Kemba Walker + 2021 First Round Pick to OKC for Al Horford, Moses Brown

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
23,077
You need to re read the question. I'd take SImmons over McCollum in any situation.
Lol, mixed the two posts.
I'd take Simmons over Beal here, Beal over Simmons with JAGs, Simmons on an essentially empty team. Simmons of me is limited, but younger, cheaper, and if you surround him with shooters he could be great. Beal is older, paid more and I think has a lower ceiling, but if you have no #1 option he can really score, which is what a team of JAGs needs.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
16,945
Lol, mixed the two posts.
I'd take Simmons over Beal here, Beal over Simmons with JAGs, Simmons on an essentially empty team. Simmons of me is limited, but younger, cheaper, and if you surround him with shooters he could be great. Beal is older, paid more and I think has a lower ceiling, but if you have no #1 option he can really score, which is what a team of JAGs needs.
I think if Portland had the choice, they'd trade CJ for Ben over Beal. I think any team that has 2 alpha scorers or at least an alpha scorer (Dame) and a really good one (Powell) would be a great fit for Simmons. A team with only one would prefer Beal. I think that's most teams in the NBA but I'd have to look. 76ers would be way better with Beal instead of Ben, imo.

I think Portland would be very interested in Marcus Smart too, I'm just not sure they'd prefer him to Ben Simmons. In the above deal I mentioned, they'd just take Simmons. Regarding CJ McCollum though, meh. Is he really that much better than Marcus Smart re: overall value? There are just so many players out there than can do 90% of what CJ does at a fraction of the cost. Maybe I'm underselling CJ. He just seems like a healthy Kemba.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
23,077
I think if Portland had the choice, they'd trade CJ for Ben over Beal. I think any team that has 2 alpha scorers or at least an alpha scorer (Dame) and a really good one (Powell) would be a great fit for Simmons. A team with only one would prefer Beal. I think that's most teams in the NBA but I'd have to look. 76ers would be way better with Beal instead of Ben, imo.

I think Portland would be very interested in Marcus Smart too, I'm just not sure they'd prefer him to Ben Simmons. In the above deal I mentioned, they'd just take Simmons. Regarding CJ McCollum though, meh. Is he really that much better than Marcus Smart re: overall value? There are just so many players out there than can do 90% of what CJ does at a fraction of the cost. Maybe I'm underselling CJ. He just seems like a healthy Kemba.
Yeah, I'm the wrong person to ask, I think McCollum is really overrated, he's a good but not elite scorer to me, who doesn't defend.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
16,945
Yeah, I'm the wrong person to ask, I think McCollum is really overrated, he's a good but not elite scorer to me, who doesn't defend.
He's like the Jaylen Brown of shooting guards. By that, I mean they are both in like tier 2 or 3 of their position. Neither are elite and neither are clear number 2s. It's possible Jaylen gets there but this is probably his last real off season of anything more than marginal growth.

Of course, the Jaylen Brown of the wing position has way more value than the Jaylen Brown of the shooting guard position. A year ago, I think most of us would have traded Jaylen for Simmons. I don't think anyone would now. That makes me think the only way Simmons is traded is like (I think) you said, Embiid demands it. I think for the 76ers, McCollum works better than Smart/TT but I don't think value wise it's far off.

I just go down the list and see so few teams Simmons actually makes sense for. Would Vuc and Embiid work together? If Sexton is that big of a problem in Cleveland, would they be interested in Simmons for Kevin Love and Sexton?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
23,077
He's like the Jaylen Brown of shooting guards. By that, I mean they are both in like tier 2 or 3 of their position. Neither are elite and neither are clear number 2s. It's possible Jaylen gets there but this is probably his last real off season of anything more than marginal growth.

Of course, the Jaylen Brown of the wing position has way more value than the Jaylen Brown of the shooting guard position. A year ago, I think most of us would have traded Jaylen for Simmons. I don't think anyone would now. That makes me think the only way Simmons is traded is like (I think) you said, Embiid demands it. I think for the 76ers, McCollum works better than Smart/TT but I don't think value wise it's far off.

I just go down the list and see so few teams Simmons actually makes sense for. Would Vuc and Embiid work together? If Sexton is that big of a problem in Cleveland, would they be interested in Simmons for Kevin Love and Sexton?
The rumors on a Bulls deal are that it would center on LaVine. Which is interesting, but I also wonder... do Vuc and Simmons work? And, do the Bulls want to pay that much for Simmons when they have a year of LaVine at 19M and can extend him?
 

tbb345

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,783
He's like the Jaylen Brown of shooting guards. By that, I mean they are both in like tier 2 or 3 of their position. Neither are elite and neither are clear number 2s. It's possible Jaylen gets there but this is probably his last real off season of anything more than marginal growth.

Of course, the Jaylen Brown of the wing position has way more value than the Jaylen Brown of the shooting guard position. A year ago, I think most of us would have traded Jaylen for Simmons. I don't think anyone would now. That makes me think the only way Simmons is traded is like (I think) you said, Embiid demands it. I think for the 76ers, McCollum works better than Smart/TT but I don't think value wise it's far off.

I just go down the list and see so few teams Simmons actually makes sense for. Would Vuc and Embiid work together? If Sexton is that big of a problem in Cleveland, would they be interested in Simmons for Kevin Love and Sexton?
I don’t really see the similarity between McCollum and Brown, even in talking about tiers.

Jaylen was kind of a mess defensively last year but he has the capability to be a plus plus defender (we’ve seen it here at times) and has shown a lot of improvement throughout his career. He also is a fit on pretty much any roster due to his size and adaptability. I think almost anyone would rate Brown as a top 25-30 trade asset

McCollum is, at best, a bad defender and is an undersized 2 guard. He’s older (29 to 24) and has been basically the same player for the last 3-4 years. Because of his size he really needs a specific type of roster to thrive (ironically Simmons would be a great fit playing next to him). I don’t think McCollum is a top 30 asset and I don’t think many would include him there either
 

jasail

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,117
Boston
I'd drive both to the airport. If the market for Ben Simmons is really that low, the C's should be all over that trade. Simmons fits in with the Jays perfectly.

In another month or two, Simmons value is going to rebound. I think a lot of people are overreacting to one series. Yeah, he has warts but his game is also a terrible fit in Philly. It's like watching Brandon Ingram play alongside LeBron or Victor Oladipo playing alongside Westbrook.

Acquire Simmons, trade TL/stuff for a Stretch 5 and win titles.
I agree with your point that Simmons value is likely going to rebound. How can it not? The taste he left in our mouths was that fourth quarter that ultimately saw him not closing the game because he was such an offensive liability. Eventually, someone will look at the body of work, the positive skills, and the potential and convince themselves a change of scenery will help him figure out how to shoot well enough.

I also agree that Simmons is a good player. He's a good scorer and play maker in the paint and he's a good defender 2-4. You say he has warts, I'd also agree. I just think those warts are more the genital herpes type than say the common plantar wart. I don't like his game in the context of the current NBA that relies on 3pt shooting, spacing, and creating from the perimeter. He provides none of that. I also don't buy the idea that he can play out of 5. He gets bullied by bigger players and has shown no ability to play out of the post on offense. Then there comes the issue of heart and I'll take Jimmy Butler's word for it.

I get why folks would like the idea of Simmons on the C's, it's just not for me. And thankfully for me, the C's probably don't have the pieces to get it done anyway. That's not say he's washed up, I just don't want him. I can see his game fitting in much better in GS with Curry/Green/Thompson (Wiggins and the 7th) or in Portland if they could swing it without giving up McCollum (they can't).

I'd much rather the C's target someone like Beal if they're going after that 3rd player this offseason or settle for rolling with the Jays and JAGs and going after that next piece in 2022/2023. I'm just not a Simmons fan and have never been.
 
Last edited:

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
16,945
I don’t really see the similarity between McCollum and Brown, even in talking about tiers.

Jaylen was kind of a mess defensively last year but he has the capability to be a plus plus defender (we’ve seen it here at times) and has shown a lot of improvement throughout his career. He also is a fit on pretty much any roster due to his size and adaptability. I think almost anyone would rate Brown as a top 25-30 trade asset

McCollum is, at best, a bad defender and is an undersized 2 guard. He’s older (29 to 24) and has been basically the same player for the last 3-4 years. Because of his size he really needs a specific type of roster to thrive (ironically Simmons would be a great fit playing next to him). I don’t think McCollum is a top 30 asset and I don’t think many would include him there either
Wings fit on pretty much every team, that's why they are far more valuable than shooting guards. Shooting guard is a dying position slowly being replace by the wing position. The game is evolving into 3 positions. Most players like CJ are burdens on defense even if they play with effort. There are exceptions.

Brown is a top 25-30 player in the league. Some might have McCollum in the top 50-60. It's more a commentary on today's game and how little value certain positions have nowadays. SG isn't exactly C but it's taken a hit over the years. Of course, the PF and SF spots are already relics.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
16,945
I agree with your point that Simmons value is likely going to rebound. How can it not? The taste he left in our mouths was that fourth quarter that ultimately saw him not closing the game because he was such an offensive liability. Eventually, someone will look at the body of work, the positive skills, and the potential and convince themselves a change of scenery will help him figure out how to shoot well enough.

I also agree that Simmons is a good player. He's a good scorer and play maker in the paint and he's a good defender 2-4. You say he has warts, I'd also agree. I just think those warts are more the genital herpes type than say the common plantar wart. I don't like his game in the context of the current NBA that relies on 3pt shooting, spacing, and creating from the perimeter. He provides none of that. I also don't buy the idea that he can play out of 5. He gets bullied by bigger players and has shown no ability to play out of the post on offense. Then there comes the issue of heart and I'll take Jimmy Butler's word for it.

I get why folks would like the idea of Simmons on the C's, it's just not for me. And thankfully for me, the C's probably don't have the pieces to get it done anyway. That's not say he's washed up, I just don't want him. I can see his game fitting in much better in GS with Curry/Green/Thompson (Wiggins and the 7th) or in Portland if they could swing it without giving up McCollum (they can't).

I'd much rather the C's target someone like Beal if they're going after that 3rd player this offseason or settle for rolling with the Jays and JAGs and going after that next piece in 2022/2023. I'm just not a Simmons fan and have never been.
I'd just worry with Beal there wouldn't be enough shots to go around. Beal also causes problems defensively. I could be wrong, but I think it's far easier to hide a player's offensive shortcomings than his defensive one. You can't really control what other teams are doing on offense but you can control what you are doing on offense.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
6,807
New York City
I'd just worry with Beal there wouldn't be enough shots to go around. Beal also causes problems defensively. I could be wrong, but I think it's far easier to hide a player's offensive shortcomings than his defensive one. You can't really control what other teams are doing on offense but you can control what you are doing on offense.
I wouldn't be worried about the former - with injuries, rotations, etc. players are going to get their shots/points. Plus, if Beal made his way here, it would be specifically to play with Tatum, so he'd know that he'd be coming into a situation where he doesn't always have to be "the guy."

The defensive issues, though, are very real. Beal seems to be regarded as anywhere from bad to extremely bad on defense. On the other hand, so were Kemba, Kyrie, and IT - guards who are both prolific scorers and decent on defense are guys that probably never become available via trade at all.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
5,918
C's get Ben Simmons
Philly gets CJ McCollum, stuff
Portland gets Smart, TT, stuff

I'm sure if someone fudged around with it, there's a deal to be made that makes sense for all 3 teams. It might involve RL and/or some picks.

Ultimately, if Ben Simmons is traded, Philly can do better than anything the C's offer. And I don't see Ben Simmons demanding a trade to Boston.

Who would people rather have on the C's? Simmons or Beal? Who would people rather have on a generic team?

The first question is a tough decision for me (I'd reluctantly take Simmons and probably regret it later) but the 2nd one is an easy one (Beal). It's possible that impacts just how much Simmons would get in a return.

I usually think "don't trade a star player within a division/conference" is the logic of losing teams. But in this case, I think it would make sense for Philly to take a little less to not give Boston a 3rd all star under 25. Maybe more than a little less.
 

Eddie Jurak

Go Leafs Go
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
32,499
Melrose, MA
C's get Ben Simmons
Philly gets CJ McCollum, stuff
Portland gets Smart, TT, stuff

I'm sure if someone fudged around with it, there's a deal to be made that makes sense for all 3 teams. It might involve RL and/or some picks.

Ultimately, if Ben Simmons is traded, Philly can do better than anything the C's offer. And I don't see Ben Simmons demanding a trade to Boston.

Who would people rather have on the C's? Simmons or Beal? Who would people rather have on a generic team?

The first question is a tough decision for me (I'd reluctantly take Simmons and probably regret it later) but the 2nd one is an easy one (Beal). It's possible that impacts just how much Simmons would get in a return.
For THIS Celtic team I'd rather have Simmons. If you had Tatum, Beal, and Brown would you just end up forcing Brown into a lesser role because Tatum and Beal are better scorers? Simmons won't fit everywhere (he's not a good fit alongside Embiid) but on a team with 2 star wings who can shoot and score? Simmons essentially arrived in the NBA as a very good player and has since stagnated, and he has no shot. Not every team is going to be a fit, but the Celtics are one of the few that may be.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
6,807
New York City
I usually think "don't trade a star player within a division/conference" is the logic of losing teams. But in this case, I think it would make sense for Philly to take a little less to not give Boston a 3rd all star under 25. Maybe more than a little less.
In the scenario discussed, though, there would be nothing preventing Portland from flipping Simmons for the Celtics guys anyway, though. Not that I think that would happen as I don't think Portland would trade McCollum for Smart/TT/picks, unless they think Smart can make that much of a defensive difference that it makes up for the drop off in scoring. (I know some here aren't that high on McCollum but I'm trying to view it from Portland's perspective.)
 

Rustjive

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2009
992
The defensive issues, though, are very real. Beal seems to be regarded as anywhere from bad to extremely bad on defense. On the other hand, so were Kemba, Kyrie, and IT - guards who are both prolific scorers and decent on defense are guys that probably never become available via trade at all.
They aren't that real - his defense is simply a function of effort/team/coaching, how much he has to do on the offensive end, and perception/bias. In 2016-2017, by DRPM, he was slightly above average (.18), then in 2017-2018 he was the 18th best defender in the league, 5th among qualified guards, by DRPM (2.63). 2018-2019 he was negative (-.83), in 2019-2020 he was absolutely dreadful (-4.79, essentially tied with IT for 2nd/3rd worst), and last year he was just merely negative again (-.86). His dropoff basically coincides with Washington being non-competitive - Wall only played half the 2018-2019 season, which meant the Wizards were lottery bound.

The perception/bias thing has to do with fans consistently attaching the 'undersized' label to him - which he isn't. He's not big by any stretch, but at the same time he was still 6'3" with no shoes after the NBA-mandated re-measurement. Kemba and IT he is not. He's taller and a better scorer and better on defense than Donovan Mitchell, and no one ever stresses about how Mitchell's defense would play if the dream scenario of Mitchell/Jaylen/Jayson would come to pass.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
16,945
They aren't that real - his defense is simply a function of effort/team/coaching, how much he has to do on the offensive end, and perception/bias. In 2016-2017, by DRPM, he was slightly above average (.18), then in 2017-2018 he was the 18th best defender in the league, 5th among qualified guards, by DRPM (2.63). 2018-2019 he was negative (-.83), in 2019-2020 he was absolutely dreadful (-4.79, essentially tied with IT for 2nd/3rd worst), and last year he was just merely negative again (-.86). His dropoff basically coincides with Washington being non-competitive - Wall only played half the 2018-2019 season, which meant the Wizards were lottery bound.

The perception/bias thing has to do with fans consistently attaching the 'undersized' label to him - which he isn't. He's not big by any stretch, but at the same time he was still 6'3" with no shoes after the NBA-mandated re-measurement. Kemba and IT he is not. He's taller and a better scorer and better on defense than Donovan Mitchell, and no one ever stresses about how Mitchell's defense would play if the dream scenario of Mitchell/Jaylen/Jayson would come to pass.
The vast majority of us would be doing cartwheels if we could acquire any of Beal, Simmons or Mitchell in a trade that didn't require Tatum and Jaylen. You can still have a preference towards one over the other. I don't think anyone is really stressing adding Beal to the roster, just talking about possible issues that would arise if he was here.

Dame too.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
4,346
Imaginationland
obviously, Philly would never go for it

Portland (CJ) in a 3-way would never go for it also
Yeah. Flawed as he is, Simmons is still a 24 year old 3x all-star signed longterm. Other than Tatum or Brown, the Celtics don't have the assets to fetch a player like that (not right now).
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,464
Brown is a top 25-30 player in the league. Some might have McCollum in the top 50-60. It's more a commentary on today's game and how little value certain positions have nowadays. SG isn't exactly C but it's taken a hit over the years. Of course, the PF and SF spots are already relics.
Simmons and Russillo did their top 40 players on a podcast last week and both had McCollum in the 30-40 range, so saying some might have him 50-60 is way underselling him.
 

JM3

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
1,155
Simmons and Russillo did their top 40 players on a podcast last week and both had McCollum in the 30-40 range, so saying some might have him 50-60 is way underselling him.
That was referring to current skills for this season. He could both be in the top 30-40 for this season & be top 50-60 in terms of a trade value asset.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
8,454
Kiev, Ukraine
I agree with your point that Simmons value is likely going to rebound. How can it not? The taste he left in our mouths was that fourth quarter that ultimately saw him not closing the game because he was such an offensive liability. Eventually, someone will look at the body of work, the positive skills, and the potential and convince themselves a change of scenery will help him figure out how to shoot well enough.

I also agree that Simmons is a good player. He's a good scorer and play maker in the paint and he's a good defender 2-4. You say he has warts, I'd also agree. I just think those warts are more the genital herpes type than say the common plantar wart. I don't like his game in the context of the current NBA that relies on 3pt shooting, spacing, and creating from the perimeter. He provides none of that. I also don't buy the idea that he can play out of 5. He gets bullied by bigger players and has shown no ability to play out of the post on offense. Then there comes the issue of heart and I'll take Jimmy Butler's word for it.

I get why folks would like the idea of Simmons on the C's, it's just not for me. And thankfully for me, the C's probably don't have the pieces to get it done anyway. That's not say he's washed up, I just don't want him. I can see his game fitting in much better in GS with Curry/Green/Thompson (Wiggins and the 7th) or in Portland if they could swing it without giving up McCollum (they can't).

I'd much rather the C's target someone like Beal if they're going after that 3rd player this offseason or settle for rolling with the Jays and JAGs and going after that next piece in 2022/2023. I'm just not a Simmons fan and have never been.
Hmmmm, so I'm a Simmons fan, but I think he's shown enough issues in the playoffs now that teams are going to tread carefully. In the right situation he could be really, really good, but you have to be very convinced as a GM that you can create that situation. To me, he's moved out of the "acquire the talent and let it sort itself out" category and into the "better make sure you don't hamstring your franchise for 3-4 years if he doesn't quite fit" category.
 

Jimbodandy

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
5,982
around the way
Hmmmm, so I'm a Simmons fan, but I think he's shown enough issues in the playoffs now that teams are going to tread carefully. In the right situation he could be really, really good, but you have to be very convinced as a GM that you can create that situation. To me, he's moved out of the "acquire the talent and let it sort itself out" category and into the "better make sure you don't hamstring your franchise for 3-4 years if he doesn't quite fit" category.
Apologies for the ditto here, but that is really well stated.

To add, we have seen that his floor, in the playoffs, with the wrong kind of team around him, is lower than previously thought. That's what makes the contract an albatross, not Simmons' skills or contributions--on the wrong team. On the right team, he's likely still a stud.
 

jasail

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,117
Boston
Hmmmm, so I'm a Simmons fan, but I think he's shown enough issues in the playoffs now that teams are going to tread carefully. In the right situation he could be really, really good, but you have to be very convinced as a GM that you can create that situation. To me, he's moved out of the "acquire the talent and let it sort itself out" category and into the "better make sure you don't hamstring your franchise for 3-4 years if he doesn't quite fit" category.
I'm not sure we are saying entirely different things here. Perhaps I didn't phrase what I'm saying as well as a I could have. My view is that his value eventually bounces back from where it was at the end of G7. I don't know how it couldn't. At that point his value was that of an unplayable bust, owed ~ $130M plus through 2025, and loathed by his current team and city. His situation is not going to be a contract dump. Eventually, water will find its level and Philly will get a reasonable return for him. At the same time, the veneer is off and a team isn't going to pay a King's ransom for a guy who generously put has warts in his game.

As I stated up thread, I see GS as a great landing spot for him. They have the pieces (Wiggins +), his contract keeps him through their remaining Curry/Thompson/Green window, and they're a good fit. They have sharp shooters all over the place who can stretch a defense, he can find the open shooter, he doesn't have to be a top scoring option and can pick his spots, and he'll blend in with their switching defense.

I just don't like his game or want to see him in green. Reasonable minds will disagree.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
23,077
As I stated up thread, I see GS as a great landing spot for him. They have the pieces (Wiggins +), his contract keeps him through their remaining Curry/Thompson/Green window, and they're a good fit. They have sharp shooters all over the place who can stretch a defense, he can find the open shooter, he doesn't have to be a top scoring option and can pick his spots, and he'll blend in with their switching defense.

I just don't like his game or want to see him in green. Reasonable minds will disagree.
I don't really see this. I don't think Wiggins has value, and what is the plus... draft picks or Wiseman? Not sure PHI is looking for that return. I also see no way you can play Green and Simmons together, neither wants to take a shot. I mean Draymond straight up doesn't even try to shoot anymore, he put up 9 FGA per 100 possessions last year... 15th on the team and 230th of 237 qualifiers.

I think if you're looking at Simmons to the Warriors, it's a 3 way deal with Draymond and picks/Wiseman going to a 3rd team.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
20,766
Newton
I spent some time today reading the hottakes in the Horford to Sixers thread from two years ago. Posters arguing that it signaled the beginning of a rebuild, that we were now the East Coast T-Wolves, that he was leaving for a team that could actually compete.

That is some funny stuff.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
8,454
Kiev, Ukraine
I don't really see this. I don't think Wiggins has value, and what is the plus... draft picks or Wiseman? Not sure PHI is looking for that return. I also see no way you can play Green and Simmons together, neither wants to take a shot. I mean Draymond straight up doesn't even try to shoot anymore, he put up 9 FGA per 100 possessions last year... 15th on the team and 230th of 237 qualifiers.

I think if you're looking at Simmons to the Warriors, it's a 3 way deal with Draymond and picks/Wiseman going to a 3rd team.
3-teamer seems to be the only way it works. The Warriors have the fit for Simmons and the assets to the 3rd team to make it make sense though.