In all events, it's almost enough to send Petey back to USCHow much is the current state of Seattle D due to Dan Quinn leaving?
A 22-year-old movie reference, at that. We have members here who weren't born when it hit the theaters
Not much in my opinion. Richard is having to blitz more than Quinn did because the pass rush hasn't been as good. Otherwise, I don't see that many changes in the way they play.How much is the current state of Seattle D due to Dan Quinn leaving?
Well, we don't have a shitload of mediocrity this year, we have a few good teams, the remainder appear evenly divided between mediocre and shitty. Below is a distribution of winning percentage across the league:I think what's he's saying is that if we eliminated the salary cap there might be more of a divide between the have's and have not's but we'd at least have a few "good" teams this year, as opposed to a shitload of mediocrity. It isn't a bad point.
I'd still take him over anyone not names Brady or Rodgers. And the Steelers sure do know how to get him pass catchers. If the Steelers could defend the pass. They would be a nightmare.Terrible pick by the Rapist there. Momentum shifting.
Freshman year in college, so the answer to your question would be 18.How old were you the first time you saw someone start gnawing on chocolate chip cookie dough straight out of the freezer?
If you say so.Again, we see that there are a few very good teams, and an equal number of mediocre/awful teams.
That man is handsome.
That was atrocious. And the interference call was questionable at best.Niners are getting jobbed by the officials.
rotf, same answer here, which just shows my age, in the 60's most of us never had decent access to weed until we went to college, these days I'm guessing the answer is closer to 10....Freshman year in college, so the answer to your question would be 18.
I don't know. I could be persuaded to take Brees or Rivers over Ben, but it is very close.I'd still take him over anyone not names Brady or Rodgers. And the Steelers sure do know how to get him pass catchers. If the Steelers could defend the pass. They would be a nightmare.
92 hit Palmer so hard that every part of each player contacted the other except private parts. That's just physics and momentum, not a penalty.That was atrocious. And the interference call was questionable at best.
Well the Steelers once beat the Patriots in a playoff game because the Pats held up on hitting their QB on his way out of bounds only he turned right and kept going so screw them.I hate the Steelers but that's a shit call right there.
Yep. Looks like it all went to hell really quickly.Looks like the knee just gave out.
Pretty automatic in the fourth quarter.This is an interesting call on the conversion
What was it. Redzone just showing 49ersThis is an interesting call on the conversion
You flip a bunch of coins 16 times in a row, and count heads as wins, you'll get some really "good" coins.Well, we don't have a shitload of mediocrity this year, we have a few good teams, the remainder appear evenly divided between mediocre and shitty. Below is a distribution of winning percentage across the league:
View attachment 1015
You can see from here that more than a third of the league has won less than 40 percent of their games. Roughly the same number have won between 40 and 60 percent, and seven have won 60 percent or more.
Now, it is true that scoring is mostly mediocre, and is even skewed towards more points; below is the distribution of points for:
View attachment 1017
As we can see, more than half the league is between 200 and 250 points scored. Only three teams have scored fewer than 200 points, while 12 teams have scored more than 250 points. The problem is in points allowed:
View attachment 1018
This is a skewed distribution, where If we take the same criteria where we identified the range comprising half the league, only nine teams have allowed between 200 and 250 points. 17 teams have allowed more than 250 points, while only 6 teams have allowed fewer than 200 points.
In other words, more teams give up 250 points or more than score 250 points or more. Naturally, this leads to an effect where more teams have negative point differentials:
View attachment 1019
Again, we see that there are a few very good teams, and an equal number of mediocre/awful teams.