Round 2: Celtics vs. Bucks

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    126
  • Poll closed .

DrewDawg

Dorito Dink
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
36,023
538 only giving Boston a 21% chance of beating Bucks.

Of course, that's better than the 20% it gives Philly to beat Toronto.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
4,569
Kiev, Ukraine
538 only giving Boston a 21% chance of beating Bucks.

Of course, that's better than the 20% it gives Philly to beat Toronto.
Pretty sure 538 doesn’t have anything that captures Hayward being Hayward or players accepting their roles and playing way better defense.

Bucks should/will be favorites, but those 538 numbers have basically zero information value.
 

Big John

lurker
Dec 9, 2016
1,757
538 only giving Boston a 21% chance of beating Bucks.

Of course, that's better than the 20% it gives Philly to beat Toronto.
The key to the Milwaukee series may be controlling Bledsoe, who did not play well last year and who is reportedly looking for redemption. The Celtics have to deal with George Hill as well.
 

DrewDawg

Dorito Dink
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
36,023
Pretty sure 538 doesn’t have anything that captures Hayward being Hayward or players accepting their roles and playing way better defense.

Bucks should/will be favorites, but those 538 numbers have basically zero information value.
Well, when the series line comes out, I would bet it's pretty close to those numbers. That said, I agree with you. 538 doesn't account for injuries. If Giannis was hurt in Game 4, those numbers would not move.

And we have a week off, it's gonna get boring...
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
29,085
The key to the Milwaukee series may be controlling Bledsoe, who did not play well last year and who is reportedly looking for redemption. The Celtics have to deal with George Hill as well.
Bledsoe had a good season but the reason he struggled was because the Cs defenders (mostly Rozay) shut him down. He may be seeking redemption but its not clear how he will find it.

And if George Hill beats the Cs, they probably don't deserve to be in this round. He is pretty clearly washed/a shell of the player he used to be.

Both guys are relatively poor three point shooters so aside from the obvious in Antetokounmpo, the guys the Cs will have a problem with are Middleton and Brogdon, if healthy.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
17,980
I eagerly look forward to Celtics as large underdogs line is posted.
How large are you thinking? I'm guessing we are +7 on the road (give or take a half pt/pt)......and around even at home. The Celtics have gotten much greater respect from the numbers all season than your typical 49-win team.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
5,231
I think they'll probably be +225 or something similar for the series. That puts them around 30% odds, when it should be closer to 65% based my biased expectations. I'm just glad we don't have to deal with Thon Maker's ridiculous +24 +/-, 3 for 4 3-point shooting game this year. I like opening on the road, feels like we have a good chance to steal one. Gives us more flexibility if we come out slow and need to adjust in game 2, with some house money if we come out solid again.

Here are minutes by game last year. Factor in Game 1 went to OT and game 3 was a blow out .

Jaylen: 45 / 33 / 29 / 41 / 38 / 40 / 16
Tatum: 44 / 30 / 27 / 36 / 25 / 32 / 39
Al: 44 / 35 / 24 / 37 / 37 / 33 / 33
Rozier: 40 / 38 / 31 / 36 / 33 / 37 / 36
Baynes: 14 / 24 / 30 / 19 / (not starting) 10 / (n.s.) 9 / (n.s) 15
Semi: 14 / 1 (!) / 13 / 17 / (starting) 31 (!) / (starting) 22 / (starting) 29
Morris: 35 / 30 / 25 / 26 / 26 / 26 / 24
Smart: DND (did not dress) / DND / DND / DND / 25 / 26 / 32
Larkin (!): 16 / 20 / 19 / 16 / 14 / 9 / 14
Monroe (!!): 10 / 16 / 23 / 5 / 0 / 3 / 0

#1 - Holy crap, this current season's team is SO much more talented. Replacing Rozier's minutes with Kyrie, Larkin's minutes with Rozier, adding in Hayward and improvements for Tatum/Brown. This really is a completely different team.
#2 - It's amazing that team won the first two games with Larkin, Monroe, and Morris getting so many minutes.
#3 - not surprising how different the 3 pt shooting was if the Celtics were home (42% / 42% / 32% / 35%) vs away (33% / 34% / 28%) given the cast of characters.
#4 - Clearly the pivot to Semi starting (over Baynes) in game 5 was the big move. Smart coming back for game 5 took minutes from Monroe and Larkin. Really, the Celtics just played smaller, with Baynes + Monroe's minutes significantly lower for those last 3 games.
#5 - I expect a lot of Kyrie/Jaylen/Hayward/Tatum/Al in critical minutes, ideally with some time for Semi. But I think Brad's going to make Giannis kill us before he goes to Semi instead of planning to use him for 15 min a game.

Can't wait.
 

DrewDawg

Dorito Dink
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
36,023
Completely forgot that Smart missed those first 4 games against them last year.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
5,231
Will Theis pick up some of Monroe's minutes?

Presumably Gordon gets most of Semi's minutes.

What happened to Jaylen last year in G7? I can't recall.
That was the game Jaylen hurt his hamstring. He came back in game 2 of the 76ers series.

It's really amazing the narrative from last year was that the Celtics barely got by the Bucks instead of - the Celtics were without 2 of their max players (Kyrie / Hayward), their 6th man for 4 games (Smart), and in game 7 lost one of their key starters (Brown) and were able to still win the series because their coach completely changed the structure of their team within the same series to adapt.
 

InstaFace

MDLzera
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
8,560
What's the nature of the matchup advantage that makes Semi able to contain Giannis better than most? Is it just his strength being able to resist being backed down in the post? It's surely not footspeed and quickness, nor blocking ability at the rim. I just want to understand if I should be rooting for him to come in and be a "Giannis-banger" to tire him out for 10-15 per night, like how we used Baynes and Monroe against Embiid last year, or if he's too much of a black hole to see more than rare spot duty.
 

Koufax

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,312
He's strong and he doesn't leave his feet when his opponent tries a fake, so some moves that work against others don't work against him. He's also 6 extra fouls to give. He's not a Giannis killer by any means but he's useful.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
12,996
What's the nature of the matchup advantage that makes Semi able to contain Giannis better than most? Is it just his strength being able to resist being backed down in the post? It's surely not footspeed and quickness, nor blocking ability at the rim. I just want to understand if I should be rooting for him to come in and be a "Giannis-banger" to tire him out for 10-15 per night, like how we used Baynes and Monroe against Embiid last year, or if he's too much of a black hole to see more than rare spot duty.
Whatever it was, Id guess that he'd be less effective at it this year simply because Giannis is a better player than he was last year. Giannis is like the Borg. Have to keep changing the configuration of the weaponry to slow him a bit. And if nothing else, Semi's unusual physical profile - strong, not short, doesn't jump -- is different than the others.
 

tbrown_01923

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2006
425
Semi moves his feet well and is able to cut off attack angles and his defensive weakness is contesting jump shots - which is less of a concern with the freak. If he beats them from outside - so be it.
 

DrewDawg

Dorito Dink
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
36,023
If we started a Round 2 thread and listed the Bucks, would we be jinxing the Bucks?

Let's find out.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
5,231
Interesting in looking at Giannis's shooting this year, vs the past few:

Biggest difference? He is shooing 41% from 16 ft - 3 pt instead of ~34% the past few years...... BUT he is only taking 6% of his shots from that distance now. He's actually taking more 3s this year (16% vs 10% a year ago) and only hitting 25.6% from 3. His whole game is 0-3 feet (57% of shots / 77% makes).

Shot percent by distance:
0-3 ft = 77% (76% last year / 71% year before)
3-10 ft = 34% (35% last year / 39% year before)
10-16 ft = 38% (35% last year / 34% year before)
16 - 3pt = 41% (34% last year / 34% year before)
3pt = 25.6% (31% last year / 27% year before)

And shot breakdown:
0-3 ft = 57% (45% / 50%)
3-10 ft = 15% (17% / 15%)
10-16 ft = 5% (11% / 6%)
16 - 3pt = 6% (16% / 15%)
3pt = 16% (10% / 14%)

So he's gotten better at hitting just inside of 3 pt shots, which is likely leading to more pump fake and drives into dunks.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
17,980
I think they'll probably be +225 or something similar for the series. That puts them around 30% odds, when it should be closer to 65% based my biased expectations. I'm just glad we don't have to deal with Thon Maker's ridiculous +24 +/-, 3 for 4 3-point shooting game this year. I like opening on the road, feels like we have a good chance to steal one. Gives us more flexibility if we come out slow and need to adjust in game 2, with some house money if we come out solid again.

Here are minutes by game last year. Factor in Game 1 went to OT and game 3 was a blow out .

Jaylen: 45 / 33 / 29 / 41 / 38 / 40 / 16
Tatum: 44 / 30 / 27 / 36 / 25 / 32 / 39
Al: 44 / 35 / 24 / 37 / 37 / 33 / 33
Rozier: 40 / 38 / 31 / 36 / 33 / 37 / 36
Baynes: 14 / 24 / 30 / 19 / (not starting) 10 / (n.s.) 9 / (n.s) 15
Semi: 14 / 1 (!) / 13 / 17 / (starting) 31 (!) / (starting) 22 / (starting) 29
Morris: 35 / 30 / 25 / 26 / 26 / 26 / 24
Smart: DND (did not dress) / DND / DND / DND / 25 / 26 / 32
Larkin (!): 16 / 20 / 19 / 16 / 14 / 9 / 14
Monroe (!!): 10 / 16 / 23 / 5 / 0 / 3 / 0

#1 - Holy crap, this current season's team is SO much more talented. Replacing Rozier's minutes with Kyrie, Larkin's minutes with Rozier, adding in Hayward and improvements for Tatum/Brown. This really is a completely different team.
#2 - It's amazing that team won the first two games with Larkin, Monroe, and Morris getting so many minutes.
#3 - not surprising how different the 3 pt shooting was if the Celtics were home (42% / 42% / 32% / 35%) vs away (33% / 34% / 28%) given the cast of characters.
#4 - Clearly the pivot to Semi starting (over Baynes) in game 5 was the big move. Smart coming back for game 5 took minutes from Monroe and Larkin. Really, the Celtics just played smaller, with Baynes + Monroe's minutes significantly lower for those last 3 games.
#5 - I expect a lot of Kyrie/Jaylen/Hayward/Tatum/Al in critical minutes, ideally with some time for Semi. But I think Brad's going to make Giannis kill us before he goes to Semi instead of planning to use him for 15 min a game.

Can't wait.
I don’t see the relevance to last year since the Bucks rotation and their systems are completely different as are ours with Kyrie and Haywood. The only pieces in place are Giannis, Bledsoe and Middleton.......every other rotation player and head coach is new. The Bucks offense under Kidd, where they hardly ever shot 3’s, doesn’t at all resemble it under Bud where 3’s and spacing for Giannis are the staples.

I don’t really share the optimism I’m hearing here, on the streets and on the radio. Winning a playoff game in Wisconsin will be a tall order......if we don’t sweep at home then winning 2 out there figures to be near impossible. I think we’ll be very competitive in these games but to have a chance we’ll have to steal one of the first two.....otherwise this could end in 5.
 

Big John

lurker
Dec 9, 2016
1,757
I'm not at all optimistic about beating the Bucks. Budenholzer makes all the difference, together with a veteran bench. Maybe George Hill is on his last legs, but guys like Hill, Gasol, and Ilyasova aren't going to make dumb mistakes.

Having said that, if they Celtics beat the Bucks the will likely beat the Raptors-- and so will the Bucks if they eliminate the Celtics. The EC finals are in the 2nd round.
 
Last edited:

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
3,991
Well, you might be jinxing the Pistons. Will poor Dwayne Casey ever win a playoff game?
He has 21 career playoff wins as a head coach.
Having said that, if they Celtics beat the Bucks they will likely beat the Pistons-- and so will the Bucks if they eliminate the Celtics. The EC finals are in the 2nd round.
The Bucks are playing the Pistons currently. The winner of Celtics/Bucks plays the winner of the 76ers/Raptors, barring a major comeback.
 

Big John

lurker
Dec 9, 2016
1,757
Misspoke. Meant the Raptors.

I think either the Celtics or the Bucks will beat the Raptors, assuming that Toronto beats Philadelphia (which seems likely). I thought Marc Gasol would be the missing piece for the Raptors, but he hasn't been so far.
 

benhogan

Baynes Hogan (pending trade)
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
6,669
Santa Monica
I don’t see the relevance to last year since the Bucks rotation and their systems are completely different as are ours with Kyrie and Haywood. The only pieces in place are Giannis, Bledsoe and Middleton.......every other rotation player and head coach is new. The Bucks offense under Kidd, where they hardly ever shot 3’s, doesn’t at all resemble it under Bud where 3’s and spacing for Giannis are the staples.

I don’t really share the optimism I’m hearing here, on the streets and on the radio. Winning a playoff game in Wisconsin will be a tall order......if we don’t sweep at home then winning 2 out there figures to be near impossible. I think we’ll be very competitive in these games but to have a chance we’ll have to steal one of the first two.....otherwise this could end in 5.
Celtics v Bucks went head to head 3X this season. Let's take a look at how the "new look" Bucks played the Celtics (box scores attached):

Game 1 11/1 @Boston Celtics 117 Bucks 113
The Celtics shoot lights out, set a team record w/24 3-pointers. C's almost blow a big 4th quarter lead, foreshadowing the rest of the regular season. Bucks fully healthy. Celtics played w/out Jaylen Brown, Semi started in his place.
http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=401070796

Game 2 12/21 @Boston Bucks 120 Celtics 107
Bucks easily handle the Celtics from the tip, C's down 17 at the Half.
Bucks fully healthy. Celtics w/out Horford, Baynes, & Morris Sr.
Brad starts Semi and Hayward as his 4/5. Theis, TL, Yabo play 37 mins put up a -9.
http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=401071154

Game 3 2/21 @Milwaukee Bucks 98 Celtics 97
Kyrie misses an awkward last-second shot from 10 feet.
Bucks at full strength. Celtics w/out Hayward and Baynes.
Brad plays HRB favorites Yabu/Theis a total of 11 minutes and they produce a -13. We won't see either of them play meaningful minutes in this series.
http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=401071543


The finally healthy Celtics (well, no Smart) match up well with the Bucks. If Brogdon plays I see a rugged 7-game series. The Bucks haven't seen the new and improved Gordon Hayward. A healthy Baynes (20-25MPG) helps Horford clog the lane to slow down Giannis. Perimeter Lopez shouldn't really expose MaMo defensively. Rozier/Kyrie will be in Bledsoe's grill. Brown can somewhat handle Middleton. Horford w/Semi will try to keep Giannis around 30pgm.

IMO Brogdon is huge IF he is out the Celtics win this in 6.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
4,569
Kiev, Ukraine
Celtics v Bucks went head to head 3X this season. Let's take a look at how the "new look" Bucks played the Celtics (box scores attached):

Game 1 Celtics 117 Bucks 113
The Celtics shoot lights out, set a team record w/24 3-pointers. C's almost blow a big 4th quarter lead, foreshadowing the rest of the regular season. Bucks fully healthy. Celtics played w/out Jaylen Brown, Semi started in his place.
http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=401070796

Game 2 12/21 @Boston Bucks 120 Celtics 107
Bucks easily handle the Celtics from the tip, C's down 17 at the Half.
Bucks fully healthy. Celtics w/out Horford, Baynes, & Morris Sr.
Brad starts Semi and Hayward as his 4/5. Theis, TL, Yabo play 37 mins put up a -9.
http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=401071154

Game 3 2/21 @Milwaukee Bucks 98 Celtics 97
Kyrie misses an awkward last-second shot from 10 feet.
Bucks at full strength. Celtics w/out Hayward and Baynes.
Brad plays HRB favorites Yabu/Theis a total of 11 minutes and they produce a -13. We won't see either of them play meaningful minutes in this series.
http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=401071543


The finally healthy Celtics (well, no Smart) match up well with the Bucks. If Brogdon plays I see a rugged 7-game series. The Bucks haven't seen the new and improved Gordon Hayward. A healthy Baynes (20-25MPG) helps Horford clog the lane to slow down Giannis. Perimeter Lopez shouldn't really expose MaMo defensively. Rozier/Kyrie will be in Bledsoe's grill. Brown can somewhat handle Middleton. Horford w/Semi will try to keep Giannis around 30pgm.

IMO Brogdon is huge, IF he is out the Celtics win this in 6.
Wish I could share your optimism, and I will note that in that Game 2, the Celtics built a large early lead before getting completely rolled after.

I think that the Celtics will need to make a ton of 3s in order to win this series, and I think the game-to-game variance, combined with the Cs tendency to drift to bad habits when shots don't fall, have Milwaukee winning this in 6.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
29,085
I'm not at all optimistic about beating the Bucks. Budenholzer makes all the difference, together with a veteran bench. Maybe George Hill is on his last legs, but guys like Hill, Gasol, and Ilyasova aren't going to make dumb mistakes.

Having said that, if they Celtics beat the Bucks the will likely beat the Raptors-- and so will the Bucks if they eliminate the Celtics. The EC finals are in the 2nd round.
Gasol isn't on the Bucks unless I am misunderstanding you.

And please take a look at George Hill's numbers. The guy is the epitome of a savvy veteran but its not mistakes where he will cost the Bucks. He has lost a few steps and Stevens/the Cs will target him on the defensive end much the way Budenholzer will target the Celtics weaker defenders.

You may know this better than most here but InstaFace and others have highlighted how these series are about match-ups given that teams only have to focus on one opponent. The Cs have a tall order stopping Milwaukee because Giannis cannot really be stopped and he has a guy like Middleton, who is a matchup nightmare given his length and skill set as well as Brogdon who can also make teams pay in multiple ways.

Boston is going to have to play their best basketball this round to even win a game in Milwaukee. That said, given how they played down the stretch and in the first round, they have a shot. But the Bucks should be the favorite in this series imho.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
44,775
Pau is on MIL, Marc is on TOR.

Edit: Pau is hurt, but they said ‘out for a month’ a month ago, so maybe back soon.
 

DrewDawg

Dorito Dink
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
36,023
The key to the Milwaukee series may be controlling Bledsoe, who did not play well last year and who is reportedly looking for redemption. The Celtics have to deal with George Hill as well.
Oh no! Eric Bledsoe and George Hill!
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
29,085
Is that bizarre Spurs contract of his still going?
He got bought out for $22.7mm (this year's contract plus a partial guarantee of $6.7mm for next year) but gave the Spurs $2.5mm back. He then signed with the Bucks for $527+ thousand. Not bad work for a guy who likely has already played his last games in the NBA
 

benhogan

Baynes Hogan (pending trade)
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
6,669
Santa Monica
Wish I could share your optimism, and I will note that in that Game 2, the Celtics built a large early lead before getting completely rolled after.

I think that the Celtics will need to make a ton of 3s in order to win this series, and I think the game-to-game variance, combined with the Cs tendency to drift to bad habits when shots don't fall, have Milwaukee winning this in 6.
Don't worry, we'll keep the lights on for you:)

We were never close to being healthy in any game, especially that Game 2 ("large early lead"? Celtics up 10-1 in the first 2:44 minutes means next to nothing).

Milwaukee was at full strength every game, let's see them w/a hobbled Brogdon.
 

JohnnyTheBone

Member
SoSH Member
May 28, 2007
16,581
A Buick 6
We should have this thread by now.

Some good history in this series (Celtics win last year); some bad (Bucks sweep in 1983 that led to Bill Fitch getting sh!tcanned).

I will be watching cautiously, having been burned multiple times by this frustrating Celtics group, thinking they had turned the corner, and finding out they had...not.

Bottom line is, if they can't beat Milwaukee without home court advantage, they weren't winning a title. Hopefully Brad has a playoff rotation ready to go, and the C's send a message in round two.
 
Last edited:

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
16,859
.
where our wing depth will be much needed vs the Bucks fast pace and perimeter oriented game.
Not sure what you mean by MIL's "perimeter oriented game." Giannis lead the league with just shy of 8 restricted area buckets a game. And he shot something like 27% outside the restricted area. MIL also took 34 shots per game in the restricted area and made them at a 66% clip. They apparently became just the 2nd team to hit 56+% on 2P shots. https://www.reddit.com/r/MkeBucks/comments/bg8mfk/the_bucks_set_the_nba_record_for_2p_this_season/

My initial reaction to the matchup is that BOS has to run Brook Lopez off the court. MIL doesn't swith on PnRs (at least they didn't) so the Cs big men are going to have to hit enough 3Ps to get MIL out of their drop coverage.

Also, so long as Lopez is standing at the 3P line, I'm not guarding him with a big guy.

This chess match will be fun. I expect game 6 to be played much differently than Game 1.
 

Reardons Beard

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2005
3,207
Boston, MA
Starts and ends with containing the Greek Freak.

I believe Al has had good success in containing him, with success a relative term of course. I'd like to think between Al and Baynes with some help they can force outside shots versus close range, higher percentage.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
17,980
Not sure what you mean by MIL's "perimeter oriented game." Giannis lead the league with just shy of 8 restricted area buckets a game. And he shot something like 27% outside the restricted area. MIL also took 34 shots per game in the restricted area and made them at a 66% clip. They apparently became just the 2nd team to hit 56+% on 2P shots. https://www.reddit.com/r/MkeBucks/comments/bg8mfk/the_bucks_set_the_nba_record_for_2p_this_season/

My initial reaction to the matchup is that BOS has to run Brook Lopez off the court. MIL doesn't swith on PnRs (at least they didn't) so the Cs big men are going to have to hit enough 3Ps to get MIL out of their drop coverage.

Also, so long as Lopez is standing at the 3P line, I'm not guarding him with a big guy.

This chess match will be fun. I expect game 6 to be played much differently than Game 1.
All 5 Bucks starters and every one of their bench players play face up from the perimeter. They were 2nd in the NBA in 3-pt attempts......everything they do is initiated on the perimeter. Even Giannis is most dangerous going downhill from 18-feet off the dribble and of course can dominate in the paint as well.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
16,859
The single most interesting schematic theme to this series will be MIL's drop coverage on the PnR. That means if the other team is setting the screen, MIL's big - usually Lopez - is dropping down into the restricted area while the other defender trails the ball handler. The theory here is to (1) protect the rim and (2) force ordinarily worse shooting bigs into taking 3Ps. As such, MIL is really high in 3P attempts against and 3P makes against.

This works well against teams like DET that don't have stretch 5s. We'll see how that fares against BOS. In their game. the only game when BOS was at full strength, BOS hit 40% if a ton of 3P and won.

Here's a breakdown on the game in February that discusses the drop coverage (with video!): https://thebasketballplaybook.com/blog-posts/breakdown-milwaukee-bucks-vs-boston-celtics/.

If Al and MaMo and GH are hitting 40+% from 3P at the end of the series, I would think BOS will be in the conference finals.
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
Jun 27, 2006
31,607
Haiku
Some good history in this series (Celtics win last year); some bad (Bucks sweep in 1983 that led to Bill Fitch getting sh!tcanned).
I have some even better history: Celtics beat Bucks in 1974 for all the marbles. It was the first Celtics' championship, and the last Oscar Robertson I can remember. The Celtics took game 7 by doubling-teaming Kareem, fronting him with Cowens and relying on Silas to root him out of his favorite positions. In an era where Kareem's post game was the deadliest weapon in sport, the Celtics found a way to neutralize the star by by giving Buck PF Cornell Warner a chance to make his name in history. Warner remains nearly anonymous to this day.

Keeping the ball out of Giannis' hands would be a good start for the 2019 Celtics too.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,609
Yes pack the defensive paint

Al Horford on Giannis

Brown on Middleton

Kyrie on Bledsoe

Tatum on Sterling

Baynes on Lopez
Baynes would end up taking a lot of threes. As Jay King said on Twitter,I think you consider starting Hayward (or Morris) with this group.

Some interesting tweets (click for threads/more)




 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
3,545
Here to ask an important question: Who are the TV announcers? Please don't say Hubie Brown. Please don't say Breen.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
16,859
All 5 Bucks starters and every one of their bench players play face up from the perimeter. They were 2nd in the NBA in 3-pt attempts......everything they do is initiated on the perimeter. Even Giannis is most dangerous going downhill from 18-feet off the dribble and of course can dominate in the paint as well.
OK. To me, everything starts with Giannis and his attacks on the basket, whether it is the half court or transition. Giannis lead the league in 3P assists. If The Cs can build a wall in the restricted area, that will help them a lot.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
29,085
The single most interesting schematic theme to this series will be MIL's drop coverage on the PnR. That means if the other team is setting the screen, MIL's big - usually Lopez - is dropping down into the restricted area while the other defender trails the ball handler. The theory here is to (1) protect the rim and (2) force ordinarily worse shooting bigs into taking 3Ps. As such, MIL is really high in 3P attempts against and 3P makes against.

This works well against teams like DET that don't have stretch 5s. We'll see how that fares against BOS. In their game. the only game when BOS was at full strength, BOS hit 40% if a ton of 3P and won.

Here's a breakdown on the game in February that discusses the drop coverage (with video!): https://thebasketballplaybook.com/blog-posts/breakdown-milwaukee-bucks-vs-boston-celtics/.

If Al and MaMo and GH are hitting 40+% from 3P at the end of the series, I would think BOS will be in the conference finals.
Unless I am misunderstanding what HRB was saying in the other thread, Milwaukee isn't very efficient from deep. They were second in 3PA during the season but 15th in 3P%. Brogdon and Middleton are good outside shooters as is Snell in limited run. The rest of their cast includes Lopez who had uneven three point shooting and may have been a bit lucky/streaky from deep this season as well as role players. Ilyasova, Dellavedova and Brown are all decent but as anyone can recall, Ersan is a bit of a liability on defense (he looks half calcified on any given sequence).

If the C's can slow Giannis a bit and contain Middleton on defense while Boston's bigs take advantage of the tendencies you've described, they have a decent shot. Interestingly (at least to me) the Celtics were seventh in 3PA and seventh in 3P%. Consistency!