2016 Bills: BRexit

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,716
Perhaps because exposing Jones to live action could take off some of the rumor mill shine that helps make the job attractive?

The timing on this just seems weird. Is this about having 10 players on the field in overtime? Is this Rex refusing to have his QB benched by management?

I have two questions about Buffalo this weekend:

1. Is Anthony Lynn auditioning for the HC job this weekend, basically making this a Koetter / Lovie situation redux?

2. If this is true, does Lynn have the power to choose his qb, for this week or is ownership / Whaley making the call with the QB position?

And one more question. If Rex doesn't have a job, Rob is no more than a LB's coach at this point, right?
Lynn is definitely auditioning for the job and will definitely be interviewed after the season for the permanent gig.

If Rob Ryan gets another DC job then shame on the head coach that hires him. He is nothing more than position coach this point.
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
From Rotoworld:

The Buffalo News' Vic Carucci reports "every indication from within One Bills Drive" is that Buffalo has settled on promoting OC Anthony Lynn to head coach in 2017.

According to Carucci, the Bills aren't going to get serious outside interest in the head-coaching post because prospective "big-name" candidates don't want to work with GM Doug Whaley. As the leader of the "search," Whaley's job appears secure, and he will maintain control of the 53-man roster. That won't fly with guys like Josh McDaniels, Jon Gruden, Tom Coughlin, and any other "name" candidate. McDaniels allegedly has interest, but he wants control of the roster. Lynn would be getting his first coaching opportunity, so he'd be in no position to make those demands. He's the heavy favorite in the clubhouse for the full-time gig.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
FWIW, Anthony Lynn is highly regarded and was in demand for other openings.

(Tom Coughlin & roster control?)
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,127
Newton
The other advantage with Lynn is that he knows the assets the Bills have, such as they are. In particular, he (unlike the big names Whaley is apparently repulsing) probably is ok with being attached at the hip to Tyrod. At least for the time being. Still, I'm struggling to see how Whaley isn't part of the problem in Buffalo.

One question: before Lynn was promoted to OC, were he and Rob both assistant head coaches under Rex (Wikipedia had him listed as Assistant HC/Running Backs coach).
 

Gunfighter 09

wants to be caribou ken
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2005
8,550
KPWT
So this is a repeat of the Dirk Koetter / Lovie Smith thing in Tampa last year. This is a weird new (?) trend in the league where you fire HCs to avoid losing promising coordinators. Of course, I wonder if the Bears would like to redo the decision to keep Fox and lose Gase or the Bengals would still prefer to have Lewis over Zimmer/Gruden/HueJack.


Rex has to go to TV for a few years and let his "brand" re-build a bit before he takes his third stab at coaching, right? Or if Gruden to the Rams happens does Kroenke pay huge freight to bring in Rex to run a talented defense that has players who would fit his ridiculously complicated and only occasionally effective schemes well.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,696
Still, I'm struggling to see how Whaley isn't part of the problem in Buffalo.
Whaley may or may not be a good executive, but all indications were that team president Russ Brandon was behind the Rex Ryan hire, to the point that he gave pointers to Rex on how to impress Pegula prior to his interview with the owner, then told the Pegulas to 'make sure Ryan doesn't walk out that door' without hiring him. Sadly for Bills fans, there is no indication that Brandon's influence has waned with the Pegulas.
 

jimv

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 5, 2011
1,118
Everyone remains in place except for Bros Ryan who are surgically excised. Next year if the Bills are a decent team Rex will play the "they're winning with my team" card.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,235
Everyone remains in place except for Bros Ryan who are surgically excised. Next year if the Bills are a decent team Rex will play the "they're winning with my team" card.
Or everyone else will play the "They were decent before you arrived, sucked while you were here, and decent after you left, maybe it's you" card.
 

jimv

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 5, 2011
1,118
Or everyone else will play the "They were decent before you arrived, sucked while you were here, and decent after you left, maybe it's you" card.
Agreed, that card will get played as well. Not that Rex will pay any attention to it
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
They aren't getting rid of Taylor. They are benching him to keep him from getting injured in a meaningless game when they would still owe him almost $40 million over the rest of his contract, and calling it a 'business decision.' You are absolutely correct that he isn't the problem, and honestly, if they can get their receivers healthy and get a good tight end, they are probably an above average/top-10 offense again next year. It's the defense that sucked (which is probably why the brothers Ryan got canned, since the defense was supposed to be a strength).
Right, they are not letting Taylor go. They are wisely trying to put their new coach (whoever that is) in the best position to win next year by eliminating the possibility that their salary cap is tied up on an injured quarterback.
Per Rotoworld:

Jason La Canfora of CBS Sports reports the Bills made the decision to move on from Tyrod Taylor (groin) "weeks ago."

Taylor has been benched for Week 17 and might need groin surgery despite being left off the final injury report. That surgery could complicate the Bills' plan to move on as Taylor's contract calls for a guaranteed $30.75 million if he cannot pass a physical by the start of the new league year. This saga should dominate the Rotoworld headlines in the early part of 2017.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,688
Oregon

dbn

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 10, 2007
7,785
La Mancha.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!



http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000767158/Jets-recover-own-kickoff-in-Bills-end-zone-for-touchdown
 

Bowhemian

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2015
5,795
Bow, NH
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!



http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000767158/Jets-recover-own-kickoff-in-Bills-end-zone-for-touchdown
Yeah, that's a mistake that could happen in youth football. OK, maybe in high school football. But in the freakin' NFL?
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,143
Boulder, CO
I didn't exactly attend a football powerhouse in high school but they made clear to me day one that a kickoff is a live ball. Jesus.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,903
I mean...has this EVER happened before in an NFL game?

This play might really end up causing my children (6&4) a lifetime of pain. For some reason, they were really into watching this game with me and the Jets pasting the Bills had them pretty fired up, but then my antics from when the ball hit the field *whispers* that's a live ball...*slightly louder* he doesn't know ... *really loud* I've never seen this! Then, this is where I ruined them, "Daddy's been watching football for a long time and I've never seen that before" and we cheered and they started screaming that they loved the Jets, "WE LOVE THE JETS, WE LOVE THE JETS", and that's when what l had done hit me. It was like Bruce Willis realizing he was dead. Later my wife told me "you're really good at brainwashing, huh?"
 

Curtis Pride

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
1,390
Watertown, MA

OCST

Sunny von Bulow
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2004
24,569
The 718
I saw it in a high school game- my own high school. I knew the kid, not too well, just to say hello. Coach screamed in his face for five minutes and the kid sat on the bench for the rest of the game.
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Classic Bills and residue of Sexy Rexy's undisciplined approach.

I'm just sad that the Jets and their mutant fans got to enjoy it and that we were deprived of seeing Ryan's stunned face after it happened.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,912
Deep inside Muppet Labs
This play might really end up causing my children (6&4) a lifetime of pain. For some reason, they were really into watching this game with me and the Jets pasting the Bills had them pretty fired up, but then my antics from when the ball hit the field *whispers* that's a live ball...*slightly louder* he doesn't know ... *really loud* I've never seen this! Then, this is where I ruined them, "Daddy's been watching football for a long time and I've never seen that before" and we cheered and they started screaming that they loved the Jets, "WE LOVE THE JETS, WE LOVE THE JETS", and that's when what l had done hit me. It was like Bruce Willis realizing he was dead. Later my wife told me "you're really good at brainwashing, huh?"
You're history's greatest monster!
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,231
Here
I mean...has this EVER happened before in an NFL game?
I still contend it happened in SB 49 after Amendola's 4th quarter TD and the refs missed it.

Edit - Nevermind, that was clearly out of bounds.
 

MuellerMen

New Member
Apr 13, 2006
90
Jungles of Borneo
By the rules explained there, it's essentially an onside kick recovered in the end zone.
"Haji-Sheikh kicked the opening kickoff to A.J. Jones of the Rams, who allowed the ball to bounce next to him. Jones thought the ball was going to bounce out of the end zone for a touchback, but instead it bounced straight up in the air. Phil McConkey of the Giant raced downfield and recovered the ball in the end zone.

11. What is the correct call?
Once a kickoff travels 10 yards, either team is allowed to recover the ball and get possession. Because the recovery is in the end zone, the Giants are awarded the touchdown. . . .

Compare this to a kickoff on Oct. 22, 1990. . . . Barry Foster was of the Pittsburgh Steelers was deep to receive the kickoff from 49ers kicker Mike Cofer. The ball bounced inside the 10-yard line, and Foster did not make an attempt to recover the ball. Mike Wilson of the 49er recovered at the 5-yard line.

12. Can Wilson score a touchdown?

On all kicking plays, the kicking team is able to advance and recover only if the receiving team has actually possessed the ball. If a kickoff has traveled 10 yards (or if it is touched but not possessed by the receiving team), it can be recovered by either team, but it is a dead ball on the recovery by the kicking team. . . .
Okay, like the Bills, I may be having a brain-freeze of my own. In the Bills' case, the Bills kicking team never actually possessed the ball (they didn't even touch it). They simply let it bounce into the end zone. So why were the Jets allowed the touchdown?

Conversely, in the Wilson example cited in the rules guide, my question is: given what the rules say, why didn't Wilson allow the ball to bounce into the end zone and only then jump on it for a touchdown? So many times, when the receiving team lets the balls bounce, I see the kicking team try actively to bat the ball away from the end zone so as to hand the receiving team awful field position. If you're the kicking team, why bat the ball away from the end zone - why not let it enter the end zone and the jump on it for a touchdown?

Forgive the tortured logic of my post. But the examples given in the guide confuse rather than enlighten me.

Edit: Fix incompetent use of quotes. And brain farts.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,903
Okay, like the Bills, I may be having a brain-freeze of my own. In the Bills' case, the Bills kicking team never actually possessed the ball (they didn't even touch it). They simply let it bounce into the end zone. So why were the Jets allowed the touchdown?

Conversely, in the Wilson example cited in the rules guide, my question is: given what the rules say, why didn't Wilson allow the ball to bounce into the end zone and only then jump on it for a touchdown? So many times, when the receiving team lets the balls bounce, I see the kicking team try actively to bat the ball away from the end zone so as to hand the receiving team awful field position. If you're the kicking team, why bat the ball away from the end zone - why not let it enter the end zone and the jump on it for a touchdown?

Forgive the tortured logic of my post. But the examples given in the guide confuse rather than enlighten me.

Edit: Fix incompetent use of quotes. And brain farts.

Aren't you confusing punts and kickoffs? The ball is live after 10 yards on a kickoff as far as I know.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,430
Philadelphia
Okay, like the Bills, I may be having a brain-freeze of my own. In the Bills' case, the Bills kicking team never actually possessed the ball (they didn't even touch it). They simply let it bounce into the end zone. So why were the Jets allowed the touchdown?

Conversely, in the Wilson example cited in the rules guide, my question is: given what the rules say, why didn't Wilson allow the ball to bounce into the end zone and only then jump on it for a touchdown? So many times, when the receiving team lets the balls bounce, I see the kicking team try actively to bat the ball away from the end zone so as to hand the receiving team awful field position. If you're the kicking team, why bat the ball away from the end zone - why not let it enter the end zone and the jump on it for a touchdown?

Forgive the tortured logic of my post. But the examples given in the guide confuse rather than enlighten me.

Edit: Fix incompetent use of quotes. And brain farts.
I think what you're getting confused is that you can only advance the ball on a recovered kickoff if the other team has touched it. You can always recover as long as it has gone 10 yards. The Jets were allowed the TD because they recovered in the end zone.

As far as batting the ball out of the end zone, maybe you're confusing punt plays with kickoffs.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,163
As per the above, ball is live but can't be advanced - but it didn't need to be, since it was recovered in the end zone. The quote above in bold says "Because the recovery is in the end zone, the Giants are awarded the touchdown." Same applies to the Jets yesterday, right?

EDIT - or as MMS said, but faster and in a clearer fashion
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,464
@Smiling Joe Hesketh
@NortheasternPJ

Here is the full transcript
http://buffalonews.com/2017/01/02/said-transcript-bills-gm-doug-whaleys-season-ending-press-conference/
Its a tire fire of epic proportions

Read the whole thing... I think the thread needs a title change
Thanks for posting that. So, there is no way I'd want McD or Patricia to go to work in that situation---it seems clear the GM is somewhat out of the loop and ownership is way too involved. Good luck, whoever lands there...
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,783
Well, it's a little odd that the GM had no foreknowledge of and no input into the decision to fire Rex and therefore no ability to discuss it at all even though he is the "singular voice" of the organization, and it's a little odd that he says Ryan picked Lynn to be interim Head Coach, and he sort of says that this next coaching hire is his and then later admits that it's the owners' choice. He really comes across as more of a middle-man who is trying to act as if he actually has the authority his title implies and is as a result fumbling for answers while facing a pretty irritable pool of reporters.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,538
Thanks for posting that. So, there is no way I'd want McD or Patricia to go to work in that situation---it seems clear the GM is somewhat out of the loop and ownership is way too involved. Good luck, whoever lands there...

Sounds like a fun place to work.