He's saying he can't see it, therefore it can't be anywhere but in the net. But it could have been under his leg anywhere. It's a really hasty conclusion he's trying to reach.waht is Millbury babbling about? I don't see the puck at all anywhere.
They have glow puck in torontoThey make have had another angle
You eat ‘em raw and they’re salty enough.Salt and pepper with that?
I was expecting a pass given how cute they’ve been. Bet Bob was too.He had barely moved and the shot was already past him
You are way behindwell whiskey enters the equation in 3...2...1....
That one angle showed that It ricocheted off Tuuka’s pad and deflected in and you could see the black puck like four inches behind the line.did they change the nhl rule where they allow you to use "common sense" to determine a puck is in? or announcers just making stuff up
As I said I’m super against replay in all sports but pretty much all of them are undone by having some sort of “deference to the call on the field” rule that at they then haphazardly ignore. If they’re just gonna use slow motion to try to guess they should just say sodid they change the nhl rule where they allow you to use "common sense" to determine a puck is in? or announcers just making stuff up