Yeah I think someone posted the Machiavelli version of Hanlon's Razor in the gamethread "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Im somewhere between that and possibly some subconscious type bias...as in I do think there's a chance there is some bias against the Bruins coming from the league office, but cant imagine there are directives coming down from the top to punish them.
Stupidity, and they really don’t want to do anything.
They would rather just let everything go honestly, and they only act to discipline someone when they feel like they HAVE TO based on public outrage.
And for Parros, Campbell, etc. the amount and tone of the chatter that they hear on the radio on the way into work absolutely has an affect on whether or not they feel there is sufficient public outrage where they have to act.
And when every transgression against the Bruins is portrayed as “a tap” or “a noogie” or they just don’t talk about it, but every transgression that the Bruins commit generates outrage up there, this is what happens.