The terribly mediocre Lakers

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,772
First of all, it was great for Carlisle to give Walton all that cover.

Secondly:

Lavar and his kids are a"story" in the same way that steaming hot urine is a "beverage."
and it's reasonable to call out ESPN on their clickbait trash stories and their clickbait trash sources and remind ESPN that when they report trash they jeopardize not only their reputation but also their access to actual sources.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,716
Totally agree with Carlisle, but I think it would only be fair for ESPN and others to see it through for the rest of this season. The offseason is the best time for self-reflection.
I agree, in fact, I think that they should spend the first week of July reflecting on this as they give 24-7 coverage to LaVar recruiting LeBron and Paul George for the Lakers.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,639
Oregon
I think Carlisle needs to chill. His commenting on this only helps to make the story even bigger. Like it or not, Lavar and his kids are a story and will continue to be for the foreseeable future
Lorenzo is a story because he's an NBA player. LaVar and the other sons are not a story
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,046
St. Louis, MO
First of all, it was great for Carlisle to give Walton all that cover.

Secondly:



and it's reasonable to call out ESPN on their clickbait trash stories and their clickbait trash sources and remind ESPN that when they report trash they jeopardize not only their reputation but also their access to actual sources.
Walton was around the ‘86 locker room with his Dad. Lots of Celtic loyalty in this I think.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,717
What a shitty situation for this kid.

We don't know LaVar Ball but given what we do know about him, it may be asking a lot to expect his kid to get him to shut up (Lonzo says as much during the interview). As far as the rest of the interview goes, while Lonzo doesn't give Walton a ringing endorsement my take is that he was just trying to give standard answers to get done with a line of questions that clearly made him uncomfortable.

Its easy to criticize the kid for not stepping up and trying say something to (or about his dad) but if you have ever been around any situations similar to this (star athlete kid, controlling parent) you know its not that easy.
Well said.

The Lakers performance tonight (from the box, anyway) maybe was some form of team-wide response.
 

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,066
Well said.

The Lakers performance tonight (from the box, anyway) maybe was some form of team-wide response.
I think it’s simpler

They played the Hawks at home, who have won exactly 3 games on the road
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
First of all, it was great for Carlisle to give Walton all that cover.

Secondly:

and it's reasonable to call out ESPN on their clickbait trash stories and their clickbait trash sources and remind ESPN that when they report trash they jeopardize not only their reputation but also their access to actual sources.
I think we agree. ESPN actually has a reporter in Lithuania hanging with the Balls.


Walton was around the ‘86 locker room with his Dad. Lots of Celtic loyalty in this I think.
I think it's also telling that Bill has kept quiet publicly here. Given what I assume is his loyalty both to his son and to UCLA, he probably has a lot to say. But he's not a stupid grifter.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,011
Isle of Plum
please dont joke about this
That would be a great sequel! Not quite the look though, back to central casting :)

On a more serious note, ESPN is absolutely not going to stop covering Lavar and the NBA needs to just get over it. If they blackball him there will be plenty other bright lights for his special kind of train wreck.

ESPN is in the eyeballs market and they are the ones giving the NBA money, not the other way around.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
I'd like to see Popovich answer questions during a sideline interview in an ESPN game with some variant of "we're on to Lithuania."
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,644
Haiku
Lonzo's airballs are uglier than most. I want to root for the kid (mostly because his dad is such an a-hole), but somewhere in his palette, Lonzo needs more Rembrandt.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,811
A Ringer article on just how bad LAL has been: https://www.theringer.com/nba/2018/1/9/16867672/los-angeles-lakers-historically-bad-five-year-stretch. The numbers:

"At their current pace this season, the Lakers would finish their five-season run from 2013–14 through 2017–18 with the 24th-worst winning percentage in the 1,300-plus sample. Take out overlaps — for instance, counting only one of the 1996 to 2000 Grizzlies and 1997 to 2001 Grizzlies, who possess the bottom two spots on the list — and the Lakers would fall to 12th-worst."

Feel good read of the morning.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,207
Upcoming 12 game schedule: Home vs SA, @ Dal, @ Mem, @ OKC, vs Ind, vs NYK, vs. Bos, @ Chi, @ TOR, @ ORL, @ BKN, @ OKC.

They likely won't be favored in any of those. They have 2 games on that stretch on 2 days rest, all others are 1 day rest. Nothing like stretch of 8-12 games on the road to bring you back down to the cellar.
 

uk_sox_fan

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,273
London, England
Upcoming 12 game schedule: Home vs SA, @ Dal, @ Mem, @ OKC, vs Ind, vs NYK, vs. Bos, @ Chi, @ TOR, @ ORL, @ BKN, @ OKC.

They likely won't be favored in any of those. They have 2 games on that stretch on 2 days rest, all others are 1 day rest. Nothing like stretch of 8-12 games on the road to bring you back down to the cellar.
538 has them favored in the home games v Ind and NY (19 & 21 Jan) albeit by 1 pt in each. Of the other 10 games in this stretch in which they're dogs, only the Orlando game (31 Jan) is seen to be closer than 4 1/2 points (Magic are also 1 pt favorites).

They're expected to win 3.75 of those 12 games in aggregate, a .313 winning pctg (down from their season-to-date rate of .325)
 

uk_sox_fan

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,273
London, England
538 currently has them finish 4th-from-last (by a good 2-game margin from the Griz) with 26.9 wins (a .330 winning pct for the remaining 42 games) whilst basketball-reference has them 3 wins and .072 better and in the #6 slot with more thana win better than the #5 Bulls and #4 Suns.

Both models are starting to have the Hawks, Kings and Magic solidify their hold on the Top 3.
 

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
8,871
NYC
"At their current pace this season, the Lakers would finish their five-season run from 2013–14 through 2017–18 with the 24th-worst winning percentage in the 1,300-plus sample."
In those 4.5 seasons, the Warriors have picked up — wait for it — 216 games on the Lakers in the historic standings.

Unfortunately, they remain 637 games behind. :,-(
 
Last edited:

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,066
Last few years, and max number of wins to be "Top (Bottom) 5"

2016/2017:

Pick 1 - 20
Pick 2 - 24
Pick 3 - 26
Pick 4 - 28
Pick 5 - 29

2015/2016:

Pick 1 - 10
Pick 2 - 17
Pick 3 - 21
Pick 4 - 23
Pick 5 - 29

2014/2015:

Pick 1 - 16
Pick 2 - 17
Pick 3 - 18
Pick 4 - 21
Pick 5 - 25

I am going to set 25 wins as my target for the Lakers...
 

Manzivino

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
7,169
MA
For comparison sake, the lowest 5 win totals at a similar point of the schedule from a games played standpoint (i.e. teams having played 38-43 games as they have this season):

2017/8:
Pos. 1 - 11
Pos. 2 - 12
Pos. 3 - 13
Pos. 4 - 13
Pos. 5 - 13

2016/7: (3 of 5 finished in the bottom 5)
Pos. 1 - 8
Pos. 2 - 11
Pos. 3 - 12
Pos. 4 - 12
Pos. 5 - 13

2015/16: (same 6 teams finished with the worst 6 records)
Pos. 1 - 4
Pos. 2 - 9
Pos. 3 - 11
Pos. 4 - 12
Pos. 5 - 13 (two teams)

2014/5: (4 of 5 teams finished in the bottom 5)
Pos. 1 - 5
Pos. 2 - 7
Pos. 3 - 8
Pos. 4 - 12
Pos. 5 - 13

So the top of the lottery is a lot more condensed at this point than in years past, but the threshold for being within the bottom 5 records has remained consistent and being in the bottom 5 at the halfway mark of the season is a good sign that a team will end the year there.
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,170
Including tonight, the Lakers have played 23 home games and only 18 road games. Will be fun to see them play as that evens out.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,261
They’re probably going to win again tonight against a depleted Spurs team. Not good.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,169
New York, NY
It's general a mistake to give up on any NBA game when a team is shooting 25% in the second quarter. That sort of awful shooting tends not to last.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
Wins - # of teams
10 - 1
11 - 1 (Lakers)
12 - 2
13 - 2
14 - 1
15 - 3

They’re a short winning streak away from being outside the bottom 5. I think the 6+ is the bigger concern.
Oy. Ummm...they’re a long losing streak from being bottom two! Ahem, ahem.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,261
And even bigger one Monday @Mem. Two losses and they could re-right the ship. 48% chance they lose them both...
2 wins would be devastating. Starting to get pessimistic about this pick but I’m probably overreacting to their recent stretch.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,704
Pop is a national treasure.

"Luke [Walton] has been schooled in this game from the time he was a little kid,” Popovich said. “And he doesn’t even know what he knows probably, just by osmosis, whether it was living at home, [or] in school as a player. He’s had tremendous experience. As a player, he wasn’t the best athlete in the world. But those are the guys that sometimes understand the game better because it comes a little tougher to them. They understand what wins and loses, what they have to do to get an advantage and really understand the game, which he does. He inherently understands the game, and not everybody does. And then the icing on the cake, he gets to spend a few years up with Steve [Kerr] at Golden State with a great organization, and a great group.

So, he’s way more than ready to handle this situation. But it’s a situation that’s gonna take time. It’s a process. And it certainly doesn’t need any outside chatter from people who don’t have a clue and haven’t gotten over themselves.”

QUOTE]
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,811
Why would he care? And if he does care, why would he be happier with Philly getting the pick? The Lakers pick is a lose/lose for everyone in the league except the Sixers and Celtics, really.
Was only half-serious but it's in the Spurs interest to make the pick as far down as possible so that (hopefully) BOS or PHI would have to add a less talented player.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,261
Was only half-serious but it's in the Spurs interest to make the pick as far down as possible so that (hopefully) BOS or PHI would have to add a less talented player.
Figured you weren’t being serious because I highly doubt the Spurs are concerned at all with anything related to the Eastern Conference. They have to figure out a way to beat both Houston and Golden State, an incredibly tall task, for any of this stuff to even matter.
 

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
8,871
NYC
Figured you weren’t being serious because I highly doubt the Spurs are concerned at all with anything related to the Eastern Conference. They have to figure out a way to beat both Houston and Golden State, an incredibly tall task, for any of this stuff to even matter.
Their first order of business may be holding onto the #3 seed, as they're now only a game ahead of Minnesota, with a worse net rating. If Kawhi never gets fully healthy, they're going to struggle to make it out of the first round.

As a GS fan, I have to say the idea of Philly with the pick is significantly less scary than Boston with the pick — less scary existing team, less scary head coach, less scary front office which makes them more likely to bungle the pick if they get it. (But since the Cs are my #2 team, I hope they get it, consequences to my Warriors down the road be damned).
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,261
Lakers up 8 early on Mavericks. This week has been a disaster. They’re playing good basketball and it’s making me sad.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Lakers up 8 early on Mavericks. This week has been a disaster. They’re playing good basketball and it’s making me sad.
Even with a win here, they are the 6th worst team in the NBA. It's going to be a stressful year in regards to the pick. There's Orlando, Atlanta and then 7 other teams who could finish 3rd or 10th and it's basically going to come down to shit luck.

It's possible the Kings are in that Orlando/Atlanta range and that the Griz, Bulls and Hornets work their way into a 3rd tier of awful. I guess we'll find out but it's going to be a roller coaster ride.
 

Sportsbstn

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 8, 2004
8,794
The lakers beat the 2 worst teams in the league then beat a San Antonio team siting half their starters. The lakers are still a very bad team
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
22,195
Durham, NC
I should know this, but is the 2-5 conveyance based upon the Lakers finishing spot OR what the ping pong balls come out to be.

For example, if they finish 3rd but the ping pong give them #1, do the Cs get that pick or not.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,272
Pittsburgh, PA
I should know this, but is the 2-5 conveyance based upon the Lakers finishing spot OR what the ping pong balls come out to be.

For example, if they finish 3rd but the ping pong give them #1, do the Cs get that pick or not.
It's based on what pick in the draft it ends up being, which is affected partly by pingpong balls but not entirely. As posted a few times around here, we know the odds of it conveying based on what the team-rank finish of the Lakers is:

I posted this a while ago, but a useful reminder... odds the pick conveys based on LAL finishing position:

1 75%
2 80.1
3 80.4
4 70.9
5 46.5
6 15.2
7 10.7
8 7.2
9 4.4
10 2.9
11 2.1
12 1.8
13 1.6
14 1.3

1-4: really good chance
5: coin flip
6-8: not likely, but possible
9+: very unlikely

I think there's a chance they end up in that 6-8 "very unlikely to convey" range, but getting any higher than that is more about the ineptitude of Dallas/Atl/SAC/Chi/Pho than about the Lakers' talent (barring injuries).
That summary there is a pretty good way to think about it.