Sam Vecenie’s scouting report:
17. Aaron Nesmith | W | Vanderbilt | Birthdate: Oct. 16, 1999 (Age: 21) | 6-6 | 215 LBS | Hometown: Charleston, S.C. BACKGROUND: Parents are Benard and Erine. Comes from a high-achieving academic family. Brother attends Harvard and education has always been important. Graduated high school with a 3.5 grade point average from Porter Gaud School in Charleston, S.C., a very strong academic, private school. Has had a very mature, focused approach to his life since high school. Helped lead Porter Gaud to three straight state titles in the 3A classification. Averaged 21 points per game as a senior. Won Gatorade High School Player of the Year in South Carolina, which recognizes both on- and- off-court performance. Consensus four-star recruit that really spiked in the rankings starting in the summer before his senior year despite his positive previous past performances. Chose Vanderbilt over South Carolina and Florida in large part because of academics. Part of the best recruiting class in school history along with Darius Garland and Simi Shittu. Came off the bench early in his freshman season but took on a larger offensive role as the year progressed because of the Garland knee injury that knocked him out for the season. Really emerged as a sophomore, though, once Garland and Shittu departed and Bryce Drew was fired in favor of Jerry Stackhouse. Stackhouse and assistant Adam Mazarei came from NBA backgrounds and with that came NBA sets to free him. Running more intricate offensive sets off ball, Nesmith blossomed into one of the best floor-spacers in college hoops while averaging 23 points per contest. However, his season was cut short in January after a stress fracture to his right foot. Recovery is said to have gone well with no concern for long-term problems, but teams will want to get a look at his medicals to fully clear him.
YEAR TEAM LEAGUE Age GP PPG RPG APG TOPG BPG SPG FG% 3P% FT% 2018-19 Vanderbilt NCAA (SEC) 19 32 11.0 5.5 1.4 1.6 0.6 0.7 39.2 33.7 82.5 2019-20 Vanderbilt NCAA (SEC) 20 14 23.0 4.9 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.4 51.2 52.2 82.5
STRENGTHS: Absolute lights-out shooter. Hit 52.5 percent of his 3s in his sophomore season before getting hurt. Most of these shots came off the catch, but a lot of them were high degree-of-difficulty shots. His mechanics are elite. Everything is so quiet in terms of movement. Great base, simple load into the shot and clean release with great rotation. Shot prep is elite with his footwork always in position. He’s always ready to fire. Only two players in all of college hoops scored more points coming off of screens than Nesmith per game, which goes to show how strong Nesmith is at shooting off of movement in large part because of that prep work. Can also hit shots off of dribble-hand-offs, which are quickly becoming some of the toughest sets to deal with the NBA. Doesn’t have the quickest release in the world but can speed it up if he sees someone flying to closeout. Also has the ability to side-step and knock down shots off a couple of dribbles if a defender closes out heavily. He’ll step into the NBA as a knockdown shooter from Day One, something every team in the NBA is looking for. I don’t think he’s a 52.5 percent 3-point shooter, but he should make 40 percent of his 3s at a real volume.
The rest of what Nesmith does revolves around his IQ on offense. He’s smart at running off of screens and finding extra space. Smart at relocating off of offensive rebounds and broken action. Also good as a screener himself, as Vanderbilt used a lot of “screen the screener” action to get him loose. His shot IQ is terrific, as he rarely takes dumb shots despite sometimes taking contested ones. When opponents close out heavily on him, he can attack and get all the way to the rim, where he uses his length to finish well. Made 55 percent of his shots in the halfcourt this season according to Synergy. Sneaky decent floater game. Good size and length on defense
at 6-6 with a 6-11 wingspan and great strength. More of a positional defender than a chaos one, though. Largely a guy who can operate within a positive defensive scheme, but not one who will make the defense a positive. Does a solid job on wings and forwards in man, but gets blown by more often than you’d like to see because he doesn’t have great lateral quickness. Rotates well and typically is not at fault for a breakdown. His defense is neither a positive nor a negative.
WEAKNESSES: Doesn’t do a whole lot with ball in hand other than shoot it. Resigned to driving in a straight line when he has an advantageous situation. Doesn’t operate well in ball-screens. Not a great ballhandler with shiftiness or burst. Generally, a below-average athlete by NBA standard. Additionally, Nesmith is a pretty poor passer. He’s not selfish and generally makes the right decision. But you’d like to see him make reads quicker and read the second and third levels of defenses on kickouts. Does not make advanced passing reads at all. Will need to hit the ball reversal at a rapid speed at the next level. There’s a difference between IQ and intelligence versus feel for the game. Nesmith has the first two in a big way, but he hasn’t displayed enough of the latter.
Not really a switchable defender despite being a wing. His lateral quickness being an issue, he’s susceptible to getting taken advantage of if teams run 1/3 ball-screens with his man. If he does end up turning into more of a negative on defense, it’ll be because of this.
SUMMARY: Where you fall on Nesmith largely comes down to how important you think shooting is. Because at the end of the day, the shooting and basketball IQ is really all you’re getting from him in a truly positive sense. He won’t kill you on defense, but he’s not going to really make an impact. Imagine Nesmith as something of a better version of Allen Crabbe. He runs off of screens better, he can attack in a straight line a bit more comfortably and he’s stronger and smarter on defense by one level of importance. But it will likely be wrong to call Nesmith a true 3-and-D guy, too. Crabbe is going to end up making about $80 million in his career, while being a 27 rotation player on three playoff teams. Can the increased ability on defense compared to Crabbe make enough of a difference to where he’s worth taking in the mid first? I think so, but Nesmith is also my least favorite of the wings in this tier. GRADE: Solid mid-first round grade