Wk. 1 Pre-Game Thread: vs. Steelers

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,104
A Scud Away from Hell
[To note: as was the case the past couple of seasons, this thread will be for discussing opponent-specific strategies, roster, and injury news. The actual game thread will be for, well, game threading.]
 
It's that time again, SoSHers! Your defending Super Bowl champions open their season versus Pittsburgh this Thursday. 
 
Week 1 version of the Steelers is incomplete. They have two huge offensive pieces missing in Martavis Bryant & Le'Veon Bell. 
 
We all know what Bell meant to them in last year's playoff loss vs. Ravens. After having a record-breaking performance against the consecutive regular season contests vs. Colts & Ravens (6 TD + 6 TD), Big Ben was pretty much shut down in the 30-17 upset loss. Bell did not play in that final game. 
 
That does not mean the Steelers are lacking weapons. In fact, they still boast Antonio Brown (this is where we really miss Revis), and the dangerous Dri Archer, who has played a lot of snaps in PS and can break one out either as a runner or as a pass-catcher out of the backfield. Oh yeah, Archer ran 4.26 40-yard at the combine. 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dpvSqIAge4
 
The defense will continue to practice many of Dick Labeau's zone-blitz concepts, even though the venerable DC has been replaced by Keith Butler (worked under LaBeau for 11 years). The problem is that they most likely will have one of the worst secondary in the AFC. 
 
Troy Polamalu may be an addition by subtraction, but S Mike Mitchell just doesn't have the experience (or the speed) to control the middle. Brady has carved up Steelers secondary before, and not sure if the trend will break against corners William Gay and Cortez Allen. In fact, out of 115 corners who played 25% or more in 2014, Gay ranked 84th while Allen 99th according to PFF. We all know PFF numbers should be taken with a small barrel of salt, no one is mistaking them as even an average CB pair in the AFC. 
 
Some quick 2014 numbers. First up FootballOutsiders.com DVOA rankings:
  • Total DVOA: 8th (Pats 4th)
  • Offensive DVOA: 2nd (Pats 6th)
    Passing: 1st (Pats 5th)
  • Rushing: 12th (Pats 14th)

[*]Defensive DVOA: 30th (Pats 11th)
  • Passing: 30th (Pats 12th)
  • Rushing: 17th (Pats 13th)

[*]Special Teams DVOA: 12th (Pats 5th)
PFF's team rankings:
  • Total Offense: 3rd (Pats 13th)
    Passing: 2nd (Pats 4th)
  • Rushing: 6th (Pats 9th)

[*]Total Defense: 17th (Pats 6th)
  • Passing Coverage: 26th (Pats 3rd)
  • Passing Rush: 6th (Pats 17th) 
  • Run Defense: 15th (Pats 6th) 

[*]Special Teams: 29th (Pats 14th)
Wild card: Steelers will also miss C Maurkice Pouncy, who's out until Week 9. As difficult it is to bring Roethlisberger down, having Easley and Brown dominate the middle of the trench will go a long, long way come Thursday. 
 
Some link goodies: 
P.S. Beer tax:
 
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
ITP has set up a Q&A with a Steelers expert. If you have any questions about the Steelers and what to expect, please post 'em here, send me a PM or find a carrier pigeon. The piece will be published Thursday morning, just in time for your pregame enjoyment. Thanks for reading, everyone.
 

lambeau

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 7, 2010
1,175
Connecticut
As the best receiver in football, Antonio Brown should provide an early stress test for the secondary. Without Bell, Ben will be throwing early and often.
We'll learn a lot about how vulnerable we are at CB. I suspect he'll line up all over. Will they target anyone in particular?
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Good point, Lambeau.  But I think we will learn about our new corners, and how those safeties look without Revis and Browner in the backfield, against all of the Pats' early opponents.
 
I might be guilty of being lulled into contentment by the pre-season performance of the corners -- and that's rarely a good idea -- but the offensive line worries me a lot more going into this game than the corners.  All of the QBs were under pressure all pre-season long, and it appears that Stork missed practice on Saturday and may be suffering some concussion issues.  The Pats' season last year turned around when the O-Line got better, as we know.
 
That they are starting off without four important pieces from last year's skill group also concerns me.  None of Vereen, LaFell, Blount or Develin by himself is a show stopper.  That all four will not be there (and of course Verreen is gone for good) on Thursday means that Tom will be working with a bunch of different parts, which could compound whatever problems the line might present.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
With all the hullaballoo over DG, I wonder if the actual play on the field for the Pats has been overshadowed.  I have a lot of concerns about our won Patriots this week, regardless of the opponent:
  • How will the team deal with the general hangover form the euphoria of the SB win?  How will they handle the specific celebration of Opening Night combined with raising the banner, etc?
  • This is the first Opening Game since 2003 without Big Vince Wilfork on the DLine.  How will the new folks do in the middle?
  • Is Malcolm more than a one-hit wonder (admittedly, that one hit being one of the biggest single plays in NFL history)?  Even beyond him, how does the rest of the secondary shake out past him and DMC?  Can an improved pass rush makeup for a fall-off from last year's secondary's coverage abilities? (will there even be an improved pass rush?) 
  • Who carries the rock?  Does it matter as the OLine has looked awful so far in preseason?
  • Who catches the ball?  Can Edelman step in with no ill effects from no pre-season?  Who steps into LaFell's spot?  
  • Can the OLine improve on their preseason performance?  Who is the OLine between the tackles this season?
  • Can Brady improve on his preseason performance now that DG is off the docket (for now)?
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,509
RedOctober3829 said:
 
Which I think makes Stork's apparent injury that much more concerning.  I think the Steelers' path to victory is to pressure Brady to help protect their secondary, and a weak o-line will play right into that strategy.  The Pats are going to need a big game out of the RBs, which will make Blount's absence hurt that much more.
 
On the defensive side, I assume the Pats will do the same thing I just said the Steelers will do -- pressure Big Ben to make his rush his throws in order to protect the secondary and hope the backup RBs aren't overly effective.
 
Edited to add:  Stork's not at practice again today.  Hard to imagine he's going to be able to start in three days.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,104
A Scud Away from Hell
lambeau said:
As the best receiver in football, Antonio Brown should provide an early stress test for the secondary. Without Bell, Ben will be throwing early and often.
We'll learn a lot about how vulnerable we are at CB. I suspect he'll line up all over. Will they target anyone in particular?
 
Having Butler cover with McCourty shading over may limit the damage, but the real danger is Markus Wheaton. The 3rd year receiver had 53 catches for 644 yards & a healthy 12.2 yards/catch last year, and poised to get much, much better. 
 
With Wheaton's speed and quickness, I think he's going to eat up Fletcher for breakfast. 
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,457
Overland Park, KS
Really interested to see the whole offense together. Chandler and Gronk will be fun to watch.
 
This is the best set of NE pass rushers since 2003. Really deep, I am interested to see how much they play Nink and Jones with all these good back ups. They played those two way too much the last few years. Easley is not the typical Pats DT but he has looked like a beast rushing the passer in the pre-season. This could be a 50+ sack team that always generates good pressure. 
 
How much will Mayo play? I wonder if they play 2 LBs and 3 safeties in their base defense.
 
Will the special teams be as dominant after the coaching change? I assume so because the core group of players remains the same.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,203
Here
Fwiw:

@jeffphowe: Bryan Stork still plans to play Thursday, per source. He has missed the last two practices, though.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
Saints Rest said:
<p>

With all the hullaballoo over DG, I wonder if the actual play on the field for the Pats has been overshadowed.  I have a lot of concerns about our won Patriots this week, regardless of the opponent:
  • How will the team deal with the general hangover form the euphoria of the SB win?  How will they handle the specific celebration of Opening Night combined with raising the banner, etc?
  • This is the first Opening Game since 2003 without Big Vince Wilfork on the DLine.  How will the new folks do in the middle?
  • Is Malcolm more than a one-hit wonder (admittedly, that one hit being one of the biggest single plays in NFL history)?  Even beyond him, how does the rest of the secondary shake out past him and DMC?  Can an improved pass rush makeup for a fall-off from last year's secondary's coverage abilities? (will there even be an improved pass rush?) 
  • Who carries the rock?  Does it matter as the OLine has looked awful so far in preseason?
  • Who catches the ball?  Can Edelman step in with no ill effects from no pre-season?  Who steps into LaFell's spot?  
  • Can the OLine improve on their preseason performance?  Who is the OLine between the tackles this season?
  • Can Brady improve on his preseason performance now that DG is off the docket (for now)?
I don't have as many worries as you.
Basically, I want to see what both lines look like. I think the team this year goes as the lines go.

I'm optimistic about the secondary and the WR playing well, and I have no concerns about Brady if he is healthy and gets protection.

I am hoping Gronk+Chandler gives the Pats a more TE-based offense than we saw last year. That could be fun to watch if they get it going.
 

lambeau

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 7, 2010
1,175
Connecticut
This is White's big chance--they must have some confidence in him or they wouldn't have cut Gray, but if he sucks Lewis is right there to leapfrog him.
 

ScubaSteveAvery

Master of the Senate
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2007
8,329
Everywhere
Ed Hillel said:
Fwiw:

@jeffphowe: Bryan Stork still plans to play Thursday, per source. He has missed the last two practices, though.
 
Stork currently going through concussion protocol per Breer. Availability for Thursday unclear.
 
Edit: This is really from Rapaport. Saw Breer RT - so take it for what it's worth. 
 
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/640938711933431808
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Can't believe it's already time for one of these. Time flies when you're Super Bowl champions and in the midst of a Kafka-esque faux scandal.

One for the thumb!!!!!

SeoulSoxFan said:
Week 1 version of the Steelers is incomplete. They have two huge offensive pieces missing in Martavis Bryant & Le'Veon Bell. 
 
Don't forget that the Steelers are also without Pouncey, their All-Pro Center.

As Patriots fans saw while Stork was out at the beginning of last year, even good offenses can look pedestrian when the offensive line is in flux. Even worse for the Steelers, the Patriots front 7 looked very good at times this preseason and could be an explosive unit.

I'm going to be looking for Patricia to test the middle of the Steelers offensive line right away on passing downs, perhaps bringing Mayo or Collins up the middle.
 

mulluysavage

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
714
Reads threads backwards
In recent seasons, the Pats have often taken a let's-see-who-can-have-success approach to RB. If someone isn't gaining yards (or holding onto the ball), they put someone else in. I wouldn't be surprised to see them start Bolden, given BB's trust of vets, and just start shuffling through until the run is working. That is, if they don't just rely on the pass if it's working and the run game isn't. We've also seen them totally abandon the run in games.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,717
TheoShmeo said:
Good point, Lambeau.  But I think we will learn about our new corners, and how those safeties look without Revis and Browner in the backfield, against all of the Pats' early opponents.
 
I might be guilty of being lulled into contentment by the pre-season performance of the corners -- and that's rarely a good idea -- but the offensive line worries me a lot more going into this game than the corners.  All of the QBs were under pressure all pre-season long, and it appears that Stork missed practice on Saturday and may be suffering some concussion issues.  The Pats' season last year turned around when the O-Line got better, as we know.
 
That they are starting off without four important pieces from last year's skill group also concerns me.  None of Vereen, LaFell, Blount or Develin by himself is a show stopper.  That all four will not be there (and of course Verreen is gone for good) on Thursday means that Tom will be working with a bunch of different parts, which could compound whatever problems the line might present.
 
Not worried, either, about the DBs -- Big Ben and that offense have the skill to put that worry back in, but the Pats are fortunate that they're missing a few key offensive parts. I love the Pats' defensive front and think the whole D will be a lot of fun to watch.
 
On the offensive side, my worries are less about the OL -- the preseason repped nothing in that regard, as guys are just now coming back. Missing Stork would suck, but I think that'll be fine. I worry more about the skill positions -- a potentially overhyped up Brady, a depleted receiver corps, and neither Blount nor Gray. Edelman and Amendola having big days will be key -- I suspect the Steelers will swarm Gronk. 
 

lambeau

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 7, 2010
1,175
Connecticut
They say Ryan Shazier is their tight end-killer--the fast LB that can stay with them--but two TE's?
 
I think Markus Wheaton will be in the slot, maybe with Brown on him; and outside they'll start Sammie Coates, the Amari Cooper clone from Auburn.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
lambeau said:
They say Ryan Shazier is their tight end-killer--the fast LB that can stay with them--but two TE's?
 
I think Markus Wheaton will be in the slot, maybe with Brown on him; and outside they'll start Sammie Coates, the Amari Cooper clone from Auburn.
Sammie Coates is not like Amari Cooper. He plays much bigger and is not a very polished route runner but he can go vertical and contest. Amari is the most polished route runner to come out of college in a decade. He's not much shorter than Coates but he plays smaller.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,203
Here
lambeau said:
They say Ryan Shazier is their tight end-killer--the fast LB that can stay with them--but two?
Shazier is 6 foot 1. He could cover them and still not stop them.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,499
deep inside Guido territory
amarshal2 said:
Sammie Coates is not like Amari Cooper. He plays much bigger and is not a very polished route runner but he can go vertical and contest. Amari is the most polished route runner to come out of college in a decade. He's not much shorter than Coates but he plays smaller.
Coates also has terrible hands.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,294
from the wilds of western ma
Echoing others here, really interested in watching this front seven play, and seeing how they are deployed/in what combinations in a real game plane situation. Excited to see Jones and Collins hitting their early prime years. With Easley and Sheard also in the mix, along with Nink, they should have the depth and versatility to be very aggressive and creative with their fronts and blitz packages. As concerned about the secondary as I also am, I'm cautiously optimistic they can grow into an effective, complimentary unit., with the kind of pressure they should consistently get up front. And BR et al should provide a stiff first test. I cannot wait to watch this game.
 

lambeau

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 7, 2010
1,175
Connecticut
It will be equally fascinating to see the offense evolve--more two TE's, or more two RB's? More Amendola, or Travaris Cadet? Will Dobson step up? So many unknowns. What'll work?
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
tims4wins said:
Given LaFell's absence, really hoping Chandler is 100% healthy
I would say that given Lafell's absence, I am really hoping that we can see even moderate improvement form Aaron Dobson.  Dobson's 2013 stats were actually pretty decent: 37 rec, 519 yes, 4TD, long of 81.  This numbers are not far from Lafell's averages before becoming a starter with NE.  
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,104
A Scud Away from Hell
One thing I didn't mention is how much the Steelers OL improved. Now that was before Pouncy's injury of course, but it's not the 3-4 sacks a game unit it was a couple of years ago. 
 

KiltedFool

has a terminal case of creeping sharia
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
2,401
The Steelers' OL is significantly improved, they've been together for an extended span, even the backups (Chris Hubbard and Cody Wallace have time in service with the Steelers, Doug Legursky has started a Super Bowl in place of an injured Pouncey before.  Mike Munchak has been working his OL Whisperer role with them for over a year now.  The line should be at the least decent.
 
Darius Heyward-Bey will see more action than Coates.  He's a more polished route runner, a special teams guy, and a willing blocker and is more familiar with the system and Big Ben.  Coates is very raw, but may take some Martavis Bryant spots (Go routes or red zone where he can maximize his size).
 
There are signs of a lot more hybrid roles within the defense, the drafting choices and personnel give a whiff that the long-running 3-4 will also sometimes morph to more of a 4-3 based on situation.  There are signs of Cover 2 concepts being installed (with attendant mistakes and resulting massive yards and points during preseason) in th ebackend.  Recall Tomlin comes from Tampa 2, he didn't displace Lebeau's Cover 3 when he arrived initially, but he was seen actively coaching Cover 2 techniques during training camp this year.  And what is one thing you need to make a Cover 2 work?  Fast as hell inside linebacker(s).
 
The Steelers defense has looked atrocious, though there have been very few snaps all preseason that had the starting defense on the field.  There's going to be a lot of learning and acclimating for the Steelers this season on that side of the ball, and I wouldn't be surprised if Brady carved the hell out of them.  Like most teams that gel over time, this game is likely to be the weakest game for the defense, so you couldn't catch them at a better time.
 
LeBeau's defenses used to give cushions and tackle the catch, knowing most teams couldn't sustain 15 play drives without making a mistake that would kill the drive.  Brady and the Patriots can run a drive like that while reading a novel and drinking coffee.  The times the Steelers have been successful was when they did more press and jamming of the receivers.  Don't know if they have the personnel to do that, I doubt it.
 
I'll be interested to see how Cameron Heyward fares against the line, he's their best DL.  Stephon Tuitt has a lot of talent, we'll see if he can make the traditional second year jump.
 
Warren Sapp dubbed the Steelers old and slow many years ago, now they're young and fast as hell, but they're also pretty green.
 
Oh and Harrison can still eat someone every once in a while.  He's still a beast just on a limited snap count.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,814
I'm curious to know (for other purposes) from people who follow the Pats pretty closely.
 
Does the 7 point spread seem high to you?  Given that the Pats are the highest favorite on the board this week, it doesn't seem that the general public seems that confident that the Pats will win.

Thoughts?
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,203
Here
Looks like it's going to rain all day and pour tomorrow night. Wish Blount was healthy.
 

Mr. Littlejeans

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
42
Just got back from my daughter's basketball game.  Tip-off was at noon, February 2, and the game ended this morning.  Anything interesting happen in the offseason while I was gone?  Anyway, looking forward to the game tomorrow!
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,104
A Scud Away from Hell
KiltedFool said:
The Steelers' OL is significantly improved, they've been together for an extended span, even the backups (Chris Hubbard and Cody Wallace have time in service with the Steelers, Doug Legursky has started a Super Bowl in place of an injured Pouncey before.  Mike Munchak has been working his OL Whisperer role with them for over a year now.  The line should be at the least decent.
 
Just want to say thanks for the awesome post!
 

jablo1312

New Member
Sep 20, 2005
985
wade boggs chicken dinner said:
I'm curious to know (for other purposes) from people who follow the Pats pretty closely.
 
Does the 7 point spread seem high to you?  Given that the Pats are the highest favorite on the board this week, it doesn't seem that the general public seems that confident that the Pats will win.
Thoughts?
 
Seems about right, considering a couple of elements:
 
-Pats are at home, where they've been incredible the last 15 years, even after accounting for HFA  (I believe Brady is 90-15 at home as a starter).
-The Steelers are missing Bell, arguably the best running back in the league, and certainly right up there with Charles and Forte as the most dynamic pass catching RB in football. Additionally, they're missing Martavis Bryant, expected to be the 2nd or 3rd WR, and starting center Maurkice Pouncey.
-So you'd expect the Steelers offense to be somewhat limited, although still solid with Roethlisberger and Antonio Brown around. Their defense is obviously not as strong a unit (30th in DVOA last season) and will be facing one of the leagues best offenses. That offense, in an interesting coincidence, will also be missing starters at WR (LaFell), RB (Blount) and center (Stork, who hasn't practiced all week and is very doubtful to play). The difference being (and this is certainly arguable) that the Pats success on offense is more scheme than player dependent and not having Blount + Lafell will hurt them less than not having Bell + Bryant will hurt the Steelers. I can't say which team will miss their starting center more, though I'd lean toward the Pats considering that they'll be starting several rookies on the interior OL.
 
With both teams at full strength, and the Pats at home, I'd predict the spread would be closer to 5.5 or so. 7 seems pretty reasonable considering what we know; it opened closer to 6 at most books and has moved between 6.5 and 7.5 since the Brady news came down last weekend. The fact that it's the highest spread this week is mostly a scheduling quirk, with a lot of similarly rated teams playing each other, and several match-ups where the superior team is playing on the road.