RedOctober3829 said:
When you can sit behind a microphone and say whatever you want without having to cover a team day-to-day you tend to spew off and say things you wouldn't normally say.
First of all, I think this entire "controversy" is extremely dumb.
But people say what you said above. Then when someone is in the locker room every day and on the beat they say shit like "Well you can't report all the bad stuff, else they won't give you a story the next time".
When Haggs reported the John Lackey story about double fisting beers he was railroaded by the normal beat reporters.
So you are a "coward behind the microphone" you have no credibility, if you are a beat reporter who relies on stories from your "friends" and can't say anything negative (Hi Drew Bledsoe! Ohh Hey Ron Borges!) you have no credibility.
What do people want? The media has showed you can't be fair, honest and still get the inside stories. If that's true, then the large majority of beat reporters are lazy or frauds.