Sox acquire Wade Miley for De La Rosa, Webster, and minor leaguer

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,867
I think we need to put into perspective that RDLR only has 1 more year of control than Miley and has yet to prove anything like Miley at the major league level.

And Webster and RDLR are starting to get the age where they are not really prospects anymore.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
And for the record who gives a rats ass how cheap you got the players. Selling them for less than market value because you got them below market value is failing to benefit. It's not a justification or an excuse.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,368
Webster and Rubby are two of the many young guys who never really turned a corner and demonstrated the ability to go out and produce consistently (ugh, that word...Joe Morgan). I know Boston is a big market and that some of those guys are bound to get moved, especially with a deep farm, but I hope the FO isn't losing its ability to be patient one year removed from a WS.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
LondonSox said:
What.... The..... F@ck

Rdlr looked pretty Damn good and I had hopes he was a real arm, Webster is a decent bullpen arm at worst.

Rdlr is the best player in the trade for me. I need to go away and calm down and then try to talk myself into this. But this seems like a classic we fucked up so we are doing this move.

I just don't get the rush to get average starters. We have average starters. Rdlr (with upside) Owens, Kelly, all the kids. We need predictable plus pitchers.
 
We had/have "projectable" average starters that are not guarantees to get there . Need some innings that you can not worry about. 
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,199
Rasputin said:
I hate trading valuable guys to not fill a hole.
 
Well, yeah.
 
I mean, I'd quibble with the "valuable guys" part and the "not filling a hole" part though.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,508
deep inside Guido territory
LondonSox said:
What.... The..... F@ck

Rdlr looked pretty Damn good and I had hopes he was a real arm, Webster is a decent bullpen arm at worst.

Rdlr is the best player in the trade for me. I need to go away and calm down and then try to talk myself into this. But this seems like a classic we fucked up so we are doing this move.

I just don't get the rush to get average starters. We have average starters. Rdlr (with upside) Owens, Kelly, all the kids. We need predictable plus pitchers.
How is RDLR the best player in the trade?  He's 26, pitched 174 career IP to a 4.34 career ERA.  Miley has near 200 IP in his 3 full seasons, is 28 years old, and has xFIPs in the low 3.00's in 2 of the 3 seasons.
 
You have no idea if RDLR, Owens, Raunado, etc. will pitch to league average.  Miley has done it.
 

diehard24

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 10, 2006
554
Cambridge, MA
Eddie Jurak said:
Have a shot, yes. But not much of a shot. There's also a decent chance that one or both top out as middle relievers.
I think there's a solid chance Miley turns into a middle reliever in the AL East.
 

semsox

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 14, 2004
1,744
Charlottesville
I'm not a huge fan of this deal, but from a probabilistic perspective I can understand it. I think both Webster and RDLR have the potential to be a better starter than Miley is, but I also feel that neither of them are likely to reach that potential. Even from a bullpen perspective, neither is as good a match as Ranaudo or Barnes would be for converting to that role, so I understand Cherington's preference of dealing them. That being said, this deal feels a bit high risk. The upside is Miley performs as a #3 and Webster/RDLR never amount to anything. The downside is if both of them put it together and make this seem very, very, very lopsided. 
 

LuckyBen

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
3,396
diehard24 said:
I think there's a solid chance Miley turns into a middle reliever in the AL East.
Seriously? This needs to die down, it is no longer 2004.  The AL East currently would be the worst division in the AL.  What would that make him in AL West?
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Meh. Wade Miley is a number 5 starter in the American League. They traded quite a bit of potential upside for certainty at the bottom of the rotation, but they can afford to do that because they've got more prospects than they have 40 man roster spots. This is a decent deal if it is follow up by acquiring 2 pitchers who are significantly better than Miley, and thus make the team a favorite to win the American League East. If they are planning on Miley being a top 3 starter, and thus only acquiring one more pitcher significantly better than Miley, I move from meh to dislike.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
Miley was also a 4.5 WAR player his rookie year.
The Red Sox had none of those in 2012, one of those (Lester 4.3) in 2013, and Lester in 2014.  Beckett had a 4.1 in 2011.
I like his potential if the Sox can help tweak his control a bit, and he's shown he can go 200 innings several years in a row.
 

Lowrielicious

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 19, 2011
4,328
twibnotes said:
Webster and Rubby are two of the many young guys who never really turned a corner and demonstrated the ability to go out and produce consistently (ugh, that word...Joe Morgan). I know Boston is a big market and that some of those guys are bound to get moved, especially with a deep farm, but I hope the FO isn't losing its ability to be patient one year removed from a WS.
 
With the amount of pitching prospects in the system (or that were in the system assuming this goes through), it wasn't so much lack of patience as lack of room.
 
Other than throwing a few starters into the bullpen there just wasn't room in the MLB or AAA club to play the number of guys they had that need innings at that level.

Edit to avoid double post:
 
grimshaw said:
Miley was also a 4.5 WAR player his rookie year.
The Red Sox had none of those in 2012, one of those (Lester 4.3) in 2013, and Lester in 2014. Beckett had a 4.1 in 2011.
I like his potential if the Sox can help tweak his control a bit, and he's shown he can go 200 innings several years in a row.
I agree there is definite potential here for Miley.
 
Keep his 2014 K rate (8.18) and get the walk rate down to 2012 levels (1.71) and he is a very nice pitcher. Vazquez framing behind the plate should help with that and hopefully Farrell can too.
 

sackamano

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2004
693
on the river
People are under rating Allen Webster. His ml numbers are a lot better than Miley's ever were.
 
 No they are not.
 
Please stop being an idiot.
 
Miley has been in the Majors for 4 years ... 3 decent seasons of big innings and has improved every season.
 

Bellhorn

Lumiere
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2006
2,328
Brighton, MA
Rico Guapo said:
RDLR should not have been trade bait, despite his inconsistent performance.
Why not?  Surely this makes his value more difficult to estimate, giving an advantage to the team who has the greatest familiarity with him.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,368
Lowrielicious said:
 
With the amount of pitching prospects in the system (or that were in the system assuming this goes through), it wasn't so much lack of patience as lack of room.
 
Other than throwing a few starters into the bullpen there just wasn't room in the MLB or AAA club to play the number of guys they had that need innings at that level.
I think and hope you're right. Worth noting that Rubby is out of options, and Webster has one left.
 

diehard24

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 10, 2006
554
Cambridge, MA
LuckyBen said:
Seriously? This needs to die down, it is no longer 2004.  The AL East currently would be the worst division in the AL.  What would that make him in AL West?
 
Perhaps I should have simply stopped at American League. But yes, seriously. He gets hit a lot, doesn't appear to have particularly fine control, and his stuff is pedestrian.
Have to give the benefit of the doubt to the front office, but based on Miley's stuff and numbers, I just don't see how this guy can be anything better than a 5 on the staff of a competitive AL team. Given the amount of upside arms with major-league experience we have and available free agents, I don't understand why you'd give up any amount of equity for someone like that.
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,505
Scituate, MA
If Miley is the 2nd best pitcher we acquire this offseason, I'm not really a fan. The trade in itself isn't horrible, but if the offseason leaves us with Hamels, Miley, Buchholz, Masterson, Kelly as the rotation I feel we're going into the season with at least 3 question marks.
 

swingin val

New Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,162
Minneapolis
If Wade Miley is the Sox number 5 starter you all better be ecstatic as fuck because that is one hell of a rotation we would be throwing out there.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,368
HangingW/ScottCooper said:
If Miley is the 2nd best pitcher we acquire this offseason, I'm not really a fan. The trade in itself isn't horrible, but if the offseason leaves us with Hamels, Miley, Buchholz, Masterson, Kennedy as the rotation I feel we're going into the season with at least 3 question marks.
Is Kennedy really a better option than Kelly? Seems odd that they would get Miley, Masterson and Kennedy.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,935
There is some serious overrating of RDLR going on. He has 1 year more of control that Miley and he'd have to take a huge leap to be anywhere near Miley as a pitcher. Other than velocity what does he do as well as Miley?
Only way I see this not being a good deal is if you think Webster is going to put it all together as a starter since he has so many years of control left. Otherwise looks like a decent deal to me, you get a solid young lefty starter with peripherals that say he could be as high as a #2 starter.
He's probably a better pitcher than some of the other guys getting tossed around as well (Kennedy, Masterson etc.)
 

gammoseditor

also had a stroke
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,233
Somerville, MA
Alex Speier with a really good point in the link below.  Brandon McCarthy had a terrible ERA with the Diamondbacks while his FIP/XFIP said he was a lot better.  After being traded to the Yankees his ERA was much better.  
 
 
 

The success of Brandon McCarthy after he was traded from the Diamondbacks to the Yankees last year gives theRed Sox some reason for optimism regarding the potential for Miley to adapt well to the AL East. McCarthy was 3-10 with a 5.01 ERA in 18 starts for Arizona, though with some indicators (such as a career-high strikeout rate) that suggested he was outperforming those numbers by a considerable distance. With New York, he was 7-5 with a 2.89 ERA in 14 starts, ratifying that outlook.
 
http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2014/12/10/sources-red-sox-land-wade-miley-from-diamondbacks-for-rubby-de-la-rosa-allen-webster/#more-89884
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,508
deep inside Guido territory
gammoseditor said:
Alex Speier with a really good point in the link below.  Brandon McCarthy had a terrible ERA with the Diamondbacks while his FIP/XFIP said he was a lot better.  After being traded to the Yankees his ERA was much better.  
 
http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2014/12/10/sources-red-sox-land-wade-miley-from-diamondbacks-for-rubby-de-la-rosa-allen-webster/#more-89884
I've been saying that all day.  McCarthy pre and post trade is night and day.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,697
NY
gammoseditor said:
Alex Speier with a really good point in the link below.  Brandon McCarthy had a terrible ERA with the Diamondbacks while his FIP/XFIP said he was a lot better.  After being traded to the Yankees his ERA was much better.  
 
 
 
 
 
http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2014/12/10/sources-red-sox-land-wade-miley-from-diamondbacks-for-rubby-de-la-rosa-allen-webster/#more-89884
 
But that doesn't apply to Miley other than 2014.  Just because they both pitched for AZ doesn't mean the results will be the same.  I don't think Speier's point is at all valid.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,508
Not here
DrewDawg said:
 
Well, yeah.
 
I mean, I'd quibble with the "valuable guys" part and the "not filling a hole" part though.
How?

Webster and de la Rosa may not be super high ceiling prospects, but they were going to be at least decent bullpen arms and RDLR in particular looked like he was going to be a high leverage reliever.

We had holes at the top of the rotation. We still have the same holes. The bottom of the rotation is a little bit better in the short term.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,871
Northern Colorado
Seems like a solid deal, and the exact type of move we all knew the Sox had to make soon given the glut of young players bulging at the seems of the 40 man.  Surprised some are so opposed.  
 
Like others have pointed out, I like RDLR's live arm and don't like giving him up, but Miley is solid and a definite upgrade, even if RDLR has a higher ceiling.  
 
Also, a few others have mentioned that it is possible Miley is someone the Phillies want as part of a Hamels deal.  Using this logic, I think it is more likely that he is someone the Reds would want given that they have 3 pitchers who will be free agents next year.  Is a possible Miley/Cespedes to the Reds for Cueto or Latos deal possible?
 

foulkehampshire

hillbilly suburbanite
SoSH Member
Feb 25, 2007
5,101
Wesport, MA
He's a LHP, he's under control for 3 years, gets groundball outs, and saw an uptick in his K/9 last year, while keeping underlying peripherals in check. With a decent defense behind him and a change of park, there's good chance for him to put up 200 IP and solid-good ERA's (3.5-3.8ish). Those are basically Lackey-type (Lackey 2.0) numbers. Last time I checked, the Sox don't have that.
 
Miley is not a #5 pitcher. 
 

Just a bit outside

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 6, 2011
8,013
Monument, CO
This is a good trade. Exactly what the Sox need to do. Miley is a quality starter who they picked up for 2 guys who will probably end up in the bullpen. 200 innings with a high groundball rate will work. If his HR% goes down he could be a 2. I think he is a solid #3.
 

Jnai

is not worried about sex with goats
SoSH Member
Sep 15, 2007
16,147
<null>
Here's the Wade Miley "scouting report" generated by ye olde website:
 


Basic description of 2014 pitches compared to other LHP:
His fourseam fastball generates a very high amount of groundballs compared to other pitchers' fourseamers and has slightly above average velo. His sinker generates more whiffs/swing compared to other pitchers' sinkers, has less armside run than typical, has little sinking action compared to a true sinker and has slightly above average velo. His slider is thrown extremely hard and generates a very high amount of groundballs compared to other pitchers' sliders. His change has a lot of backspin. His curve is a real worm killer that generates an extreme number of groundballs compared to other pitchers' curves, generates fewer whiffs/swing compared to other pitchers' curves, is slightly harder than usual and has primarily 12-6 movement.
 
Legit groundball generation on every pitch last year, hard slider which he used as his out-pitch.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,508
Not here
foulkehampshire said:
He's a LHP, he's under control for 3 years, gets groundball outs, and saw an uptick in his K/9 last year, while keeping underlying peripherals in check. With a decent defense behind him and a change of park, there's good chance for him to put up 200 IP and solid-good ERA's (3.5-3.8ish). Those are basically Lackey-type (Lackey 2.0) numbers. Last time I checked, the Sox don't have that.
 
Miley is not a #5 pitcher. 
But he's not a #1 or #2 pitcher which means the net effect is to improve the bottom of the rotation. At best, the third, fourth and fifth spot get a little better. If we get anything but terrible Buchholz, it will be the fourth and fifth spot getting a little better.
 

kieckeredinthehead

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
8,635

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,692
Rogers Park
LondonSox said:
What.... The..... F@ck

Rdlr looked pretty Damn good and I had hopes he was a real arm, Webster is a decent bullpen arm at worst.

Rdlr is the best player in the trade for me. I need to go away and calm down and then try to talk myself into this. But this seems like a classic we fucked up so we are doing this move.

I just don't get the rush to get average starters. We have average starters. Rdlr (with upside) Owens, Kelly, all the kids. We need predictable plus pitchers.
 
I generally love your posts, but I have to take issue with this. "Average starters" don't throw 200 IP/season. That has tremendous value to a staff, even if the quality of those innings is merely decent. 
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,508
deep inside Guido territory
Rasputin said:
But he's not a #1 or #2 pitcher which means the net effect is to improve the bottom of the rotation. At best, the third, fourth and fifth spot get a little better. If we get anything but terrible Buchholz, it will be the fourth and fifth spot getting a little better.
He wasn't acquired to be a #1 or #2.  If he was, then it's a mistake.  But, let's let the offseason play out before anybody starts irrationally freaking out.
 

gammoseditor

also had a stroke
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,233
Somerville, MA
glennhoffmania said:
 
But that doesn't apply to Miley other than 2014.  Just because they both pitched for AZ doesn't mean the results will be the same.  I don't think Speier's point is at all valid.
 
The point is that the Diamondbacks home ballpark is the 2nd most hitter friendly park in baseball and the defense is terrible, and we already know FIP and xFIP are better predictors of performance than ERA and that Miley looks pretty good by xFIP and still good by FIP and that McCarthy is an example of a pitcher from the exact ballpark and defense that showed the same trend in FIP/xFIP looking better than results, and his results dramatically improved when moving to the AL East.  What part of that do you disagree with?  Your problem is we don't have 15 pitchers that have done the same exact thing?  
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
twibnotes said:
Webster and Rubby are two of the many young guys who never really turned a corner and demonstrated the ability to go out and produce consistently (ugh, that word...Joe Morgan). I know Boston is a big market and that some of those guys are bound to get moved, especially with a deep farm, but I hope the FO isn't losing its ability to be patient one year removed from a WS.
 
Wait, seriously? You're talking about a guy with less than a full year's worth of ML innings and a guy with less than half a year's worth of innings. They haven't even reached the corner, never mind turning it.
 
Don't get me wrong, I don't hate this deal, though I wish they could have swapped Ranaudo or Workman in for one of the higher-upside guys they dealt. But talking as if these guys had their chance and blew it is absurd, especially in Webster's case. The expectations around here for instant success from rookies, especially rookie pitchers, are off the scale.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,696
Rasputin said:
But he's not a #1 or #2 pitcher which means the net effect is to improve the bottom of the rotation. At best, the third, fourth and fifth spot get a little better. If we get anything but terrible Buchholz, it will be the fourth and fifth spot getting a little better.
So, Ben shouldn't make any pitching moves at all until he nets a true replacement for Lester?
 

g0wave

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 25, 2003
203
Sox and Rocks said:
 
Also, a few others have mentioned that it is possible Miley is someone the Phillies want as part of a Hamels deal.  Using this logic, I think it is more likely that he is someone the Reds would want given that they have 3 pitchers who will be free agents next year.  Is a possible Miley/Cespedes to the Reds for Cueto or Latos deal possible?
 
I like this deal as well but I sure as heck hope this isn't a chip to flip for a single year of an upgraded pitcher's control.  I think the Sox front office likely values Miley more than many on this board; that seems to be reflected in the early analyst opinions.
 
Very solid pickup for the Sox and I am damn tired of the - this guy is a number "3" a number "5" or a whatever - I trust the evaluations the Sox use and I imagine Farrell's opinion is part of this process.  This guy is a solid lefty, who can eat innings, is under control for 3 more years, and is a very nice addition to the staff for a reasonable cost.
 
How many people would be complaining if RDLR doesn't put it together consistently this year, is out of ML options, and is stuck on the 25 or we lose him for nothing?  The Red Sox cannot afford to carry many players that fit that criteria.
 

GilaMonster

New Member
Nov 30, 2014
63
Jnai said:
Here's the Wade Miley "scouting report" generated by ye olde website:
 
 
 
 
Legit groundball generation on every pitch last year, hard slider which he used as his out-pitch.
 
Basically a bad four-seamer, a nice sinker, average changeup, and above average slider.....He doesn't throw a curveball. I don't mind it, but I would like a slightly better changeup from a lefty.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
Another thing people who hate the trade aren't taking into consideration is that 4 out of 5 of those guys in AAA (not counting Wright or Ranaudo even) could have overtaken either of Webster or De La Rosa during the season.  Owens and Rodriguez are an injury away and have much higher ceilings.  Barnes is right there.  Johnson is ready.  You either hang onto all of them and let some of them rot, or you move two unproven 26 year olds for what you can get.  These aren't the main chips teams are asking about, and the Sox are still loaded for a #2.
 
We have no clue who they're really chasing either.  Miley's name came up for the first time late this afternoon.
 

RoDaddy

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2002
3,267
Albany area, NY
He's a proven decent big league pitcher, and importantly, left handed.  This not only gives us at least one lefty in the rotation, but maybe (?) takes away some added pressure to overpay for Hamels in part because he's LHed.  It also removes two SPs from a very crowded SP candidate list, especially when you include almost ready guys like Barnes, Ranaudo (who had a great season in AAA and might be better than people think), Owens, ERod, and Johnson.  And that's moving Workman to the pen.
 

foulkehampshire

hillbilly suburbanite
SoSH Member
Feb 25, 2007
5,101
Wesport, MA
Unlikely that RDLR and Webster were factoring towards the Sox's long term plan anyways. This is why Ben has been stockpiling high-upside minor league pitchers. 
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,393
Santa Monica
Plympton91 said:
Meh. Wade Miley is a number 5 starter in the American League. 
STEAMER projections has Miley as a top 50 starter, which would imply a #2/3 starter.
 
Go get Porcello for Cespedes.
 
Sign Shields and away we go... 
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,508
Not here
RedOctober3829 said:
He wasn't acquired to be a #1 or #2.  If he was, then it's a mistake.  But, let's let the offseason play out before anybody starts irrationally freaking out.
 
I'm rationally critiquing the move, not freaking out.
 
The point wasn't that Miley is a crappy guy to get to be a top of the rotation guy, the point was that WE DID NOT FILL A HOLE. We did not have a need for a fifth starter. Back of the rotation depth is the one thing that this team has in fucking spades. Rubby de la Rosa, Allen Webster, Matt Barnes, Anthony Ranaudo, Brandon Workman, Henry Owens, Brian Johnson, Eduardo Rodriguez, Edwin Escobar. That's NINE guys who were candidates for the fifth starter spot at some point in 2015. There is no way these guys couldn't get 200 innings. There's almost no way none of these guys were going to be decen enough for a fifth starter.
 
We paid decent value for minimal improvement and that is something that should be criticized.