2023 Pats: Offseason

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
I don’t see how it couldn’t be much better. For all the GM shit BB gets, this is the biggest issue (outside of Brady leaving) by far in my opinion is he knew for years Josh was a risk to leave and had zero plan on what to do if he did. Not only did he leave but Bill made a decision so bad that it’s almost unbelievable and in Year 2 of a new QB at his most pivotal point in his career.
A good amount of this was bad timing. At various points over the previous few years, they had Daboll, Chad O'Shea, Jedd Fisch, etc. on the staff. But when McDaniels left, they didn't have an obvious successor, and several of the veteran coaches (the above plus Scar and Fears) were gone, too.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,324
, take a look at the top teams and think for a moment how long those teams have taken to develop and build around their young QBs. Mahomes and KC aside ( and how comparable they are to NE and Brady as far as success), look at Buffalo, LA, Cincy, Jacksonville, Miami, and Baltimore. What do you notice about these teams and the development of their QB? How long does it take to develop and build a team around that young QB? Now look at NE.
I don’t know if this is a trick question, but it seems like the answer is generally between 1-2 years. Burrow went to the SB in year 2, his first full season. Lamar Jackson won 13 games his first full year. Lawrence showed dramatic growth in year two. Herbert has improved in years 2 and 3. Allen has improved each year.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,210
Missoula, MT
I can't disagree with that at all. The other part of that is Mac's injury and missing 3? 4? games and then took some time to get fully healthy certainly did not help either.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
I am in the camp that BB new of the risks involved in losing Josh but the timing of his departure was the hard part. I think BB knew he didn't want to bring in anyone other than BoB once the role was vacant but he also knew he would have to wait a year for it. So, he made that decision. It was not a good one.
I'm more or less in this camp as well (I"m also in the school of thought that BB thought Saban was going to let BOB join the Pats for 2022 and Saban or BOB changed their mind about it too late in the off-season to get a much better option)
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,556
Filling out the back of the roster with late round picks, UDFAs and cast-offs who can contribute in his system is a talent of his that I don't think is getting enough credit here. Again, not a ton of great successes here recently but a lot in the past. Not just the Malcolm Butlers but also the Brandon Boldens.
He's still been rolling with this recently.

Besides the stream of special teamers, David Andrews and Jonathan Jones are still starters here, and JC Jackson just left.


I'm not discarding BJ's analytical thread, I just don't know why we're talking about results from 10+ years ago when we had the GOAT at our disposal. Talking about BB's lifetime drafting history and the current state of the team are two very different topics in my head, yet people seem to want to blend them into one topic. This team is looking up at half of a stacked conference and is the worst in the division on paper. Kraft may have walked back some of his playoffs-or-bust statements, but if they miss it again he's right to question the direction of this team.
I mean, the conversation was sparked by a post that said "but even at his best, he was never more than a competent GM"

You think when talking about him even at his best, the first 20 years of his time here should be thrown out because Brady was here?

C'mon man.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,210
Missoula, MT
I don’t know if this is a trick question, but it seems like the answer is generally between 1-2 years. Burrow went to the SB in year 2, his first full season. Lamar Jackson won 13 games his first full year. Lawrence showed dramatic growth in year two. Herbert has improved in years 2 and 3. Allen has improved each year.
I think the answer is 2-3 years. Burrows was 2 years, Lamar was 1 year. Lawrence was year 2. Herbert is still developing and getting better over 3 years, Allen was 3 seasons. Tua and Miami are in year 3. That's only the first part of the equation though. The second part is building the team around that young QB.

Lance and Fields are year 3 as well.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,324
Ok, so I think we agree. All the guys who are franchise QBs seem to have shown a lot of improvement between years 1-2. Hopefully that happens with Mac this year. Feels like a make or break year for him and the direction of the franchise will become a lot more clear based on that.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,210
Missoula, MT
Yep, absolutely. But I also think that is why BB is building a defense first team so that even if Mac is a top 15 QB this year, the defense will be good enough so that the team can win 9-11 games. That allows for an extra year to develop Mac into a top 10 QB, similar to the philosophy with Brady. That also allows extra time for that 5th year option decision.
 

macal

New Member
Jul 31, 2005
74
I am in the camp that BB new of the risks involved in losing Josh but the timing of his departure was the hard part. I think BB knew he didn't want to bring in anyone other than BoB once the role was vacant but he also knew he would have to wait a year for it. So, he made that decision. It was not a good one.
This is my thinking too. I don't have anything to back it up, just a hunch. I've always thought that there was a handshake agreement last year that BOB would be the OC this year and therefore BB couldn't hire a true OC last year. He then had to take an unorthodox route to the offensive coaching. A while ago, on another thread, this was mentioned and another member said it would be criminal for BB to do this and punt on a year. However, I think that if Patricia and Judge were his actual plan going forward for multiple years, that was much more criminal.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,089
New York City
It’s kind of premature to know how big a blunder the coaching staff was last year, until we see what happens this year, no? If Mac stumbles around to another mediocre season, then I imagine the role of the coaching staff in the performance of the offense may be reassessed, and the team will be looking for a new QB. Hopefully he shows a lot of growth, the team makes the playoffs and we can all agree that it really was Patricia’s fault.
It's not premature. It was Patricia's fault. The offense was sloppy and a mess and committed a lot of stupid penalties, too.

That is what happens when you hire a defensive coach who was a massive flop as a head coach as your offensive coordinator. It's not some crazy thing to suggest this. The Patricia hire was horrendous and the most baffling thing Belichick has ever done.
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,572
Boston
Yep, absolutely. But I also think that is why BB is building a defense first team so that even if Mac is a top 15 QB this year, the defense will be good enough so that the team can win 9-11 games. That allows for an extra year to develop Mac into a top 10 QB, similar to the philosophy with Brady. That also allows extra time for that 5th year option decision.
I don't think some of you have a grasp of where this team is relative to the division and conference, and where Mac is relative to the young QB talent in this league. I mean, maybe it really was all Patricia's fault and BOB will be the savior, but my prediction is a lot of finger-pointing by the end of this season. I hope I'm wrong (even if you don't believe that).
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,298
from the wilds of western ma
It's not premature. It was Patricia's fault. The offense was sloppy and a mess and committed a lot of stupid penalties, too.

That is what happens when you hire a defensive coach who was a massive flop as a head coach as your offensive coordinator. It's not some crazy thing to suggest this. The Patricia hire was horrendous and the most baffling thing Belichick has ever done.
Yeah, I think the verdict is in as well. It was a disaster. To the point that basic sideline/game mechanics were a complete embarrassment. Not getting the correct play called and communicated to Mac in a timely fashion, frequently having to rush the snap before play clock expired, pedestrian, vanilla calls in critical situations, etc. If just those things get cleaned up this year, it should result in a noticeably more productive and efficient offense.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,089
New York City
I don't think some of you have a grasp of where this team is relative to the division and conference, and where Mac is relative to the young QB talent in this league. I mean, maybe it really was all Patricia's fault and BOB will be the savior, but my prediction is a lot of finger-pointing by the end of this season. I hope I'm wrong (even if you don't believe that).
The Pats were a playoff team in 2021. Their defense should be very solid. This team could definitely make the playoffs this season. I don't think they are SB contenders, they just don't have the talent relative to the best teams in the NFL. But this is Bill Belichick. I don't think he's lost his fastball, outside of the mystifying Patricia hire.

But there is no reason to go into this season thinking this is a 6 win team. They should compete and if they can win a couple of close games (which they didn't do well last year, because, yeah, Patricia), they will make the playoffs.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,395
But there is no reason to go into this season thinking this is a 6 win team. They should compete and if they can win a couple of close games (which they didn't do well last year, because, yeah, Patricia), they will make the playoffs.
The AFC is pretty stacked. With Payton in Denver, it's possible that the only teams the Patriots can claim to be better than are the Colts, Texans, Titans (maybe?), and Raiders.

If we go chalk and say that the Bills, Bengals, Jaguars, and Chiefs win their division, then the Patriots have to beat out the following teams for a wildcard spot: Jets, Dolphins, Ravens, Browns, Steelers, Broncos, and Chargers. I can see them being better than one of those teams, maybe two, outside chance at three. But having a better record than five of those teams and doing so in the hardest division in the NFL seems pretty unlikely.

I'll swallow my words if I'm wrong, but the odds are against them. 7-10 and last place in the division would be my expected outcome.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,210
Missoula, MT
I don't think some of you have a grasp of where this team is relative to the division and conference, and where Mac is relative to the young QB talent in this league. I mean, maybe it really was all Patricia's fault and BOB will be the savior, but my prediction is a lot of finger-pointing by the end of this season. I hope I'm wrong (even if you don't believe that).
I disagree. We've been pointing out that this team is not a 4 win talent team throwing parlor tricks out to win 7-8 games. We've been saying the drafts are better than you think and in line with that study done by Baseball Jones. In other words, they had the talent to win 7-10 games each year. Mac's first year they won 10, last year we know what happened with Jones and the coaching staff and they were one quarter away from the playoffs. But, as far as team building is concerned, they have the defense, ST, and enough for a top 15 offense. That is enough talent to win anywhere from 9-11 games, especially with this year's draft.

We know the division and conference are very good. Keep in mind that although we have to play every team in our division twice, so do they. The AFCE should beat up on each other. I'm thinking 4-2 wins the division with the other 3 teams at 2-4 or 3-3. We also know we have the best coach in the history of the game. They should compete in every tough game and as JohnMD mentions, win some close ones. That should be enough to get us there.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,324
The Pats beat exactly one QB last year who is projected to start this year- Jared Goff. I think people are underestimating how much more difficult the schedule could potentially be- the Pats had the good fortune of missing lots of starting QB’s over the past few years.

I agree that the team has the talent to win 7-11 games, but 25 NFL teams won 7 or more games last year. Virtually every team has the potential to win 7+ games.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
I disagree. We've been pointing out that this team is not a 4 win talent team throwing parlor tricks out to win 7-8 games. We've been saying the drafts are better than you think and in line with that study done by Baseball Jones. In other words, they had the talent to win 7-10 games each year. Mac's first year they won 10, last year we know what happened with Jones and the coaching staff and they were one quarter away from the playoffs. But, as far as team building is concerned, they have the defense, ST, and enough for a top 15 offense. That is enough talent to win anywhere from 9-11 games, especially with this year's draft.

We know the division and conference are very good. Keep in mind that although we have to play every team in our division twice, so do they. The AFCE should beat up on each other. I'm thinking 4-2 wins the division with the other 3 teams at 2-4 or 3-3. We also know we have the best coach in the history of the game. They should compete in every tough game and as JohnMD mentions, win some close ones. That should be enough to get us there.
I'm pretty optimistic about this year's team as well. I think the defense was good, you're adding more players than you're substracting, Jones will be more like the 2021 version, and the draft looks possibly pretty good. I also think as tough as the AFC and AFC east looks a bunch of those teams are going to unexpectedly struggle with injuries, aging, whatever. Mahomes and Allen are going to slow down sometimes; Kelce (33 turning 34 this season) and Tyreek Hill (29) and Diggs (29 turning 30 this season) aren't going to be unstoppable forever, etc.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,411
I don't think some of you have a grasp of where this team is relative to the division and conference, and where Mac is relative to the young QB talent in this league. I mean, maybe it really was all Patricia's fault and BOB will be the savior, but my prediction is a lot of finger-pointing by the end of this season. I hope I'm wrong (even if you don't believe that).
I think we all have a grasp where the team is but your agreements why are lazy and takez. I expect the Pats to be between 8-9 and 10-7 at best.
 
Last edited:

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,324
Vegas has the pats o/u at 7.5 wins, 25th of 32 teams and 2 or more games worse than every other team in the division. When folks say the Pats have added more than they have subtracted….who, exactly are we talking about?
 

88 MVP

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 25, 2007
537
WNY
I think we all have a grasp where the team is but your agreements why are lazy and takez. I expect the Pats to be between 8-9 and 10-7 at best.
Why is expecting the Pats win win 8-10 games any less of a hot take? Would people here be surprised if the Pats go 0-6 in the division this year? How many weeks will they be favored? 4?
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,411
Why is expecting the Pats win win 8-10 games any less of a hot take? Would people here be surprised if the Pats go 0-6 in the division this year? How many weeks will they be favored? 4?
It’s not. The issue here is one poster just yelling they suck at drafting and refusing to even read a word that’s been posted.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,240
CA
I don't think some of you have a grasp of where this team is relative to the division and conference, and where Mac is relative to the young QB talent in this league. I mean, maybe it really was all Patricia's fault and BOB will be the savior, but my prediction is a lot of finger-pointing by the end of this season. I hope I'm wrong (even if you don't believe that).
I think everyone has a grasp, it just may differ from yours, and you seem to be taking that very personally. You are saying words to defend your position — but offering no quantifiable reason or data, and when being presented with data (a 14 year sample size of Bb’s drafting record which was pretty great and lays a strong benchmark / baseline that so far, aligns really well with what he has done the last 10 years (hint: this would make the last 10 years pretty great too), you are owning up to the fact that despite posting the same thing over and over like 11 times, you don’t have enough time to read the data being put in front of you.

Long story short, your posting sucks here and you should look in the mirror and take everyone’s advice and do better.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
Vegas has the pats o/u at 7.5 wins, 25th of 32 teams and 2 or more games worse than every other team in the division. When folks say the Pats have added more than they have subtracted….who, exactly are we talking about?
OL should be quite a bit better, and the defense should be solid, although I realize there are people here the doubt the latter point. Wouldn't be completely surprised to see some regression from one of the divisional rivals.

There definitely will be more than 7 teams with 7 or fewer wins (there were 13 last season, 11 in 2021), so Vegas win total predictions need to be taken with a huge grain of salt. And Vegas odds traditionally miss at least 3 or 4 playoff teams, sometimes more. Which also means there are at least 3 or 4 teams that fall well short of their predicted win totals.

EDIT: I'm not discounting the possibility that the Pats could indeed go 0-6 in the division, as was noted upthread. Such an intra-divisional record is not common even among bad teams; on the opposite end, even the most powerful Brady-led Pats teams seldom went 6-0 in the division. So if the Pats do that poorly in the division, it almost certainly means a combination of injuries to key players and a horrible season by Mac Jones. Not impossible, obviously, but I don't believe it to be the most likely scenario either.
 
Last edited:

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,324
I hope the OL is better than last year, hard to believe it could be worse, but the personnel is largely the same, no? Onwenu, Brown, and Strange were all pretty healthy last year too. Seems like a ton is riding on the Pats problems being coaching; as they haven’t really added much in the way of impact players, as far as I can tell.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
539
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
I hope the OL is better than last year, hard to believe it could be worse, but the personnel is largely the same, no? Onwenu, Brown, and Strange were all pretty healthy last year too. Seems like a ton is riding on the Pats problems being coaching; as they haven’t really added much in the way of impact players, as far as I can tell.
While I am definitely not as down on BB as PiaB is, the o-line has the potential of being substantially worse than last year. They only made one substantial addition, a 34 YO RT coming off a mediocre season for a bad team. Perhaps the departure of Wynn is addition by subtraction, but I see no reason to believe it'll be a team strength.

With few weapons on offense, and a QB controversy looming should they start poorly (0-4 is very possible), I believe the team is overall going to be under .500 again. They have enough talent to beat some truly terrible teams (WDC, DEN, IND) and some unbalanced squads (NO, SD), but I don't see them as better than 7-10, and 5-12 is very possible. I'm bullish on the D, but not so much that I see them winning much.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,244
While I am definitely not as down on BB as PiaB is, the o-line has the potential of being substantially worse than last year. They only made one substantial addition, a 34 YO RT coming off a mediocre season for a bad team. Perhaps the departure of Wynn is addition by subtraction, but I see no reason to believe it'll be a team strength.
Between Reiff (I know) and Anderson and the teams draftees, there should be a lot more quality depth that can swing among multiple positions in the line. Continuity always helps in OL as well, and we should see some organic growth from Strange as he seems poised to make the typical leap between years 1 and 2.
 

Eck'sSneakyCheese

Member
SoSH Member
May 11, 2011
10,440
NH
I hope the OL is better than last year, hard to believe it could be worse, but the personnel is largely the same, no? Onwenu, Brown, and Strange were all pretty healthy last year too. Seems like a ton is riding on the Pats problems being coaching; as they haven’t really added much in the way of impact players, as far as I can tell.
How many impact players on the oline were available that the team reasonably could have afforded? How many teams have “impact” players at every position on their offensive line? Would you consider Brown, Strange, Andrews and Onwenu impact players? That’s a stout oline. RT was a turnstile and there was no depth. We’ve added a handful of players that will get the chance including some rookies, a possibly sneaky pick up in Anderson and one aging but solid vet in Reiff. Bill is doing a great job. There are a ton of options this year but because it wasn’t “insert big name here” it’s looked at like they just sat on their hands. Not calling you out specifically just the line of thinking.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,324
I don’t think I’m down in BB at all, I just don’t think the team has really added all that much and expect them to be about the same as last year- add in an improved division and 7-8 wins seems about what should be expected.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,774
To me the improvements are (or could be):

(1) Bill O’Brien. I think we forgot what an even semi-competent offense looks like and how important quality offensive coaching is. The media people covering the team have already noticed a huge difference from last year and we haven’t even gotten to camp yet. BOB should give everyone on offense a boost.

(2) The tackle position. Wynn was soooo bad last year. The line improved when McDermott took over. Brown was pretty bad too so I can only imagine there’s nowhere to go but up for the tackles. Just having a full season of not Wynn at RT and a hopefully improved Brown at LT may make a huge difference.

(3) Mac Jones. Hopefully plays without injuries, unlike last year. Hopefully gets a huge boost from BOB. Is stronger with another year of experience. Even if all he does is play like his rookie year, that’s a big improvement over last year’s disaster.

(4) Special teams. I refuse to believe they’ll even be as close to as bad as what they were last year. All those punts blocked, the two KO returns for TDs by Buffalo. I mean it was atrocious. They HAVE to be better, right? And special teams lost them a couple of games last year (to be fair, Marcus Jones’s punt return won them one too)

(5) Better pass catching. I expect Bourne to be better. Gesicki is really good, folks. He will be a factor. And obviously Thornton has nowhere to go but up from a performance perspective.

(6) More athletic defense. Gonzalez is elite. I think he could be a difference maker right out of the gate, like Sauce Gardner was for the Jets last year. Not saying he will be that good but he will be good…very good. White could be an impact player right away. But the guy I’m maybe most interested in is Mapu. Early reports are absolutely glowing on this guy. He could improve the defense against guys like Josh Allen right away.

So I have reasons to be optimistic in terms of how and where the Patriots can improve from last year. On the flip side, the division is a monster, especially if Tua stays healthy. It’ll be tough to see how they get even three wins there. And of course the conference is loaded now so they’re likely looking up at a lot of teams. They have a very difficult schedule. I think it’s entirely possible that they could be much improved over last year and still win only 8 games.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,219
The AFC is pretty stacked. With Payton in Denver, it's possible that the only teams the Patriots can claim to be better than are the Colts, Texans, Titans (maybe?), and Raiders.
Denver was much worse than NE last year, but gets a competent coach and they are better than NE? So head coaching matters but not the Patriots apparent upgrade at OC?
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,395
Denver was much worse than NE last year, but gets a competent coach and they are better than NE? So head coaching matters but not the Patriots apparent upgrade at OC?
If the Patriots were to finish ahead of the Broncos, I wouldn't be surprised. The expected outcome as of July 20th, however, is that the Broncos will be better, as pretty much every book has the Broncos line at 8.5 and the Patriots line at 7.5.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,219
If the Patriots were to finish ahead of the Broncos, I wouldn't be surprised. The expected outcome as of July 20th, however, is that the Broncos will be better, as pretty much every book has the Broncos line at 8.5 and the Patriots line at 7.5.
I get it. And lots of folks will place money on it. And casinos will get bigger.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,395
I get it. And lots of folks will place money on it. And casinos will get bigger.
Well, what would you like from me? I made a statement about the perception of the team right now, and the likelihood that they will make the playoffs in a crowded field. Popular opinion backs me up.

Popular opinion may be wrong - as it often is - but it's not like I'm sitting alone on an island with a controversial opinion here. Outside of Patriots fandom, the general expectation is that the team will finish last in their division and not make the playoffs.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,219
Well, what would you like from me?
Nothing. There was no shot at you. I said the Broncos were much worse than NE last year, and got a new coach but have the same shitty QB and now they're gonna be better than NE which also seems to have made a significant coaching improvement. It struck me as odd. You defended it.

That's all it was.
 

Rico Guapo

New Member
Apr 24, 2009
2,183
New England's Rising Star
Between Reiff (I know) and Anderson and the teams draftees, there should be a lot more quality depth that can swing among multiple positions in the line. Continuity always helps in OL as well, and we should see some organic growth from Strange as he seems poised to make the typical leap between years 1 and 2.
Having a dedicated OL coach in Klemm instead of Patricia trying to fill the role, while also being OC, is a significant upgrade itself.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
539
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
Having a dedicated OL coach in Klemm instead of Patricia trying to fill the role, while also being OC, is a significant upgrade itself.
That's a very good point, and one I'd completely spaced on. I still don't expect it to be a strength, with Brown likely to remain a shell, but there's cautious optimism for competent play, at least.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Yeah, I think the verdict is in as well. It was a disaster. To the point that basic sideline/game mechanics were a complete embarrassment. Not getting the correct play called and communicated to Mac in a timely fashion, frequently having to rush the snap before play clock expired, pedestrian, vanilla calls in critical situations, etc. If just those things get cleaned up this year, it should result in a noticeably more productive and efficient offense.
I've been harping on this for awhile. Our offensive coaching wasn't even replacement level last year.

BOB will surely be a huge improvement on MP as OC. But I expect a full-time, dyed-in-the-wool, offensive line coach (and lifelong OLineman himself) in Adrian Klemm will also be a huge improvement on a part-time MP.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
That's a very good point, and one I'd completely spaced on. I still don't expect it to be a strength, with Brown likely to remain a shell, but there's cautious optimism for competent play, at least.
I'll echo the point about the value in having a F/T OL coach in Klemm. Moreover, I wonder (WARNING: dime-store sports psychologist at work) if Brown is the type who desperately needs someone riding his ass to be his best. I seem to recall quotes from and about Scar (maybe even from Brown himself) suggesting that. MP was like the gym teacher who is asked to teach geometry as a substitute for the week, and spends most of his time planning for gym class later in the day.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
I'll echo the point about the value in having a F/T OL coach in Klemm. Moreover, I wonder (WARNING: dime-store sports psychologist at work) if Brown is the type who desperately needs someone riding his ass to be his best. I seem to recall quotes from and about Scar (maybe even from Brown himself) suggesting that. MP was like the gym teacher who is asked to teach geometry as a substitute for the week, and spends most of his time planning for gym class later in the day.
Some of the reporting suggests that pretty quickly MP went to full time offensive coordinator, Yates was basically the offensive line coach, and Judge was doing lord know what but whatever it was didn't involve interacting with players. That they inserted Klemm as the offensive line coach over Yates suggests to me that Yates was useful and good but not up to the task of head OL coach for some reason.

For whatever the reasons Wynn was hopeless last year and Brown was not good; I do think the OL got to an ok level towards the end of the season when McDermott became the regular RT so hopefully they can build and improve on the decent end of the season.
 

astrozombie

New Member
Sep 12, 2022
409
I've been harping on this for awhile. Our offensive coaching wasn't even replacement level last year.

BOB will surely be a huge improvement on MP as OC. But I expect a full-time, dyed-in-the-wool, offensive line coach (and lifelong OLineman himself) in Adrian Klemm will also be a huge improvement on a part-time MP.
Seconded. There were so many times where the offense looked like it had to rush to get a play off because no one had any idea what was going on. I am also hopeful that BOB and Klemm can at least get the offense from "putrid" to "okay" and not only would that be a significant improvement, it would let the team at least make some noise. I like the D last year, but I always got the creeping sense that they were tired/angry/exhausted that they would stop the other team after a few series, then immediately be back on the field 40 seconds later after (another) 3 and out from the Pats. That is unsustainable.
 

Rico Guapo

New Member
Apr 24, 2009
2,183
New England's Rising Star
Seconded. There were so many times where the offense looked like it had to rush to get a play off because no one had any idea what was going on. I am also hopeful that BOB and Klemm can at least get the offense from "putrid" to "okay" and not only would that be a significant improvement, it would let the team at least make some noise. I like the D last year, but I always got the creeping sense that they were tired/angry/exhausted that they would stop the other team after a few series, then immediately be back on the field 40 seconds later after (another) 3 and out from the Pats. That is unsustainable.
Special teams were atrocious last year putting the defense in bad field position fairly often. Cam Achord is still in charge unfortunately but with a new punter and kicker we should see improvement.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Special teams were atrocious last year putting the defense in bad field position fairly often. Cam Achord is still in charge unfortunately but with a new punter and kicker we should see improvement.
Neither you nor I nor any of us know for sure if Cam Achord is still in charge-judge was reportedly doing a lot with special teams in the training camps
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,616
Breer on Joe Judge being officially named Assistant Head Coach and listed under Defense on the team website. I believe in regard to Achord that "demoted" was intended and not "promoted":

"They can't put him on special teams, because it makes it look like they promoted (special teams coordinator) Cam Achord -- which they essentially have, but they don't want to make it look that way," Breer said Thursday night on NBC Sports Boston's Arbella Early Edition, as seen in the video above.

"And they can't put him on the offensive staff after what happened last year. So, if you're looking at it, it's either, we put him right next to Bill (Belichick), the optics of that aren't good, put him on offense, the optics of that aren't good, put him on special teams, the optics of that aren't good -- let's just slide him in with the defense and hope nobody else notices. That's what I think this is."

The Patriots are notorious for giving their assistants mysterious titles that don't always match their job descriptions, and it sounds like that trend will continue in 2023. While Achord has been New England's special teams coordinator since 2020, Breer suggested that Judge will be the lead special teams coach, while also performing a variety of "assistant head coach" tasks as Belichick's right-hand man.

"His role is going to be sort of a guy who is, in a lot ways, helping Bill do his job better," Breer said of Judge. "He's going to run the special teams and oversee the special teams with Cam Achord; I think he's the No. 1 and Achord is the No. 2 now. And beyond that, what an assistant head coach does in other places is what Joe Judge will do, which is be sort of the guy who can be Bill's eyes and ears when he can't be certain places and fill some roles that Bill would typically fill when he can't fill them."
LINK