pappymojo said:What makes you think it was his signature moves that got him endorsement deals? Eli Manning endorses products and I don't think he has any signature moves.
Oh really?
pappymojo said:What makes you think it was his signature moves that got him endorsement deals? Eli Manning endorses products and I don't think he has any signature moves.
Silverdude2167 said:65,000 people leaving a stadium by car, what do people expect? I'm sure they can improve assisting people, but that is what you get for putting a stadium out in the suburbs.
Just another reason to watch games from home.
Sure he does......his last name and two Super Bowl rings. If Archie was his Dad, and he were a good ole country boy, and put up two championships then Colin wouldn't have needed all the cameras on his kissing his biceps.pappymojo said:What makes you think it was his signature moves that got him endorsement deals? Eli Manning endorses products and I don't think he has any signature moves.
Your argument is weak. 1 landing sponsorships does nothing to prove or disprove whether he is a douche. 2 there is no proof that his signature celebration moves raise, lower or affect in any way his earning power or his ability to land sponsorships. 3 there is no proof that he is performing signature moves as a way to market himself.HomeRunBaker said:Sure he does......his last name and two Super Bowl rings. If Archie was his Dad, and he were a good ole country boy, and put up two championships then Colin wouldn't have needed all the cameras on his kissing his biceps.
Colin doesn't have all those things so he brilliantly manufactured another way to generate attention. There's nothing wrong with this imo.
1. Where is your proof that he IS a douche? I surely haven't seen anything in interviews I've seem. The one with Russell Wilson actually shows the opposite.pappymojo said:Your argument is weak. 1 landing sponsorships does nothing to prove or disprove whether he is a douche. 2 there is no proof that his signature celebration moves raise, lower or affect in any way his earning power or his ability to land sponsorships. 3 there is no proof that he is performing signature moves as a way to market himself.
Fair point but while I didn’t use stats to support my point, I also didn’t really use wins either. I don’t know how you feel about Total QBR but Kaepernick has been sixth and seventh respectively the past two seasons. The bottom line is that like many other QBs, he has his warts but can be very good.Shelterdog said:Mark Sanchez says hi. I actually like Kaepernick but using QB wins to judge a QB with 31 career starts from a team with a great defense and running game doesn't seem analytically sound.
Johnny Manziel, marketing genius. Also large douche. Im sticking with my flat brimmed hat assessment.DeJesus Built My Hotrod said:HRB's post brings something up that we have to acknowledge and perhaps discuss in its own thread. These guys have a really limited shelf life and, as such, signature moves and self promotion are really pretty savvy moves. Especially amongst players in the NFL who typically have a helmet/facemask covering their heads and, as such, aren't as recognizable as other athletes and more importantly have non-guaranteed contracts in a sport where violent (and in some cases career-ending) injuries are fairly common.
If Kaepernick's signature move has earned him some extra dough to mitigate the chance that a concussion or knee injury derails his career, then more power to him. One more thing - major sports are the only game in town now in getting people to watch television in real time, with commercials. Why shouldn't the athletes, who essentially provide all the content, get theirs as well?
.DeJesus Built My Hotrod said:Fair point but while I didn’t use stats to support my point, I also didn’t really use wins either. I don’t know how you feel about Total QBR but Kaepernick has been sixth and seventh respectively the past two seasons. The bottom line is that like many other QBs, he has his warts but can be very good.
Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt said:The best, snarkiest final word on the jets debacle comes courtesy of Darren Hartwell at NESN:
"The Jets promptly turned over the ball on downs after the timeout and ended up losing 31-24, because of course they did."
( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) said:
Randall Cunningham was the QB of the future because he was a dynamic dual threat QB until Michael Vick was the QB of the future becuase he had speed and athleticism that was on another level. But then guys like Kaepernick became the QB of the future because the read option had a brillant flash as a dynamic play that defenses really struggled to catch up.
The thought of the prototype QB of the future that is going to change the game of football forever is nothing new. It's been happening for decades. The dual threat QB in the NFL can certainly be a weapon, but the great QBs are always going to be defined by decision making, accuracy and ball security first and their ability to run with the football second. I don't think that will every really change.
The Saints improved to 10th in DVOA last year compared to 32nd the year before, while the Cowboys dropped to 30th from 23rd. It doesn't explain why Rob Ryan is the league's most recognized coordinator, but I think he has done a decent job with some shaky talent.Tony C said:Sean Payton screaming at Rob Ryan is worth a fun glimpse: http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/09/14/new-orleans-saints-sean-payton-yelling-rob-ryan
What's with the Ryans? They accomplish so little and get so much acclaim for it. Rob has had two defenses ranked in the top 10 in his career, 6 in the 20s according to PTI
JMDurron said:The great QBs, IMO, are always going to be defined by staying healthy long enough to put up the resumes required to be considered great. That is always going to skew things against the dual threat QB, and impact their development as passers negatively due to increased wear and tear. I wonder if too much gets made of potential mental development issues when it comes to reading defenses for some of those QBs, when the ability to stay on the field and maintain healthy mechanics might be more of an issue over multiple years.
That's because Elway was not surrounded by very good players until the end. He single handedly elevated what in reality were 8 - 8 teams to the SB. All I remember is he killed us with his arm and legs, and the Pats had some good teams during his run.Tony C said:Steve Young was. Was Elway? I know he ran a lot early in his career, but didn't his success only come later after he evolved into a more traditional QB, albeit still with some escapability (a la Andrew Luck)?
Foles isn't exactly putting it on the money. Last one well behind Ertz.dcmissle said:That is at least the 3rd dropped pass by Philly tonight. Two by Ertz.
cshea said:He bailed out of the 2nd down scramble. He should've gotten the first down.
Issue for Philadelphia players over the last two days: the ball Zach Ertz.dcmissle said:That is at least the 3rd dropped pass by Philly tonight. Two by Ertz.
And that was no horse collar.Jed Zeppelin said:Looked like a pretty blatant hold on Hilton at first glance, especially given the new standard.
and every year he goes way above whatever football outsiders prjects for him.SeoulSoxFan said:Sproles is the ageless wonder.
Bomani Jones has made that point on Twitter many times, in defense of Cam Newton as well. He's not wrong.Super Nomario said:If Andrew Luck looked like Colin Kaepernick, what would people say about his smarts and decision-making?