Official Patriots 2024 Draft Pick Watch Thread (#3)

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,041
Isle of Plum
Yep, cuz, guess what?

1--Mac Jones type stats in college: "He was never challenged, that won't translate when playing against better players."
2--JJ McCarthy type stats in college: "I mean, his numbers are blah, the team never asked him to do much."
3--Bailey Zappe type stats in college: "Sure, he threw for 400+ yards a game, but it's against ODU and MTSU."
4--Josh Allen type stats in college: "Why didn't he dominate at a lower level?"

There's always gonna be some issue if we look hard enough.

That's why you hope your FO talks to these guys, works them out, and gets a feel for the player, because just checking stats won't do it.
It’s also got to matter what your FO will have them doing when they land. If you’re pocket qb only, better have a line. If you’re ok arm multi-tool, better get a creative offensive coach. If you’re limited but reliable, better land defense first. Some situations can’t be saved by a qb, so there you just have to be tough.
 

rguilmar

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,736
Agreed and none of them might. Given the risk/reward of the pick as noted by @Super Nomario above, I want my team to take a swing here - and if that means going after the player who has the intangibles as well as the skills but also carries a lot of baggage, I feel like you have to really think about it. To me that's Penix but there is a reason I am in my mom's basement and not working for an NFL blog, podcast or team.
Penix would make me nervous. He’s older than the others (will be 24 when the next season starts) and is a relatively late riser. His O line performed very well which might have masked slow processing. His WR room was among the best in college football, if not the best. No doubt he had a good game against Texas and a lot can change with another good game tonight, but he had so many advantages this season compared to the others that can cover up his flaws.
 

smokin joe wood

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
859
I would be team Maye if he's available at 3. Started two full seasons at UNC with good/not great WR and put up excellent numbers under two different coordinators. He's got prototype size and was really durable in Chapel Hill. Excellent athlete from a family of athletes and stayed out of the news. Being productive in college without superior WR talent is something I think is really valuable in the evaluation process.
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
22,307
Durham, NC
So, 4 months out, is the consensus top 4 Caleb Williams, Drake Maye, Marvin Harrison Jr., Jayden Daniels?

Do we spend the next 4 months talking ourselves into and out of these guys? Do any of the tackles rise to #3 worthy?
There is gonna be a lot of mental masturbation over who is the ideal #3 choice or best trade between now and April. Thank goodness for the Bs and Cs.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,967
Penix would make me nervous. He’s older than the others (will be 24 when the next season starts) and is a relatively late riser. His O line performed very well which might have masked slow processing. His WR room was among the best in college football, if not the best. No doubt he had a good game against Texas and a lot can change with another good game tonight, but he had so many advantages this season compared to the others that can cover up his flaws.
I watched every one of his games and he definitely has flaws. But the slow processing stuff feels like some scout used it before the season and it just kept getting repeated by the hive evaluation mind online. Ditto some but not all of the other negatives about him - he definitely had to adjust in the middle of the season with shorter throws for example.

On a more general note, the more I read these draft write ups and evaluations, the less faith I have in them. How can anyone effectively scout all these players and not miss them rounding out their games in real time? I feel like watching tape isn't the same thing but I am just a ham & egger like most here so who knows.

But again the highly paid experts are wrong. A lot.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,868
I would be team Maye if he's available at 3. Started two full seasons at UNC with good/not great WR and put up excellent numbers under two different coordinators. He's got prototype size and was really durable in Chapel Hill. Excellent athlete from a family of athletes and stayed out of the news. Being productive in college without superior WR talent is something I think is really valuable in the evaluation process.
Yep, to reiterate (and/or add to this)...

Maye's pluses:

- Can make every throw an NFL QB is asked to make. Short, deep, intermediate, with zip, with touch, in the pocket, on the move. Every throw.
- He's big: 6'5", 220 lbs
- Very good (not Lamar-level, but very good) athlete (4.65 in the 40, which is superb for a QB - Josh Allen was 4.76, Hurts was 4.59, Mahomes 4.80)
- Highly productive without an elite set of players around him
- Only 21 years of age, so there's still lots of projectability left in him

If he's there at #3, you could do a lot, lot, lot worse than just taking him right there. That would be a solid choice.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,981
I would be team Maye if he's available at 3. Started two full seasons at UNC with good/not great WR and put up excellent numbers under two different coordinators. He's got prototype size and was really durable in Chapel Hill. Excellent athlete from a family of athletes and stayed out of the news. Being productive in college without superior WR talent is something I think is really valuable in the evaluation process.
Yep, to reiterate (and/or add to this)...

Maye's pluses:

- Can make every throw an NFL QB is asked to make. Short, deep, intermediate, with zip, with touch, in the pocket, on the move. Every throw.
- He's big: 6'5", 220 lbs
- Very good (not Lamar-level, but very good) athlete (4.65 in the 40, which is superb for a QB - Josh Allen was 4.76, Hurts was 4.59, Mahomes 4.80)
- Highly productive without an elite set of players around him
- Only 21 years of age, so there's still lots of projectability left in him

If he's there at #3, you could do a lot, lot, lot worse than just taking him right there. That would be a solid choice.
Highly disagree that Maye didn’t have an elite set of players
Walker is going to be a high pick, and 3 other very good receivers. 2 very good tight ends, a great tailback who will be a front runner for Doak Walker next year and a fairly good OL too.

Weaker OL and #1 WR than WA sure, but the other offensive players were elite too.
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,136
Duval
In my limited views of Penix, I don’t get the whole Mac argument about his WR’s. That doesn’t matter to me when his WR has 12 inches of separation and he’s throwing perfect lasers into windows the size of a volleyball from 25 yards away. That game against Texas was as impressive a throwing display as I’ve ever seen in a college game.

Now if someone wants to say his o-line made it so that he never had to worry about having a clock in his mind, okay.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,071
Hingham, MA
In my limited views of Penix, I don’t get the whole Mac argument about his WR’s. That doesn’t matter to me when his WR has 12 inches of separation and he’s throwing perfect lasers into windows the size of a volleyball from 25 yards away. That game against Texas was as impressive a throwing display as I’ve ever seen in a college game.

Now if someone wants to say his o-line made it so that he never had to worry about having a clock in his mind, okay.
Agree. This wasn't Bama WRs running wide open and Mac having a 10 yard window to get the ball to him. Penix was dropping dimes.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,146
Highly disagree that Maye didn’t have an elite set of players
Walker is going to be a high pick, and 3 other very good receivers. 2 very good tight ends, a great tailback who will be a front runner for Doak Walker next year and a fairly good OL too.

Weaker OL and #1 WR than WA sure, but the other offensive players were elite too.
Drake Maye and Walker played a grand total of 8 college games together.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,981
Drake Maye and Walker played a grand total of 8 college games together.
I was commenting on this year
That’s most of the season for which he’s given the expectation of such an early pick

If you want to include last year, Drake had 2 of his WR drafted, one in the third round who was a 2-time All-ACC selection and put up a great season this year in the pros. (68 catches)

Point is, Maye indeed did have elite talent.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,277
Yeah, when QBs have good numbers, their WRs are gonna have good numbers. We're so deep into this that a team having talent is now something to hold against him? But if they didn't and a dude's numbers were bad, we'd say he can't lift his team up.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,146
I was commenting on this year
That’s most of the season for which he’s given the expectation of such an early pick

If you want to include last year, Drake had 2 of his WR drafted, one in the third round who was a 2-time All-ACC selection and put up a great season this year in the pros. (68 catches)

Point is, Maye indeed did have elite talent.
If Drake Mayes talent was elite, what would we call the talent around Penix or Daniels? Ultra uber elite?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,097
In my limited views of Penix, I don’t get the whole Mac argument about his WR’s. That doesn’t matter to me when his WR has 12 inches of separation and he’s throwing perfect lasers into windows the size of a volleyball from 25 yards away. That game against Texas was as impressive a throwing display as I’ve ever seen in a college game.

Now if someone wants to say his o-line made it so that he never had to worry about having a clock in his mind, okay.
I think the Mac argument is far more about his line, his line is ridiculously stacked, won best line of the year award
 

smokin joe wood

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
859
I was commenting on this year
That’s most of the season for which he’s given the expectation of such an early pick

If you want to include last year, Drake had 2 of his WR drafted, one in the third round who was a 2-time All-ACC selection and put up a great season this year in the pros. (68 catches)

Point is, Maye indeed did have elite talent.
My point was specifically about pass catchers.

As a RS Freshman he started with a known stud (Josh Downs) and very little else in terms of established receivers. Going into the App State game (which Downs didn't play) I sat in a meeting with Mack Brown and Phil Longo and they both said Antoine Green (also coming off a major injury) was talented but not really a very good receiver. No other WR had an substantial experience and Nesbit hadn't proven much.

This season - Walker came in the middle of the season and it appears that there is a large difference in how most evaluators rank him as an NFL WR. Conservatively, he is probably a mid 2nd round pick.

Maybe JJ Jones, Nesbit, and Nate McCollum become stars and my viewpoint looks foolish. Based on what we know right now - Maye being super productive with a 5'9" Downs and lifting everybody else is a positive to me. Reasonable minds can disagree on 'what is elite' (insert Flacco joke here) but I don't think a 2nd round WR and 3rd round WR is elite WR talent.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,981
My point was specifically about pass catchers.

As a RS Freshman he started with a known stud (Josh Downs) and very little else in terms of established receivers. Going into the App State game (which Downs didn't play) I sat in a meeting with Mack Brown and Phil Longo and they both said Antoine Green (also coming off a major injury) was talented but not really a very good receiver. No other WR had an substantial experience and Nesbit hadn't proven much.

This season - Walker came in the middle of the season and it appears that there is a large difference in how most evaluators rank him as an NFL WR. Conservatively, he is probably a mid 2nd round pick.

Maybe JJ Jones, Nesbit, and Nate McCollum become stars and my viewpoint looks foolish. Based on what we know right now - Maye being super productive with a 5'9" Downs and lifting everybody else is a positive to me. Reasonable minds can disagree on 'what is elite' (insert Flacco joke here) but I don't think a 2nd round WR and 3rd round WR is elite WR talent.
Thank you for the detail and backstory.

Yeah, Odunze is in his own category of elite being a HS Gatorade Player of the Year as a WR. No one can take that away from him. I just have a more liberal definition of elite, obviously. Downs and Walker and Hampton are great college players for a QB to have.
 

jtn46

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 10, 2004
9,783
Norwalk, CT
Fortunately, having the third pick means not having to take a chance on either Penix or McCarthy.
Well, if they took Harrison or a tackle at 3 they could look at those guys if they are there at their 2nd pick or could use the 2nd pick to trade up to get one of them if they were interested.

I saw a mock yesterday that had Washington trading up to 1 which I don't understand at all. If the Bears make the pick available it signals they are staying with Fields, they only have leverage with Washington if they have another taker. After what happened with Young and Stroud I think Washington will just take whichever QB they like that doesn't go number 1.
 

Pat Spillane

New Member
Feb 12, 2021
64
Hopefully without Bill the GM we just go for consensus highest value offensive players. Ok with MHJ if two quarterbacks go 1 and 2. We have plenty of holes and wont be competeing for a while. Just get best players available on offensive side of field for the first 3 or 4 rounds. Build up the young talent level. We so badly need it
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,097
That's assuming the Pats pick a QB at 3.
Not really he's saying with the 3rd pick you don't HAVE to take a chance, you can just scoop one of the 3 top tier (or second tier depending how you view the gaps there) QBs. Sure they could choose to punt on the chance at one of the elite prospects and draft one of the lesser prospects later, but they don't have to (also shouldn't unless they have another plan for a trade).
 

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
11,664
The Coney Island of my mind
Well, if they took Harrison or a tackle at 3 they could look at those guys if they are there at their 2nd pick or could use the 2nd pick to trade up to get one of them if they were interested.

I saw a mock yesterday that had Washington trading up to 1 which I don't understand at all. If the Bears make the pick available it signals they are staying with Fields, they only have leverage with Washington if they have another taker. After what happened with Young and Stroud I think Washington will just take whichever QB they like that doesn't go number 1.
They could, and we're along way out from the draft, b
That's assuming the Pats pick a QB at 3.
Sure, but last night suggests that if they want to take a QB, neither of those guys are worth the risk involved in trading back.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,287
306, row 14
It's early but I think I stay at 3 and just take whichever of Williams, Maye or Daniels is left or having our pick of 2 of them is something weird happens at 1 and 2. Maybe simplistic but it seems like those are going to be the top 3 QB's in some order and I don't love the Penix, Nix tier enough to roll the dice on trading back or hoping one is there at 34 and taking MHJ/Fashanu/Alt at 3.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,097
Fair, but I hope one game doesn't really move the needle on a guy that much.
It doesn't, neither of those guys was ever seriously considered in the same tier as the top 3 guys (or top 2 plus Daniels depending who you ask). Penix got some hype train helium off the Texas game, but most QB evaluators were saying "hold on, his tape does not look like that overall, wait until he faces Michigan and you'll see the flaws"

To me as soon as we got a top 3 pick, the question wasn't whether we took a QB, it's whether we want to move up to make sure we get the one we like the most. You don't pass on top QB prospects unless you have a QB.
 

GPO Man

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
571
I’m warming up to the idea of taking MHJ, signing a veteran, and drafting a 2nd round QB. The Pats can ill afford a top 3 bust at QB.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,287
306, row 14
I’m warming up to the idea of taking MHJ, signing a veteran, and drafting a 2nd round QB. The Pats can ill afford a top 3 bust at QB.
So what happens if the 2nd round QB busts? You have a Cousins type for 2 years, go like 10-7, then what? Right back at square one, probably with a middle of the pack draft pick.

I understand the risk associated with a highly drafted QB potentially busting but I think the upside if the pick doesn't bust is too much to pass up.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
To me as soon as we got a top 3 pick, the question wasn't whether we took a QB, it's whether we want to move up to make sure we get the one we like the most. You don't pass on top QB prospects unless you have a QB.
This has been my feeling as well. Obviously, nothing is certain, but the Pats need a QB to build around, and their top 3 pick in this draft gives them that opportunity. You don't get cute.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,478
Philadelphia
To me as soon as we got a top 3 pick, the question wasn't whether we took a QB, it's whether we want to move up to make sure we get the one we like the most. You don't pass on top QB prospects unless you have a QB.
That's certainly what I hope happens.

I think you also have to be realistic that even top QB prospects are dice rolls. You don't pass on a guy just because he isn't a sure thing to be a top tier NFL QB because if you're waiting for a Peyton/Lawrence/Luck type prospect you'll wait forever. If you have a 25% chance at drafting a guy who will be a top 5-10 QB in the league for 10+ years you take that gamble every single time you can (assuming you don't already have that guy).
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,565
Passing on a QB in a strong class when you have a Top 3 pick and don't expect (or at least hope not) to be picking this high again anytime soon strikes me as trying to be too clever by half. They have a glaring need at the position. The FA/vet class is complete crap and will always be so. It's a cheat code to get a good QB on a first contract. They'll do all their homework but I really hope they don't mess with this. I have no idea if it will work out, but they have to try to find their QB. All the other positions can be addressed later in the draft or in FA.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,380
I am absolutely rooting for it to be Daniels (or Maye if he falls to 3 and they prefer him), but I value their evaluation of QBs enough that I will be OK if the pick is MHJ. If they have a legitimate top of 1st round grade on one of whichever QBs are available at 3, I believe it would be an enormous mistake not to take one. But if they don't, I can absolutely see the logic in getting the closest thing to a sure thing at a premium position.

A tackle at 3 would be malpractice. I'm not instantly hanging up the phone if a king's ransom is out there to trade back from 3 to 4, 5, 6, or 7 (assuming the 3 QBs & MHJ + 2 tackles + Nabers are the board), but they better be damn sure Daniels sucks if that's the case.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,277
Yeah, if the Bears go QB at #1, and Daniels is there at 3 and you're pretty certain the Cardinals and Chargers BOTH want MHJ...maybe you scare the Cardinals into tossing you a pick to move up a spot and take him.

But I don't want to mess around--if the medicals and everything comes back on these 3 QBs and you have them as top 10 guys, just take who's there and move on.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,097
I am absolutely rooting for it to be Daniels (or Maye if he falls to 3 and they prefer him), but I value their evaluation of QBs enough that I will be OK if the pick is MHJ. If they have a legitimate top of 1st round grade on one of whichever QBs are available at 3, I believe it would be an enormous mistake not to take one. But if they don't, I can absolutely see the logic in getting the closest thing to a sure thing at a premium position.

A tackle at 3 would be malpractice. I'm not instantly hanging up the phone if a king's ransom is out there to trade back from 3 to 4, 5, 6, or 7 (assuming the 3 QBs & MHJ + 2 tackles + Nabers are the board), but they better be damn sure Daniels sucks if that's the case.
Honestly to me, if you don't have a grade on the QB there, you either trade up or out. The value proposition on using a pick that even one other team in the league sees as a franchise QB spot on a non-QB is terrible.
 

Sille Skrub

Dope
Dope
SoSH Member
Mar 3, 2004
5,949
Massachusetts
Passing on a QB in a strong class when you have a Top 3 pick and don't expect (or at least hope not) to be picking this high again anytime soon strikes me as trying to be too clever by half. They have a glaring need at the position. The FA/vet class is complete crap and will always be so. It's a cheat code to get a good QB on a first contract. They'll do all their homework but I really hope they don't mess with this. I have no idea if it will work out, but they have to try to find their QB. All the other positions can be addressed later in the draft or in FA.
As someone firmly planted in the MHJ camp, this is a great point.

Ideally Maye falls to us, I don't have complete confidence in Williams. I do have complete confidence knowing I am glad I don't have to make this call.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,382
Trying to guess what the Bears want is really the problem. Fields sucking the last 3 games really makes me think they go Caleb instead of trading down to NYG for the capital to build a great OL as I thought would happen a few weeks ago. After seeing Mac the last couple of years I really hope we go best QB available (lost likely Daniels) which leaves MJH to the Cards.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,478
Philadelphia
Trying to guess what the Bears want is really the problem. Fields sucking the last 3 games really makes me think they go Caleb instead of trading down to NYG for the capital to build a great OL as I thought would happen a few weeks ago. After seeing Mac the last couple of years I really hope we go best QB available (lost likely Daniels) which leaves MJH to the Cards.
I would wager large amounts of money on the Bears trading Fields and taking a QB at #1. Fields just hasn't shown enough and will be expensive soon. And while last year's trade with Carolina turned out to be a total masterstroke, I think passing up on a chance to draft a franchise QB once to give Fields another shot probably makes it less likely that they'll do it again. If Ryan Poles takes Caleb Williams he buys himself a 2-3 year window to build a team around Williams with plenty of other draft capital whereas if he trades this pick, keeps Fields, and the offense struggles next year, he's under a huge amount of pressure with people saying he passed on franchise QBs year-after-year.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,577
Here
I would wager large amounts of money on the Bears trading Fields and taking a QB at #1. Fields just hasn't shown enough and will be expensive soon. And while last year's trade with Carolina turned out to be a total masterstroke, I think passing up on a chance to draft a franchise QB once to give Fields another shot probably makes it less likely that they'll do it again. If Ryan Poles takes Caleb Williams he buys himself a 2-3 year window to build a team around Williams with plenty of other draft capital whereas if he trades this pick, keeps Fields, and the offense struggles next year, he's under a huge amount of pressure with people saying he passed on franchise QBs year-after-year.
If they move on from Fields, maybe the best bet is to trade a 2025 and 2026 contingent pick for him and also to draft a 2nd tier QB in a loaded QB draft in the 2nd or 3rd this year. Draft MHJ with the 3rd pick.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,321
Yeah, if the Bears go QB at #1, and Daniels is there at 3 and you're pretty certain the Cardinals and Chargers BOTH want MHJ...maybe you scare the Cardinals into tossing you a pick to move up a spot and take him.
Unless the Patriots sign a more established QB before the draft, which is possible, I don't see them having any leverage in trading down with Arizona. Yes, they could theoretically trade the #3 pick to someone else, but I see no chance the Patriots pass up the chance of Maye, Williams, or Daniels and instead see who is left at someone lower in the top 10. Everyone knows they need a QB.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,981
Trading down to 5 or 6 or 7, (assuming Williams and Daniels go 1-2) taking one of the tackles and then taking the best available WR (it’s a deep WR draft) (or reverse if MHJ falls) and then signing a veteran like cousins seems like a possibility, especially if we went to get closer to Shula win total faster.
 

jk333

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2009
4,335
Boston
To provide a bit of content, the trade calculators show that either AZ or LA should pay a bit more than a 3rd to move from their current draft slots (4/5) to #3.

I think if MHJ is the top receiver, it’s possible to imagine playing LA against AZ to get that extra pick.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,380
Thing is, Daniels was a late riser and there is the entire run up to the draft season to go. While the 3 QB needy teams at the top make it likely, I don't think it's a stone cold lock he's three on the big board come April. MHJ is a big time prospect and the tackles are, too. What if one of the QBs tests poorly? There's debate even here about MHJ over the 3rd QB.

I think the vast majority of us want the Pats to go QB, but I don't think that means they have no leverage with AZ. I'd prefer they don't get cute with trading back if it's Daniels they want, but there's plenty of potential it doesn't shake out that way.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,146
Thing is, Daniels was a late riser and there is the entire run up to the draft season to go. While the 3 QB needy teams at the top make it likely, I don't think it's a stone cold lock he's three on the big board come April. MHJ is a big time prospect and the tackles are, too. What if one of the QBs tests poorly? There's debate even here about MHJ over the 3rd QB.

I think the vast majority of us want the Pats to go QB, but I don't think that means they have no leverage with AZ. I'd prefer they don't get cute with trading back if it's Daniels they want, but there's plenty of potential it doesn't shake out that way.
As far as I'm concerned, the only stone cold locks this far out from the draft is that Caleb, Maye and MHJ are going in the top 5.

That's it. We haven't even finished the football season yet, and one of those guys could even blow out an ACL between now and then while working out. Things change, a lot, and quickly during the months leading up to the draft.