Ok. Then it's odd.It’d be pretty odd if the gigantic man coming off a historic offensive season decided to obviously cheat in front of hundreds of thousands of viewers in a meaningless May 6-0 game against a scrub reliever.
As they should, because it's how the game is supposed to be played.The whole concept of people being up in arms about players 'cheating' in baseball needs to stop. By the same token, fans burying their heads in the sand and saying 'not my player, he's a saint!' needs to stop as well. Every player tries to find competitive advantages. Baseball is not some bastion of integrity. They're all cheating.
This is exactly where I'm at. Realize your every gesture is captured in 4K and have a better story ready for postgame.Ok. Then it's odd.
It's not a huge deal - although after the Astros bullshit, I think it's fair for everyone to be skeptical (non-Yankee fans) or defensive (Yankee fans).
I have no idea if they were stealing signs from outside the coaches box, the pitcher was tipping his pitches, or if Judge came down with a nervous tick for that one at bat.
What I do know is that his excuse - not reason - was a lie. And he could be lying for the right reasons (he doesn't owe the Blue Jay's shit if their guy is tipping pitches) or wrong reasons. But glancing sideways for half a second for several pitches in a row as the pitcher is starting his windup (and only then)? Yeah. He wasn't doing that, "to see who's chirping".
Doesn't mean Judge should be playing for the Astros or anything.
If he's doing something that's accepted within the game, is the burden still on him to come up with a better story? Is he supposed to tell the world Toronto is telegraphing their pitches or location? That would seem like bad strategy and probably breaking one of those unwritten rules.This is exactly where I'm at. Realize your every gesture is captured in 4K and have a better story ready for postgame.
"I was distracted." Done.If he's doing something that's accepted within the game, is the burden still on him to come up with a better story? Is he supposed to tell the world Toronto is telegraphing their pitches or location? That would seem like bad strategy and probably breaking one of those unwritten rules.
Captain Intangibles 10.0?Also I think the part that non-Yankee fans are missing a bit in this situation is that I really can't emphasize enough how hands on Judge has tried to be as captain, I've literally never seen anything like it in MLB. I can't point to specific examples but since the start of spring training, it's been quite clear that he considers himself almost a part of management now in addition to a player, and he does everything he can in that role.
Maybe I notice it more than others because 1) Judge is my favorite player (maybe ever) and 2) I was co-captain of my NCAA title fencing team in college junior and senior seasons, and I did something similar, to the point where the coach of the #2 team in the country (Penn State) told me and my coach after we beat them that I was the team MVP, even though I had just lost 2 of 3 and there were a lot of better fencers than me on the team.
Holy shit .... how many will he have at 150 games, which will still have him well behind ARod's 166? This guy is an absolute monster. Do we have video of his eyes in the other 99 games? I'm still inclined to believe the glances are nothing for us to focus on. As much as I still dislike the Yankees, I'd be broken hearted to hear he was cheating - especially after last year.
Agreed. It is utterly ridiculous to say that you are willing to put your at bat at risk so that you can take notes on your teammates dugout behavior so you can fulfill your captainly duties when you all get back to the clubhouse.Ok. Then it's odd.
It's not a huge deal - although after the Astros bullshit, I think it's fair for everyone to be skeptical (non-Yankee fans) or defensive (Yankee fans).
I have no idea if they were stealing signs from outside the coaches box, the pitcher was tipping his pitches, or if Judge came down with a nervous tick for that one at bat.
What I do know is that his excuse - not reason - was a lie. And he could be lying for the right reasons (he doesn't owe the Blue Jay's shit if their guy is tipping pitches) or wrong reasons. But glancing sideways for half a second for several pitches in a row as the pitcher is starting his windup (and only then)? Yeah. He wasn't doing that, "to see who's chirping".
Doesn't mean Judge should be playing for the Astros or anything.
Isn't it possible (even quite likely) that Jackson was tipping pitches, that the Yankees were trying to relay the information to Judge within the bounds of the rules, and that Judge crushes that pitch with or without the information given that it was a middle-middle meatball slider and all he threw in that AB were sliders? These things are not mutually exclusive.Did he tip a meatball slider down right down the middle of the plate?
Possible? Sure. But they created this new signaling system just for Judge and no other batters? After we were already up 6-0? During an at-bat was insane already? And he was looking in the dugout, which is not what Toronto is accusing anyone of...they are arguing that it was the base coaches. So, again. I just don't understand the assumptions being made when there are actual circumstances during that at bat that tie in exactly to what Judge was saying and how he acts.Isn't it possible (even quite likely) that Jackson was tipping pitches, that the Yankees were trying to relay the information to Judge within the bounds of the rules, and that Judge crushes that pitch with or without the information given that it was a middle-middle meatball slider and all he threw in that AB were sliders? These things are not mutually exclusive.
And if that's how it went down, it's neither cheating nor "dirty". It almost certainly didn't affect the outcome. It's a non-issue. But isn't that probably how it went down?
Yes, seems pretty clear now that’s what happened. Bauers (a lefty) was up before Judge and there is a screen cap where you can see him look sideways similarly at the third base coach.Isn't it possible (even quite likely) that Jackson was tipping pitches, that the Yankees were trying to relay the information to Judge within the bounds of the rules, and that Judge crushes that pitch with or without the information given that it was a middle-middle meatball slider and all he threw in that AB were sliders? These things are not mutually exclusive.
And if that's how it went down, it's neither cheating nor "dirty". It almost certainly didn't affect the outcome. It's a non-issue. But isn't that probably how it went down?
I didn't see or know this. Good catch. I change my opinion now. Thanks everyone for listening to me certain about things I'm potentially wrong aboutYes, seems pretty clear now that’s what happened. Bauers (a lefty) was up before Judge and there is a screen cap where you can see him look sideways similarly at the third base coach.
I'll push back on this: if the Yankees found a tell, either from the pitcher or the catcher, and used a coach to relay that tell to Judge, then they did absolutely nothing wrong and such actions have been part of baseball for more than 100 years.First off, I want to apologize to @jon abbey for never following up on the "Jomboy clip" thing -- yes, I meant the clip of the Jays announcers (and boy, is Buck Martinez's voice actually getting worse as he gets older? That was actually painful to listen to for 3 minutes, I can't imagine watching a whole season of him calling games. Sox fans complained about Mazz's voice last year and, well, Martinez is like 100x worse).
Beyond Judge, I find the whole sign stealing/pitch tipping thing to be exhausting in general. I get that teams want to get "any edge they can" but at this point, with the Yankees/Red Sox/Astros all having been caught going over the line, I'd really love it for teams to just, you know, find other ways to win. It has always felt a little unsportsmanlike to me, even if it's as old as the game itself. I'm not convinced it would meaningfully change any outcomes once it evens out anyway.
The Athletic article suggests that the 1B coach could see the pitch grip in the glove. As to the question of why was Judge the only one to do this....he was the only RHH to face Jay Jackson and therefore the only hitter able to glance over at the 1B coach.I'll push back on this: if the Yankees found a tell, either from the pitcher or the catcher, and used a coach to relay that tell to Judge, then they did absolutely nothing wrong and such actions have been part of baseball for more than 100 years.
I strongly suspect that Judge was looking over at his 1B coach because they found a tell, likely from the catcher's positioning or knee, about pitch location.
No, I get that -- I'm just suspect as to how valuable sign-stealing and pitch tipping really is over the long haul. Obviously it can be valuable in the moment--ie, "we saw how Pitcher X was gripping the ball on sliders and got to him for 6+ runs"--but if you assume deciphering this stuff is a capability most teams have and that it's not something that impacts too many pitches or plays per game, I question how much of an advantage it really provides to the team or the game more broadly. And unlike, say, advanced metrics around defensive positioning, there's clearly a temptation to go over the line with this stuff and to break the rules (which is def. unsportsmanlike). So why keep it legal?I'll push back on this: if the Yankees found a tell, either from the pitcher or the catcher, and used a coach to relay that tell to Judge, then they did absolutely nothing wrong and such actions have been part of baseball for more than 100 years.
I strongly suspect that Judge was looking over at his 1B coach because they found a tell, likely from the catcher's positioning or knee, about pitch location.
Exactly this.I'll push back on this: if the Yankees found a tell, either from the pitcher or the catcher, and used a coach to relay that tell to Judge, then they did absolutely nothing wrong and such actions have been part of baseball for more than 100 years.
I strongly suspect that Judge was looking over at his 1B coach because they found a tell, likely from the catcher's positioning or knee, about pitch location.
I think it's the line regarding signs and signals that needs to be done away with. In all team sports. Alls fair in love and war, during the game. Not trespassing/spying on a teams practice facility, not stealing playbooks, not hacking emails or other proprietary information. A right of privacy is a reasonable expectation in those situations. But during a game, being played in front of thousands of fans, all equipped now with cameras, and many other media people, also with cameras, expecting signals to be private and sacrosanct seems ridiculous to me. It was the fundamental absurdity of the faux spy gate "scandal". Same with the Astros. In this case, I think the Yankees bench absolutely found a pitch tell, and Judge was looking in to get it. So what? Doing exactly what he/they should be doing.No, I get that -- I'm just suspect as to how valuable sign-stealing and pitch tipping really is over the long haul. Obviously it can be valuable in the moment--ie, "we saw how Pitcher X was gripping the ball on sliders and got to him for 6+ runs"--but if you assume deciphering this stuff is a capability most teams have and that it's not something that impacts too many pitches or plays per game, I question how much of an advantage it really provides to the team or the game more broadly. And unlike, say, advanced metrics around defensive positioning, there's clearly a temptation to go over the line with this stuff and to break the rules (which is def. unsportsmanlike). So why keep it legal?
Here's my problem, and I feel like I'm beating a dead horse but whatever.Exactly this.
I brought up the issue because its obviously news worthy. People got defensive and kind of freaked out. My point was that Judges response was obviously a lie, but...what else could he do? They didn't break the rules, and you definitely don't want to let the Blue Jays know he was tipping his pitches in case you face him again. Judge came up with the best excuse he could on the spot.
The only thing that bothers me a little - mainly because its the Yankees - is that the coaches were standing outside the boxes so they could get a better view of the tell. Thats skirting the line a little, but...really, who gives a shit?
@Murderer's Crow - the first base coach could get the tell and communicate it back to the dugout (offspeed = crossed arms/standing a certain way/etc). Then the dugout could relay it to Judge.
They could see his grip on the ball.Here's my problem, and I feel like I'm beating a dead horse but whatever.
Jackson threw 21 pitches that inning and it was the first time NY has seen him all year. Maybe they watched video, who knows. But based on at least one above post, we're saying the base coaches were looking at the pitcher glove position out of their box so they could see where his glove was to identify his pitch tipping.
We're saying that by the time Judge got up at bat, with a small sample size of only a few pitches having been throw by Jackson so far, they identified a tell, incorporated a fucking relay system to the dugout, and implemented it with the offense? And they did it with such efficiency and secrecy that nobody can really identify the signals hitters were receiving?
The alternative that it could have been coming from the catcher could be the case, but that ain't what's being discussed by Jackson and the general population. And it's not really easy to see something with the catcher. So, basically, the entire evidence of this is based on Judge's glance. Which we've all already established would be legal for him to do anyway, if he was being relayed signs legally. I just don't get how this is actually a story.
With the new pitch clock rules, the timing to transfer that information has to be so quick, just don't know how helpful it can really be in real time. And for God's sake, how much help does Judge need? It's so freaking hard to hit a baseball and he's already so good at it.Shouldn’t teams have someone watching the base coaches and dugouts then? A relay system from base coach to dugout to hitter would seem to be easy to pick up on.
I am insanely bored today, Crow, so I actually watched both the Yankees and Jays broadcast of that inning this afternoon. The crazy thing that I saw is that on the Jays feed, they showed Judge on deck and he was making hand signals to someone either on the bench or down the line. The Jay's announcers even mentioned that it looked like he was double-checking to see what kind of pitch Jackson had just thrown to Bauers. They cut back to him and he did it twice. It's possible the Yankees saw something on tape or advanced scouting picked it up and Chapman signaled when he was able to identify it. It happens all the time.Here's my problem, and I feel like I'm beating a dead horse but whatever.
Jackson threw 21 pitches that inning and it was the first time NY has seen him all year. Maybe they watched video, who knows. But based on at least one above post, we're saying the base coaches were looking at the pitcher glove position out of their box so they could see where his glove was to identify his pitch tipping.
We're saying that by the time Judge got up at bat, with a small sample size of only a few pitches having been throw by Jackson so far, they identified a tell, incorporated a fucking relay system to the dugout, and implemented it with the offense? And they did it with such efficiency and secrecy that nobody can really identify the signals hitters were receiving?
The alternative that it could have been coming from the catcher could be the case, but that ain't what's being discussed by Jackson and the general population. And it's not really easy to see something with the catcher. So, basically, the entire evidence of this is based on Judge's glance. Which we've all already established would be legal for him to do anyway, if he was being relayed signs legally. I just don't get how this is actually a story.
He came, he saw, he conquered.The fact that Judge has led the league in exit velocity every single season since his ROY one (with the exception of the 2020 60 game season, so 6 out of 7 if you count this year) is pretty wild. Yeah, he's a big dude, but that's still a statistical improbability.
Lowest… but still. Didn’t realize he owned them like that wow
38 HRs in 86 games career, that fact and BAL moving their LF wall back before 2022 are not entirely unconnected.Lowest… but still. Didn’t realize he owned them like that wow
Nothing like a hot dog at the ballpark.Have to admit I kind of like that Judge chose to own a dachshund.