Joe D Reid said:I don't like the NFL's flag-humping in general. But man, of all weeks. Don't put Francis Key in this.
Which has literally zero to do with a football game, which is my point.DrewDawg said:It's the 200th birthday of the Star-Spangled Banner.
Joe D Reid said:Which has literally zero to do with a football game, which is my point.
Dollar said:You can tell on the replay that the ref didn't see Mornhinweg, he only called for the timeout when Sheldon Richardson yelled it in the ref's ear.
Really? I had no clue about the 200th anniversary. It is what it is and I'm not surprised but my wife and I both commented on how the NFL is wrapping itself in the flag today and it s more pathetic than it typically is.E5 Yaz said:The Sunday night football game is seen by more people than any TV program. If the NFL didn't make a big deal of the anthem's 200th anniversary, given the audience and the wekk of bad press, they'd be criticized even more
Ralphwiggum said:Really? I had no clue about the 200th anniversary. It is what it is and I'm not surprised but my wife and I both commented on how the NFL is wrapping itself in the flag today and it s more pathetic than it typically is.
This is where I think Rex fails as a head coach. He should know that there is an issue with the offense (whatever Marty sees) and be calling the timeout himself.Dollar said:Then he hears time-out in his ear, where Rex Ryan was just standing, and signals for a time-out because he assumed it was Ryan calling it.
Does this mean we can finally retire the song and pick a good one, like America the Beautiful or something better than a poem put to an Irish drinking song.E5 Yaz said:The Sunday night football game is seen by more people than any TV program. If the NFL didn't make a big deal of the anthem's 200th anniversary, given the audience and the wekk of bad press, they'd be criticized even more
Luis Taint said:The refs and NFL are making football unbearable
I don't want to imply the Bears are old but Gary Fencik just entered when they went to the nickel.DanoooME said:I think if the Bears signed Champ Bailey, their defense would get younger. That's a bunch of old fuckers.
HomeRunBaker said:Has to be incomplete right?
Edit: good grief that was 100% obvious the ball is spinning to show the receiver doesn't have control and Collinsworth is chuckling at the ruling? Wtf!!
HomeRunBaker said:If the ball is spinning in your hands by definition you don't have control.
Once it stopped spinning and the receiver had control he could only get one foot down.
crystalline said:I thought catch too. It spun a bit after the punch but after he pulled it down there was never any question he was controlling the ball.
Serious question: have 50% of the plays this game (including special teams) had one or more flags or a review? If you forced me to guess I'd go with 60%. Crazy.
They've been calling it "The Field of Jeans"DanoooME said:So have they come up with a dumb nickname for the new stadium yet? It looks like a giant D from the overhead shots. Or would they call it "The Dungaree" or something like that?
gammoseditor said:
Most of these calls look obvious. To me, this is a sloppy game, but it's the teams fault and not the refs.
It's because he didn't catch the ball per the definition of possession, complete and continuous control of the ball, while having both feet inbounds. The ball made a half revolution in the players arms which isn't considered possession. Once the ball stops spinning the player by definition has control but didn't get his second foot down once he gained control.Mloaf71 said:
I know the rule and all but how can you catch the football (i.e. it never touches the ground), get both feet in bounds, and then have someone say you didn't catch the ball?
Isn't the definition of the word catch "intercept and hold (something that has been thrown, propelled, or dropped)"?
nothumb said:i love frank gore. please tell me he hasn't ever done anything truly shitty like 90% of the NFL.
Frank Gore's efforts in the San Francisco 49ers' NFC Championship Game victory over the Atlanta Falcons didn't go unnoticed by the NFL, which decided he wore his socks last Sunday a little too low to its liking.
The running back was fined $10,500 on Wednesday for wearing his socks too low in the game, marking the second time he has been fined this season.
"Yeah, I'll be cool. It's all good," Gore said Wednesday. "I was wrong. Next time, I'll do better.
"
http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2012/story/_/id/8873686/2013-nfl-playoffs-frank-gore-san-francisco-49ers-fined-105k-low-socks
HomeRunBaker said:It's because he didn't catch the ball per the definition of possession, complete and continuous control of the ball, while having both feet inbounds. The ball made a half revolution in the players arms which isn't considered possession. Once the ball stops spinning the player by definition has control but didn't get his second foot down once he gained control.