Kenny F'ing Powers said:On my phone so I'll provide context later.
Ryan Doumit, Catcher, Pittsburgh Pirates
Dude can hit and will platoon nicely for me, despite being on the wrong side of 30.
Scoops Bolling said:Rather than reiterate the whole "you guys had the entire time leading up to the draft to suggest players for the Exception List", I'm just going to go ahead and say fuck you.
Chris Johnson was the other guy I was thinking about with the Pacheco pick, but the problem with him is his splits...he cannot hit lefties for his life. I already have some platoons to deal with, and adding another platoon at 1B seemed really inefficient to me. At this stage in the draft, he is a huge value though, so that's an excellent pick.
If I were to redo any pick, it would almost certainly be the Norris pick as I think I would've been better served grabbing a bat there. Oh well, such are the sacrifices we make for the sake of keeping the draft moving along. Well, except Andrew.
I've been assuming that if that happens the draft proceeds as normal and KFP can pick whenever he gets back onScoops Bolling said:KFP is still on the clock due to picking a player who has already been drafted.
Better than Andrew at least, seriously, what happened to him?Kenny F'ing Powers said:Its fine. Go on picking without me. Needto order food. I'll have my pick up in the next few hours.
SMU_Sox said:Farv, I raise you 25 minutes to 15. Also first one to 10 shots wins.
That was my original idea, but as others rightly noted, the more prospects you let people draft, the more prospect fucking that will go on, and the less interesting the exercise becomes...it's much more interesting to see people try and choose between a bunch of deeply flawed veterans than to see them grab some kid and say "eh, he's my backup MI and maybe he turns into something good!".SydneySox said:I wasn't part of the draft till like Round 4... I'm sure if I had been I'd have built a huge exception list.
What's the thinking behind the exception list though? Why not let people pick whoever they want and just get criticised for it (Jimmy Rollins) if they do something dumb?
That would suck for a lot of people. Not me specifically. But there would be bitching.Frank said:Could you do a reverse stipulation? They have to have one career ML AB or IP by the end of 2013 or poof! they disappear from your team.
There have already been talks about doing a strictly minor league draft, like a 5 round or shorter, at the end of this. Not really sure what the consensus is on that though.SydneySox said:Make it like a Rule 5 sort of thing? That'd be cool. Maybe you could give every team two Rule5* choices.
What if we started - and this is, btw, total spitballing - doing that at the top of round 20?
You'd have to seriously consider whether it was worth investing in a Xander B or a Jackie Bradley or whatever.
I was under the impression that we weren't really going to be tracking this beyond like 3 years before a redraft. Under that the rule 5 thing is kind of pointlessSydneySox said:Yeah. But I like the added intrigue of the Rule 5* thing.
Round 20 won't be for like 4 weeks in realtime anyway.
That's true. Although, I feel like there should be a reshuffling of the draft order if something like that were to happen, and it would be easier to do at the end.SydneySox said:Yeah. But I like the added intrigue of the Rule 5* thing.
Round 20 won't be for like 4 weeks in realtime anyway.
MakMan44 said:I was under the impression that we weren't really going to be tracking this beyond like 3 years before a redraft. Under that the rule 5 thing is kind of pointless
FarvinMoosey said:I picture MakMan as both Statler and Waldorf.
MakMan44 said:I meant that going back and selecting players like a rule 5 draft thing would be pointless, wouldn't you be pulling them from people's rosters in that case?
I'm down for a prospect draft after this but a rule 5 draft a year later seems kind of pointless is all
Frank said:I believe he gets dropped if he misses two picks, so it's gonna be a while.
Sorry I misunderstood what you meant when you said rule 5 draft, I thought you meant something more akin to the actual rule 5 draft.SydneySox said:
Huh?
I said maybe in Round 20 ... which is 2 and a half rounds from now... you could pick players who didn't make the exception list, the only proviso being that to be assessed later by the totally arbitrary and theoretical asessment process, if the player doesn't end up playing in 2013 then he never made your squad and you wasted your pick.
Honestly not that scientific. And a way to jazz up the draft in the later parts and also a way to balance against the not-Scoops-fault woefully underpopulated exception list that was created at the start.
Batting order | Player | Age (opening day) | Position | Handed | ~wOBA | Career wRC+ | Proj. BB% | Proj. HR |
1 | Jon Jay | 28 | CF | Left | 0.328 | 116 | 6.9 | 8 |
2 | Alberto Callaspo | 30 | 3B | Switch | 0.314 | 95 | 9.4 | 9 |
3 | Carlos Beltran | 36 | RF | Switch | 0.350 | 121 | 11.0 | 21 |
4 | Billy Butler | 27 | DH | Right | 0.367 | 121 | 9.5 | 25 |
5 | Nick Swisher | 32 | 1B | Switch | 0.350 | 120 | 12.7 | 22 |
6 | Yasmani Grandal | 24 | C | Switch | 0.342 | 144 | 11.6 | 11 |
7 | Ryan Ludwick | 34 | LF | Right | 0.333 | 114 | 8.9 | 20 |
8 | Brian Dozier | 25 | 2B | Right | 0.289 | 64 | 6.2 | 6 |
9 | Didi Gregarius | 23 | SS | Left | 0.291 | 60 | 5.1 | 5 |
Average Age = 28.8 | ||||||||
Bench | ||||||||
Gregor Blanco | 29 | OF | Left | 0.302 | 90 | 11.7 | 4 |
Rotation Slot | Player | Age (opening day) | Handed | ~ERA | ~FIP | ~IP | K/9 | BB/9 | K/BB |
1 | David Price | 27 | Left | 3.14 | 3.18 | 216 | 8.62 | 2.68 | 3.22 |
2 | Clay Buchholz | 28 | Right | 3.97 | 4.12 | 179 | 6.42 | 3.19 | 2.01 |
3 | Felix Doubront | 25 | Left | 4.15 | 3.97 | 167 | 8.18 | 3.68 | 2.23 |
4 | Gavin Floyd | 30 | Right | 4.09 | 4.01 | 171 | 7.06 | 2.80 | 2.52 |
5 | Ervin Santana | 30 | Right | 4.16 | 4.51 | 192 | 6.59 | 3.02 | 2.18 |
Closer | David Hernandez | 27 | Right | 3.11 | 3.20 | 66 | 10.47 | 3.52 | 2.98 |
Set Up | Antonio Bastardo | 27 | Left | 3.15 | 3.27 | 48 | 11.68 | 4.11 | 2.84 |
Veteran starting pitchers? I'll be interested to learn who they are as they come off the board.Scoops Bolling said:Given the construction of your team, I'm fairly shocked you went with Alvarez there over a couple veterans still available.
MakMan44 said:Great pick man, I was seriously thinking about him when I picked Cishek.
Point of order: There are no Redwoods or Cascades in Portland. If you're moving to Portland, you're the Moose or the White Pinecone and Tassels or the Lobsters or the Moxie or the Dirigo.Cellar-Door said:My team will be moving to Portland.
The name will be chosen by fan vote from among the following:
Pilots
Cascades
Redwoods
Pioneers
Write in.
SydneySox said:As Andrew is evidently now ignoring PMs and the like, I think it's probably best to move on from his next turn and if he misses it 12 hours later we get someone to take over or just let Sumner -our overlord- pick him someone.