shawnrbu said:Al Michaels confused a downed punter for a penalty flag.
BigSoxFan said:Why doesn't Bernard get more touches?
phragle said:That block should be a suspension
Fred in Lynn said:If the NFL doesn't consider that a hit worthy of suspension, they should make sure it is in the future. It wasn't necessary. The blocker could have eliminated the punter without obliterating him.
Fred in Lynn said:If the NFL doesn't consider that a hit worthy of suspension, they should make sure it is in the future. It wasn't necessary. The blocker could have eliminated the punter without obliterating him.
Dogman2 said:
I agree and he most likely wouldn't have had a play on the ball carrier. He could have hit him much lower.
Dogman2 said:
I agree and he most likely wouldn't have had a play on the ball carrier. He could have hit him much lower.
phragle said:
This is what I meant.
He could have just blocked him with his hands instead of launching his helmet into the punter's chin.
Harry Hooper said:
He hit the punter with the crown of his helmet (illegal) and hit him right in the chops (also illegal). That really should receive heavy discipline.
Dogman2 said:
I wasn't disagreeing that the hit was bad only that there isn't much of a precedent with these hits. Helmet to helmet, sure.
I've been furious after some regular season losses (2012 Ravens Week 3, first and foremost) but today? They lost a tight game to a solid Division opponent .RedOctober3829 said:This result is cooling me down a bit. I don't think I've been this pissed off since SB 2011.
phragle said:
Oh I know. I'm saying that there there should be. Hits like that should come with consequences.
I could see this, but honestly 24-point comebacks just don't happen very often. I'll be surprised if the Bengals pull it off.SeoulSoxFan said:Two hated rivals, divisional matchup, PO spot/seeding at stake.
I venture to guess the score will be a lot tighter by the time 4th quarter comes around.