Does two formation changes count?!?JP: "I wonder who will be the first team to make a change here." Has he ever watched Jill Ellis coach before? It will not be her.
Does two formation changes count?!?JP: "I wonder who will be the first team to make a change here." Has he ever watched Jill Ellis coach before? It will not be her.
She's probably the best passer on the team, and a top-3 dribbler. She made that 40-yard run, and then couldn't find a passing outlet, but she almost made something out of completely nothing.I've seen enough of Lavelle today.
If you've ever have the opportunity to explain to an incredulous Brit on why the term "soccer" exists (The British came up with it as an abbreviated form of Association Football, focusing on the 'soc' part of Association and was used without controversy in the UK for 100 years) do not pass it up. It is one of life's great joys.To be honest, anybody who uses the words "proper" and "football" in the same sentence should be fed into the woodchipper, Fargo-style.
Indeed.If you've ever have the opportunity to explain to an incredulous Brit on why the term "soccer" exists (The British came up with it as an abbreviated form of Association Football, focusing on the 'soc' part of Association and was used without controversy in the UK for 100 years) do not pass it up. It is one of life's great joys.
I always point out that every time they hear "football" said with an American accent, they think we are talking about the NFL anyways.If you've ever have the opportunity to explain to an incredulous Brit on why the term "soccer" exists (The British came up with it as an abbreviated form of Association Football, focusing on the 'soc' part of Association and was used without controversy in the UK for 100 years) do not pass it up. It is one of life's great joys.
Why does a team full of top 10 players at like every position pass so well?Why does this team pass so much better than the mens national team?
What about describing a touch-tackling midfielder (your Lee Cattermole types) as "proper-hard"?Indeed.
Here's my ranking of obnoxiousness though:
3. Brits who scold Americans for saying soccer
2. Americans who scold Americans for saying soccer
1. People who describe anything soccer-related as "proper". It's a small word, but stuffed to the gills with arrogance and condescension.
These are the best women players in the world, basically.Why does this team pass so much better than the mens national team?
I don't speak Mackem, so I'll give it a pass.What about describing a touch-tackling midfielder (your Lee Cattermole types) as "proper-hard"?
the USWNT is basically like if the Ronaldo/Ronaldinho/Roberto Carlos etc. Brazil teams were merged with the dominant Spain side, and then added Messi and Christiano RonaldoIt's pretty amazing when there's an unfortunate injury for the US, the replacement are players like Press and Mewis.
I read this literally as England scored.I do subscribe to the USA 1 and USA 2 thing. It's not arrogance, it's facts.
What? No. Close to being okay doesn't make it okay.oh good, rigged
Not really close, or not really correct? She was half a step ahead.Yeah not really though
Aren't they using an international feed with their own announcers? Don't know if they really have control of what shots come up on screen.FOX is doing an excellent job of showing pointless closeups instead of a useful replay.
Eh. Just because it was close, doesn't mean it didn't reach the standard. They didn't even go to the ref to look.That's a tough call--goal should've stood. There should be a higher standard to overturn.
Could be true. Apologies to Fox if so.Aren't they using an international feed with their own announcers? Don't know if they really have control of what shots come up on screen.
OKAY WHERE IS VAR OFFICIAL FROM???VAR playing the role of the French fleet at Yorktown here.