's recovered from his midseason malaise by going the last 18 2/3 innings without allowing an earned run (and just one unearned). Oct 4 - 2:09 AM

This will make you feel slightly better.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
Former ESPN Seattle guy with some good details on Elias who sounds like he could benefit from some seasoning Pawtucket. 5 years of control for both him and Smith and this is just a complete win for DD in my book.

Elias is an ultra-athletic arm with enough angle and stuff to pitch out of the bullpen but a lot of upside as a starter, still. The fastball is low-90s — up to 94 on occasion — to go with a plus curveball that he didn’t command consistently in 2015. His changeup has improved, giving him a chance at a third big-league offering and he’ll change arm angles with the first two pitches versus left-handed batters.

Elias, despite being 27, has five years of club control remaining and with the right attention to his mechanics could end up better than Miley ever has been, though he’s not right now and his exact role in Boston remains to be seen.


In conclusion, I don’t like this trade for Seattle and I absolutely love it for Boston. The Sox shed a little payroll, add a useful, multi-dimensional lefty with cheap controlled years left, and a devastating right-handed reliever who also will be dirt cheap for two more seasons.

http://prospectinsider.com/analysis-ms-acquire-miley-aro/
 

alwyn96

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,351
September stats for Carson Smith:
11.1 IP 8 hits 0 runs 2 walks 19Ks

Resume celebration.
Works for me. I was a little bummed about this deal at first (I like Miley a lot for some reason), but I'm coming all the way around.

I get why Kimbrel required a huge, valuable prospect package and Smith basically just went for a backend starter, but it really wouldn't surprise me if they put up similar numbers in 2016.
 

JamieConway

New Member
Dec 1, 2015
7
Bullpen now projects 3 closer level talents with K/9 rates last year: 11.8 (15' smith) 10.5 ('15 Koji) and 13.2 ('15 Kimbrel)!!!!

Unfortunately, building bullpens on historical trends is a fickle process, but on paper this gives them a chance to shut the door.
 

Oil Can Dan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2003
8,051
0-3 to 4-3
This deal makes so much sense on multiple levels and I don't believe DD is nearly done.

1. Miley's value is greatly tied to being a quality "Innings Eater" who saves our bullpen which isn't as valuable to us as it was pre-David Price. Still valuable.....but not nearly as much.
2. We have multiple backend starters available to provide similar production as Miley during regular season....some even come with a higher upside.
3. Miley's post-season role could be minimal or none at all while Smith's has the potential to be crucial.
4. We invested $30m in Price.....knocking around $7m off the payroll each of the next two seasons "isn't nothing" when constructing a roster with a somewhat reasonable budget. Having replacements available in house allow this to occur.
5. It allows us to even move Uehara if we need to reduce payroll further or as a part of the Hanley elimination.
Great point on #3. Even more fired up for this trade after thinking about that.
 

staz

Intangible
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2004
20,781
The cradle of the game.
Elias too? This is a great deal for Sox. Elias has swung and miss change up and curve. Hasn't broken out due more to inconsistent use than injury. Great ground ball history.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,507
Not here
Are you forgetting about Layne? He's death to LHH.

I'm legit excited to watch this bullpen.
No, I'm nott forgetting about Layne, he's the lefty I trust. It's Ross and Escobar and the like that I'd like to have more confidence in.
 

Hee Sox Choi

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 27, 2006
6,134
From MLBTR:

Elias dominated lefties, holding same-handed batters to a .218/.304/.332 clip. His control against lefties could stand to improve a bit, but he’s a generally useful weapon against them and could conceivably be tougher if shifted to a bullpen role, where he could throw harder in shorter stints.
 

TheWave

New Member
Nov 12, 2007
8
Love this trade, now when is DD going to bring back Jenny Dell? Then the off-season is complete.
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,591
I was dreading a starting pitcher for a reliever trade, because I was certain they'd get back something mediocre for a player of value. But I can't complain about this. A starter with upside and a top shelf performer who would close for a lot of teams. And lots of team control on both. And salary relief on top of it all, if only a little. Love it.
 

AZBlue

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 1, 2003
1,566
Phoenix, Airzona
I'll place my bet that Roenis Elias will be part of another trade before spring training. DD said that he was looking to add another starting pitcher. I doubt that Elias was his target.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
Aro is a decent throw in to the M's which should be at least noted. He's sort of a fringe prospect at his age (25 and ranked #20 in the system), but he was one of the few minor league arms who took a step forward last year and probably would have fought for a spot out of the pen this spring training. Obviously expendable, but the M's could have nabbed a 7th inning guy.
 
Dec 2, 2014
20
This deal makes so much sense on multiple levels and I don't believe DD is nearly done.

1. Miley's value is greatly tied to being a quality "Innings Eater" who saves our bullpen which isn't as valuable to us as it was pre-David Price. Still valuable.....but not nearly as much.
2. We have multiple backend starters available to provide similar production as Miley during regular season....some even come with a higher upside.
3. Miley's post-season role could be minimal or none at all while Smith's has the potential to be crucial.
4. We invested $30m in Price.....knocking around $7m off the payroll each of the next two seasons "isn't nothing" when constructing a roster with a somewhat reasonable budget. Having replacements available in house allow this to occur.
5. It allows us to even move Uehara if we need to reduce payroll further or as a part of the Hanley elimination.
If they option Elias he also would not count against the luxury tax I believe (same situation as Craig), so the true savings to the team is greater than the $7 million because of the 50% tax savings on Elias.

Edit: Assuming Sox are over the luxury tax threshold (After Price and barring a big trade this seems likely in 2016)