Rusney Castillo Conundrum

luckysox

Indiana Jones
SoSH Member
Apr 21, 2009
8,086
S.E. Pennsylvania
Al Zarilla said:
Being a wiseass here, but maybe even David Ortiz would be an improvement in LF over Hanley. You didn't mean David play some LF, did you?
No.  I meant that Rusney and Hanley share left, Hanley and Ortiz and Rusney share DH - depending on who needs what kind of rest. 
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
uncannymanny said:
Without some context I'm not sure how illustrative those numbers really are. Did the rookie classes that were producing high wRC+ numbers exhibit the same in the minors relative to their counterparts? Does the move toward younger, cost-controlled players on MLB rosters mean guys are getting called up sooner than in the past? 
 
Not that the factors that you list aren't real or large factors, but I think there's more to it.
I completely agree that it is only a superficial measurement, but there are more signs than just Cherrington's comments pointing towards MLB being uniquely hard to break into as a hitter right now.
 
Beyond just seeing if mL numbers now result in lower ML numbers it would also be worth seeing if we're all working in an artificially inflated sense of what a rookie break in period consists of exiting a prolonged stretch of dominant offensive performance.  It is entirely possible that pre-1990's the current rate of rookie success was the norm and now we're seeing a return to the norm, not an artificial bubble fueled by all the various factors that made the previous two decades offense dominant.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,127
Drek717 said:
I completely agree that it is only a superficial measurement, but there are more signs than just Cherrington's comments pointing towards MLB being uniquely hard to break into as a hitter right now.
 
Beyond just seeing if mL numbers now result in lower ML numbers it would also be worth seeing if we're all working in an artificially inflated sense of what a rookie break in period consists of exiting a prolonged stretch of dominant offensive performance.  It is entirely possible that pre-1990's the current rate of rookie success was the norm and now we're seeing a return to the norm, not an artificial bubble fueled by all the various factors that made the previous two decades offense dominant.
I think your conclusions are likely correct but I also think this is an area ripe for a deeper dive as we see the results dramatically shifting. I suspect that the smart teams, including Cherington's staff, are using systems internally doing just this and that some of the bleeding edge in front office statistical analysis includes some very significant models of player progressions within their own system.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
Rusney Castillo's car is at Fenway Park, so it's reasonable to infer he is too.

https://twitter.com/TimBritton/status/601827065508298752
link to tweet
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
Regardless of my fantasy approach in the "Offense" thread, most likely scenario is:
 
- JBJ to Pawtucket
- Castillo to RF
- Victorino 4th OF
 
right?
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,639
soxhop411 said:
RT @Sean_McAdam: Industry source on the likelihood of Rusney Castillo being promoted by Red Sox Friday: "Possible.''
 
On WBZ today, Sean related that the answer he got was that Rusney would be suiting up in Boston before the weekend ended.
 

Stan Papi Was Framed

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
2,942
Red Sox stats has what sounds like a reasonable take on what to expect now that Castill is up:
 

 Red Sox Stats @redsoxstats  ·  14m 14 minutes ago

Rusney isn't the savior, like the team has been mismanaged to make it seem. But play him in RF daily and that won't be a garbage black hole.
-----
Sounds right to me.  wish he'd been around last couple of days, but no use thinking about that.  Now that he's up, I hope Hanley can get some time off soon. I realize Rusney is starting in RF tonight, but hope his callup means some rest for Hanley as Rusney rotates around.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,576
@PeteAbe: Farrell said there will be a rotation in RF and CF with Betts, Castillo and Victorino. For now, Victorino is day to day.
 

Chief Wahoo

New Member
Aug 30, 2013
117
Stan Papi Was Framed said:
-----
Sounds right to me.  wish he'd been around last couple of days, but no use thinking about that.  Now that he's up, I hope Hanley can get some time off soon. I realize Rusney is starting in RF tonight, but hope his callup means some rest for Hanley as Rusney rotates around.
 
They could do a L/R platoon with Nava & Hanley until Hanley's shoulder is a little better.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,549
soxhop411 said:
@PeteAbe: Farrell said there will be a rotation in RF and CF with Betts, Castillo and Victorino. For now, Victorino is day to day.
 
Unless this "rotation" is actually just giving Mookie one day a week off, there is no way it makes sense to put him on the bench so Victorino can play more.  I'll reserve going nuts until we see what this "rotation" actually is, but it seems like Ben needs to get ShaneVic off the team before Farrell hurts the growth of young players so that he can get Victorino ABs.
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
soxhop411 said:
@PeteAbe: Farrell said there will be a rotation in RF and CF with Betts, Castillo and Victorino. For now, Victorino is day to day.
 
Does this mean
 
A. Betts CF, Castillo RF
B. Castillo CF, Victorino RF
C. Betts CF, Victorino RF
 
???
 

johnnywayback

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2004
1,422
geoduck no quahog said:
 
Does this mean
 
A. Betts CF, Castillo RF
B. Castillo CF, Victorino RF
C. Betts CF, Victorino RF
 
???
 
I'd imagine you get 3 days a week of A, 2 days a week of B, and 2 days a week of C.  That way, Betts plays 5 days, Castillo plays 5 days, and Victorino plays four.  Once every other week or so, either Hanley or Ortiz takes a day off and you can play all three of those guys.  And now you always have a legit RH pinch-hitter if Sandoval faces a tough lefty, or a legit pinch-runner for Ortiz or the catcher.  Seems pretty workable to me.
 
And, of course, it's flexible.  If (when) Victorino is banged up, you get more A.  If Mookie keeps struggling, you maybe get more B.  If Castillo is out of sync, you get more C.
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,713
Haiku
I'd like to see Rusney stay healthy for a while. So far he has been an injury list tease.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
I'm hoping (as others have suggested) that Hanley and Ortiz also figure into this rotation, so that in addition to the ABC options that GNQ suggested we also occasionally see
 
D Betts, Castillo, Vic
 
with Hanley sometimes out of the lineup and sometimes replacing Ortiz at DH. That would get Betts/Castillo/Vic a little more PT, help the defense, and rest Hanley/Ortiz. 
 
In this scenario, Nava is just the 25th man; he mostly spells Nap at 1B, pinch-hits occasionally, and once or twice a month gets a start in the outfield.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
So tonight Castillo goes out and makes Hanley look like a gold glove outfielder. Good Lord, can anybody here play this game?
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,649
02130
Plympton91 said:
So tonight Castillo goes out and makes Hanley look like a gold glove outfielder. Good Lord, can anybody here play this game?
I dunno, you need three years' worth of data to make that conclusion.
 
I hope we give him another chance.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,540
Sheesh if a $60m major league OF needs two hands to catch a fly ball something is seriously wrong. This isn't little league.
 

In my lifetime

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
959
Connecticut
So much for the OF rotation with Victorino pulled out of the game with a calf injury.

Obviously at the point, Victorino can't be counted on being anything more than a spot starter when healthy.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,810
Oregon
In my lifetime said:
So much for the OF rotation with Victorino pulled out of the game with a calf injury.

Obviously at the point, Victorino can't be counted on being anything more than a spot starter when healthy.
 
You can;'t make up some of this stuff:
 
Victorino stopped switch-hitting because he felt hitting from the left side was hurting his legs.
 
What doesn't hurt his legs?
 
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/05/23/switch-hitting-lost-art/KlREDV1IVb1A86Gvkehj7I/story.html
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
If this isn't some version of the Hellenic flu (and I can't think of a reason it would be), should the medical/training staff be getting asked about the in year maintenance he is using? Or not using?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,540
Dropped fly ball? Check
Swing at first pitch with 2 out and runner going to get into scoring position for you? Check
Fall flat on your face running the bases? Check
Say "screw it" I'm not even gonna try to get in a rundown so the runner can get into scoring position? Check

What's next for Rusney?
 

Darnell's Son

He's a machine.
Moderator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,611
Providence, RI
Average Reds said:
Shouldn't the Napoli thread have taught us to be careful about jumping to conclusions early in the season?
No, his performance just frees up some energy so people can complain about Rusney now.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,540
Average Reds said:
Shouldn't the Napoli thread have taught us to be careful about jumping to conclusions early in the season?
Not jumping to conclusion about anything only pointing out how he's failed in 4 opportunities where your average little league would execute. Maybe we should ignore it as if nothing happened I dunno.
 

thehitcat

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,385
Windham, ME
I do like how he seems to be consciously going up the middle with his at bats but I agree the looking back for the play in right was a little league mistake. 
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,455
Southwestern CT
HomeRunBaker said:
Not jumping to conclusion about anything only pointing out how he's failed in 4 opportunities where your average little league would execute. Maybe we should ignore it as if nothing happened I dunno.
It's not so much that I want to ignore it as much as I trust the club to take steps to ensure its not a continuing problem.

If it is a continuing problem, we'll have a different conversation and I'll be supporting you.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,540
Average Reds said:
It's not so much that I want to ignore it as much as I trust the club to take steps to ensure its not a continuing problem.

If it is a continuing problem, we'll have a different conversation and I'll be supporting you.
I'm only bringing these incidents up as I don't recall a Red Sox player in my long lifetime making so many mental blunders in a 48 hour period. As is always the case it's a test of the teams leaders to address these. It's encouraging that Lovello said that Ortiz approached Rusney, put his arm around him and let him know that "this isn't how we do things around here" as Papi addressed Rusney being on-deck the other night and not serving as a slide/stand-up guide to the runner coming home. Hopefully Papi continues helping the kid with these other situations as well.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,540
Stan Papi Was Framed said:
falling down on way to 3rd looked like bad luck--won't hold this against him.
Right but then quitting on the play after getting up is inexcusable. If this was a one-off where he knows he messed up that's one thing.....he didn't show any remorse after the play and on top of multiple other bonehead plays this weekend.
 

Philip Jeff Frye

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2001
10,307
Stan Papi Was Framed said:
falling down on way to 3rd looked like bad luck--won't hold this against him.
It wasn't bad luck, it was because he was looking back over his shoulder at the ball instead of relying on the third base coach. Remy pointed this out on the telecast. Do they not have third base coaches in Cuba?

Edit - just realized Remy got autocorrected to Rent. Sorry.
 

thehitcat

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,385
Windham, ME
Philip Jeff Frye said:
It wasn't bad luck, it was because he was looking back over his shoulder at the ball instead of relying on the third base coach. Rent pointed this out on the telecast. Do they not have third base coaches in Cuba?
Honestly this was my first thought.  I assume they do but...do they?  I haven't watched any Cuban baseball other than their games in international tournaments.