Replacing a great QB (SB era)

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,781
I'm going to use this list as the top 20 QB in the Super Bowl era (only counting guys that have retired or have recently moved on to other teams (like Rodgers), so Mahomes, who would definitely be on this list, doesn't count for this exercise.

1. Tom Brady, NE
2. Joe Montana, SF/KC
3. Peyton Manning, Ind/Den
4. John Elway, Den
5. Dan Marino, Mia
6. Aaron Rodgers, GB
7. Brett Favre, GB
8. Drew Brees, SD/NO
9. Johnny Unitas, Bal (Colts)
10. Steve Young, SF
11. Fran Tarkenton, Min
12. Roger Staubach, Dal
13. Troy Aikman, Dal
14. Terry Bradshaw, Pit
15. Ben Roethlisberger, Pit
16. Bart Starr, GB
17. Warren Moon, Hou (Oilers)
18. Kurt Warner, StL/Ari
19. Jim Kelly, Buf
20. Dan Fouts, SD (LAC)

We can quibble with the list as a whole, and certainly with the order of guys and where they rank. That's not even really the issue. This exercise is all about how difficult it is to replace an all-time great QB. I'm going to go through the list and see what each team did to replace their HOF caliber QB. I'll work my way from 20 to 1. To make this job easier I'm just going to use pro-football-reference's "top passer" list for each team each year.

20. Dan Fouts, SD (LAC)
- Mark Malone (1)
- Jim McMahon (1)
- Billy Joe Tolliver (1)
- Joe Friesz (1)
- Stan Humphries (6)
- Craig Whelihan (1)
- Jim Harbaugh (1)
- Ryan Leaf (1)
- Doug Flutie (1)
- Drew Brees (4)
- Philip Rivers (14)
- Justin Herbert (4)
- VERDICT: They wandered the QB wilderness from 1988-2006 (19 seasons) before getting their next great QB (Rivers), and as great as Rivers was, they didn't win anything with him. They only got to ONE conference championship in Rivers' 14 seasons, and of course with Herbert, have only been to the playoffs once too. I shouldn't forget that they had Brees, but had only one good season with him before moving on.

19. Jim Kelly, Buf
- Todd Collins (1)
- Doug Flutie (1)
- Rob Johnson (1)
- Alex Van Pelt (1)
- Drew Bledsoe (3)
- Kelly Holcomb (1)
- JP Losman (1)
- Trent Edwards (2)
- Ryan Fitzpatrick (4)
- EJ Manuel (1)
- Kyle Orton (1)
- Tyrod Taylor (3)
- Josh Allen (6)
- VERDICT: Bledsoe was fine for them, but they only got him via a trade with NE, which itself only happened because Tom Brady arrived on the scene. They were in the QB wilderness from 1997-2018 (20 seasons) minus the three years of Bledsoe and maybe the two years of Flutie (he was fine with them, making one Pro Bowl and leading Buffalo to the playoffs twice).

18. Kurt Warner, StL
- Marc Bulger (8)
- Sam Bradford (4)
- Austin Davis (1)
- Nick Foles (1)
- Case Keenum (1)
- Jared Goff (4)
- Matthew Stafford (3)
- VERDICT: Bulger was solid during his time with the Rams. They made the playoffs twice. Goff was pretty good one year and made the Super Bowl. And Stafford obviously got them a Lombardi. Pretty good job by the Rams staying relevant at the QB position once Warner was gone.

Kurt Warner, Ari
- Derek Anderson (1)
- Kevin Kolb (2)
- Carson Palmer (1)
- Drew Stanton (1)
- Carson Palmer (3)
- Josh Rosen (1)
- Kyler Murray (4)
- Josh Dobbs (1) though it will be someone else by season's end
- VERDICT: They were good during some of Palmer's seasons, making it to a conference championship in the 2015 season. So not too bad. But still, there's a lot of riff raff in that mix.

17. Warren Moon, Hou
- Billy Joe Tolliver (1)
- Chris Chandler (2)
- Steve McNair (7)
- Billy Volek (1)
- Steve McNair (1)
- Vince Young (2)
- Kerry Collins (1)
- Vince Young (1)
- Kerry Collins (1)
- Matt Hasselbeck (1)
- Jake Locker (1)
- Ryan Fitzpatrick (1)
- Zach Mettenberger (1)
- Marcus Mariota (4)
- Ryan Tannehill (5)
- VERDICT: McNair was league MVP and they were terrific during his time, so it only took them a few years to make a nice transition. Since McNair, it's been a lot of meh though the team had some good years with Tannehill. But it's not like he's any sort of legend. Overall, not bad though.

16. Bart Starr, GB
- Scott Hunter (2)
- Jerry Tagge (1)
- John Hadl (2)
- Lynn Dickey (2)
- David Whitehurst (2)
- Lynn Dickey (6)
- Randy Wright (2)
- Mike Tomczak (1)
- Don Majkowski (3)
- Mike Tomczak (1)
- Brett Favre (16)
- Aaron Rodgers (9)
- Brett Hundley (1)
- Aaron Rodgers (5)
- Jordan Love (1)
- VERDICT: They were in the QB wilderness for a long time (22 seasons) until they found Favre. Then obviously after a great run with him, they followed it up with Rodgers, who is an all-time great. Now they have Love and are starting it all over.

15. Ben Roethlisberger, Pit
- Kenny Pickett (2)
- VERDICT: Too early to tell, but Pickett isn't looking like anything great. Better W-L than Mac but a much worse passer rating (78.5).

14. Terry Bradshaw, Pit
- Cliff Stoudt (1)
- Mark Malone (4)
- Bubby Brister (3)
- Neil O'Donnell (5)
- Mike Tomczak (1)
- Kordell Stewart (2)
- Tommy Maddox (2)
- Ben Roethlisberger (15)
- Kenny Pickett (2)
- VERDICT: Malone, Brister, and O'Donnell were not very good but not godawful either. They had a great team with Kordell Stewart but we all know he wasn't a great QB. It took them 18 years to land their next great QB (Ben).

13. Troy Aikman, Dal
- Quincy Carter (1)
- Chad Hutchinson (1)
- Quincy Carter (1)
- Vinny Testaverde (1)
- Drew Bledsoe (1)
- Tony Romo (4)
- Jon Kitna (1)
- Tony Romo (4)
- Matt Cassel (1)
- Dak Prescott (4)
- Andy Dalton (1)
- Dak Prescott (3)
- VERDICT: Romo was a terrific QB, but of course they never won a conference championship with him. Prescott has been a good QB for them too, but same story.

12. Roger Staubach, Dal
- Danny White (4)
- Gary Hogeboom (1)
- Danny White (1)
- Steve Pilleur (1)
- Danny White (1)
- Steve Pilleur (1)
- Troy Aikman (12)
- Quincy Carter (1)
- Chad Hutchinson (1)
- Quincy Carter (1)
- Vinny Testaverde (1)
- Drew Bledsoe (1)
- Tony Romo (4)
- Jon Kitna (1)
- Tony Romo (4)
- Matt Cassel (1)
- Dak Prescott (4)
- Andy Dalton (1)
- Dak Prescott (3)
- VERDICT: White was pretty good and they went to 3 straight NFCCG with him at the helm. Obviously Aikman is a HOFer. Overall, not a bad job finding a good replacement for Staubach.

11. Fran Tarkenton, Min
- Tommy Kramer (4)
- Steve Dils (1)
- Tommy Kramer (3)
- Wade Wilson (3)
- Rich Gannon (3)
- Jim McMahon (1)
- Warren Moon (2)
- Brad Johnson (2)
- Randall Cunningham (1)
- Jeff George (1)
- Daunte Culpepper (5)
- Brad Johnson (2)
- Tarvaris Jackson (1)
- Gus Frerotte (1)
- Brett Favre (2)
- Christian Ponder (2)
- Matt Cassel (1)
- Teddy Bridgewater (2)
- Sam Bradford (1)
- Case Keenum (1)
- Kirk Cousins (6)
- VERDICT: They had some pretty good years in the post-Tarkenton era. 15-1 with Cunningham (but that was a one-year wonder). Culpepper was pretty good. But on the whole, they moved on and on and on from their QBs because they couldn't find and settle on a great one.

10. Steve Young, SF
- Jeff Garcia (5)
- Tim Rattay (1)
- Alex Smith (2)
- Trent Dilfer (1)
- Shaun Hill (1)
- Alex Smith (3)
- Colin Kaepernick (3)
- Blaine Gabbert (1)
- Colin Kaepernick (1)
- Jimmy Garoppolo (1)
- Nick Mullens (1)
- Jimmy Garoppolo (1)
- Nick Mullens (1)
- Jimmy Garoppolo (2)
- Brock Purdy (2)
- VERDICT: Garcia was pretty solid, and they had good years under Kaepernick, reaching a Super Bowl. Some decent QB play in the mix here, but obviously it's not like they found their next superstar either. Who knows if Purdy will get there.

9. Johnny Unitas, Bal (Colts)
- Morrall (1)
- Marty Domras (2)
- Bert Jones (4)
- Bill Troup (1)
- Greg Landry (1)
- Bert Jones (2)
- Mike Pagel (4)
- Jack Trudeau (2)
- Chris Chandler (1)
- Jack Trudeau (1)
- Jeff George (4)
- Jim Harbaugh (4)
- Peyton Manning (13)
- Curtis Painter (1)
- Andrew Luck (5)
- Jacoby Brissett (1)
- Andrew Luck (1)
- Jacoby Brissett (1)
- Philip Rivers (1)
- Carson Wentz (1)
- Matt Ryan (1)
- Gardner Minshew (1)
- VERDICT: Bert Jones was a solid NFL QB so that was fine. Then came a long list of crap before they finally landed another star in Peyton Manning. Luck followed shortly thereafter. On the whole, good job with Jones, but then a lot of bad QB play led to them being able to draft Peyton with the #1 pick.

8. Drew Brees, SD
- Rivers (14)
- Herbert (4)
- VERDICT: Obviously Rivers is a close Hall of Famer (he may get in) so that was pretty nice for them to get him right away, followed up by Herbert. They've done great. They got Rivers due to the Eli Manning trade, which Eli forced on them. They did have a high draft pick though.

Drew Brees, NO
- Jameis Winston (1)
- Andy Dalton (1)
- Derek Carr (1)
- VERDICT: So far....bleh.

7. Brett Favre, GB
- Aaron Rodgers (9)
- Brett Hundley (1)
- Aaron Rodgers (5)
- Jordan Love (1)
- VERDICT: Obviously going from Favre to Rodgers is about as good as it gets.

6. Aaron Rodgers, GB
- Jordan Love (1)
- VERDICT: Can't say at this point. Love doesn't look great but who knows.

5. Dan Marino, Mia
- Jay Fiedler (4)
- AJ Feeley (1)
- Gus Frerotte (1)
- Joey Harrington (1)
- Cleo Lemon (1)
- Chad Pennington (1)
- Chad Henne (1)
- Matt Moore (1)
- Ryan Tannehill (5)
- Jay Cutler (1)
- Ryan Tannehill (1)
- Ryan Fitzpatrick (2)
- Tua Tagovailoa (3)
- VERDICT: Maybe they've got their guy in Tua, but there was lots of unadulterated garbage for about 19 years before Tua arrived.

4. John Elway, Den
- Brian Griese (4)
- Jake Plummer (4)
- Jay Cutler (2)
- Kyle Orton (2)
- Tim Tebow (1)
- Peyton Manning (4)
- Trevor Siemian (2)
- Case Keenum (1)
- Joe Flacco (1)
- Drew Lock (1)
- Teddy Bridgewater (1)
- Russell Wilson (2)
- VERDICT: Plummer was solid for them, but then it was a pile of godawfulness before landing Peyton manning. Since then it's also been terrible for them.

3. Peyton Manning, Ind
- Curtis Painter (1)
- Andrew Luck (5)
- Jacoby Brissett (1)
- Andrew Luck (1)
- Jacoby Brissett (1)
- Philip Rivers (1)
- Carson Wentz (1)
- Matt Ryan (1)
- Gardner Minshew (1)
- VERDICT: Got Luck which was fantastic, but they got him because they had the #1 pick in the draft due to Peyton being injured and missing an entire season. So they "lucked" into that #1 draft pick. Since Luck though...yuck. Maybe Richardson is the next great QB for them though. We shall see.

Peyton Manning, Den
- Trevor Siemian (2)
- Case Keenum (1)
- Joe Flacco (1)
- Drew Lock (1)
- Teddy Bridgewater (1)
- Russell Wilson (2)
- VERDICT: 8 years in the QB wilderness. You'd think that Wilson wouldn't be that, but so far, pretty much.

2. Joe Montana, SF
- Steve Young (8)
- Jeff Garcia (5)
- Tim Rattay (1)
- Alex Smith (2)
- Trent Dilfer (1)
- Shaun Hill (1)
- Alex Smith (3)
- Colin Kaepernick (3)
- Blaine Gabbert (1)
- Colin Kaepernick (1)
- Jimmy Garoppolo (1)
- Nick Mullens (1)
- Jimmy Garoppolo (1)
- Nick Mullens (1)
- Jimmy Garoppolo (2)
- Brock Purdy (2)
- VERDICT: Obviously a total home run with Young following Montana, and as I said earlier, they've done a pretty solid job overall. Still, lots of turnover trying to find the next great QB.

Joe Montana, KC
- Steve Bono (2)
- Elvis Grbac (2)
- Trent Green (5)
- Damon Huard (2)
- Tyler Thigpen (1)
- Matt Cassel (4)
- Alex Smith (5)
- Patrick Mahomes (6)
- VERDICT: They've had some decent QB after Montana, and obviously have found their next megastar in Mahomes. But it was 21 years between Montana and Mahomes.

1. Tom Brady, NE
- Cam Newton (1)
- Mac Jones (3)
- VERDICT: 0-2. Time for the next guy.


So of these 20 guys representing 24 situations, the vast majority of teams have had a very hard time finding their next GUY. GB (Favre-->Rodgers) and SF (Montana-->Young) are obviously the gold standard. In both cases, they drafted their next guy (Rodgers/Young) while their star was still...a star.

Young was taken 1st in the 1984 NFL Supplemental draft out of the USFL, while Montana was just 28 and already had been top 5 in the MVP voting twice. The 49ers could afford to have Young just sit and spell Montana when Joe was hurt but also wait for a long time to get his shot. This was also pre- salary cap.

Rodgers was taken 24th overall in the 2005 NFL draft and Favre still had 3 more years as GB's starter to go, including a near-MVP season in 2008 (he finished 2nd). So like Young, Rodgers had to wait a while for his turn. Hard in today's NFL to spend a 1st round pick on a QB and have him sit for 3 seasons as an understudy.

Indy did well with Andrew Luck following Peyton Manning, but again, they had to get "lucky" and get the 1st overall pick ("suck for Luck") after Peyton got hurt and missed the season. Much easier to find your next guy when you get the #1 pick in the draft. The Chargers have done pretty well following Brees with Rivers and then Herbert, but of course, they haven't actually won anything either.

Otherwise, most teams really struggled to find their next guy.

So here's the moral of the story, and it's a depressing one: the Patriots are moving on from the GOAT. It may take a long time before they find their next star QB, and in the meanwhile, the on-field product might be a lot like the last couple of seasons - pretty bad.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,962
Unreal America
Appreciate the work here.

I’d frame this a bit differently: put aside the replacement, it’s just very very very difficult to find an all-timer at QB.

However, it is possible to have success as a franchise without an all timer at QB. Not 6 Super Bowls. Maybe just getting to a SB.

Here are some “recent” SB losing QBs:

Jimmy G
Goff
Matt Ryan
Can Newton
Kaepernick
Rex Grossman
McNabb
Jake Delhomme

Some of these guys had a few good (or very good years) but none were anything resembling all timers.

I’m not obsessed with “replacing” Brady. That’s next to impossible. We just need to find a guy who’s pretty good, for a couple few years. That’s difficult, but not nearly as daunting.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,781
73451

Of those teams that found replacements within 5 years...

- SD traded a 3rd round pick to acquire Humphries from Washington after John Friesz got injured.

- The Rams picked up Marc Bulger off the scrap heap after he had been released from both the Saints' and Falcons' practice squads. He served as a backup for several years before getting his chance to play for the Rams when Kurt Warner played poorly and #2 backup Jamie Martin got hurt.

- Houston acquired Steve McNair with the #2 pick in the 1995 NFL draft following a 2-14 season.

- Garcia was undrafted coming out of college and spent 5 years in the CFL before SF signed him to back up Steve Young. He got his chance when Young suffered a concussion and retired.

- Rivers was drafted #4 overall by the Giants and was part of the trade that included Eli Manning, who SD drafted #1 (after a 4-12 record) but who forced his way out of town by refusing to sign with the Chargers.

- Indy got Andrew Luck famously by "sucking for Luck" in 2011, going 2-14 the season that Peyton Manning was out with an injured neck. They used the ensuing #1 overall draft pick to get Luck, and Peyton moved on to Denver.

- Young was drafted #11 in the USFL draft and played in that league for several years. After a dispute with the LA Express, he bought out his contract and was free to be picked up in the NFL. Tampa Bay drafted him in the supplemental draft, but he played poorly for the moribund franchise and was let go after Tampa drafted Vinny Testaverde. SF traded for him to back up Joe Montana and got his chance when Montana got injured. When Young performed well, eventually Montana moved on to KC. Young got his first real chance to be the MAN in SF during his 31-year old season.

- Trent Green was drafted by the Chargers in the 8th round of the 1993 draft (they had more rounds back then!) and spent 4 seasons bouncing around the NFL and CFL before finally latching on in Washington as a 27-year old.


So of these 8 situations...

- 2 were top 5 draft picks by the team needing the replacement (McNair, Luck)
- 3 were acquired via trade by the team needing the replacement (Humphries, Rivers, Young)
- 3 were essentially scrap heap veterans picked up by the team needing replacement (Green, Garcia, Bulger)
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,604
Somewhere
Appreciate the work here.

I’d frame this a bit differently: put aside the replacement, it’s just very very very difficult to find an all-timer at QB.
Doubly so in the absence of high draft picks, typical of what you’d expect when you most recently rostered one of the best quarterbacks of all time.
 

Traut

lost his degree
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
12,792
My Desk
Doubly so in the absence of high draft picks, typical of what you’d expect when you most recently rostered one of the best quarterbacks of all time.
Even if you look at Rodgers or Young as examples of teams using high draft picks and waiting on guys to develop - the last 5 years of QBs, the only guys the Patriots could have had were Lamar Jackson and Jalen Hurts.

Even at the top, the only guys drafted since 2018 worth a damn are Allen, Jackson, Lawrence, Hurts, Tua, and Purdy.

1st round busts the last 5 years: Mayfield, Darnold, Rosen, Murray, Jones, Haskins, Love, Wilson, Lance, Fields, Jones, Pickett.

The jury is still out on Herbert and the 2023 NFL Draft. With all the talent evaluators, metrics, scouting, video, and training, teams are whiffing on 2/3rds of first-round QB draft picks. I think it is easy to underestimate the role luck plays in all of this.
 

nolasoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 11, 2004
7,023
Displaced
Nice work, but I think you are downplaying the success of some of the players listed.

For example, Bert Jones was beyond ‘solid.‘ Shit, the guy was the 1976 Offensive Player of the Year and NFL MVP. He also led the Colts to 3 consecutive AFC East divisional titles, and his career was only derailed by some major shoulder injuries—that’s mostly bad luck. Is he remembered as “Johnny Football?” No, but the dude was beyond ‘solid.’
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,943
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Even if you look at Rodgers or Young as examples of teams using high draft picks and waiting on guys to develop - the last 5 years of QBs, the only guys the Patriots could have had were Lamar Jackson and Jalen Hurts.

Even at the top, the only guys drafted since 2018 worth a damn are Allen, Jackson, Lawrence, Hurts, Tua, and Purdy.

1st round busts the last 5 years: Mayfield, Darnold, Rosen, Murray, Jones, Haskins, Love, Wilson, Lance, Fields, Jones, Pickett.

The jury is still out on Herbert and the 2023 NFL Draft. With all the talent evaluators, metrics, scouting, video, and training, teams are whiffing on 2/3rds of first-round QB draft picks. I think it is easy to underestimate the role luck plays in all of this.
How so? He's a great quarterback.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,781
Nice work, but I think you are downplaying the success of some of the players listed.

For example, Bert Jones was beyond ‘solid.‘ Shit, the guy was the 1976 Offensive Player of the Year and NFL MVP. He also led the Colts to 3 consecutive AFC East divisional titles, and his career was only derailed by some major shoulder injuries—that’s mostly bad luck. Is he remembered as “Johnny Football?” No, but the dude was beyond ‘solid.’
Fair point.

I'm sure people can quibble with my evaluation, but I think the larger point holds pretty true, yes? In the vast, vast majority of cases, it took teams YEARS to find a guy they felt good enough about to start 5 seasons for them, never mind to find another star at the QB position. If you're a betting person, the safe bet is that it will take New England a long time to find the GUY to replace Brady too.
 

dirtynine

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 17, 2002
8,435
Philly
All well and good, I’m not sure what the utility of the conversation is. If the larger point is we should be happy waiting for another HOF QB, ok… no problem. If it’s, we should be happy waiting around to have a QB that can keep the team competitive, well, no. I would like to consider the Patriots an above-average franchise, so I’m holding them to a higher standard than whatever the historical precedent is.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,597
Hingham, MA
My takeaway is that there is a huge luck element that goes into this, in terms of the combination of having a high pick + having the right kind of QBs available in the draft + picking the right guy. It's not like Josh Allen, Mahomes, or Herbert were picked in the top 5 (or Lamar). So it doesn't take a full tank to get a franchise guy. You just have to pick the right guy when you have your chance. It seemed like the Pats had an opportunity in 2021, but it looks like history will prove that to be a really bad QB class aside from Lawrence. We'll see where they end up picking in 2024, and we'll also see how good guys like Williams and Maye end up being. It's all a crapshoot. Which is why you need to pick QBs basically every other year.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,781
My takeaway is that there is a huge luck element that goes into this, in terms of the combination of having a high pick + having the right kind of QBs available in the draft + picking the right guy. It's not like Josh Allen, Mahomes, or Herbert were picked in the top 5 (or Lamar). So it doesn't take a full tank to get a franchise guy. You just have to pick the right guy when you have your chance. It seemed like the Pats had an opportunity in 2021, but it looks like history will prove that to be a really bad QB class aside from Lawrence. We'll see where they end up picking in 2024, and we'll also see how good guys like Williams and Maye end up being. It's all a crapshoot. Which is why you need to pick QBs basically every other year.
I know we all love Lawrence, and CLEARLY he has better tools than Mac. Like, CLEARLY.

But...here's their career data.

Jones: 18-22, 66.1% completions, 6.8 y/a, 46 td (3.6%), 33 int (2.6%), 86.9 rating
Lawrence: 18-24, 63.9% completions, 6.6 y/a, 46 td (3.2%), 29 int (2.0%), 85.3 rating

It's also clear that he has far better weapons than Mac. I think we'd all take Etienne, Kirk, Ridley, and Engram over what the Pats have.

BUT....also....Lawrence is trending UP after a rough rookie year, and Mac is trending DOWN after a pretty good rookie year. I'm not claiming that I'd rather have Mac than Lawrence. No, no, no. Just that so far in their careers, it's shockingly similar actual on-field production.

But yes to your larger point, there's a lot of luck involved. You have to suck at just the right time when a great QB is available to get, and you have to actually get that guy.

This is why teams do (and why the Pats need to) take multiple bites of that apple. They need to keep trying til they get it right. If they use their 1st rounder on Maye this year, great. If they can't get him or Williams and end up drafting an elite OT or WR in the first and then a guy like Penix in the second, fine. They can't just wait til the 7th round and get the next guy out of Akron to back up Mac Jones.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,781
All well and good, I’m not sure what the utility of the conversation is. If the larger point is we should be happy waiting for another HOF QB, ok… no problem. If it’s, we should be happy waiting around to have a QB that can keep the team competitive, well, no. I would like to consider the Patriots an above-average franchise, so I’m holding them to a higher standard than whatever the historical precedent is.
The point is a depressing one. Not that we should be "happy" waiting for another great QB. Just that we shouldn't have too high hopes/expectations that they'll find that GUY soon. It usually takes quite a while, is the unfortunate point in all this. We can hope for better, but we should buckle up for a bumpy ride for a few more years anyway.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,943
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
I know we all love Lawrence, and CLEARLY he has better tools than Mac. Like, CLEARLY.

But...here's their career data.

Jones: 18-22, 66.1% completions, 6.8 y/a, 46 td (3.6%), 33 int (2.6%), 86.9 rating
Lawrence: 18-24, 63.9% completions, 6.6 y/a, 46 td (3.2%), 29 int (2.0%), 85.3 rating

It's also clear that he has far better weapons than Mac. I think we'd all take Etienne, Kirk, Ridley, and Engram over what the Pats have.

BUT....also....Lawrence is trending UP after a rough rookie year, and Mac is trending DOWN after a pretty good rookie year. I'm not claiming that I'd rather have Mac than Lawrence. No, no, no. Just that so far in their careers, it's shockingly similar actual on-field production.

But yes to your larger point, there's a lot of luck involved. You have to suck at just the right time when a great QB is available to get, and you have to actually get that guy.

This is why teams do (and why the Pats need to) take multiple bites of that apple. They need to keep trying til they get it right. If they use their 1st rounder on Maye this year, great. If they can't get him or Williams and end up drafting an elite OT or WR in the first and then a guy like Penix in the second, fine. They can't just wait til the 7th round and get the next guy out of Akron to back up Mac Jones.
It's not shockingly similar production at all. Trevor Lawrence was asked to throw the ball a ton and be the main driver of offense for a putrid team with the worst coaching staff of the past two decades and no weapons. Mac Jones was playing under Josh McDaniels and Bill Belichick with a top 3 defense in EPA/Play while being asked to do very little. Their past two years of production are basically comparing a guy who's been a top 6-8 QB in football with one who's been bottom 5. If your rookie numbers for a terrible team screw the overall stats that much, I'm more than comfortable in throwing them out. Was anyone bringing up 1998 to talk about 2000 Peyton?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,597
Hingham, MA
It's not shockingly similar production at all. Trevor Lawrence was asked to throw the ball a ton and be the main driver of offense for a putrid team with the worst coaching staff of the past two decades and no weapons. Mac Jones was playing under Josh McDaniels and Bill Belichick with a top 3 defense in EPA/Play while being asked to do very little. Their past two years of production are basically comparing a guy who's been a top 6-8 QB in football with one who's been bottom 5. If your rookie numbers for a terrible team screw the overall stats that much, I'm more than comfortable in throwing them out. Was anyone bringing up 1998 to talk about 2000 Peyton?
Exactly, using their career stats is pointless and irrelevant. All Pats fans are ready to move on from Mac; no Jags fans would move on from Lawrence. I posted this in the Mac thread prior to yesterday's game:

But there's been a huge gap since late 2021.

Lawrence last 26 games:
595-887 (67.1%)
6,271 yards (7.07 Y/A)
36 TD
12 INT
95.3 rating
114 rushes for 524 yards
16-10 record

Mac last 26 games:
543-839 (64.7%)
5,570 yards (6.64 Y/A)
29 TD
24 INT
83.3 rating
79 rushes for 231 yards
9-17 record

And 6 of those Mac TDs game in the final four games of 2021.

Mac has thrown for 23 TDs in his last 22 games.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,943
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Exactly, using their career stats is pointless and irrelevant. All Pats fans are ready to move on from Mac; no Jags fans would move on from Lawrence. I posted this in the Mac thread prior to yesterday's game:

But there's been a huge gap since late 2021.

Lawrence last 26 games:
595-887 (67.1%)
6,271 yards (7.07 Y/A)
36 TD
12 INT
95.3 rating
114 rushes for 524 yards
16-10 record

Mac last 26 games:
543-839 (64.7%)
5,570 yards (6.64 Y/A)
29 TD
24 INT
83.3 rating
79 rushes for 231 yards
9-17 record

And 6 of those Mac TDs game in the final four games of 2021.

Mac has thrown for 23 TDs in his last 22 games.
It's honestly staggering that Lawrence has already exceeded Mac's career ANY/A halfway through year 3 considering the difference in how their rookie years went. They shouldn't be comparable stat wise at all at this point.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,781
It's not shockingly similar production at all. Trevor Lawrence was asked to throw the ball a ton and be the main driver of offense for a putrid team with the worst coaching staff of the past two decades and no weapons. Mac Jones was playing under Josh McDaniels and Bill Belichick with a top 3 defense in EPA/Play while being asked to do very little. Their past two years of production are basically comparing a guy who's been a top 6-8 QB in football with one who's been bottom 5. If your rookie numbers for a terrible team screw the overall stats that much, I'm more than comfortable in throwing them out. Was anyone bringing up 1998 to talk about 2000 Peyton?
Last 2 seasons:

- Lawrence (15-10), 66.9%, 6,048 yds, 34 td, 12 int, 94.7 rating
- Cousins (17-8), 67.1%, 6,878 yds, 47 td, 19 int, 96.2 rating
- Mahomes (21-5), 67.6%, 7,692 yds, 58 td, 20 int, 102.3 rating
- Hurts (22-2), 67.5%, 6,048 yds, 37 td, 14 int, 99.7 rating (plus 1,076 rush yds and 20 rush TD)
- Tagoviola (14-8), 66.8%, 6,157 yds, 44 td, 15 int, 105.9 rating
- Allen (18-7), 66.2%, 6,706 yds, 53 td, 23 int, 97.7 rating (plus 995 rush yds and 13 rush TD)
- Herbert (13-11), 68.3%, 6,629 yds, 38 td, 14 int, 95.3 rating
- Jackson (15-6), 66.3%, 4,196 yds, 26 td, 10 int, 95.3 rating (plus 1,204 rush yds and 8 rush TD)
- Prescott (13-7), 67.8%, 4,871 yds, 36 td, 20 int, 95.0 rating
- Burrow (17-7), 67.8%, 6,336 yds, 47 td, 16 int, 97.3 rating
- Goff (15-10), 66.1%, 6,612 yds, 41 td, 12 int, 98.4 rating
- Smith (14-11), 68.4%, 6,084 yds, 39 td, 18 int, 96.4 rating
- Purdy (10-3), 67.8%, 3,407 yds, 25 td, 9 int, 106.2 rating

I'd put Lawrence at about #10, but unfortunately for Pats fans, I'd put Mac at about #32. :(
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,597
Hingham, MA
Last 2 seasons:

- Lawrence (15-10), 66.9%, 6,048 yds, 34 td, 12 int, 94.7 rating
- Cousins (17-8), 67.1%, 6,878 yds, 47 td, 19 int, 96.2 rating
- Mahomes (21-5), 67.6%, 7,692 yds, 58 td, 20 int, 102.3 rating
- Hurts (22-2), 67.5%, 6,048 yds, 37 td, 14 int, 99.7 rating (plus 1,076 rush yds and 20 rush TD)
- Tagoviola (14-8), 66.8%, 6,157 yds, 44 td, 15 int, 105.9 rating
- Allen (18-7), 66.2%, 6,706 yds, 53 td, 23 int, 97.7 rating (plus 995 rush yds and 13 rush TD)
- Herbert (13-11), 68.3%, 6,629 yds, 38 td, 14 int, 95.3 rating
- Jackson (15-6), 66.3%, 4,196 yds, 26 td, 10 int, 95.3 rating (plus 1,204 rush yds and 8 rush TD)
- Prescott (13-7), 67.8%, 4,871 yds, 36 td, 20 int, 95.0 rating
- Burrow (17-7), 67.8%, 6,336 yds, 47 td, 16 int, 97.3 rating
- Goff (15-10), 66.1%, 6,612 yds, 41 td, 12 int, 98.4 rating
- Smith (14-11), 68.4%, 6,084 yds, 39 td, 18 int, 96.4 rating
- Purdy (10-3), 67.8%, 3,407 yds, 25 td, 9 int, 106.2 rating

I'd put Lawrence at about #10, but unfortunately for Pats fans, I'd put Mac at about #32. :(
I don't think anyone is taking Prescott, Goff, Smith, Purdy, or Cousins over Lawrence. Which puts him 8th at worst IMO.
 

dirtynine

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 17, 2002
8,435
Philly
The point is a depressing one. Not that we should be "happy" waiting for another great QB. Just that we shouldn't have too high hopes/expectations that they'll find that GUY soon. It usually takes quite a while, is the unfortunate point in all this. We can hope for better, but we should buckle up for a bumpy ride for a few more years anyway.
I don't need THE guy. I'd like to win a playoff game within the next 3 seasons. I don't think that's an unreasonable expectation. If that takes X QB to do it, so be it. I don't care if it's Brady II. Bonus points if they're fun to watch, though. That buys a longer leash.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,781
I don't think anyone is taking Prescott, Goff, Smith, Purdy, or Cousins over Lawrence. Which puts him 8th at worst IMO.
That wasn't the issue. The issue was "Their past two years of production are basically comparing a guy who's been a top 6-8 QB in football..." So I looked at their last two years of production.

If the issue is who would you prefer MOVING FORWARD, well Lawrence is on a very short list.