Seems like pool came in around 38% on NO which is on the lower end. Lesson learned.Saying fuck this is too simplistic. We need to look closer at our strategy. Playing the average on NO was dumb.
Dark comedy. Saints are toast.glennhoffmania said:Oh my god again. This game is a comedy.
As is Baltimore. I think.edmunddantes said:Miami is going to be fine I think.
Plenty of time left.
I hope they enjoyed their continued beating at my hands.j44thor said:Vegas did take a beating last week so I'm sure they will appreciate the donation. :c070:
I know you're joking, but that's not what I said:tims4wins said:But not the Steelers
I liked the Steelers fine, just didn't want them to be our biggest pick. Oh well. I did pick NO, and I should have known better. The NFC south is a joke.Kenny F'ing Powers said:San Francisco 49ers at Pittsburgh Steelers 1: I like the Steelers, but not enough to wager a ton of picks on them.
tims4wins said:I guess what really frustrates me is that we are in the totally unique position of having 20+ entries in a costly pool which allows us to diversify and not risk losing a bunch of picks on a single game, then we only took 3 teams - 2 of which were road teams. It just wasn't a good approach