Red Sox Spring training thread

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
To defend in my lifetime a little bit I think it's a bit hilarious that Vic's "general soreness" has not triggered the same "sky is falling , he's going to AAA and lost the CF competition" nonsense from the Bos writers that the Castillo injury caused.  It's not a perfect comparison for a number of reasons, but this would seemingly be a pretty significant development undermining the "if he's healthy starting stance" from JF. ( I know that is necessary from JF but I wouldn't mind the writers  acknowledging that this stance is merely manager optimistic speak given the reality of Vic's injury occurrences.) 
 
More importantly, IF(for those who'll say I'm overreacting) he continues to be sore after playing with his usual reckless abandon I think the odds of a tough love conversation between JF and Vic greatly increase.
 
By tough love I mean Vic's skill set and defensive ability would fit ideally in a 4th OF role along with Nava for a team that craves depth and reliability. Nava brings the lower ceiling reliability and versatility while perhaps not demanding the same playing time demand allows Vic's D and speed to be available more frequently in crucial times or games. 
 
Is 13 mill an insane price for a 4th OF ? Sure, but I'm just entirely unconvinced that 2013 starting Vic who I and everyone loved is ever coming back.  
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
So, anyway, about Clay Buchholz's start, which is way way more important than Victorino's legs. Anybody have radar gun readings? Observations about his use of the changeup and it's action?
 

Darnell's Son

He's a machine.
Moderator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,610
Providence, RI
Plympton91 said:
So, anyway, about Clay Buchholz's start, which is way way more important than Victorino's legs. Anybody have radar gun readings? Observations about his use of the changeup and it's action?
I read one of the write ups and it said he was throwing 91 consistently.
 

67WasBest

Concierge
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,442
Music City USA
Plympton91 said:
So, anyway, about Clay Buchholz's start, which is way way more important than Victorino's legs. Anybody have radar gun readings? Observations about his use of the changeup and it's action?
4 pitches for strikes, good command, 91 on FB
 

Mike F

Mayor of Fort Myers
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,068
Plympton91 said:
So, anyway, about Clay Buchholz's start, which is way way more important than Victorino's legs. Anybody have radar gun readings? Observations about his use of the changeup and it's action?
The board wasn't always showing speeds. To my knowlege Buch was 91-92 with the FB.
The change had a lot of bottom and some ad side fade. It appeared to be close in speed to the curve. Again the radar readings only appeared sparingly and seemed to be mostly FBs and sliders.
The 6-4-3DP that erased Buch's only walk wasn't hit hard and X's toss to Pedey was a hair
slow but Not Captain Intangibles unloaded a throw in a blur to complete the play.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,779
ji oh said:
I tell students that using the word "obviously" in an argument is another way of saying "I have no evidence."
In a formal argument in a paper, perhaps.

In discourse closer to the conversational, in the vernacular, however--as on a message board, say--it has other usages, critical functions in fact.

The best analogy I can think of is from the old Victorian introduction where someone said, "Of course you know sir/lady whoeverthefuck...?" and then the person could say, "Of course!" even if it weren't true, but then everyone saves face.

I would say that a claim to knowing what is wrong with Victorino in the absence of information overstates the case, yes. But that's not a reason to overstate our own positions, I would hope, yes?
 

Mike F

Mayor of Fort Myers
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
2,068
There is no Rev said:
In a formal argument in a paper, perhaps.

In discourse closer to the conversational, in the vernacular, however--as on a message board, say--it has other usages, critical functions in fact.

The best analogy I can think of is from the old Victorian introduction where someone said, "Of course you know sir/lady whoeverthefuck...?" and then the person could say, "Of course!" even if it weren't true, but then everyone saves face.

I would say that a claim to knowing what is wrong with Victorino in the absence of information overstates the case, yes. But that's not a reason to overstate our own positions, I would hope, yes?
"Every intelligent reader would agree."
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,273
AZ
There is no Rev said:
In a formal argument in a paper, perhaps.
In discourse closer to the conversational, in the vernacular, however--as on a message board, say--it has other usages, critical functions in fact.
The best analogy I can think of is from the old Victorian introduction where someone said, "Of course you know sir/lady whoeverthefuck...?" and then the person could say, "Of course!" even if it weren't true, but then everyone saves face.
I would say that a claim to knowing what is wrong with Victorino in the absence of information overstates the case, yes. But that's not a reason to overstate our own positions, I would hope, yes?
Of course.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,574
Pete Abraham @PeteAbe · 41m 41 minutes ago
On a big picture front, these guys going fishing is a very 2013 Red Sox thing to do. Seeing more of that vibe this season.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,567
San Andreas Fault
Anybody get a feel for how Sandoval is looking at 3B yet? That, and his baserunning, are the keys, to me, of what kind of shape he's in. I mean, shape-wise, he's almost always sloppy looking, but when he's too fat, he can't get to and get down for grounders quickly. And, if he looks like he's going to topple over when rounding a base, he's much too fat. Last year he was solid at third all year. As a baserunner, he was slow, but nobody posted a picture of him running after cake. Also, he has been known to take off some weight in ST. Any sign of that yet? I thought of starting a Pablo watch thread, but didn't want to draw a lot of attention to the guy.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,779
Al Zarilla said:
Anybody get a feel for how Sandoval is looking at 3B yet? That, and his baserunning, are the keys, to me, of what kind of shape he's in. I mean, shape-wise, he's almost always sloppy looking, but when he's too fat, he can't get to and get down for grounders quickly. And, if he looks like he's going to topple over when rounding a base, he's much too fat. Last year he was solid at third all year. As a baserunner, he was slow, but nobody posted a picture of him running after cake. Also, he has been known to take off some weight in ST. Any sign of that yet? I thought of starting a Pablo watch thread, but didn't want to draw a lot of attention to the guy.
 
In the opener, I saw him charge a slow grounder and throw on the run looking like a guy 80 pounds lighter than he. I have no idea how he does it.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,574
 
FORT MYERS, Fla. — If you combine the individual ZiPS and Steamer projections for 2015 to further project the standings — and Fangraphs helpfully did — the Red Sox appear to have a formidable team.
. . .
 
 
Again, none of this stuff matters if there are injuries and underperformance. An unpleasant guy who can really hit is more valuable than a nice guy who can’t. But as the 2015 Red Sox start to form an identity, it’s worth noting that they seem to like each other, floppy hats and all.
 
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/03/08/team-chemistry-very-evident-red-sox-spring-training/HnXSgkdvqqx0AXOKWiVQ2O/story.html?event=event25
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,528
Not here
Is it me, or do the Sox look a little advanced for the first few days of spring training games?

I say that, but the only thing I can point to is a double steal today.
 

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,662
Pioneer Valley
The double steal, initiated by Weeks and followed by Nava, doesn't tell us much. Nor, I'm afraid, do the home runs. It seems that lots of the ST home-runs are wind-aided. At least that's what most of the commentary indicates, which means many of them would be fly-ball outs in most ballparks.
 

67WasBest

Concierge
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,442
Music City USA
Rasputin said:
Is it me, or do the Sox look a little advanced for the first few days of spring training games?

I say that, but the only thing I can point to is a double steal today.
Likely because so many were there early.  More than half the position players were there a week early, and many had been here for many weeks already. 
 
Gives me great hope they win the spring championship :q:
 

Green Monster

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
2,278
CT
I heard that you can enter the complex in the morning to watch workouts even if you don't have tickets to the days game.  Does anyone have any advise or know what is the best time to do that?
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,574
Home in Boston, Pablo Sandoval Says Leaving San Francisco 'Not Hard at All'
 
 
 
FORT MYERS, Fla. — Immediately, you recognize the infectious smile from a mile away. Pure Panda. So is the laughter and the joy.
And inside the Boston Red Sox clubhouse, nothing about Panda says San Francisco anymore.
Leaving the Giants?
"Not hard at all," Pablo Sandoval told Bleacher Report during an early-morning conversation here the other day. "If you want me around, you make the effort to push and get me back."
The Giants did not make that effort, Sandoval said, reiterating that last spring's aborted talks for a contract extension in San Francisco were pretty much the end of the line.
"I knew early in spring training last year I was going to leave," Sandoval said. "They didn't respect my agent. Contract talks, everything. The way Brian Sabean (Giants general manager) talked to my agent."
From there, Sandoval said, he did his best to soak in everything during the rest of the season, making the most out of what he knew would be his last summer in a Giants uniform.
more at the link
 

Tangled Up In Red

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2004
4,544
Potrero
ToeKneeArmAss said:
This is disappointing behavior on Sandoval's part imo. Nothing to gain and creates bad feelings - not to mention how it might tarnish his legacy in the eyes of SF fans.
Sports radio was pretty (fairly) brutal in SF today.
 

pokey_reese

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 25, 2008
16,330
Boston, MA
So, mountains and molehills and all of that, but after getting hurt Friday (and by hurt, I just mean "general soreness" with nothing to worry about), wasn't Victorino supposed to take Saturday and Sunday off, for precautionary reasons, and then play Monday?
 
He didn't play Monday. Worse than initially reported, or just being extra double cautious? What if he doesn't play Tuesday?
 

sittingstill

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,596
Bay State Road
Green Monster said:
I heard that you can enter the complex in the morning to watch workouts even if you don't have tickets to the days game.  Does anyone have any advise or know what is the best time to do that?
Anybody can drive in and park, though if it's a game day you'll pay game day parking ($10?). The problem as far as the big club goes is that it's hard to predict when and where they'll work out--and how much of the complex will be open to the public. Sometimes they restrict public access just to Fields 3-6, where the minor leaguers work. If there's a 1:00p game, workouts will usually be mid-morning to late morning, maybe 9:15a-10:45a. Last week the pitchers were using the agility field and Field 1 (in public view) and the position players were in the park itself (inaccessible until gates opened for ticketholders).
 
That said, if you're interested in seeing the minor leaguers work, that's guaranteed to be an option (weather permitting). Now through March 17 they'll have workouts, drills, etc.; starting March 18 they'll work out/practice in the morning and play games in the afternoon (aside from a couple of "Camp Days"). Opponents rotate among the Twins, Orioles and Rays affiliates; on any given day if the AAA/AA teams are home, the A ball teams are away, and vice versa. (Keep in mind that the level assignments are pretty loose at first, when a fair number of PawSox are still with the Red Sox and the effect trickles down.) Happy to advise more via questions or PMs.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,999
Maine
pokey_reese said:
So, mountains and molehills and all of that, but after getting hurt Friday (and by hurt, I just mean "general soreness" with nothing to worry about), wasn't Victorino supposed to take Saturday and Sunday off, for precautionary reasons, and then play Monday?
 
He didn't play Monday. Worse than initially reported, or just being extra double cautious? What if he doesn't play Tuesday?
 
He's in the lineup for today's game, batting lead-off.  Remains to be seen what happens when he arrives at the park.  He was in the lineup for Saturday's game until he got to the park.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,749
NY
For whatever this is worth:
 
The Red Sox are now prepared to keep Craig on their roster and, according to manager John Farrell, only play him part-time. 
 
"It'll be an adjustment — how difficult remains to be seen,"  Farrell said. "He's been accustomed to being an everyday player."
 
There have been no signs of Boston looking to trade Craig, despite his status as a back-up.
 
"We fully expect him to be on this team," Farrell said. "There's nothing to expect otherwise. He's the one in particular that we just said, 'Let's get the appropriate number of at-bats that spring training would provide,' and we'll go from there. His attitude has been great. He understands the situation that he's in. He understands that, coming off last year, we had to make decisions to improve the team, and he's got to compete for at-bats. He's more than willing to embrace that."
 
 

Flunky

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 3, 2009
1,918
CT
Red(s)HawksFan said:
 
Can't decide if the best part of DO's "uniform" is the loafers or the helmet hat.
 
the answer is
 
loafers.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,574
@PeteAbe: #Phillies are taking a lot of looks at #RedSox 3B prospect Garin Cecchini. Another one today.