Eliot Wolf will be in charge of the personnel department,

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,458
Overland Park, KS
BB gave Mac a "real" OC this past year like we had all wanted and Mac promptly got exponentially worse. So I don't buy the changing OCs as any sort of excuse for his poor play.
I don’t despise Mac like you do BUT i still want him gone. If we gave BOB truth serum, he probably would say he wanted to hire his own offensive staff, instead, he got what BB gave him. He also would probably say that this was a bottom 5 offensive skill group and the worse pass blocking line in the NFL. Mac did himself no favors, and maybe a league average QB makes them 22nd in points scored instead of last but the 2023 team blew on offense and it wasn’t all the quarterbacks fault.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
Jesus Fucking Christ the Mac stuff infects every thread on this forum and is fucking tired and boring. He sucked and he sucks, nobody disagrees. I happen to think that boiling down all of the problems with the Pats right now into one player is absurdly reductive, but it doesn't much matter. Everyone wants Mac gone, everyone wants a new QB. Can this thread be about the new guy who is going to be picking players in a very important draft for the franchise?
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,403
Washington, DC via Worcester
Let's be clear: It's not madness to think BB was responsible for how things went the last several years. You get the credit, you get the blame. And there were many problems that land at BB's doorstep, not just vague bucks stopping there. Not seeing that two years $50 mill guaranteed for TB12 was a steal. The Patricia catastrophe. The not realizing "the Patricia catastrophe" was, in fact a catastrophe (i.e., having to be forced NOT to run it back with MP as OC); the overrulings of scouts (Gold medal winner, N'Keal Harry over AJ Brown and Deebo); the general mismanagement of Mac Jones. The damned middle ground of franchising Thuney and not signing him long-term, the half-assed trades of Mason and Gilmore, even letting Jakobi and Karras go leave for relative peanuts.

I love BB and I'm so grateful for his work the last two decades, it really bums me out that he may not get the all-time wins record at all and certainly don't get it as HC of the NEP. But those misfires are all on Belichick. He deserves the lion's share of the blame for that, just as he deserved so much of the credit for an unprecedented run of NFL success. Having said all that...
Exactly. If BB's culture made greats out of unknown/unheralded players and an unprecedented run of success, then his culture would also be responsible for the team not being able to develop players and falling into the basement of the AFC East. BB fucked up a lot of things to take himself from God status to "mutually agreeing to part ways" status, to then being passed over for a job in favor of Raheem Morris. That's a precipitous decline.

Did Wolf break the BB rule of never say anything that could be considered even marginally controversial? Yep. Should he probably worked on his phrasing or just kept his mouth shut? Maybe. But really, what difference does it make. It's a new regime and new culture.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494
BB gave Mac a "real" OC this past year like we had all wanted and Mac promptly got exponentially worse. So I don't buy the changing OCs as any sort of excuse for his poor play.
Constantly shifting OCs usually doesn't benefit a QB, especially a young one. The post-Parcells revolving door at OC probably didn't help Bledsoe's development.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,555
around the way
Well if Ron Borges said it, it must be true.
Ron famously picked a fight with Pete at one of the pregame or postgame press conferences in front of all of the other reporters and cameras because he hated the man so much. Of course he hated Bill too, but he didn't try that shit with him really (and it wouldn't have worked anyway).

Ron was a miserable man (probably still is). But there's probably a lot of truth to the fact that Pete was too soft back then if a reporter felt confident enough to piss all over him in public.
 

Silverdude2167

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2006
4,717
Amstredam
Exactly. If BB's culture made greats out of unknown/unheralded players and an unprecedented run of success, then his culture would also be responsible for the team not being able to develop players and falling into the basement of the AFC East. BB fucked up a lot of things to take himself from God status to "mutually agreeing to part ways" status, to then being passed over for a job in favor of Raheem Morris. That's a precipitous decline.
Lol at this...I wonder what else happened that led to that decline. Totally had nothing to do with not having a QB.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,713
NOVA
They are replacing the most successful 20 year run in football history and certainly seem to be doubling down on the idea that it's all BB's fault.

So. They deserve scrutiny when they say "Well we're gonna be the kinder and gentler regime now." Because the hard-ass regime had wildly successful results. And they're now changing things that, once again, look like the Pete Carroll era.

Obviously words matter little. If they don't follow up on these words by pitching Mac out of an airlock ASAP, then they'll accomplish absolutely nothing. We'll see.

EDIT: they seem to be blaming BB for everything over the past few years, when Wolf and Mayo and the two Krafts were right there as well. The biggest reason the team is in the state it's in today is because the QB imploded horribly but not before giving us the worst play I've been blessed to see in my 52 years on this earth. IMO the change that needs to be made has nothing to do with being "hard-ass," (besides, the QB last year got more chances than he should have and sucked), it's getting a better QB into the building at once and giving him the starting job. All else follows from that.

It's not culture that was the problem. It's the fucking QB.
Jesus. Was just trying to catch up tonight and was like damn there’s nothing like replacing the pats approach with the packers approach and then you saved me. What a shitshow we are in for going forward… unless the qb is great and even then that can be screwed.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,586
Through the whole of the horrible 2023 season, the defense played it collective asses off. The team stunk, but goddammit they did not quit in spite of getting the worst QB play any of us have seen in our lifetimes.

For Wolf to take that and say "gee we're gonna get away from the hard-ass culture" is drawing the wrong conclusion. Maybe it's just presser pablum, but I'm not super impressed with that.
Lots of positives in the rhetoric.
Throwing BB a bone would have been nice is all I think folks are saying - “Bill brought excellence to the organization for a long time and stressed accountability. Our objective is the same - we will make some adjustments like x, y, z for what we need to be successful in today’s NFL but the goal is the same.”
If you do that small bit of acknowledgment then the rest of it is less likely to be inferred as cheap shots. BB was the GOAT so as fans you just want a bit more honor there. Instead we are left reading between the lines that the guy was a pain in the ass to work with. I’m sure that’s true but who are you signaling this to? Mayo is actually the guy players will play for and will hear from.

I don’t think Wolf is shying away from accountability on decision making though which is important.
He was trying to be a good teammate here…

That's really the first time Mayo has said something like that. It's about time.
Reads the press clippings. Would not play for. :p
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,932
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Jesus. Was just trying to catch up tonight and was like damn there’s nothing like replacing the pats approach with the packers approach and then you saved me. What a shitshow we are in for going forward… unless the qb is great and even then that can be screwed.
Well, good news then, the old approach was also kind of a shit show when the QB wasn't great! Just like pretty much every approach ever in league history.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,815
Melrose, MA
I think guys like Wolf who have been here for a couple of unsuccessful years probably think that there are certin things that could be done better. And are excited to do them better. That's probably all this was, I think otherwise people are reading too much in. I mean, if I'm the socout who wanted Deebo in 2019 (that was before Wolf's time) I'd be pissed, too.

BB both maintained some of his excellence to the very end (see the defense - and the key defensive injuries - of the past 2 years) but also went through some lean years drafting and completely bungled his coaching staff and QB situation.

The concept that there is room for improvement should be easy to swallow.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,555
around the way
I think guys like Wolf who have been here for a couple of unsuccessful years probably think that there are certin things that could be done better. And are excited to do them better. That's probably all this was, I think otherwise people are reading too much in. I mean, if I'm the socout who wanted Deebo in 2019 (that was before Wolf's time) I'd be pissed, too.

BB both maintained some of his excellence to the very end (see the defense - and the key defensive injuries - of the past 2 years) but also went through some lean years drafting and completely bungled his coaching staff and QB situation.

The concept that there is room for improvement should be easy to swallow.
This 1000%. Can you imagine the outcry here if Wolf had a press conference and said "we're going to keep doing everything that Bill did exactly the same way that he did it, notwithstanding the last few years of suck." Some things absolutely need to evolve, not just the QB position. That doesn't mean that Bill's entire philosophy goes in the trash.
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,403
Washington, DC via Worcester
Lol at this...I wonder what else happened that led to that decline. Totally had nothing to do with not having a QB.
See the part about not being able to develop players. Not sure what your quibble is. BB gets credit for creating a culture that developed unheralded players into stars or vital contributors, see Brady, Edelman, Koppen, Samuel, Onwenu, Mason, etc. When the players stop developing suddenly BB's culture not part of the equation?
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
See the part about not being able to develop players. Not sure what your quibble is. BB gets credit for creating a culture that developed unheralded players into stars or vital contributors, see Brady, Edelman, Koppen, Samuel, Onwenu, Mason, etc. When the players stop developing suddenly BB's culture not part of the equation?
Not every player can be developed. Mac, N’Keal Harry, etc. Drafting was probably the biggest problem, along with Mac busting. The first one was on BB for sure; the second is almost entirely on Mac Jones.
 

Silverdude2167

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2006
4,717
Amstredam
See the part about not being able to develop players. Not sure what your quibble is. BB gets credit for creating a culture that developed unheralded players into stars or vital contributors, see Brady, Edelman, Koppen, Samuel, Onwenu, Mason, etc. When the players stop developing suddenly BB's culture not part of the equation?
They had a plan in place, they executed the plan, unfortunately the QB failed and sank the ship.

If Mac had been an average QB we are not having this conversation. Instead, we are talking about how a fringe playoff team with a great defense has a lot of cap room to add weapons to the offense.
 

Rico Guapo

New Member
Apr 24, 2009
2,183
New England's Rising Star
Not every player can be developed. Mac, N’Keal Harry, etc. Drafting was probably the biggest problem, along with Mac busting. The first one was on BB for sure; the second is almost entirely on Mac Jones.
I'm not defending Mac Jones here, he sucks and much of it falls it his feet, but who wouldn't have been a bust with the OL and weapons the Pats trotted out the last two seasons?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,199
I'm not defending Mac Jones here, he sucks and much of it falls it his feet, but who wouldn't have been a bust with the OL and weapons the Pats trotted out the last two seasons?
Can't wait to go over this again!
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,317
They had a plan in place, they executed the plan, unfortunately the QB failed and sank the ship.

If Mac had been an average QB we are not having this conversation. Instead, we are talking about how a fringe playoff team with a great defense has a lot of cap room to add weapons to the offense.
Posting this a hundred times doesn’t make it any more true. It wasn’t just the QB(‘s).
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
In the MAC WARS, I was pretty consistently on the side that said he just wasn't good enough...

But, Jesus H Christ, some of the posts in here are absolutely fucking insane.

Mac sucks yes, but so did the entire fucking offense. The OL was mediocre at best and the skill players might be the worst in the NFL.

I'll ask this again. How many players on offense would start on more than 10 NFL teams? Now remove the OL from that. Probably only Rhamondre Stevenson?

The entire system for scouting offensive players needed to be changed.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,555
around the way
In the MAC WARS, I was pretty consistently on the side that said he just wasn't good enough...

But, Jesus H Christ, some of the posts in here are absolutely fucking insane.

Mac sucks yes, but so did the entire fucking offense. The OL was mediocre at best and the skill players might be the worst in the NFL.

I'll ask this again. How many players on offense would start on more than 10 NFL teams? Now remove the OL from that. Probably only Rhamondre Stevenson?

The entire system for scouting offensive players needed to be changed.
The OL would have been perfectly mediocre if they stayed healthy. That didn't happen.

The crew here that's worried about the appearance of absolution for Mac's failures has a counterpart group--those of us worried that Wolf et al. will grab a QB and do jack shit about offensive line upgrades. Our ceiling last year on the OL was "average".

The skill players were no bargain either, but one real X and a real QB goes a long way to making everything work.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,685
The OL would have been perfectly mediocre if they stayed healthy. That didn't happen.

The crew here that's worried about the appearance of absolution for Mac's failures has a counterpart group--those of us worried that Wolf et al. will grab a QB and do jack shit about offensive line upgrades. Our ceiling last year on the OL was "average".

The skill players were no bargain either, but one real X and a real QB goes a long way to making everything work.
I am 99% sure we are in lock step here.

Mac is awful. There's no way he should be brought back.

However, the offense had more problems than him. Their pass catching group is pathetic. That may be harsh but it's the truth.

My post was in response to a few posters who seem to think that Mac was literally the only problem on the team. He wasn't.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,555
around the way
I am 99% sure we are in lock step here.

Mac is awful. There's no way he should be brought back.

However, the offense had more problems than him. Their pass catching group is pathetic. That may be harsh but it's the truth.

My post was in response to a few posters who seem to think that Mac was literally the only problem on the team. He wasn't.
78834

To me, it's QB, OT, WR, in that order.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
I'm not defending Mac Jones here, he sucks and much of it falls it his feet, but who wouldn't have been a bust with the OL and weapons the Pats trotted out the last two seasons?
A lot of QBs? I mean, Mac's only success in the league came as a rookie when they had an excellent O-line and spent a ton on weapons for him. Go look up articles after that year, everyone was talking about how great a job the Patriots were doing developing him and how the other teams (Jets, Jags, Bears etc.) didn't and how it was a blueprint for how a smart organization helps a young QB.

The playmakers aren't good.... they also look much better when they have better QBs, the All-22s show guys open that Mac never looks at, the route trees are limited by his faults, it's a poor room, it's not the reason he's bad. The line was only bad this year when obliterated by injury it was average in 2022, Mac was still terrible.

Mac didn't develop for the same reason he was the 5th QB taken in his class... he can't consistently drive the ball outside, he doesn't throw guys open, he makes poor decisions, his footwork sucks, and he's scared of even a moderate pass rush. Sure it imploded when the line got hurt, but plenty of other QBs have line injuries, it hurts their performance but it doesn't turn them into an unplayable mess.

Edit- the ability to play well when your line isn't great and you don't have guys wide open every play is what separates NFL QBs from OOGs.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,317
It wasn’t just Mac, though. Zappe was even worse. Which is maybe to be expected. But to see another guy come in and be just as awful was kind of sobering.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
He did look a lot more exciting as he was throwing the ball to the guys in the wrong uniform. I guess style POINTZ or something.
He also threw 3 TDS to beat PIT and 2 more to win a game in Denver where the Pats have traditionally never won. He also (and this to me was a big point) clawed his way back after a HORRENDOUS start against Buffalo to make it a game and give the Pats a chance to win, which Mac never did.

At no point did I say Zappe was objectively good. I don't expect him to be on the team next year either. But it was clear watching him that he could at least give them a puncher's chance every once in a while.
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,511
Worcester

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs

Steve Dillard

wishes drew noticed him instead of sweet & sour
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2003
5,968
At a minimum, I think the interview makes clear that the Draft subform must be renamed from Wait, Who??? to "Kiper's next highest rated player is ...."
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,962
Unreal America
I'm happy that they've made it clear who has the final decision making power on personnel. (I don't even care if it was made publicly clear who it was. Just that it is clear internally and it's somebody not named Kraft.)
Ahhh, remember that glorious week when so many people here were ADAMANT that Jonathan Kraft was not only the dastardly guy who was shivving Bill, but that he'd also be inserting himself as GM once Bill was gone.

Fun times.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,517
Ahhh, remember that glorious week when so many people here were ADAMANT that Jonathan Kraft was not only the dastardly guy who was shivving Bill, but that he'd also be inserting himself as GM once Bill was gone.

Fun times.
I'm not sure it's who's in charge that's the issue. Jonathan, Glaser, whomever was never going to be involved in mid and bottom of the roster decisions. It's whether they can maintain the complete separation of church and state that they had with Bill during the vast majority of his tenure, up to and including the major, franchise altering decisions. That still remains to be seen. From the Dynasty doc, it seems like even during the Bledsoe/Brady drama the Krafts really strained themselves to stay out of it. If Mayo and Wolf can't deliver results, they will start to feel the same pull.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,123
Newton
Curran mentioned on a recent pod that there’s a possibility they bring in a football “overlord.” It felt to me like he was privy to some kind of information there but he didn’t say who was being considered or what the odds were.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,211
Given the timing of Bill being let go and all the prep on the upcoming draft and FA that had been done prior to that, it would be more of a story to let the front office team go now versus after the draft. It's not uncommon for front office personnel to stay on through the draft during a shake-up. Doesn't necessarily mean anything one way or the other on Wolf's future though.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
Given the timing of Bill being let go and all the prep on the upcoming draft and FA that had been done prior to that, it would be more of a story to let the front office team go now versus after the draft. It's not uncommon for front office personnel to stay on through the draft during a shake-up. Doesn't necessarily mean anything one way or the other on Wolf's future though.
definitely true, but you usually bring in the new GM right away so he can plan for a bunch of stuff make key decisions. Letting Wolf draft this draft, hire the coaches, spend a ton in FA then let him walk would be very unusual.
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,066
The Granite State
Given the fact that Wolf has been out in front and has brought in Highsmith as well makes me think he’s sticking around. It’s usually the draft/scouting guys that stay through the draft and then depart. With that said, I think it’s more likely Groh leaves after the draft (and maybe some of the scouts) and Wolf stays.