Offseason rumors

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,747
From that article - "The Red Sox bid for the Japanese star, but according to a major league source, had limited their offer to a two-year deal with the potential for two additional vesting years."

Mixed feelings on that, just because no matter how high risk he is, that offer was never going to get him.
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,508
Scituate, MA
Why would it matter in any meaningful way to stay under the CBT tax this season? The Sox can add ~$75 million to the CBT payroll this year and incur a penalty of around $12 million. And if the team added that amount of payroll this year, they would still be roughly $90 million below the "draft pick" threshold for 2025. The point of being bad last year was to reset the penalties for going over this year and beyond.



Because of the huge amount of money available in the Sox budget, I think this should be the year. The top prospects we've been obsessing over should be ready to contribute by the end of 2024 or the beginning of 2025. The time to force open that window is now.
The argument would be that the pieces aren't there to make it worth spending the money in 2024. The fan in me doesn't like this argument, but 2025 could conceivably have Mayer and Anthony on the roster.
 

manny

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
267
While I would love to be proven wrong, I don't know how many more reports we need to strongly imply there is no shot the Sox get Snell or Montgomery. If there is any truth to the report of the Yankees offer to Snell, that seems well beyond where the Sox are willing to go (that said, I could see the Yanks planting that offer if they are out on him in order to drive up the price). My guess is Snell ends up with Yankees or Giants and Montgomery ends up with Texas or Toronto (or I could even see a 'mystery' team like Phillies).

It is discouraging, and my only hope is that the Sox do not think these are the right guys to extend their financial resources for (either based on player evaluation or timetable for when the Sox expect to be serious contenders). That said, it has been a weirdish offseason and I can't imagine may fanbases are thrilled with their teams' offseasons aside from Dodgers and Yankees fans (Braves and Phillies fans are also probably relatively satisfied with where their teams stand). Imagine being an Orioles fan--a contender with glaring rotation holes and not in on anyone, even someone like Stroman. Or the Giants, who continuously are supposedly ready to sign a big free agent but keep missing out. It could be better but it definitely could be a whole lot worse.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,331
Imagine being an Orioles fan--a contender with glaring rotation holes and not in on anyone, even someone like Stroman.
Everyone mocked them for not doing anything last winter also and then they won 101 games, I think they'll be just fine.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,303
The argument would be that the pieces aren't there to make it worth spending the money in 2024. The fan in me doesn't like this argument, but 2025 could conceivably have Mayer and Anthony on the roster.
I'm in favor of keeping Mayer and Anthony and every other legit prospect at this point. I'm not in favor of not spending $$ on short term assets that would help this year while not hurting flexibility in the future. If they aren't going to do that, just sell off Martin and Jansen and sign Pivetta to a deal that will give him more $ this year that allow for him to take a less than might might get in FA.
 

grepal

New Member
Jul 20, 2005
193
Everyone mocked them for not doing anything last winter also and then they won 101 games, I think they'll be just fine.
I keep stating John Means should be available all year he was their best hurler before he got hurt. I do think they should add someone else too but I am not an Orioles fan unless they are playing the Yankees.
 

Sox Pride

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
115
The Triangle
https://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=ALL&teamid=3

The Red Sox current projections have them in 80-84 win range with Vegas more pessimistic at 80. Picking up a Snell or Montgomery would put them around gains you about 2-3 wins in the projection which leaves you a little behind the Orioles for 5th in the division again. You wouldn't be in the WC conversation projection wise unless you grabbed another 4-5 WAR player, even there you would be on the outside looking in.

True - but those projections are based off of previous PA totals. I'd bet the total PA's for O'Neill and Grissom are relatively low when we're _hoping_ they get close to a full season of PA's.

What we'd have to hope for this year is:
1) Health - a much healthier year
2) Devers hits to his ability
2) TT maintains his SS fielding and refinds some of his power stroke (His career has always been a little hot and cold)
3) Casas takes another step forward
4) Grissom delivers on the spark plug potential he showed in 2022
5) Yoshida plays like he did in the first half of last year and doesn't tire
6) The outfield kids are alright :) aka some kind of combination of Duran, Rafaella and Abreu provides outfield enough outfield value (I do expect some change here)


Pitching
1) Health
2) Giolito returns to form as a S1/S2
3) Bello takes another step forward
4) Pivetta can continue to be effective like he showed down the stretch
5) Crawford/Wikelman/Houck/Whitlock form a solid 4th 5th starter/longman relief combination.


Finishing in last place isn't a foregone conclusion.
Missing the playoffs isn't a forgone conclusion

I'd bet against it, but the team - even as constructed today - would have a path there.
And we all hope they improve it.

But if JMont decides he wants to be in Texas. And Snell chooses to stay on the west coast, I won't be crying in my cheerio's because I don't think they are elite adds that are going to guarantee the playoffs this year let alone into the future.
 

manny

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
267
Everyone mocked them for not doing anything last winter also and then they won 101 games, I think they'll be just fine.
I'm not saying they aren't going to contend this year, but it has to be disheartening to see the team do essentially nothing when they are so close. I'm sure the fans are used to it by now, but I'm guessing it sure would have felt good to add some pitching. Once again, offseason is not over yet so maybe they end up doing something. Adding someone like Hader would also be pretty great for them with Bautista out for the year. I think Grayson Rodriguez will make the leap this year, so a Bradish-Rodriguez top of the rotation is pretty nice, but I'm meh on the rest, including Means. In any event, as a Sox fan, I will not complain if they do nothing of note.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,303
Who is signing Jordan Montgomery for big money?
Still think that will be TEX, but I wonder what the answer is for Snell.

I know how it looks and I agree. But I'm still betting on Team Boras. At the very least, the deals they settle for will still be more than the 2 years Boston offers.

EDIT: It's possible they are in a long game of chicken with Boras. Maybe they leaked stuff to Speier today to put pressure on. If so, they are playing with a guy who has a pretty good record, and foregoing lots of other opportunities in the interim.
 
Last edited:

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,370
I think the problem is that if Montgomery or Snell’s market collapses to the level that the Sox are comfortable with, then imagine suddenly a bunch of other teams are interested too, and it’s officially to understand why they pick the Sox…and if they age suddenly willing to take a pillow contract, is that something you want to give up a comp pick for?
 

grepal

New Member
Jul 20, 2005
193
Talent evaluation is the key, who do the Sox feel very strongly about as a part of the future, Mayer, Anthony, Teel, Bleis, maybe Perales and or Gonzalez, the board seems to not think very highly of Yorke and some have no patience for Mayer. Trade the wrong assets and the GM is hung out to dry. Trade the correct ones and he is a genius.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,331
I'm not saying they aren't going to contend this year, but it has to be disheartening to see the team do essentially nothing when they are so close. I'm sure the fans are used to it by now, but I'm guessing it sure would have felt good to add some pitching. Once again, offseason is not over yet so maybe they end up doing something. Adding someone like Hader would also be pretty great for them with Bautista out for the year. I think Grayson Rodriguez will make the leap this year, so a Bradish-Rodriguez top of the rotation is pretty nice, but I'm meh on the rest, including Means. In any event, as a Sox fan, I will not complain if they do nothing of note.
People overrate spending money every winter. Again, countless articles were written last winter about how BAL was too cheap and was wasting their window of young talent, blah blah blah. Then they won 101 games and are in decidedly better position now than they were a year ago.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
931
The argument would be that the pieces aren't there to make it worth spending the money in 2024. The fan in me doesn't like this argument, but 2025 could conceivably have Mayer and Anthony on the roster.
That's the thing. The Sox can spend over $70 million this offseason and only incur a penalty of up to $12 million (and a potential hit of an extra $500,000 next year from the international signing budget if they sign a Free Agent who received a qualifying offer). It is just money and the team has a TON of it. If there is a move that makes the team better this year and beyond, do it! This team is close enough to being competitive that they need to do more than tread water. For what it is worth, I do think they will make another big move or two and I can only hope that the talk of needing to shed salary is just subterfuge.
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,508
Scituate, MA
I'm in favor of keeping Mayer and Anthony and every other legit prospect at this point. I'm not in favor of not spending $$ on short term assets that would help this year while not hurting flexibility in the future. If they aren't going to do that, just sell off Martin and Jansen and sign Pivetta to a deal that will give him more $ this year that allow for him to take a less than might might get in FA.
Agreed, and that may be where the two year contract approach is coming in to play. Someone posted upthread a paraphrase of an Andrew Friedman quote basically saying that if you try to find value with every free agent, you're going to finish 3rd in the bidding most of the time.

In a world where the Dodgers and Yankees exist, it's going to be rare that we can outbid them. There were probably only two guys worth even exploring that option this year: Shohei and Yamamoto. If they truly want to be the Dodgers (and who doesn't), than they can't be spending money on long term deals just to spend money. As fans we want to see activity, but that's probably a smart approach.

The issue with Bloom is that while he grasped that concept (to a certain extent). He failed to build complete teams. This team as presently constructed is probably more of a complete team than the Red Sox had on opening day 2023.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
591
Seeing both Imanaga and Stroman sign absolutely reasonable contracts in both length and AAV, I'm more pessimistic than ever about the 2024 season as its shaping up. That is the going price for middle of the rotation starting pitching and the once upon a time big market Boston Red Sox cheaped out on their greatest need. No wonder so many good baseball people didn't even want to interview for that job. I feel bad for Craig Breslow already.
 

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,592
I'm going home
Talent evaluation is the key, who do the Sox feel very strongly about as a part of the future, Mayer, Anthony, Teel, Bleis, maybe Perales and or Gonzalez, the board seems to not think very highly of Yorke and some have no patience for Mayer. Trade the wrong assets and the GM is hung out to dry. Trade the correct ones and he is a genius.
That's a lot of the reason why a lot of folks are upset they have done absolutely nothing yet in free agency, and it's a valid take, especially if you believe they aren't going to spend. 6/180 for Snell and how many people here hate that? I only use that as an example because it's been reported that's what it will take to get him.

Hell, I think a trade is part of the plan and should be, but to me that can't be the only plan. @TomRicardo has posted some really interesting stuff about what our are prospects really worth compared to what we think. I just don't think they simply can trade their way to being a serious threat in the east. I say that fully understanding they could still pull a blockbuster and make me look silly, but I couldn't care less if I'm right or not, I just want them to get better. That I have a bit more faith in that happening than most is inconsequential.

But really, grepal, there's absolutely nothing I'd dispute in your post at all. It's a minefield for Breslow to navigate in any trade he makes.
 

manny

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
267
People overrate spending money every winter. Again, countless articles were written last winter about how BAL was too cheap and was wasting their window of young talent, blah blah blah. Then they won 101 games and are in decidedly better position now than they were a year ago.
As an Orioles fan, would you be happy with this offseason (ignoring that the fanbase has come to expect this)? To be completely inactive in both the trade market and free agency would disappoint me quite a bit. They won 101 games, but their rotation is suspect to me and while their bullpen was a strength last year, they lost one of the best relievers in all of baseball for 2024. I'm not saying they should have signed any huge free agent, but even someone like Stroman would have definitely added good depth to their staff.

We may just agree to disagree and I know this is kind of besides the point of the whole thread. My only point in bringing them up is to say that if Sox fans are disappointed by a lack of activity this offseason, I think other fanbases should be a lot more disappointed.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,331
As an Orioles fan, would you be happy with this offseason (ignoring that the fanbase has come to expect this)?
The Orioles are positioned as well as any team in baseball right now, including the Dodgers. They're almost certainly going to add Cease at some point too, but either way, I'd be thrilled to be an Orioles fan right now, yes.
 

manny

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
267
The Orioles are positioned as well as any team in baseball right now, including the Dodgers. They're almost certainly going to add Cease at some point too, but either way, I'd be thrilled to be an Orioles fan right now, yes.
No argument from me about being happy to be an Orioles fan (I don't think anyone would argue that). And if they add someone like Cease, that would be huge for them (and, as an Orioles fan, I would think that would be a relatively good offseason). I just doubt that any Orioles fan was thinking "if we go through the offseason and don't improve out team, I will be happy about that." As of now, they haven't done anything of consequence. If they do not do anything of consequence for the rest of the offseason, I would be very disappointed as an Orioles fan (this is my sole argument). If they add someone like Cease (or even someone lesser), that would vastly change my opinion. I agree they are in a strong position now and the next 5 years or so, but pretty much every team can use improvement in the offseason and they have not done that yet.

I will drop this for now, don't want to derail the thread.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,370
The Orioles did add Kimbrel. Bradish and Rodriguez are pretty strong front of the rotation, I think. I’d imagine they will add at least one of the Ryu / Paxton types left. They should be fine, I think.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
People overrate spending money every winter. Again, countless articles were written last winter about how BAL was too cheap and was wasting their window of young talent, blah blah blah. Then they won 101 games and are in decidedly better position now than they were a year ago.
People especially overrate throwing money at pitching. Mind you, I would love Monty as I've said all along, but I suspect they don't value him at 3x or 5x or 10x what they can get from someone else. You can win with huge contract guys, and I would feel more comfortable with them trying that route for at least one mainstay type, but it's far from guaranteed or required.
 

manny

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
267
The Orioles did add Kimbrel. Bradish and Rodriguez are pretty strong front of the rotation, I think. I’d imagine they will add at least one of the Ryu / Paxton types left. They should be fine, I think.
Honestly, I forgot about Kimbrel so good call on that. He's certainly a roller coaster as Sox fans know but he's a nice piece to have in the bullpen. I think my big wish as an Orioles fan would be for them to add a starter, and both you and JA are probably right that they will add one.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,804
It's funny. The Devers re-signing is looking like the outlier in how they conduct business now.
It is. I wonder how much of it was
1) The PR hit they would have taken letting Devers go after Betts/Bogaerts;
or
2) If they didn’t sign him, where else were they going to get a bona fide middle-of-the-order bat? Someone worse probably isn’t good enough and someone as young and better is Juan Soto money.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
FWIW, that MLB Executive Burner twitter account posted earlier that the baseline contract that Boras is using for Snell is Greinke’s 6/$206M he signed with the Diamondbacks. I feel like the Angels or Mets are always a threat to do something goofy. I doubt he leaves the West Coast but Snell seems like a nonzero possibility to me.

I think the Red Sox really want to prioritize guys who want to be here. I’m don’t think that’s Snell, but guys with loud personalities who grew up in Seattle may consider Boston more than, say, a quiet type from the Deep South (thinking of Woodruff).

People will be angry about kicking the rock down the road another year and I understand. But it seems to me like a good plan would be to recuperate Giolito and extend him a few years, sign Max Fried, and then sign Juan Soto for an immense sum. Surround them with Casas, Bello, Anthony, Mayer, Grissom, Teel, Devers, Story, Duran, Yoshida, Crawford, Whitlock, Houck and Rafaela — understanding that not all will remain with us — and that team is a contender from 2025-30 at least.
 

HfxBob

New Member
Nov 13, 2005
636
FWIW, that MLB Executive Burner twitter account posted earlier that the baseline contract that Boras is using for Snell is Greinke’s 6/$206M he signed with the Diamondbacks. I feel like the Angels or Mets are always a threat to do something goofy. I doubt he leaves the West Coast but Snell seems like a nonzero possibility to me.

I think the Red Sox really want to prioritize guys who want to be here. I’m don’t think that’s Snell, but guys with loud personalities who grew up in Seattle may consider Boston more than, say, a quiet type from the Deep South (thinking of Woodruff).

People will be angry about kicking the rock down the road another year and I understand. But it seems to me like a good plan would be to recuperate Giolito and extend him a few years, sign Max Fried, and then sign Juan Soto for an immense sum.
Fried of course might yet be extended by the Braves, or quickly re-signed the way Nola was by the Phillies.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
It is. I wonder how much of it was
1) The PR hit they would have taken letting Devers go after Betts/Bogaerts;
or
2) If they didn’t sign him, where else were they going to get a bona fide middle-of-the-order bat? Someone worse probably isn’t good enough and someone as young and better is Juan Soto money.
Or they value guys in their 20s/early 30s, to the exclusion of commitments beyond that.
 

geoflin

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2004
714
Melrose MA
Many people here have advocated spending the money to go over the tax threshold for 2024. What I haven't seen mentioned is that the amount of tax and draft pick penalty that occurs when the threshold is exceeded multiple years in a row increases. Is it really worth spending over the threshold this year, thus causing the year of resetting the tax to occur 1 year earlier, when the Sox aren't likely to be strong contenders? I think it's much more likely that they become contenders when Mayer, Anthony, Teel, etc. are ready to contribute and thus is a better plan to spend more money at that time when the window will be open for longer. I don't think the window opens this year and don't think they should spend as if it does. I still want them to spend enough to be as competitive as possible but stay below the tax.
 

Sox Pride

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
115
The Triangle
FWIW, that MLB Executive Burner twitter account posted earlier that the baseline contract that Boras is using for Snell is Greinke’s 6/$206M he signed with the Diamondbacks. I feel like the Angels or Mets are always a threat to do something goofy. I doubt he leaves the West Coast but Snell seems like a nonzero possibility to me.

I think the Red Sox really want to prioritize guys who want to be here. I’m don’t think that’s Snell, but guys with loud personalities who grew up in Seattle may consider Boston more than, say, a quiet type from the Deep South (thinking of Woodruff).

People will be angry about kicking the rock down the road another year and I understand. But it seems to me like a good plan would be to recuperate Giolito and extend him a few years, sign Max Fried, and then sign Juan Soto for an immense sum. Surround them with Casas, Bello, Anthony, Mayer, Grissom, Teel, Devers, Story, Duran, Yoshida, Crawford, Whitlock, Houck and Rafaela — understanding that not all will remain with us — and that team is a contender from 2025-30 at least.

I'm on the same page here. The Sox are probably going to keep their powder dry for when their window is open.

Not to say that I would object to a JMont signing or maybe Yariel Rodriguez (haven't heard that name for a few weeks and he's still lurking.

I mean, we have a core of a good team in the minors. There are number of players there who should be good major league players (maybe even elite). Of course not all of them will pan out, but some of them will.
It makes sense to spend money/resources to surround/supplement that core with with good/elite players.

Sending Sale to Atlanta for Grissom makes all the sense in the world, because he will supplement that core
Spending the money on Devers to extend him makes sense because he should still be an elite bat during that run.

Snell and JMont are 31. Are they going to be good pitchers past 33, 34 - only time will tell.
It probably makes more sense to wait 1-2 years to acquire the Snell/JMont pitchers in FA.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,303
Many people here have advocated spending the money to go over the tax threshold for 2024. What I haven't seen mentioned is that the amount of tax and draft pick penalty that occurs when the threshold is exceeded multiple years in a row increases. Is it really worth spending over the threshold this year, thus causing the year of resetting the tax to occur 1 year earlier, when the Sox aren't likely to be strong contenders? I think it's much more likely that they become contenders when Mayer, Anthony, Teel, etc. are ready to contribute and thus is a better plan to spend more money at that time when the window will be open for longer. I don't think the window opens this year and don't think they should spend as if it does. I still want them to spend enough to be as competitive as possible but stay below the tax.
I'll happily settle for spending right to the threshold. With 10K even.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,121
Someone has to pitch in 2025 too. They have 2 starters under control to 2025. Two. With zero sure fire starting pitching prospects in the system.

They DESPERATELY need starters beyond 2024. It’s why Montgomery makes sense today, tomorrow and the next day. They can’t go into the 24-25 offseason with 2 starters.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I'm on the same page here. The Sox are probably going to keep their powder dry for when their window is open.

Not to say that I would object to a JMont signing or maybe Yariel Rodriguez (haven't heard that name for a few weeks and he's still lurking.

I mean, we have a core of a good team in the minors. There are number of players there who should be good major league players (maybe even elite). Of course not all of them will pan out, but some of them will.
It makes sense to spend money/resources to surround/supplement that core with with good/elite players.

Sending Sale to Atlanta for Grissom makes all the sense in the world, because he will supplement that core
Spending the money on Devers to extend him makes sense because he should still be an elite bat during that run.

Snell and JMont are 31. Are they going to be good pitchers past 33, 34 - only time will tell.
It probably makes more sense to wait 1-2 years to acquire the Snell/JMont pitchers in FA.
Or if nothing else, it makes sense to let Breslow settle in and not rush out on some big shopping spree, except for sure things -- of which there were maybe one or two, Yamamoto and Nola, and they had plans to live somewhere else. I had my preferred plan for them but nobody should act hastily based on what I think about MLB roster building. I'll wait.

I do think they really want Cease but the cost is not reasonable for now.
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,294
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
Someone has to pitch in 2025 too. They have 2 starters under control to 2025. Two. With zero sure fire starting pitching prospects in the system.

They DESPERATELY need starters beyond 2024. It’s why Montgomery makes sense today, tomorrow and the next day. They can’t go into the 24-25 offseason with 2 starters.
Extend Pivetta, Houck, and Crawford. Anyone not willing to extend goes in the trade pile for someone young and cost-controlled for 2+ years.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
Fried of course might yet be extended by the Braves, or quickly re-signed the way Nola was by the Phillies.
Totally possible but I think it would have happened by now. Just about everybody else on that team has signed an extension. Some analysts saw their trade for Sale and quick extension as a hedge against Fried leaving next winter.

The significance of having a friend on the team is usually overstated but I don’t think it hurts that Giolito could be here as well.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,121
Extend Pivetta, Houck, and Crawford. Anyone not willing to extend goes in the trade pile for someone young and cost-controlled for 2+ years.
Houck and Crawford don’t need extensions and I think counting on Houck to be anything other than a reliever is poor roster construction.

I’m absolutely fine with extending Pivetta if its at the right cost.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
931
Many people here have advocated spending the money to go over the tax threshold for 2024. What I haven't seen mentioned is that the amount of tax and draft pick penalty that occurs when the threshold is exceeded multiple years in a row increases. Is it really worth spending over the threshold this year, thus causing the year of resetting the tax to occur 1 year earlier, when the Sox aren't likely to be strong contenders? I think it's much more likely that they become contenders when Mayer, Anthony, Teel, etc. are ready to contribute and thus is a better plan to spend more money at that time when the window will be open for longer. I don't think the window opens this year and don't think they should spend as if it does. I still want them to spend enough to be as competitive as possible but stay below the tax.
There is a thread about this exact topic. The current CBA expires after the 2026 season. Having reset the penalties last year, the Sox are in a good position to exceed the first threshhold every year through 2026, with minimal penalties. As long as they don't go over $40 million above the first threshold (this year, that would be staying under $277 million), there won't be any draft penalties.* So I very much agree that the Sox should stay below that $277 million dollar limit but I see no reason to be concerned about exceeding the initial $237 line.

As an example, last year Atlanta had a CBT payroll of about $249 million, the CBT threshold was $233 million, and they were assessed a tax of $3.2 million. That's it. Atlanta has to pay a little over $3 million as an extra tax. If they have a CBT payroll of $249 in 2024, they would be required to pay $3.6 million this year, since the penalty goes up, but so does the penalty threshold. If they had the same CBT payroll in 2025, they would pay $4 million the penalty would actually go down in 2026, to $2.5 million.

*Note that any team that is over the luxury tax threshold and in that next offseason signs a Major League free agent that has rejected a qualifying offer will lose $1 million from their international signing pool in the following signing period. A team that is not over the luxury tax would only forfeit $500,000 of its signing pool in the subsequent period.
 

Philip Jeff Frye

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2001
10,304
But it seems to me like a good plan would be to recuperate Giolito and extend him a few years, sign Max Fried, and then sign Juan Soto for an immense sum. Surround them with Casas, Bello, Anthony, Mayer, Grissom, Teel, Devers, Story, Duran, Yoshida, Crawford, Whitlock, Houck and Rafaela — understanding that not all will remain with us — and that team is a contender from 2025-30 at least.
That sounds like a great plan, but the team has shown zero interest in Soto twice now. Different circumstances (trade vs. free agent) and different GM now, but he's already making $30 million in 2024 - is this team really going to outbid the Yankees for his services next year?
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,475
Totally possible but I think it would have happened by now. Just about everybody else on that team has signed an extension. Some analysts saw their trade for Sale and quick extension as a hedge against Fried leaving next winter.

The significance of having a friend on the team is usually overstated but I don’t think it hurts that Giolito could be here as well.
Fried had extension talks that went nowhere last winter. He's also their union rep and as such is less likely to give a team discount. Seems like he's invested in hitting FA.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,858
Just FYI, here are their numbers as starters over their careers:

Houck: 198.1 ip, 4.17 era, 1.25 whip, 9.3 k/9, .680 ops
Whitlock: 90.2 ip, 4.76 era, 1.29 whip, 8.4 k/9, .791 ops

So ok, maybe one of them (maybe both?) end up in the 2024 rotation, but neither has been particularly good in that role in their careers so far. But both have been excellent in relief, and both can pitch multiple innings in relief.

I really wish they'd add Snell or Montgomery.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,986
Maine
Someone has to pitch in 2025 too. They have 2 starters under control to 2025. Two. With zero sure fire starting pitching prospects in the system.

They DESPERATELY need starters beyond 2024. It’s why Montgomery makes sense today, tomorrow and the next day. They can’t go into the 24-25 offseason with 2 starters.
Bello, Crawford, Houck, Whitlock, Winckowski. That's at least five guys under control in 2025 that can start, or who are reportedly training this winter as if they will be starters in 2024.

That's not to say that that is a high quality rotation and they don't need to address it further, but desperate is a bit of hyperbole. Montgomery might make sense today and tomorrow, but not if it comes with a commitment to five years from now. Maybe being patient with him might result in being able to get him for four years instead of six or more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.