Red Sox Spring training thread

flymrfreakjar

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
2,919
Brooklyn
Al Zarilla said:
A little too familiar this soon, or does it go back to when Hanley was in the Sox system? Also, what's blue about Pedey? Maybe we'll hear about a hotfoot.
I remember reading (forgetting where) that it's indeed from back in Pawtucket.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
geoduck no quahog said:
Ok all you data driven naysayers. Please provide evidence that there's a relationship between weight (body mass) and ability in baseball. Don't hesitate to use real life examples. Please don't branch out to other sports, because it's already clear that guys like Vince Wilfork can't handle it (as evidenced by a tiny wave in Nassau knocking him off his feet).
 
From there we can move onto to other physical attributes.
 
This article attempts to show heavier players peak earlier and fall off the map north of 30
 
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/how-will-prince-fielder-age/
 
 
Obviously, there is a lot of variance.  The spectrum ranges from David Ortiz to Mo Vaughn.  Pablo derives a fair amount of his value from defense though, and his regular season offensive peak seems behind him, so the latter part of his deal might not be pretty
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,628
I was surprised to hear what Gordon Edes said on WBZ's Sports Final. He thinks it's going to be Ramirez - Castillo - Victorino in the OF with Betts filling in at all 3 spots for 400+ ABs.  
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,508
Not here
Harry Hooper said:
I was surprised to hear what Gordon Edes said on WBZ's Sports Final. He thinks it's going to be Ramirez - Castillo - Victorino in the OF with Betts filling in at all 3 spots for 400+ ABs.  
One the one hand, I think that's a slightly terrible idea.

On the other hand, I have a disproportionate amount of love for the hit who can come in and steal a base late in the game.

On the third hand, if they're talking behind the scenes about getting Mookie playing time, maybe it's just softening up for the inevitable.
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,657
Haiku
Harry Hooper said:
I was surprised to hear what Gordon Edes said on WBZ's Sports Final. He thinks it's going to be Ramirez - Castillo - Victorino in the OF with Betts filling in at all 3 spots for 400+ ABs.
That sounds like the 2008 outfield: Crisp 409 plate appearances, Ramirez 425, JD Drew 456, and Ellsbury 609 (544 of them hitting leadoff).

ELMB
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,706
Rogers Park
Sprowl said:
That sounds like the 2008 outfield: Crisp 409 plate appearances, Ramirez 425, JD Drew 456, and Ellsbury 609 (544 of them hitting leadoff).

ELMB
 
That was a pretty great outfield, but if we're talking about playing time balance, it's misleading to leave out the 211 PA that went to Jason Bay. 
 

pjr

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
780
Quincy,MA
https://twitter.com/DonOrsillo/status/570207464454529024

Don OrsilloVerified account
‏@DonOrsillo Big Papi is here!




 Reply

 Retweet

 Favorite


 More













Embedded image permalink
 

pockmeister

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2006
372
London, England
Joe Shlabotnick said:
Unless its the wind or the shirt, Papi looks to be in excellent shape.
 
 I thought the same - he looks lean.  It might also be to do with standing beside Sandoval.  If you want to look slim, stand beside the fattest dude you can find.  Papi found him quickly
 

LahoudOrBillyC

Indian name is Massages Ellsbury
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
4,073
Willamette Valley
John Henry's recent comments (today, and throughout the off-season) about the Red Sox being more discerning about spending money on older high-ticket players yet more willing to spend it on young players comes as music to my ears.  This is NOT merely an aesthetic preference, but a belief that the best way to build a long-term great team is by finding and investing in great young players and keeping them.  Ownership truly seems to have learned a lesson from the 2009-11 spending spree that got the team off track.  Fingers crossed.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,948
Maine
Savin Hillbilly said:
 
I wonder if bringing this up right now is sort of pre-seeding the narrative for optioning Mookie to start the season.
 
Of course it is.  If there's anything that the Red Sox FO has strived to do consistently over the last decade or so, it's maximizing their resources.  Right now, they have to operate as if all of their assets will be healthy, productive and on the payroll (i.e. not traded or released) on Opening Day.  We've seen them do it multiple times with bullpen assets over the years (sending down the arguably better younger pitcher to hang on to a veteran on a short leash).  They nearly did exactly that last year until Victorino came up lame (sending down JBJ in favor of Sizemore).  They may be in a position where they do it this year, and Betts and Castillo are the most likely odd men out given they have options where the other guys don't. And with Castillo's contract, that makes Betts the odds on favorite to be optioned.
 
If they operate on the assumption that either someone will definitely get hurt or will definitely be moved in a deal, they could paint themselves into an undesirable corner.
 

LahoudOrBillyC

Indian name is Massages Ellsbury
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
4,073
Willamette Valley
Yeah, I do not really get the "rushed" argument.  If Betts was rushed, then Vazquez was rushed and no one is talking about sending him back down.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
I think he's mainly referring to Bradley given his lack of at-bats in the minors.  Possibly Bogaerts in terms of defense.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,948
Maine
I don't think Henry's comments specifically refer to Betts so much as JBJ, Middlebrooks, and to an extent Bogaerts.  Farrell is more the one sowing the seeds of Betts starting the year in Pawtucket with his talk of Victorino being the starter in RF and there being a "competition" for CF amongst Castilo, Betts, and JBJ.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,688
Oregon
Red(s)HawksFan said:
I don't think Henry's comments specifically refer to Betts so much as JBJ, Middlebrooks, and to an extent Bogaerts.  Farrell is more the one sowing the seeds of Betts starting the year in Pawtucket with his talk of Victorino being the starter in RF and there being a "competition" for CF amongst Castilo, Betts, and JBJ.
 
Probably some of the pitchers, as well, although that was more out of necessity after the trades
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,696
Love the selfie.  This has the potential to be a really fun team.
 

Minneapolis Millers

Wants you to please think of the Twins fans!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,753
Twin Cities
Papi does look good.  Nice to see...
 
Re: Farrell/Henry OF-related comments: Seriously, what are these guys supposed to say?  "We eff'd up our roster construction and have WAAAAY too many OFs and /1B/DH types.  If everyone's healthy, we're gonna have to just dump a guy for pennies on the dollar come the end of spring training.  Man, what were we thinking?"
 
- Tell the veterans you've got their back. 
- Let the younger/newer guys know that they don't all have F/T gigs locked up in February. 
- Keep other teams guessing about what your plans actually are. 
- See how things shake out.  Deal with any actual surplus when you actually have one and need to deal with it, not before (i.e. not now).
 
Seems like a rational approach to me.
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
soxhop411 said:
Tim Britton ‏@TimBritton  3m
3 minutes ago
Henry wonders if team has rushed some minor-leaguers given the gap between Triple-A and majors.
 
I went back 10 years and looked at some of the "successful" Red Sox minor league hitters (stretched for Varitek) and their debut year/age, ignoring "taste of the big league" call-ups:
 
Garciaparra: 1997 : 23 yrs
Varitek: 1998 : 26 yrs
Youkilis: 2004 : 25 yrs
Nixon: 1999 : 25 yrs
Hanley: 2006 : 22 yrs
Pedroia: 2007 : 23 yrs
Ellsbury: 2008 : 24 yrs
Moss: 2008 : 24 yrs
Murphy: 2007 : 25 yrs
Lowrie: 2008 : 24 yrs
Reddick: 2011 : 24 yrs
Nava: 2010 : 27 yrs
Middlebrooks: 2012 : 23 yrs
__________________________________
 
Bogaerts: 2014 : 21 yrs
Betts: 2014 : 21 yrs
 
JBJ: 2014 : 24 yrs
 
 
JH is obviously referring to Bogaerts and Betts when it comes to position players, and not JBJ. It's true, given my selective list, that these 2 are the youngest good players called up in the last 10 years, and that most of the successful ones debuted at an average of 24-25 years old.
 
I don't know what to make of that.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,508
Not here
geoduck no quahog said:
JH is obviously referring to Bogaerts and Betts when it comes to position players, and not JBJ. It's true, given my selective list, that these 2 are the youngest good players called up in the last 10 years, and that most of the successful ones debuted at an average of 24-25 years old.
 
I don't know what to make of that.
 
I don't think it's remotely obvious that he's referring to Bogaerts and Betts while excluding Bradley. I rather assume it's the other way around. Bogaerts had 1623 minor league plate appearances, Betts 1379, and Bradley 1058. 
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,948
Maine
geoduck no quahog said:
 
 
 
JH is obviously referring to Bogaerts and Betts when it comes to position players, and not JBJ. It's true, given my selective list, that these 2 are the youngest good players called up in the last 10 years, and that most of the successful ones debuted at an average of 24-25 years old.
 
I don't know what to make of that.
I have to think the "rushing" is related to the amount of time the player is in the system rather than their physical age. Bogaerts started his pro career at a younger age than JBJ for example and had nearly a full season more time in the minors before his call-up. He was arguably more ready at 21 than JBJ was at 24.
 

Heating up in the bullpen

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,100
Pittsboro NC
Red(s)HawksFan said:
I have to think the "rushing" is related to the amount of time the player is in the system rather than their physical age. Bogaerts started his pro career at a younger age than JBJ for example and had nearly a full season more time in the minors before his call-up. He was arguably more ready at 21 than JBJ was at 24.
 
I think it's even more specifically about time in the upper minors.  Here are the upper minor times, before their first call-up, of the recent young position players:
 
Middlebrooks: AA 96 G / 397 PA; AAA 40 G / 160 PA
Bradley: AA 61 G / 271 PA (After beginning the 2013 season in Boston, AAA 80 G / 374 PA)
Bogaerts: AA 79 G / 356 PA; AAA 60 G / 256 PA
Vazquez: AA 116 G / 481 PA; AAA 67 G / 274 PA
Betts: AA 54 G / 253 PA; AAA 45 G / 211 PA
 
With the exception of JBJ in 2013 (if you roll his beginning of the season Boston time into his AAA time), none of them has spent a full season in AAA. And except for Vazquez and Bradley, barely a full season between AA and AAA combined.
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
I stand corrected fella's.
 
The comparison between the 2014 rookies and former Red Sox rookies should be done based on minor league service time (not age). I'll look at that when I have a chance. Also, I ignored pitchers because it was too much work. I also forgot about Vazquez.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,538
@PeteAbe: Schilling seeing Pedroia with a bat: "Is that a 31/26?" Pedroia: "As long as it goes over." #redsox