Everybody Hates Draymond

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
5,610
Saint Paul, MN
Say what?

I watch a fuckton of basketball, and yes, there are about 50 moving picks a game.

I do not remember a moving pick in which the defender got up, led his shoulder into the defender's midsection, and then stood up flipping the defender over his back. That play has no relationship to a moving screen in any sense of the word. The only reason it wasn't a hip check is because it was a shoulder check instead.
He was on the ground and got up the same moment he picked Smart. Yes, it should have been a foul. But also yes, there are tons of moving picks like that in end of game situations, and Draymond knows that they rarely if ever call a foul in that situation
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
43,166
He was on the ground and got up the same moment he picked Smart. Yes, it should have been a foul. But also yes, there are tons of moving picks like that in end of game situations, and Draymond knows that they rarely if ever call a foul in that situation
The bolded is where you're losing everybody.

We all agree there are "tons of moving picks in end of game situations." We disagree that there are tons of moving picks "like that."

But how about this, find me one example of another player flipping a defender over his shoulder on a moving pick in any situation.

Here's a video of some of the worst screens you'll see, moving or otherwise, nobody gets flipped over the screener's shoulder. Just because it's end of game doesn't mean the sport turns into rugby.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceVET2QJrCE
 

oumbi

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 15, 2006
4,627
yes, moving picks are normal basketball plays. They should be called fouls, but it is something we see dozens of times a game. And in last second plays, there are moving screens like the one above all the damn time.

Draymond has a million worse plays than this one. You could find clips of just about every guy in the league doing something like this
Would you please provide a few of those videos of "just about every guy" throwing a block like that one? Really, I would like to see some support for your statement.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
13,480
yes, moving picks are normal basketball plays. They should be called fouls, but it is something we see dozens of times a game. And in last second plays, there are moving screens like the one above all the damn time.

Draymond has a million worse plays than this one. You could find clips of just about every guy in the league doing something like this
C’mon.. we all watch basketball.. that second pick is nowhere close to commonplace. He comes off the ground and lifts the defender off his feet like a full on fullback. He’s done worse.. but why does that matter?

edit: or what a couple others said
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
24,884
That is dirty as fuck. Pinning a guys ankle as he's trying to extend the same leg? God forbid we have announcers call that out for what it is.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,762
But the Ws win so all just part of the competitive edge I guess, you know, Draymond bringing that intensity...Edey should show him the same respect next time out. His face must be around elbow level.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
13,208
I do love the pettiness of the Grizzlies. Jenkins brought up the “code” in his postgame interview
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
13,208
Draymond has now come out guns blazing against Taylor Jenkins. He’s soft because he complains to the media.

Draymond and Kerr really do have some pretty massive blind spots towards each other
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,853
Draymond has now come out guns blazing against Taylor Jenkins. He’s soft because he complains to the media.

Draymond and Kerr really do have some pretty massive blind spots towards each other
Draymond is a dirty player because his smarts can no longer compensate for his declining skills. Kerr is "blind" because he still makes his team better.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
13,208
Draymond is a dirty player because his smarts can no longer compensate for his declining skills. Kerr is "blind" because he still makes his team better.
Everyone knows that Kerr ignores Draymond’s dirty antics but LOVES to play sanctimonious with the media about every other team.

Kerr also whines to the media and refs about calls all of the time. Apparently that’s cool with Draymond but when other coaches do it it’s “soft” and shows their team it’s ok to be soft
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,853
Everyone knows that Kerr ignores Draymond’s dirty antics but LOVES to play sanctimonious with the media about every other team.

Kerr also whines to the media and refs about calls all of the time. Apparently that’s cool with Draymond but when other coaches do it it’s “soft” and shows their team it’s ok to be soft
Ehh, Kerr is just coaching his team. If he was coaching some other team, he'd talk about Green like everyone else does.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,092
SF
Everyone knows that Kerr ignores Draymond’s dirty antics but LOVES to play sanctimonious with the media about every other team.

Kerr also whines to the media and refs about calls all of the time. Apparently that’s cool with Draymond but when other coaches do it it’s “soft” and shows their team it’s ok to be soft
Yes, Kerr whines more than the typical coach about anything he perceives as "dirty" towards his team. Extremely sanctimonious guy; it's a lame schtick.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
50,091
I was about to post about this.

He really is such a fucking dirtbag. It's absolutely impossible to have sympathy for him.

His definition of "accountability" is hilarious. You're such a martyr Draymond
Stop trying to make me look like the bad guy, says guy who punched his teammate in the face in front of the whole team…
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,853
"I kind of go back and forth with this," Green said on the podcast. "I know I was wrong, but you can't call a man a B-word and push him and not get hit, either.
Yeah, you can "not get hit."

The use of the passive voice there is remarkable. As though Poole stepped into the street with his eyes closed and got hit by a car that sped off.
"He called me a bad name so I slugged him. How could I not?"
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
24,884
How many people do you think Green has called a bitch in his life?
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
14,454
This just a few days after I read (at ESPN? The Athletic?) one of those Draymond is a changed man puff pieces (based on therapy, deep introspection, blah blah…).

Nope.
 

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,442
Moving on doesn't require that you forgive someone or stop actively disliking them.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
13,480
Moving on doesn't require that you forgive someone or stop actively disliking them.
At the same time the aggressor doesn't get to determine when their victim should move on.. almost like the bully is continuing to be the bully. With that said.. both guys aren't particularly likable..but I do have some sympathy for Poole.
 

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,442
At the same time the aggressor doesn't get to determine when their victim should move on.. almost like the bully is continuing to be the bully. With that said.. both guys aren't particularly likable..but I do have some sympathy for Poole.
I think you may have misinterpreted my point. Nothing in Poole's statements is evidence he hasn't moved on, was my point. Just because he hasn't forgotten or forgiven doesn't mean he hasn't moved on.
Edit: To be fair, I suppose my statement was ambiguous. It never occurred to me that it would be interpreted the way I *think* you interpreted it, so that's on me.
Edit: And to be super extra clear, I don't disagree with anything you said regarding victims and aggressors/bullies.
 
Last edited:

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
13,480
I think you may have misinterpreted my point. Nothing in Poole's statements is evidence he hasn't moved on, was my point. Just because he hasn't forgotten or forgiven doesn't mean he hasn't moved on.
Edit: To be fair, I suppose my statement was ambiguous. It never occurred to me that it would be interpreted the way I *think* you interpreted it, so that's on me.
Edit: And to be super extra clear, I don't disagree with anything you said regarding victims and aggressors/bullies.
I intended to use your post as a jumping off point.. I didn’t think you were taking Draymond’s side.. I wasn’t 100% sure of what you were saying but assumed.
 

timelysarcasm

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2010
2,015
Los Angeles by way of Roxbury
This just a few days after I read (at ESPN? The Athletic?) one of those Draymond is a changed man puff pieces (based on therapy, deep introspection, blah blah…).

Nope.
I was pretty shocked when I saw him in a Kia commercial recently with his daughter being all lovey Dad. There really have been zero repercussions for his behavior.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,744
Where's that clip of Draymond getting rag dolled off an opening tip, anyway?
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
43,166
I was pretty shocked when I saw him in a Kia commercial recently with his daughter being all lovey Dad. There really have been zero repercussions for his behavior.
He's made roughly $200,000,000 just in NBA salary over his career.

Not sure there are any on or off court repercussions he could face that even matter.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
10,490
Oakland
He's made roughly $200,000,000 just in NBA salary over his career.

Not sure there are any on or off court repercussions he could face that even matter.
If he somehow were barred from the HOF I think he'd feel that, but that's not remotely on the table as a consequence for anything he's done thus far.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,769
Maine
Should Draymond even be in the HOF? Usually I am pretty open with BB HOF invites. I mean College/Pro/Intl/ announcers and "ambassador" stuff all has historically counted and I am cool with that.

But Draymond? IDK....I mean lets put him on 25 other teams....or 30 other teams. Does he win titles? Or is he what he is a good lunch pail glue guy. He only seems to work with Curry, and if not for Curry would Draymond "Be anything special"? Was his college career "Special"? Does he work the same with Giannis? Tatum? Wemby? or does he NEED Curry to be "Draymond". Are his "Shenanigans" as overlooked if not for being pals with one of the most personable NBA stars of the last 20 years?
Never avged 15 pts/game and above 12 only once.
Never avged more then 9.5 Rebounds.
Assts.....I will grant you. Great numbers for a post guy. But again isnt that really a function of Curry running around and catching his passes on threes?
Career FG of 45% for a "post player"

IDK I can certainly be grading him on the Ahole curve......but i am not sure he should be considered for the Hof. Or ok....maybe considered....but not sure he should be assumed to make it.

Do you guys disagree? I can certainly be wrong.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
10,490
Oakland
Should Draymond even be in the HOF? Usually I am pretty open with BB HOF invites. I mean College/Pro/Intl/ announcers and "ambassador" stuff all has historically counted and I am cool with that.

But Draymond? IDK....I mean lets put him on 25 other teams....or 30 other teams. Does he win titles? Or is he what he is a good lunch pail glue guy. He only seems to work with Curry, and if not for Curry would Draymond "Be anything special"? Was his college career "Special"? Does he work the same with Giannis? Tatum? Wemby? or does he NEED Curry to be "Draymond". Are his "Shenanigans" as overlooked if not for being pals with one of the most personable NBA stars of the last 20 years?
Never avged 15 pts/game and above 12 only once.
Never avged more then 9.5 Rebounds.
Assts.....I will grant you. Great numbers for a post guy. But again isnt that really a function of Curry running around and catching his passes on threes?
Career FG of 45% for a "post player"

IDK I can certainly be grading him on the Ahole curve......but i am not sure he should be considered for the Hof. Or ok....maybe considered....but not sure he should be assumed to make it.

Do you guys disagree? I can certainly be wrong.
DPOY, 8x all defense, 4x champ, plus he was just as important defensively for the Warriors as Curry was offensively for much of their dynasty. I'm all for fun discussions about what he would've looked like on other teams (and I agree that he landed in the absolute perfect place for his skills), but the basketball HOF is pretty generous with their voting, and basketball reference gives him a 76.8% chance (higher than the likes of Kevin Love, Klay Thompson, Jimmy Butler and Joel Embiid). He's getting in.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
10,490
Oakland
Michael Cooper just made the HoF, Draymond is 100% getting in.
Yup. Like Draymond he's got one DPOY and 8 all-defense, but he never made a single all star or all nba team (Draymond made 4 and 2, respectively). Cooper also came off the bench for most of his career, just 94 starts in 873 games (Draymond has started 99% of his games over the last decade). Cooper somehow got in with just a 0.9% chance per Bref.

Iguodala is gonna be the GS dynasty player on the HOF bubble. Just 2 all defense and 1 all star, that finals MVP (when he held Lebron to 36/13/9) is gonna have to do some pretty heavy lifting to get him in.
 

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
9,373
NYC
when he held Lebron to 36/13/9
On .398 FG / .477 TS. If LeBron had been even moderately efficient, the Warriors would not have smoked them in Games 4-6 (all basically blowouts).

I agree that Steph should have won FMVP that year, though (26.0 ppg on .585 TS / 5.2 reb / 6.3 ast / 1.8 stl for the winning team). I'm agnostic about André for HOF, but given Michael Cooper is in he has a case, and Dray has a very strong case.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,935
Pittsburgh, PA

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
24,884
Draymond is the Wilt Chamberlain of the "both guys tangled up and don't let go" incidents.
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,633
How, after all these years of being a scumbag, does he still get a friendly whistle?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
23,193
Santa Monica
Our Hero vs Gabe Vincent:

2nd quarter:

View: https://twitter.com/LSH_lakeshow/status/1887714170118021457



Alt angle showing the "little somethin' extra":

View: https://twitter.com/CarlosYakNBA/status/1887713905264165332


3rd quarter: (Vincent was called for the foul, naturally)

View: https://twitter.com/FastBreakPhenom/status/1887722657107296583




This is like a 2/10 on the nut-punch scale for him, but still, can't control himself.
Call #1 Vincent clamped Dray's left arm under the rim. Not a great angle on your replays; they had a better one in the game. Foul on Vincent, the Refs reviewed & got that call right (my initial thought was Dray was shoving Vincent for no reason).

Call #2 The ref saw it as Vincent initiating contact on the screen. 50/50 call IMO

But I agree with your overall point that Draymond still gets the biggest NBA pass on his incessant Ref-baiting/barking