Aaron Hernandez: eating bugs not steaks

Status
Not open for further replies.

ronlt40

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
1,324
5050HindSight said:
 
Do you have to call "not it" to get out of doodie strainer duty?
You'd think a new guy would do it but it's actually a jail investigator.  Its a good news/bad news situation. Good news: You're an investigator which is a jail equivalent of a detective and comes with some nice perks. Bad news: you may on occasion have to search somebody's poop for a balloon filled with drugs.
 

Montana Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 18, 2000
8,939
Twin Bridges, Mt.
ronlt40 said:
I work in a jail. Almost all inmates lose weight. unless they were skinny to begin with or were drug abusers. the drug abusers gain weight. 
Which is supposedly where the baggy clothing style came from.

edit: As in, when a fella got out of jail they looked their best and the clothes they wore in were now baggy on them.
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,154
Boulder, CO
My friends and I took a handgun marksmanship class with the SWAT trainer for San Quentin, and it was just the three of us plus four other San Q guards taking the course. They were talking about someone who "kiestered" a weapon to murder some famous inmate a few years back, and then one topped it saying that they found in a woman's hoo-hah (might have been at another prison, not sure there's a woman's wing at San Q) NINE improvised knives, the longest of which was nearly a foot long. We were pretty blown away. Who knows if they were exaggerating though.
 

Revkeith

New Member
Apr 23, 2010
455
Forgive me for seemingly putting trivial things above the loss of human life, but doesn't this mean the Patriots may get cap relief from Hernandez's contract? Since he seemingly had involvement in a homicide before he signed the contract?
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,501
I believe he has to be convicted first.
 
If so, they won't be seeing any cap relief for quite some time.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,538
Here
Man, the 2017 offseason is shaping up to be a big one. Brady off the books, potential Hernandez cap relief. Johnny Football, here we come!
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,538
Here
Kenny F'ing Powers said:
I believe he has to be convicted first.
 
If so, they won't be seeing any cap relief for quite some time.
 
I remember reading about all of this earlier, and I still don't quite understand it. What would they be getting cap relief from? He played for them in 2012-2013, so I'm not seeing how you can both get his on-field production and then later get that money back as cap relief. Would they get the entire 7 million back for 2013-2014, instead of the chunk that's unpaid? I thought the rules stated you could only get cap relief for money you can physically get back in your pockets or you haven't handed over. I'm afraid that money is gone regardless.
 


I think it's worth noting that we haven't made a SB since we had a murderer on the team.
 
You don't know that. At least not the second part.
 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
I wonder how solid the evidence is?  How hard do the criminal people think it would be to get this indictment?  Would similar KA's be enough to go with the spotty eyewitness accounts and build a case?  Or can we presume they have more?
 

steveluck7

Member
SoSH Member
May 10, 2007
4,004
Burrillville, RI
Ed Hillel said:
 
I remember reading about all of this earlier, and I still don't quite understand it. What would they be getting cap relief from? He played for them in 2012-2013, so I'm not seeing how you can both get his on-field production and then later get that money back as cap relief. Would they get the entire 7 million back for 2013-2014, instead of the chunk that's unpaid? I thought the rules stated you could only get cap relief for money you can physically get back in your pockets or you haven't handed over. I'm afraid that money is gone regardless.
 
 
 
I know he ahd some bonus $$ due on 3/31 that i hope they withheld so maybe they get that room back? Plus, didn't he still have some guaranteed $$ on the books this year that they likely wouldn't have paid yet. I know he filed a grievance to claim money he thought he had "earned" prior to his first arrest (3rd murder, 5th? shooting)
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,802
Ed Hillel said:
 
I remember reading about all of this earlier, and I still don't quite understand it. What would they be getting cap relief from? He played for them in 2012-2013, so I'm not seeing how you can both get his on-field production and then later get that money back as cap relief. Would they get the entire 7 million back for 2013-2014, instead of the chunk that's unpaid? I thought the rules stated you could only get cap relief for money you can physically get back in your pockets or you haven't handed over. I'm afraid that money is gone regardless.
 
I believe it had to do not with getting the money back for that year but from their ability to invalidate the remaining years on his contract because he "lied" in signing the contract by signing it in spite of there being a clause saying that there was no reason he knew of that might prevent him from fulfilling the contract, which would be fulfilled by, "going to prison because I shot every third person I've ever known."
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,802
smastroyin said:
I wonder how solid the evidence is?  How hard do the criminal people think it would be to get this indictment?  Would similar KA's be enough to go with the spotty eyewitness accounts and build a case?  Or can we presume they have more?
 
The old saw is that a good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. Not sure why, but it's always a ham sandwich.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
It is said you can indict a ham sandwich, which is a bit exaggerated but not much. Not tuning in. So I don't know the extent to which they are getting into the evidence, if at all. They would be wise not to, as this compounds the pre-trial publicity problems they already have.

It's not just this case, it's the other one too, and big picture between both it's hard to envision him anywhere but jail and prison for the next 30 years. This case undoubtedly has problems, as does the other, but winning back-to- back acquittals would be historic. Convicted in one, he will be locked up for a very long time. Plea agreements would undoubtedly carry very lengthy terms. This will eventually be sorted out, and you may not hear from him again until 2048.

EDIT:

Short version from prosecutors -- AH whacked both guys after a chance encounter in a bar. Neither victim involved in anything criminal, as had been rumored. Murder weapon recovered and tied to AH.

If they can prove this, change it to 2078.
 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
Yeah, I'm not thinking there is an easy way out or anything, I'm more wondering how much more will pop up.  The more solid the evidence of this double murder is, the more you wonder what is behind it, etc. etc.  Or maybe he was just drunk and pissed off with a gun and ruined his life and several others over something stupid.  
 
Like, what did a guy that had been living in Boston for 7 months do that Hernandez felt the need to kill him?  Or was that guy just collateral damage and the other guy was the target, and why was he a target?  
 
And then of course it would be nice to know if the Odin Lloyd killing was to cover-up this event or if it was a completely unrelated act.  
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
I was on the grand jury for my county for 2 years back in the mid 90's and we would indict just about anything the cops and DA wanted. I was practicing criminal defense at the time so it was odd to say the least. The first few months I'd recuse myself and leave the room when they were discussing my cases, after I realized the cops and prosecutors didn't seem to know which cases were mine and which ones weren't, I'd just stay and listen. We had 18 people and the rules were you needed 12 yes votes to indict. There were days we only had 12 show up, so on those days I'd listen very carefully and vote no occasionally if the case sucked. 
 
But honestly, we would listen to every case from a specific department (City, etc) and vote yes on 100 cases at once. If something seemed like it needed special consideration we'd pull it out and vote on it separately after some small discussion. Since I was an attorney they all looked to me for guidance, but 99% of the cases were just detectives reading the indictments. DUI's and small crap was a waste of everyone's time. The GJ process is antiquated, its in place to reign in aggressive prosecutors, but the burden of proof difference between the indictment level and the conviction level is too great for it to matter.
 
Now a case like this gets special attention at that level. So they gave them tons of evidence as they couldn't afford a "no bill" return on the presentation.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,538
Here
Reverend said:
 
I believe it had to do not with getting the money back for that year but from their ability to invalidate the remaining years on his contract because he "lied" in signing the contract by signing it in spite of there being a clause saying that there was no reason he knew of that might prevent him from fulfilling the contract, which would be fulfilled by, "going to prison because I shot every third person I've ever known."
 
Right, but isn't that what happened anyway? The Pats cap hit from Hernandez this year was for money already paid in bonuses, correct? It was all just accellerated because he was, well, incarcerated. As NFL contracts aren't guaranteed to begin with, what difference does invalidating the remaining years of the contract do in terms of impact on the salary cap? I'm not sure of the practical impact, either, since they can essentially just end a contract whenever. In other words, why the need for a clause allowing a team to get out of a contract that is non-guaranteed to begin with?
 
That's why I'm thinking we must be missing something. Maybe it entitles them to legally be able to get their signing bonus money back, but I'm not sure how much money Hernandez will have left to give back, and I swear the rule was that you can't get a cap hit back unless you actually get the money back. So my thinking was that maybe that clause that was discussed is more of a theoretical cap victory than an actual cap victory.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,027
Mansfield MA
Ed Hillel said:
 
Right, but isn't that what happened anyway? The Pats cap hit from Hernandez this year was for money already paid in bonuses, correct? It was all just accellerated because he was, well, incarcerated. As NFL contracts aren't guaranteed to begin with, what difference does invalidating the remaining years of the contract do in terms of impact on the salary cap? I'm not sure of the practical impact, either, since they can essentially just end a contract whenever. In other words, why the need for a clause allowing a team to get out of a contract that is non-guaranteed to begin with?
 
That's why I'm thinking we must be missing something. Maybe it entitles them to legally be able to get their signing bonus money back, but I'm not sure how much money Hernandez will have left to give back, and I swear the rule was that you can't get a cap hit back unless you actually get the money back. So my thinking was that maybe that clause that was discussed is more of a theoretical cap victory than an actual cap victory.
I agree getting money back is dubious. Some of the guaranteed money, however, has not been physically paid to Hernandez: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/16/hernandez-files-grievance-for-his-guaranteed-pay/. So I think they will be able to get $3.25 MM in cap space back, even if it's unclear if they will be able to recoup the remainder (i.e., the already-paid portion) of the guaranteed money.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
You forget about this for a long while. Then comes back like a recurring nightmare. If the charges are true, I can't think of anyone this vile associated with a major sports franchise in this country. OJ's playing days were long over, and he had been claimed by the entire country as a media celebrity. Belcher was just tragic. There have been vehicular homicides related to alcohol, but nothing quite like this. Complete sociopath, it would appear, who hoodwinked and charmed the socks off Kraft among others.

Had these acts occurred in FL, he's be in serious jeopardy of the DP if convicted. He'd probably not get it because of his resources, but still -- a guy you rooted like crazy for maybe on death row. Unbelievable.

Edit- Carruth would be close if not there with AH. Nice company.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,802
Ed Hillel said:
 
Right, but isn't that what happened anyway? The Pats cap hit from Hernandez this year was for money already paid in bonuses, correct? It was all just accellerated because he was, well, incarcerated. As NFL contracts aren't guaranteed to begin with, what difference does invalidating the remaining years of the contract do in terms of impact on the salary cap? I'm not sure of the practical impact, either, since they can essentially just end a contract whenever. In other words, why the need for a clause allowing a team to get out of a contract that is non-guaranteed to begin with?
 
That's why I'm thinking we must be missing something. Maybe it entitles them to legally be able to get their signing bonus money back, but I'm not sure how much money Hernandez will have left to give back, and I swear the rule was that you can't get a cap hit back unless you actually get the money back. So my thinking was that maybe that clause that was discussed is more of a theoretical cap victory than an actual cap victory.
 
I think the issue is the money "on paper" (no pun intended) and not actual cash paid out or collected. The issue of the actual money is something for the Patriots to settle with Hernandez. The salary cap hits are spread over a number of years based on the contract in ways not always affected by the non-guaranteed nature of the contract, right? Like, a signing bonus will be spread over a certain number of years because that's the way the contract is written, whereas some money gets accelerated if the player is cut? Invalidating a year is, I think, different from cutting a guy or even the guy getting injured--it's like it never happened, so it could have a different salary cap hit based on how the overarching agreement works. But it's obviously rare as fuck that we have a situation like this, so I can't find any good comparisons.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,835
Miami (oh, Miami!)
dcmissle said:
You forget about this for a long while. Then comes back like a recurring nightmare. If the charges are true, I can't think of anyone this vile associated with a major sports franchise in this country. OJ's playing days were long over, and he had been claimed by the entire country as a media celebrity. Belcher was just tragic. There have been vehicular homicides related to alcohol, but nothing quite like this. Complete sociopath, it would appear, who hoodwinked and charmed the socks off Kraft among others.

Had these acts occurred in FL, he's be in serious jeopardy of the DP if convicted. He'd probably not get it because of his resources, but still -- a guy you rooted like crazy for maybe on death row. Unbelievable.

Edit- Carruth would be close if not there with AH. Nice company.
 
I suppose the only mitigating factor would depend on how dirty the victims were (I don't mean legal mitigation, but gangsters trading bullets is different than gangsters gunning down someone who looked at them funny).  
 
Thus far, all of the AH victims seem to be somewhat normal people, but specifically targeted by Hernandez for a premeditated killing.  That puts AH in the OJ class.  Vehicular homicide, while stupid and tragic, lacks specific intent to kill (which in my mind is worse.)
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,802
smastroyin said:
Yeah, I'm not thinking there is an easy way out or anything, I'm more wondering how much more will pop up.  The more solid the evidence of this double murder is, the more you wonder what is behind it, etc. etc.  Or maybe he was just drunk and pissed off with a gun and ruined his life and several others over something stupid.  
 
Like, what did a guy that had been living in Boston for 7 months do that Hernandez felt the need to kill him?  Or was that guy just collateral damage and the other guy was the target, and why was he a target?  
 
And then of course it would be nice to know if the Odin Lloyd killing was to cover-up this event or if it was a completely unrelated act.  
 
How long has he been smoking PCP? I'm about as hardcore an abolitionist for marijuana as you will find in a non-smoker, but PCP is really, really bad shit. Specifically, literally insane levels of paranoia inducing bad shit.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,471
Reverend said:
 
I think the issue is the money "on paper" (no pun intended) and not actual cash paid out or collected. The issue of the actual money is something for the Patriots to settle with Hernandez. The salary cap hits are spread over a number of years based on the contract in ways not always affected by the non-guaranteed nature of the contract, right? Like, a signing bonus will be spread over a certain number of years because that's the way the contract is written, whereas some money gets accelerated if the player is cut? Invalidating a year is, I think, different from cutting a guy or even the guy getting injured--it's like it never happened, so it could have a different salary cap hit based on how the overarching agreement works. But it's obviously rare as fuck that we have a situation like this, so I can't find any good comparisons.
 
Did someone say MONEY????
 
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,538
Here
Reverend said:
 
I think the issue is the money "on paper" (no pun intended) and not actual cash paid out or collected. The issue of the actual money is something for the Patriots to settle with Hernandez. The salary cap hits are spread over a number of years based on the contract in ways not always affected by the non-guaranteed nature of the contract, right? Like, a signing bonus will be spread over a certain number of years because that's the way the contract is written, whereas some money gets accelerated if the player is cut? Invalidating a year is, I think, different from cutting a guy or even the guy getting injured--it's like it never happened, so it could have a different salary cap hit based on how the overarching agreement works. But it's obviously rare as fuck that we have a situation like this, so I can't find any good comparisons.
 
Here's the problem, though. The year they are "invalidating," he actually played on the field and produced for the Patriots. I can't see the NFL having a system that would allow the Patriots to get that benefit and then turn around and get the benefit of that cap space back. Unless you are talking about 2013-2014, but I don't think he got any bonuses in the offseason last year before he was cut (could be wrong). Regardless, I am still under the impression that the rule is that the Patriots can't get any cap relief for money they don't actually get back in their hands or that they haven't given him. So, even if he never should have gotten the money, I'm not sure that helps the Patriots regarding the salary cap unless they could actually get that money back from him, assuming there was any from bonus money last year to get back.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Ed Hillel said:
 
Here's the problem, though. The year they are "invalidating," he actually played on the field and produced for the Patriots. I can't see the NFL having a system that would allow the Patriots to get that benefit and then turn around and get the benefit of that cap space back. I don't think he got any bonuses in the offseason last year before he was cut, but I could be wrong. Though I am still under the impression that the rule is that the Patriots can't get any cap relief for money they don't actually get back in their hands.
 
I've looked up the CBA on this a couple of times and it's pretty clear that that's the case.  As SN states it might help them with some of the disputed, guaranteed but as of now unpaid payments.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
RedOctober3829 said:
His experience in the shotgun offense takes on a brand new meaning.
 
His legitimate scouting report does mention that he is dangerous in an open field or in traffic. 
 
M

MentalDisabldLst

Guest
dcmissle said:
You forget about this for a long while. Then comes back like a recurring nightmare. If the charges are true, I can't think of anyone this vile associated with a major sports franchise in this country. OJ's playing days were long over, and he had been claimed by the entire country as a media celebrity. Belcher was just tragic. There have been vehicular homicides related to alcohol, but nothing quite like this. Complete sociopath, it would appear, who hoodwinked and charmed the socks off Kraft among others.

Had these acts occurred in FL, he's be in serious jeopardy of the DP if convicted. He'd probably not get it because of his resources, but still -- a guy you rooted like crazy for maybe on death row. Unbelievable.

Edit- Carruth would be close if not there with AH. Nice company.
 
Even with Carruth, I think that's something close to Chris Rocks's bit on OJ... "now I'm not saying he shoulda killed her... but I understand."  Carruth's affair at least had to do with someone he was romantically involved with.  He was not convicted of first-degree murder.  Hernandez's murders, meanwhile, appear entirely without explanation, entirely cold-blooded, with no precipitating act even as pitiless as "she refused to abort the baby".  I think your statement doesn't need qualification, dcmissile: Aaron Hernandez is likely the worst person (that we know about) ever to play for a professional sports team.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,328
Ed Hillel said:
 
Here's the problem, though. The year they are "invalidating," he actually played on the field and produced for the Patriots. I can't see the NFL having a system that would allow the Patriots to get that benefit and then turn around and get the benefit of that cap space back. Unless you are talking about 2013-2014, but I don't think he got any bonuses in the offseason last year before he was cut (could be wrong). Regardless, I am still under the impression that the rule is that the Patriots can't get any cap relief for money they don't actually get back in their hands or that they haven't given him. So, even if he never should have gotten the money, I'm not sure that helps the Patriots regarding the salary cap unless they could actually get that money back from him, assuming there was any from bonus money last year to get back.
Hernandez had already collected about $9.25M in bonus money from his contract extension; that money was charged to the Patriots cap in 2013 and 2014.  The Patriots are trying to claim that AH signed the contract under false pretenses; they are making the argument that Hernandez signed the contract claiming he would be able to fulfill the obligations; getting convicted for the double murder that occurred prior to signing that contract would make it hard for Hernandez to claim in good faith that he would be able to fulfill his contract, knowing that the possibility of a conviction was real. 
 
I'm not sure how the NFL would view it if Hernandez is indeed convicted of these murders, but is unable to return the money.  But the Patriots feel it's worth a shot at getting some retroactive cap relief.  But don't expect anything to happen in 2014.  
 
There is also some unpaid bonus money:  $3.25M that would have been due in March, as well as some assorted workout and roster bonuses totaling $1M or so.  The Patriots have no intention of paying this money, and it will not be charged against the Patriots cap.  There is a grievance (maybe more than one) over this withheld money, but there is no way AH will win that case, unless he is acquitted entirely (and even then he will have an uphill battle).  However, that money has not been charged yet, so there's no relief possible.  
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
EDIT: fuck it, I'm not going there. Rae Carruth is a despicable asshole.
 

bradmahn

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
591
soxfan121 said:
EDIT: fuck it, I'm not going there. Rae Carruth is a despicable asshole.
 
On a sheer numbers game (3 > 1-2), I see the tally going in Hernandez's favor, but none of Hernandez's (alleged) murders is, in my mind, as bad as putting out the hit on your pregnant GF.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,839
Needham, MA
Ending a human life like that is vile. I don't think it is worthwhile to attempt to differentiate between Carruth and Hernandez. They can be in a tie for the worst person ever associated with a professional sports franchise.
 

MarcSullivaFan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,412
Hoo-hoo-hoo hoosier land.
MentalDisabldLst said:
 
Even with Carruth, I think that's something close to Chris Rocks's bit on OJ... "now I'm not saying he shoulda killed her... but I understand."  Carruth's affair at least had to do with someone he was romantically involved with.  He was not convicted of first-degree murder.  Hernandez's murders, meanwhile, appear entirely without explanation, entirely cold-blooded, with no precipitating act even as pitiless as "she refused to abort the baby".  I think your statement doesn't need qualification, dcmissile: Aaron Hernandez is likely the worst person (that we know about) ever to play for a professional sports team.
Dude.
 

JohntheBaptist

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
11,410
Yoknapatawpha County
MentalDisabldLst said:
 
Even with Carruth, I think that's something close to Chris Rocks's bit on OJ... "now I'm not saying he shoulda killed her... but I understand."  Carruth's affair at least had to do with someone he was romantically involved with.  He was not convicted of first-degree murder.  Hernandez's murders, meanwhile, appear entirely without explanation, entirely cold-blooded, with no precipitating act even as pitiless as "she refused to abort the baby".  I think your statement doesn't need qualification, dcmissile: Aaron Hernandez is likely the worst person (that we know about) ever to play for a professional sports team.
 
MDL, I don't want to put too fine a point on this, but sometimes you fucking suck beyond belief.
 

JohntheBaptist

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
11,410
Yoknapatawpha County
Wait, so which habit of highly effective people is "trying too hard to be funny and regularly alienating everyone around you with your tremendous lack of wit, self-awareness or common sense"?
 
I bet it's a number two.
 

Year of Yaz

Banned
May 1, 2014
45
Off the top of my head I can't think of another person, who was in AH's financial position, that has committed such apparently motiveless, almost random murders. Is it a lack of intelligence that makes him incapable of understanding either how fortunate he was to be successful in football or the ramifications of murdering someone?
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,624
deep inside Guido territory
Year of Yaz said:
Off the top of my head I can't think of another person, who was in AH's financial position, that has committed such apparently motiveless, almost random murders. Is it a lack of intelligence that makes him incapable of understanding either how fortunate he was to be successful in football or the ramifications of murdering someone?
PCP is a helluva drug.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.